1932

Abstract

Women in the United States are making historic progress in business leadership, with research linking women's leadership representation to positive outcomes. However, men still dominate US leadership, raising several key questions. Is the United States closing the leadership gender gap? What organizational barriers perpetuate the gap? What facilitates women's leadership? We synthesized and extended US literature to develop a multilevel organizational model of Barriers And Facilitators of Female Leader Empowerment, called the “BAFFLE” Female Leadership Model to highlight the baffling complexities and limited success in solving the US leadership gender gap. The review found that literature narrowly focuses on barriers and offers limited insights about how to facilitate female leader empowerment while simultaneously addressing systemic, entrenched organizational barriers. We also used the World Economic Forum (WEF) Global Gender Gap Index to provide global perspective on the US leadership gender gap. Finally, we summarize findings and implications for practice and scholarship.

[Erratum, Closure]

An erratum has been published for this article:
Erratum: Women and Leadership in the United States: Are We Closing the Gender Gap?
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104739
2018-01-21
2024-04-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/orgpsych/5/1/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104739.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104739&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Acker J. 1990. Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: a theory of gendered organizations. Gend. Society 4:139–58 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bartol K, Martin D, Kromkowski J. 2003. Leadership and the glass ceiling: gender and ethnic group influences on leader behaviors at middle and executive managerial levels. J. Leadersh. Organ. Stud. 9:8–19 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bierema LL. 2005. Women's networks: a career development intervention or impediment?. Hum. Resour. Dev. Int. 8:207–24 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bierema LL. 2017. No woman left behind: critical leadership development to build gender consciousness and transform organizations. Handbook of Research on Gender and Leadership SR Madsen, Ch. 9 Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publ. [Google Scholar]
  5. Biernat M, Kobrynowicz D. 1997. Gender- and race-based standards of competence: lower minimum standards but higher ability standards for devalued groups. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 72:544–57 [Google Scholar]
  6. Branson DM. 2011. Initiatives to place women on corporate boards of directors: a global snapshot. J. Corp. Law 37:793–814 [Google Scholar]
  7. Burke RJ. 2017. Supporting women's career development. Handbook of Research on Gender and Leadership SR Madsen, Ch. 26 Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publ. [Google Scholar]
  8. Carrasco A, Francoeur C, Labelle R, Laffarga J, Ruiz-Barbadillo E. 2015. Appointing women to boards: is there a cultural bias?. J. Bus. Ethics 129:429–44 [Google Scholar]
  9. Catalyst. 2017. Pyramid: Women in S&P 500 Companies New York: Catalyst
  10. Cheung FM, Halpern DF. 2010. Women at the top: powerful leaders define success as work plus family in a culture of gender. Am. Psychol. 65:182–93 [Google Scholar]
  11. Chira S. 2017. The world's most powerful woman won't call herself a feminist. The New York Times Sept. 16. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/16/sunday-review/angela-merkel-feminist-germany.html
  12. Clarke M. 2011. Advancing women's careers through leadership development programs. Empl. Relat. 33:498–515 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cuddy AJC, Glick P, Beninger A. 2011. The dynamics of warmth and competence judgments, and their outcomes in organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 31:73–98 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cullen-Lester KL, Woehler ML, Willburn P. 2016. Network-based leadership development: a guiding framework and resources for management educators. J. Manag. Educ. 40:321–58 [Google Scholar]
  15. Dawson J, Kersley R, Natella S. 2014. The Credit Suisse gender 3000: Women in senior management - index.cfm. (RCE 1545924). http://30percentclub.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/2014-09-23_Research_Institute_Women_in_Business.pdf
  16. Day DV, Fleenor JW, Atwater LE, Sturm RE, McKee RA. 2014. Advances in leader and leadership development: a review of 25 years of research and theory. Leadersh. Q. 25:63–82 [Google Scholar]
  17. Debebe G, Anderson D, Bilimoria D, Vinnicombe SM. 2016. Women's leadership development programs: lessons learned and new frontiers. J. Manag. Educ. 40:231–52 [Google Scholar]
  18. DeRue DS, Ashford SJ. 2010. Who will lead and who will follow? A social process of leadership identity construction in organizations. Acad. Manag. Rev. 35:4427–47 [Google Scholar]
  19. de Vries JA, van Den Brink M. 2016. Transformative gender interventions. Equal. Div. Incl. 35:429–48 [Google Scholar]
  20. Dezső CL, Ross DG. 2012. Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strateg. Manag. J. 33:1072–89 [Google Scholar]
  21. Diehl AB, Dzubinski LM. 2016. Making the invisible visible: a cross-sector analysis of gender-based leadership barriers. Hum. Resour. Dev. Q. 27:181–206 [Google Scholar]
  22. Diehl AB, Dzubinski LM. 2017. An overview of gender-based leadership barriers. Handbook of Research on Gender and Leadership SR Madsen, Ch. 17 Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publ. [Google Scholar]
  23. Duehr EE, Bono JE. 2006. Men, women, and managers: are stereotypes finally changing?. Pers. Psychol. 59:815–46 [Google Scholar]
  24. Eagly AH. 1987. Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-Role Interpretation Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
  25. Eagly AH. 2012. Women as leaders: progress through the labyrinth. Social Categories in Everyday Experience S Wiley, G Philogène, TA Revenson 63–82 Washington, DC: Am. Psychol. Assoc. [Google Scholar]
  26. Eagly AH, Carli LL. 2007. Through the Labyrinth: The Truth about How Women Become Leaders Cambridge, MA: Harv. Bus. Press
  27. Eagly AH, Johannesen-Schmidt MC, van Engen ML. 2003. Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: a meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychol. Bull. 129:569–91 [Google Scholar]
  28. Eagly AH, Karau SJ. 2002. Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychol. Rev. 109:573–98 [Google Scholar]
  29. Eagly AH, Wood W. 2012. Social role theory. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology PAM Van Lange, AW Kruglanski, ET Higgins 458–76 Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage [Google Scholar]
  30. Edwards JR, Rothbard NP. 2000. Mechanisms linking work and family: clarifying the relationship between work and family constructs. Acad. Manag. Rev. 25:178–99 [Google Scholar]
  31. Ely RJ, Ibarra H, Kolb DM. 2011. Taking gender into account: theory and design for women's leadership development programs. Acad. Manag. Learn. Educ. 10:474–93 [Google Scholar]
  32. Emrich CG, Denmark FL, Den Hartog DN. 2004. Cross-cultural differences in gender egalitarianism: implications for societies, organizations, and leaders. Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies RJ House, PJ Hanges, M Javidan, PW Dorfman, V Gupta 343–94 Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage [Google Scholar]
  33. Fiske ST, Cuddy AJC, Glick P, Xu J. 2002. A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 82:878–902 [Google Scholar]
  34. Fitzsimmons TW, Callan VJ. 2016. CEO selection: a capital perspective. Leadersh. Q. 27:765–87 [Google Scholar]
  35. Fitzsimmons TW, Callan VJ, Paulsen N. 2014. Gender disparity in the C-suite: Do male and female CEOs differ in how they reached the top?. Leadersh. Q. 25:245–66 [Google Scholar]
  36. Foschi M. 1996. Double standards in the evaluation of men and women. Soc. Psychol. Q. 59:237–54 [Google Scholar]
  37. Foschi M. 2000. Double standards for competence: theory and research. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 26:21–42 [Google Scholar]
  38. Garcia-Retamero R, López-Zafra E. 2006. Prejudice against women in male-congenial environments: perceptions of gender role congruity in leadership. Sex Roles 55:51–61 [Google Scholar]
  39. Gelfand MJ, Nishii LH, Raver JL, Schneider B. 2005. Discrimination in organizations: an organizational-level systems perspective. Discrimination at Work RL Dipboye, SM Colarelli 89–116 Mahwah, NJ: Soc. Ind. Organ. Psychol. [Google Scholar]
  40. Gipson AN, Pfaff DL, Mendelsohn DB, Catenacci LT, Burke WW. 2017. Women and leadership: selection, development, leadership style, and performance. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 53:32–65 [Google Scholar]
  41. Glass C, Cook A. 2016. Leading at the top: understanding women's challenges above the glass ceiling. Leadersh. Q. 27:51–63 [Google Scholar]
  42. Goodman JS, Fields DL, Blum TC. 2003. Cracks in the glass ceiling: In what kinds of organizations do women make it to the top?. Group Organ. Manag. 28:475–501 [Google Scholar]
  43. Harrington B, Van Deusen F, Humberd B. 2011. The New Dad: Caring, Committed and Conflicted Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston Coll. Cent. Work Family
  44. Heilman ME. 1983. Sex bias in work settings: the lack of fit model. Research in Organizational Behavior BM Staw, LL Cummings 269–98 Greenwich, CT: JAI Press [Google Scholar]
  45. Heilman ME. 2001. Description and prescription: how gender stereotypes prevent women's ascent up the organizational ladder. J. Soc. Issues 57:657–74 [Google Scholar]
  46. Heilman ME. 2012. Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Res. Organ. Behav. 32:113–35 [Google Scholar]
  47. Hogue M, Lord RG. 2007. A multilevel, complexity theory approach to understanding gender bias in leadership. Leadersh. Q. 18:370–90 [Google Scholar]
  48. Hoobler JM, Masterson CR, Nkomo SM, Michel EJ. 2016. The business case for women leaders: meta-analysis, research critique, and path forward. J. Manag. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316628643 [Crossref]
  49. Hopkins MM, O'Neil DA, Passarelli A, Bilimoria D. 2008. Women's leadership development strategic practices for women and organizations. Consult. Psychol. J. 60:348–65 [Google Scholar]
  50. Hoyt CL, Blascovich J. 2007. Leadership efficacy and women leaders' responses to stereotype activation. Group Process. Intergr. Relat. 10:595–616 [Google Scholar]
  51. Hurley D, Choudhary A. 2016. Factors influencing attainment of CEO position for women. Gend. Manag. 31:250–65 [Google Scholar]
  52. Ibarra H, Carter NM, Silva C. 2010. Why men still get more promotions than women. Harv. Bus. Rev. 88:80–85 [Google Scholar]
  53. Ibarra H, Ely R, Kolb D. 2013. Women rising: the unseen barriers. Harv. Bus. Rev. 91:60–67 [Google Scholar]
  54. Ibarra H, Petriglieri J. 2016. Impossible selves: Image strategies and identity threat in professional women's career transitions INSEAD Work. Pap. No. 2016/12/OBH
  55. Inter-Parliamentary Union. 2017. Women in national parliaments. World Classification Sept. 1. http://www.ipu.org/wmn-e/classif.htm
  56. Johnson SK, Murphy SE, Zewdie S, Reichard RJ. 2008. The strong, sensitive type: effects of gender stereotypes and leadership prototypes on the evaluation of male and female leaders. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 106:39–60 [Google Scholar]
  57. Joshi A, Neely B, Emrich C, Griffiths D, George G. 2015. Gender research in AMJ: an overview of five decades of empirical research and calls to action. Acad. Manag. J. 58:1459–75 [Google Scholar]
  58. Judge TA, Piccolo RF. 2004. Transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analytic test of their relative validity. J. Appl. Psychol. 89:755–68 [Google Scholar]
  59. Judiesch MK, Lyness KS. 1999. Left behind? The impact of leaves of absence on managers' career success. Acad. Manag. J. 42:641–51 [Google Scholar]
  60. Kaiser RB, Wallace WT. 2016. Gender bias and substantive differences in ratings of leadership behavior: toward a new narrative. Consult. Psychol. J. 68:72–98 [Google Scholar]
  61. Kalev A, Dobbin F, Kelly E. 2006. Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. Am. Sociol. Rev. 71:589–617 [Google Scholar]
  62. Kalysh K, Kulik CT, Perera S. 2016. Help or hindrance? Work–life practices and women in management. Leadersh. Q. 27:504–18 [Google Scholar]
  63. Kanter RM. 1977. Men and Women of the Corporation New York: Basic Books
  64. Karelaia N, Guillén L. 2014. Me, a woman and a leader: positive social identity and identity conflict. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 125:204–19 [Google Scholar]
  65. Kassotakis ME. 2017. Women-only leadership programs: a deeper look. Handbook of Research on Gender and Leadership SR Madsen, Ch. 25 Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publ. [Google Scholar]
  66. Kegan R, Lahey LL. 2016. An Everyone Culture: Becoming a Deliberately Developmental Organization Boston: Harv. Bus. Rev. Press
  67. King EB, Botsford W, Hebl MR, Kazama S, Dawson JF, Perkins A. 2012. Benevolent sexism at work: gender differences in the distribution of challenging developmental experiences. J. Manag. 38:1835–66 [Google Scholar]
  68. King EB, Hebl MR, George JM, Matusik SF. 2010. Understanding tokenism: antecedents and consequences of a psychological climate of gender inequity. J. Manag. 36:482–510 [Google Scholar]
  69. Koch AJ, D'Mello SD, Sackett PR. 2015. A meta-analysis of gender stereotypes and bias in experimental simulations of employment decision making. J. Appl. Psychol. 100:128–61 [Google Scholar]
  70. Koenig AM, Eagly AH, Mitchell AA, Ristikari T. 2011. Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychol. Bull. 137:616–42 [Google Scholar]
  71. Konrad AM, Yang Y. 2012. Is using work–life interface benefits a career-limiting move? An examination of women, men, lone parents, and parents with partners. J. Organ. Behav. 33:1095–119 [Google Scholar]
  72. Krishnan HA, Park D. 2005. A few good women—on top management teams. J. Bus. Res. 58:1712–20 [Google Scholar]
  73. Kulik CT, Metz I. 2017. Women at the top: Will more women in senior roles impact organizational outcomes?. The Oxford Handbook of Strategy Implementation MA Hitt, SE Jackson, S Carmona, L Bierman, CE Shalley, M Wright 239–75 Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  74. Kurtulus FA, Tomaskovic-Devey D. 2012. Do female top managers help women to advance? A panel study using EEO-1 records. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 639:173–97 [Google Scholar]
  75. Leicht C, de Moura GR, Crisp RJ. 2014. Contesting gender stereotypes stimulates generalized fairness in the selection of leaders. Leadersh. Q. 25:1025–39 [Google Scholar]
  76. Lent R, Brown S. 2013. Social cognitive model of career self-management: toward a unifying view of adaptive career behavior across the life span. J. Couns. Psychol. 60:557–68 [Google Scholar]
  77. Li A, Bagger J, