1932

Abstract

Despite an extensive history of research on status (the prestige, respect, and esteem that a party has in the eyes of others), the time is ripe for a new review of the status literature given a fairly recent trend to study the dynamic nature of status, that is, not just how individuals acquire status, but also how they maintain or lose it over time. Greater understanding of dynamic status processes better informs our predictions about individuals' behavior and group outcomes as a function of the kinds of status interactions that play out over time.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104602
2018-01-21
2024-05-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/orgpsych/5/1/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104602.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104602&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Alexander CN, Wiley MG. 1981. Situated activity and identity formation. Social Psychology: Sociological Perspectives M Rosenberg, R Turner 269–89 New York: Basic Books [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson C, Brion S, Moore DA, Kennedy JA. 2012a. A status-enhancement account of overconfidence. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 103:718–35 [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson C, Brown CE. 2010. The functions and dysfunctions of hierarchy. Res. Organ. Behav. 30:55–89 [Google Scholar]
  4. Anderson C, Hildreth JAD, Howland L. 2015. Is the desire for status a fundamental human motive? A review of the empirical literature. Psychol. Bull. 141:3574–601 [Google Scholar]
  5. Anderson C, John OP, Keltner D, Kring AM. 2001. Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 81:116–32 [Google Scholar]
  6. Anderson C, Kilduff GJ. 2009a. The pursuit of status in social groups. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 18:295–98 [Google Scholar]
  7. Anderson C, Kilduff GJ. 2009b. Why do dominant personalities attain influence in face-to-face groups? The competence-signaling effects of trait dominance. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 96:491–503 [Google Scholar]
  8. Anderson C, Willer R. 2014. Do status hierarchies benefit groups? A bounded functionalist account of status. In The Psychology of Social Status JT Cheng, JL Tracy, C Anderson 47–70 New York: Springer [Google Scholar]
  9. Anderson C, Willer R, Kilduff GJ, Brown CE. 2012b. The origins of deference: When do people prefer lower status. ? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 102:1077–88 [Google Scholar]
  10. Anicich EM, Fast NJ, Halevy N, Galinsky AD. 2015. When the bases of social hierarchy collide: power without status drives interpersonal conflict. Organ. Sci. 27:123–40 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bales RF. 1950. Interaction Process Analysis: A Method for the Study of Small Groups Oxford: Addison-Wesley
  12. Barkow JH. 1975. Prestige and culture: a biosocial interpretation. Curr. Anthropol. 16:553–72 [Google Scholar]
  13. Bendersky C, Hays NA. 2012. Status conflict in groups. Organ. Sci. 23:323–40 [Google Scholar]
  14. Bendersky C, Hays NA. 2017. The positive effects of status conflicts in teams where members perceive status hierarchies differently. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 8:124–32 [Google Scholar]
  15. Bendersky C, Shah NP. 2012. The cost of status enhancement: performance effects of individuals' status mobility in task groups. Organ. Sci. 23:308–22 [Google Scholar]
  16. Bendersky C, Shah NP. 2013. The downfall of extraverts and rise of neurotics: the dynamic process of status allocation in task groups. Acad. Manag. J. 56:387–406 [Google Scholar]
  17. Berger J, Cohen BP, Zelditch M Jr. 1972. Status characteristics and social interaction. Am. Sociol. Rev. 37:241–55 [Google Scholar]
  18. Berger J, Ridgeway CL, Fisek MH, Norman RZ. 1998. The legitimation and delegitimation of power and prestige orders. Am. Sociol. Rev. 63:379–405 [Google Scholar]
  19. Berger J, Zelditch M. 1985. Status, Rewards, and Influence San Franc.: Jossey-Bass
  20. Bitterly TB, Brooks AW, Schweitzer ME. 2017. Risky business: when humor increases and decreases status. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 112:431–55 [Google Scholar]
  21. Blader SL, Chen Y-R. 2012. Differentiating the effects of status and power: a justice perspective. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 102:994–1014 [Google Scholar]
  22. Blader SL, Chen Y-R. 2014. What's in a name? Status, power, and other forms of social hierarchy. The Psychology of Social Status JT Cheng, JL Tracy, C Anderson71–95 New York: Springer [Google Scholar]
  23. Blader SL, Shirako A, Chen Y-R. 2016. Looking out from the top: differential effects of status and power on perspective taking. Pers. Soc. Psychol. B. 42:723–47 [Google Scholar]
