1932

Abstract

Studies of team-level constructs can produce new insights when researchers explicitly take into account several critical conceptual and methodological issues. This article explicates the conceptual bases for multilevel research on team constructs and discusses specific issues relating to conceptual frameworks, measurement, and data analysis. To advance programmatic research involving team-level constructs, several future research directions concerning issues of substantive content (i.e., changes in the nature of work and teams, member-team fit, linking team-level constructs to higher-level constructs) and strategic approaches (i.e., the construct's theoretical roles, dimensionality and specificity, malleability and changes over time, relationships with Big Data) are proposed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015117
2019-01-21
2024-06-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/orgpsych/6/1/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015117.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015117&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Aguinis H, Gottfredson RK, Joo H 2013. Avoiding a “me” versus “we” dilemma: using performance management to turn teams into a source of competitive advantage. Bus. Horiz. 56:503–12
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Allen JA, Reiter-Palmon R, Crowe J, Scott C 2018. Debriefs: teams learning from doing in context. Am. Psychol. 73:504–16
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Avey JB, Reichard RJ, Luthans F, Mhatre H 2011. Meta-analysis of the impact of positive psychological capital on employee attitudes, behaviors, and performance. Hum. Resour. Dev. Q. 22:127–52
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Baard SK, Rench TA, Kozlowski SWJ 2013. Performance adaptation: a theoretical integration and review. J. Manag. 40:48–99
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bandura A 1977. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol. Rev. 84:191–215
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bell BS, Kozlowski SWJ, Blawath S 2012. Team learning: a theoretical integration and review. See Kozlowski 2012 859–909
  7. Bliese PD 2000. Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: implications for data aggregation and analysis. See Klein & Kozlowski 2000 349–81
  8. Bluedorn AC, Kaufman CF, Lane PM 1992. How many things do you like to do at once? An introduction to monochromic and polychromic time. Acad. Manag. Exec. 6:17–26
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bollen K, Lennox R 1991. Conventional wisdom on measurement: a structural equation perspective. Psychol. Bull. 110:305–14
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Braun MT, Kuljanin G, DeShon RP 2018. Special considerations for the acquisition and wrangling of big data. Organ. Res. Methods 21:633–59
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Cable DM, Edwards JR 2004. Complementary fit and supplementary fit: a theoretical and empirical integration. J. Appl. Psychol. 89:822–34
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Cascio WF, Montealegre R 2016. How technology is changing work and organizations. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 3:349–75
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Chan D 1998.a Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: a typology of composition models. J. Appl. Psychol. 83:234–46
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Chan D 1998.b The conceptualization and analysis of change over time: an integrative approach incorporating longitudinal means and covariance structures analysis (LMACS) and multiple indicator latent growth modeling (MLGM). Organ. Res. Methods 1:421–83
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Chan D 2000.a Conceptual and empirical gaps in research on individual adaptation at work. Int. Rev. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 15:143–64
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Chan D 2000.b Understanding adaptation to changes in the work environment: integrating individual difference and learning perspectives. Res. Pers. Hum. Resour. Manag. 18:1–42
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Chan D 2005.a Current directions in personnel selection. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 14:220–23
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Chan D 2005.b Multilevel research. The Psychology Research Handbook FTL Leong, JT Austin 401–18 Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2nd ed..
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Chan D 2011.a Advances in analytical strategies. APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 1: Building and Developing the Organization S Zedeck 85–113 Washington, DC: Am. Psychol. Assoc.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Chan D 2011.b Longitudinal assessment of changes in job performance and work attitudes: conceptual and methodological issues. Int. Rev. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 26:93–117
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Chan D 2014.a Advances in modeling dimensionality and dynamics of job performance. The Nature of Work: Advances in Psychology, Theory, and Practice JK Ford, JR Hollenbeck, AM Ryan, ch. 10 Washington, DC: Am. Psychol. Assoc.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Chan D 2014.b Emerging themes in adaptability research. Individual Adaptability to Changes at Work: New Directions in Research D Chan 177–92 New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Chan D 2014.c Multilevel and aggregation issues in climate and culture research. The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Climate and Culture Research B Schneider, KM Barbera 484–95 New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Chan D 2014.d Time and methodological choices. Time and Work, Vol. 2: How Time Impacts Groups, Organizations, and Methodological Choices AJ Shipp, Y Fried 146–76 New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Chan D 2017.a Psychological Capital: Essays by David Chan (2015–2017) Singapore: World Sci.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Chan D 2017.b Values, styles, and motivational constructs. Handbook of Employee Selection JL Farr, NT Tippins, ch. 14 New York: Routledge, 2nd ed..
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Chen G, Bliese PD, Mathieu JE 2005. Conceptual framework and statistical procedures for delineating and testing multilevel theories of homology. Organ. Res. Methods 8:375–409
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Chen G, Kirkman BL, Kanfer R, Allen D, Rosen B 2007. A multilevel study of leadership, empowerment and performance in teams. J. Appl. Psychol. 92:331–46
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Chen G, Tesluk P 2012. Team participation and empowerment: a multilevel perspective. See Kozlowski 2012 767–88
  30. Deci EL, Connell JP, Ryan RM 1989. Self-determination in a work organization. J. Appl. Psychol. 74:580–90
    [Google Scholar]
  31. D'Innocenzo L, Luciano M, Mathieu JE, Manard MT, Chen G 2016.a Empowered to perform: a multi-level investigation of the influence of empowerment on performance in hospital units. Acad. Manag. J. 59:1290–307
    [Google Scholar]
  32. D'Innocenzo L, Mathieu JE, Kukenberger MR 2016.b A meta-analysis of different forms of shared leadership-team performance relations. J. Manag. 42:1964–91
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Drescher G, Garbers Y 2017. Shared leadership and commonality: a policy-capturing study. Leadersh. Q. 27:200–17
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Edwards JR 1994. The study of congruence in organizational behavior research: critique and a proposed alternative. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 58:51–100
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Edwards JR, Bagozzi RP 2000. On the nature and direction of relationships between constructs and measures. Psychol. Methods 5:155–74
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Ferragina E, Arrigoni A 2017. The rise and fall of social capital: requiem for a theory. ? Political Stud. Rev. 15:355–67
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Gruhn B, Brettel M 2016. Structuring and compensating top management teams to influence entrepreneurial orientation Paper presented at 76th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Anaheim, CA, Aug 5–9
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Gully SM, Incalcaterra KA, Joshi A, Beaubien JM 2002. A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency and performance: interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. J. Appl. Psychol. 87:819–32
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Hackman JR, Oldham GR 1976. Motivation through the design of work: test of a theory. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 16:250–79
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Hambrick DC, Cho TS, Chen M-J 1996. The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms’ competitive moves. Adm. Sci. Q 41:659–84
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Hoffman ME, Chan D, Chen G, Dansereau F, Rousseau D, Schneider B 2018. Panel interview: reflections on multilevel theory, measurement & analysis. Handbook of Multilevel Theory, Measurement, and Analysis SE Humphrey, JM LeBreton Washington, DC: Am. Psychol. Assoc. In press
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Hollenbeck JR, Beersma B, Schouten ME 2012. Beyond team types and taxonomies: a dimensional scaling conceptualization for team description. Acad. Manag. Rev. 37:82–106
    [Google Scholar]
  43. House R, Rousseau DM, Thomas-Hunt M 1995. The meso paradigm: a framework for the integration of micro and macro organizational behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior 17 LL Cummings, EM Staw 71–114 Greenwich, CT: JAI
    [Google Scholar]
  44. James LR 1982. Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. J. Appl. Psychol. 67:219–29
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Kirkman BL, Gibson CB, Kim K 2012. Across borders and technologies: advancements in virtual teams research. See Kozlowski 2012 789–858
  46. Kirkman BL, Rosen B 1999. Beyond self-management: antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Acad. Manag. J. 42:58–74
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Klein KJ, Dansereau F, Hall RJ 1994. Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis. Acad. Manag. Rev. 19:195–229
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Klein KJ, Kozlowski SWJ 2000. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Klein KJ, Sorra JS 1996. The challenge of innovation and implementation. Acad. Manag. Rev. 21:1055–88
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Kozlowski SWJ 2012. The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Psychology 2 New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Kozlowski SWJ 2017. Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams: a reflection. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 13:205–12
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Kozlowski SWJ, Bell BS 2013. Work groups and teams in organizations. Handbook of Psychology, Vol. 12: Industrial and Organizational Psychology IB Weiner, NW Schmitt, S Highhouse 412–69 New York: Wiley, 2nd ed..
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Kozlowski SWJ, Chao G 2012. Macrocognition, team learning, and team knowledge: origins, emergence, and measurement. Theories of Team Cognition: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives E Salas, SM Fiore, MP Letsky New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Kozlowski SWJ, Chao G, Grand JA, Braun MT, Kuljanin G 2016. Capturing the multilevel dynamics of emergence: computational modeling, simulation, and virtual experimentation. Organ. Psychol. Rev. 6:3–33
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Kozlowski SWJ, Klein KJ 2000. A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. See Klein & Kozlowski 2000 3–90
  56. Kreft IGG, de Leeuw J 1998. Introducing Multilevel Modeling London: Sage
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Kristof Al 1996. Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Pers. Psychol. 49:1–49
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Kukenberger MR, Mathieu JE, Ruddy TM 2015. Cross-levels test of empowerment and process influences on members’ informal learning and team commitment. J. Manag. 41:987–1016
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Kunnari I, Homaki L, Toom A 2018. Successful teacher teams in change: the role of collective efficacy and resilience. Int. J. Teach. Learn. Higher Educ. 30:111–26
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Lee S, Eo S 2014. The mediating roles of collective teacher efficacy in the relations of teachers’ perceptions of school organizational climate to their burnout. Teach. Teach. Educ. 44:138–47
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Luthans F, Youssef-Morgan CM 2017. Psychological capital: an evidence-based positive approach. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 4:339–66
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Mathieu JE, Gilson LL 2012. Criteria issues and team effectiveness. See Kozlowski 2012 910–30
  63. Mathieu JE, Hollenbeck JR, van Knippenberg D, Ilgen DR 2017. A century of work teams in the Journal of Applied Psychology. J. Appl. . Psychol 102:452–67
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Mathieu JE, Maynard MT, Rapp TL, Gilson LL 2008. Team effectiveness 1997–2007: a review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. J. Manag. 34:410–79
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Mathieu JE, Rapp TL, Maynard MT, Mangos PM 2010. Interactive effects of team and task shared mental models as related to air traffic controllers’ collective efficacy and effectiveness. Hum. Perform. 23:22–40
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Mathieu JE, Wolfson MA, Park S 2018. The evolution of work team research since Hawthorne. Am. Psychol. 73:308–21
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Michael JG, Hambrick DC 1992. Diversification posture and top management team characteristics. Acad. Manag. J. 35:9–37
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Morgeson FP, Hofmann DA 1999. The structure and function of collective constructs: implications for research and theory development. Acad. Manag. Rev. 24:249–65
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Ostroff C 1993. Comparing correlations based on individual level and aggregated data. J. Appl. Psychol. 78:569–82
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Ostroff C, Kinicki AJ, Tamkins MM 2003. Organizational culture and climate. Handbook of Psychology, Vol. 12: Industrial and Organizational Psychology IB Weiner, WC Borman, DR Ilgen, RJ Klimoski 565–93 New York: Wiley, 1st ed..
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Payne RL, Pugh DS 1976. Organizational structure and climate. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology MD Dunnette 1125–73 Chicago: Rand-McNally
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Park W-W, Kim MS, Gully SM 2017. Effect of cohesion on the curvilinear relationship between team efficacy and performance. Small Group Res 48:455–81
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Rapp TL, Gilson LL, Mathieu JE, Ruddy T 2016. Leading empowered teams: an examination of the role of external team leaders and team coaches. Leadersh. Q. 27:109–23
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Roberts KH, Hulin CL, Rousseau DM 1978. Developing an Interdisciplinary Science of Organizations San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Robinson WS 1950. Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. Am. Sociol. Rev. 15:351–57
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Rousseau DM 1985. Issues of level in organizational research: multi-level and cross-level perspectives. Research in Organizational Behavior 7 BM Staw, LL Cummings 1–7 Greenwich, CT: JAI
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Salas E, Tannenbaum SI, Kozlowski SWJ, Miller CA, Mathieu JE, Vessey WB 2015. Teams in space exploration: a new frontier for the science of team effectiveness. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 24:200–7
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Schneider B 1990. The climate for service: an application of the climate construct. Organizational Climate and Culture B Schneider 383–412 San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Schneider B, Ehrhart MG, Macey WH 2013. Organizational climate and culture. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 64:361–88
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Sorenson O, Rogan M 2014. (When) Do organizations have social capital. ? Annu. Rev. Sociol. 40:261–80
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Stajkovic AD, Luthans F 1998. Self-efficacy and work-related performance: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 124:240–61
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Tonidandel S, King EB, Cortina JM 2018. Big Data methods: leveraging modern data analytic techniques to build organizational science. Organ. Res. Methods 21:525–47
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Wang D, Waldman DA, Zhang Z 2014. A meta-analysis of shared leadership and team effectiveness. J. Appl. Psychol. 99:181–98
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Wenzel R, Van Quaquebeke NV 2018. The double-edged sword of Big Data in organizational and management research: a review of opportunities and risks. Organ. Res. Methods 21:548–91
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Wohr DJ, Loignon AC, Schmidt PB, Loughry ML, Ohland MW 2015. Justifying aggregation with consensus-based constructs: a review and examination of cutoff scores for common aggregation indices. Organ. Res. Methods 18:704–37
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015117
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015117
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error