  24. Blau PM. 1964. Exchange and Power in Social Life Piscataway, NJ: Trans. Publ.
  25. Bunderson JS. 2003. Team member functional background and involvement in management teams: direct effects and the moderating role of power centralization. Acad. Manag. J. 46:458–74 [Google Scholar]
  26. Bunderson JS, van der Vegt GS, Cantimur Y, Rink F. 2016. Different views of hierarchy and why they matter: hierarchy as inequality or as cascading influence. Acad. Manag. J. 59:1265–89 [Google Scholar]
  27. Case CR, Maner JK. 2014. Divide and conquer: when and why leaders undermine the cohesive fabric of their group. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 107:1033–50 [Google Scholar]
  28. Chen Y-R, Peterson RS, Phillips DJ, Podolny JM, Ridgeway CL. 2012. Introduction to the special issue: Bringing Status to the Table—Attaining, Maintaining, and Experiencing Status in Organizations and Markets. Organ. Sci. 23:299–307 [Google Scholar]
  29. Cheng JT, Tracy JL, Foulsham T, Kingstone A, Henrich J. 2013. Two ways to the top: evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 104:103–25 [Google Scholar]
  30. Cheng JT, Tracy JL, Henrich J. 2010. Pride, personality, and the evolutionary foundations of human social status. Evol. Hum. Behav. 31:334–47 [Google Scholar]
  31. Cheng JT, Tracy JL, Ho S, Henrich J. 2016. Listen, follow me: dynamic vocal signals of dominance predict emergent social rank in humans. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 145:536–47 [Google Scholar]
  32. Chizhik AW, Alexander MG, Chizhik EW, Goodman JA. 2003. The rise and fall of power and prestige orders: influence of task structure. Soc. Psychol. Q. 66:303–17 [Google Scholar]
  33. Correll SJ, Ridgeway CL. 2003. Expectation states theory. Handbook of Social Psychology J Delamater 29–51 New York: Kluwer Acad. [Google Scholar]
  34. DeRue DS, Ashford SJ. 2010. Who will lead and who will follow? A social process of leadership identity construction in organizations. Acad. Manag. Rev. 35:627–47 [Google Scholar]
  35. DeRue DS, Nahrgang JD, Ashford SJ. 2015. Interpersonal perceptions and the emergence of leadership structures in groups: a network perspective. Organ. Sci. 26:1192–209 [Google Scholar]
  36. Fast NJ, Halevy N, Galinsky AD. 2012. The destructive nature of power without status. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 48:391–94 [Google Scholar]
  37. Fiske ST. 2010. Interpersonal stratification: status, power, and subordination. Handbook of Social Psychology ST Fiske, DT Gilbert, G Lindzey 941–82 Hoboken, NJ: Wiley [Google Scholar]
  38. Fiske ST, Cuddy AJ, Glick P. 2007. Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence. Trends Cogn. Sci. 11:77–83 [Google Scholar]
  39. Fiske ST, Cuddy AJC, Glick P, Xu J. 2002. A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 82:878–902 [Google Scholar]
  40. Flynn FJ. 2003. How much should I give and how often? The effects of generosity and frequency of favor exchange on social status and productivity. Acad. Manag. J. 46:539–53 [Google Scholar]
  41. Flynn FJ, Reagans RE, Amanatullah ET, Ames DR. 2006. Helping one's way to the top: Self-monitors achieve status by helping others and knowing who helps whom. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 91:1123–37 [Google Scholar]
  42. Fragale AR. 2006. The power of powerless speech: the effects of speech style and task interdependence on status conferral. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Proc. 101:243–61 [Google Scholar]
  43. Fragale AR, Overbeck JR, Neale MA. 2011. Resources versus respect: social judgments based on targets' power and status positions. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 47:767–75 [Google Scholar]
  44. Galinsky AD, Magee JC, Gruenfeld DH, Whitson JA, Liljenquist KA. 2008. Power reduces the press of the situation: implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 95:1450–66 [Google Scholar]
  45. Goffman E. 1956. The nature of deference and demeanor. Am. Anthropol. 58:473–502 [Google Scholar]
  46. Gould RV. 2003. Collision of Wills: How Ambiguity About Social Rank Breeds Conflict Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  47. Grant AM, Gino F, Hofmann DA. 2011. Reversing the extraverted leadership advantage: the role of employee proactivity. Acad. Manag. J. 54:528–50 [Google Scholar]
  48. Greer LL, De Jong BA, Schouten ME, Dannals J. 2017. How, why, and when hierarchy impacts team effectiveness: a meta-analytic examination Work. Pap., Grad. Sch. Bus Stanford Univ.:
  49. Greer LL, van Kleef GA. 2010. Equality versus differentiation: the effects of power dispersion on group interaction. J. Appl. Psychol. 95:1032–44 [Google Scholar]
  50. Griskevicius V, Tybur JM, Van den Bergh B. 2010. Going green to be seen: status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 98:392–404 [Google Scholar]
  51. Groysberg B, Polzer JT, Elfenbein HA. 2011. Too many cooks spoil the broth: how high-status individuals decrease group effectiveness. Organ. Sci. 22:722–37 [Google Scholar]
  52. Gruenfeld DH, Tiedens LZ. 2010. Organizational preferences and their consequences. The Handbook of Social Psychology ST Fiske, DT Gilbert, G Lindzey 268–316 Hoboken, NJ: Wiley [Google Scholar]
  53. Halevy N, Bornstein G, Sagiv L. 2008. “In-group love” and “out-group hate” as motives for individual participation in intergroup conflict: a new game paradigm. Psychol. Sci. 19:405–11 [Google Scholar]
  54. Halevy N, Chou EY, Cohen TR, Livingston RW. 2012. Status conferral in intergroup social dilemmas: behavioral antecedents and consequences of prestige and dominance. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 102:351–66 [Google Scholar]
  55. Halevy N, Chou EY, Galinsky AD. 2011. A functional model of hierarchy. Organ. Psychol. Rev. 1:32–52 [Google Scholar]
  56. Hardy CL, Van Vugt M. 2006. Nice guys finish first: the competitive altruism hypothesis. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 32:1402–13 [Google Scholar]
  57. Harvey OJ, Consalvi C. 1960. Status and conformity to pressure in informal groups. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 60:182–87 [Google Scholar]
  58. Hays N, Blader SL. 2017. To give or not to give? Interactive effects of status and legitimacy on generosity. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 112:17–38 [Google Scholar]
  59. Hays NA, Bendersky C. 2015. Not all inequality is created equal: effects of status versus power hierarchies on competition for upward mobility. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 108:867–82 [Google Scholar]
  60. Heilman ME, Haynes MC. 2005. No credit where credit is due: attributional rationalization of women's success in male-female teams. J. Appl. Psychol. 90:905–16 [Google Scholar]
  61. Henrich J, Gil-White FJ. 2001. The evolution of prestige: freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evol. Hum. Behav. 22:165–96 [Google Scholar]
  62. Hogan R, Curphy GJ, Hogan J. 1994. What we know about leadership: effectiveness and personality. Am. Psychol. 49:493–504 [Google Scholar]
  63. Hogan R, Hogan J. 1991. Personality and status. In Personality, Social Skills, and Psychopathology: An Individual Differences Approach D Gilbert, J Connoll y, pp. 137–54 New York: Plenum [Google Scholar]
  64. Hollander EP. 1958. Conformity, status, and idiosyncrasy credit. Psychol. Rev. 65:117–27 [Google Scholar]
  65. Homans GC. 1961. Human Behavior: Its Elementary Forms New York: Harcourt Brace
  66. Huberman BA, Loch CH, Onculer A. 2004. Status as a valued resource. Soc. Psychol. Q. 67:103–14 [Google Scholar]
  67. Johnson C, Dowd TJ, Ridgeway CL. 2006. Legitimacy as a social process. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 32:53–78 [Google Scholar]
  68. Jost JT, Banaji MR. 1994. The role of stereotyping in system‐justification and the production of false consciousness. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 33:1–27 [Google Scholar]
  69. Judge TA, Bono JE, Ilies R, Gerhardt MW. 2002. Personality and leadership: a qualitative and quantitative review. J. Appl. Psychol. 87:765–80 [Google Scholar]
  70. Kennedy JA, Anderson C, Moore DA. 2013. When overconfidence is revealed to others: testing the status-enhancement theory of overconfidence. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Proc. 122:266–79 [Google Scholar]
  71. Kilduff GJ, Willer R, Anderson C. 2016. Hierarchy and its discontents: Status disagreement leads to withdrawal of contribution and lower group performance. Organ. Sci. 27:373–90 [Google Scholar]
  72. Kunda Z. 1990. The case for motivated reasoning. Psychol. Bull. 3:480–98 [Google Scholar]
  73. Kuwabara K, Yu S, Lee AJ, Galinsky AD. 2016. Status decreases dominance in the West but increases dominance in the East. Psychol. Sci. 27:127–37 [Google Scholar]
  74. Lawler EE, Porter LW. 1967. Antecedent attitudes of effective managerial performance. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 2:122–42 [Google Scholar]
  75. Lawler EJ. 1992. Power processes in bargaining. Sociol. Q. 33:17–34 [Google Scholar]
  76. Lazear EP, Rosen S. 1981. Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. J. Polit. Econ. 89:841–64 [Google Scholar]
  77. Loch CH, Huberman BA, Stout S. 2000. Status competition and performance in work groups. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 43:35–55 [Google Scholar]
  78. Magee JC, Galinsky AD. 2008. Social hierarchy: the self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Acad. Manag. Ann. 2:351–98 [Google Scholar]
  79. Maner JK, Mead NL. 2010. The essential tension between leadership and power: when leaders sacrifice group goals for the sake of self-interest. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 99:482–97 [Google Scholar]
  80. Marr JC, Thau S. 2014. Falling from great (and not-so-great) heights: how initial status position influences performance after status loss. Acad. Manag. J. 57:223–48 [Google Scholar]
  81. Maslow AH. 1943. A theory of human motivation. Psychol. Rev. 50:370–96 [Google Scholar]
  82. Mead GH. 1934. Mind, Self and Society Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  83. Mead NL, Maner JK. 2012. On keeping your enemies close: powerful leaders seek proximity to ingroup power threats. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 102:576–91 [Google Scholar]
  84. Merton RK. 1968. The Matthew effect in science. Science 159:56–63 [Google Scholar]
  85. Neeley TB. 2013. Language matters: status loss and achieved status distinctions in global organizations. Organ. Sci. 24:476–97 [Google Scholar]
  86. Neeley TB, Dumas TL. 2016. Unearned status gain: evidence from a global language mandate. Acad. Manag. J. 59:14–43 [Google Scholar]
  87. Owens DA, Sutton RI. 2001. Status contests in meetings: negotiating the informal order. Groups at Work: Advances in Theory and Research ME Turner 299–316 Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc. [Google Scholar]
  88. Pettit NC, Sivanathan N. 2012. The eyes and ears of status: how status colors perceptual judgment. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 38:570–82 [Google Scholar]
  89. Pettit NC, Sivanathan N, Gladstone E, Marr JC. 2013. Rising stars and sinking ships: consequences of status momentum. Psychol. Sci. 24:1579–84 [Google Scholar]
  90. Pettit NC, Yong K, Spataro SE. 2010. Holding your place: reactions to the prospect of status gains and losses. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 46:396–401 [Google Scholar]
  91. Pfeffer J, Langton N. 1993. The effect of wage dispersion on satisfaction, productivity, and working collaboratively: evidence from college and university faculty. Adm. Sci. Q. 38:382–407 [Google Scholar]
  92. Phillips DJ, Zuckerman EW. 2001. Middle-status conformity: theoretical restatement and empirical demonstration in two markets. Am. J. Sociol. 107:379–429 [Google Scholar]
  93. Podolny JM. 2010. Status Signals: A Sociological Study of Market Competition Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press
  94. Podolny JM, Phillips DJ. 1996. The dynamics of organizational status. Ind. Corp. Change 5:453–71 [Google Scholar]
  95. Pratto F. 1999. The puzzle of continuing group inequality: piecing together psychological, social, and cultural forces in social dominance theory. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 31:191–263 [Google Scholar]
  96. Ridgeway CL. 1982. Status in groups: the importance of motivation. Am. Sociol. Rev. 47:76–88 [Google Scholar]
  97. Ridgeway CL. 1991. The social construction of status value: gender and other nominal characteristics. Soc. Forces 70:367–86 [Google Scholar]
  98. Ridgeway CL. 2001. Gender, status, and leadership. J. Soc. Issues 57:637–55 [Google Scholar]
  99. Ridgeway CL, Boyle EH, Kuipers KJ, Robinson DT. 1998. How do status beliefs develop? The role of resources and interactional experience. Am. Sociol. Rev. 63:331–50 [Google Scholar]
  100. Ridgeway CL, Erickson K. 2000. Creating and spreading status beliefs. Am. J. Sociol. 106:579–615 [Google Scholar]
  101. Ridgeway CL, Johnson C, Diekema D. 1993. External status, legitimacy and compliance in male and female groups. Soc. Forces 72:1051–77 [Google Scholar]
  102. Ridgeway CL, Walker HA. 1995. Status structures. In Sociological Perspectives on Social Psychology KS Cook, GA Fine, JS House 281–310 Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon [Google Scholar]
  103. Sauder M, Lynn F, Podolny JM. 2012. Status: insights from organizational sociology. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 38:267–83 [Google Scholar]
  104. Sauer SJ, Thomas-Hunt MC, Morris PA. 2010. Too good to be true? The unintended signaling effects of educational prestige on external expectations of team performance. Organ. Sci. 21:1108–20 [Google Scholar]
  105. Scheepers D, Ellemers N. 2005. When the pressure is up: the assessment of social identity threat in low and high status groups. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 41:192–200 [Google Scholar]
  106. Singelis TM, Triandis HC, Bhawuk DP, Gelfand MJ. 1995. Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: a theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-Cultural Res 29:240–75 [Google Scholar]
  107. Strauss A, Schatzman L, Ehrlich D, Bucher R, Sabshin M. 1963. The hospital and its negotiated order. The Hospital in Modern Society E Friedson 147–69 New York: Free Press [Google Scholar]
  108. Stryker S, Statham A. 1985. Symbolic interaction and role theory. Handbook of Social Psychology G Lindzey, E Aronson 311–78 New York: Random House [Google Scholar]
  109. Sutton RI, Hargadon A. 1996. Brainstorming groups in context: effectiveness in a product design firm. Adm. Sci. Q. 41:685–718 [Google Scholar]
  110. Thomas-Hunt MC, Phillips KW. 2004. When what you know is not enough: expertise and gender dynamics in task groups. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 30:1585–98 [Google Scholar]
  111. Thomas-Hunt MC, Phillips KW. 2011. The malleability of race in organizational teams: a theory of racial status activation. Status in Management and Organizations J Pearce 238–66 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  112. Tiedens LZ. 2001. Anger and advancement versus sadness and subjugation: the effect of negative emotion expressions on social status conferral. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 80:86–94 [Google Scholar]
  113. Tiedens LZ, Fragale AR. 2003. Power moves: complementarity in dominant and submissive nonverbal behavior. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 84:558–68 [Google Scholar]
  114. Tiedens LZ, Unzueta MM, Young MJ. 2007. An unconscious desire for hierarchy? The motivated perception of dominance complementarity in task partners. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 93:402–14 [Google Scholar]
  115. Torelli CJ, Leslie LM, Stoner JL, Puente R. 2014. Cultural determinants of status: implications for workplace evaluations and behaviors. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Proc. 123:34–48 [Google Scholar]
  116. Tost LP. 2011. An integrative model of legitimacy judgments. Acad. Manag. Rev. 36:686–710 [Google Scholar]
  117. Van Kleef GA, Homan AC, Beersma B, van Knippenberg D. 2010. On angry leaders and agreeable followers: how leaders' emotions and followers' personalities shape motivation and team performance. Psychol. Sci. 21:1827–34 [Google Scholar]
  118. Van Vugt M, Hogan R, Kaiser RB. 2008. Leadership, followership, and evolution: some lessons from the past. Am. Psychol. 63:182–96 [Google Scholar]
  119. Walker HA, Thomas GM, Zelditch M. 1986. Legitimation, endorsement, and stability. Soc. Forces 64:620–43 [Google Scholar]
  120. Walker HA, Zelditch M. 1993. Power, legitimacy, and the stability of authority: a theoretical research program. Theoretical Research Programs: Studies in the Growth of Theory J Berger, M Zeldtich Jr 364–81 Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  121. Wee EXM, Derfler-Rozin RR, Marr JC. 2016. Jolted into dominance or prestige? How jolts to groups affect status-striving and status conferral Presented at Annu. Meet. Acad. Manag., 76th, Aug. 5–9 Anaheim, CA:
  122. Whyte WF. 1943. Street Corner Society: The Social Structure of an Italian Slum Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  123. Willer R. 2009. Groups reward individual sacrifice: the status solution to the collective action problem. Am. Sociol. Rev. 74:23–43 [Google Scholar]
  124. Wittenbaum GM. 1998. Information sampling in decision-making groups: the impact of members' task-relevant status. Small Group Res 29:57–84 [Google Scholar]
  125. Word CO, Zanna MP, Cooper J. 1974. The nonverbal mediation of self-fulfilling prophecies in interracial interaction. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 10:109–20 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104602
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104602
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error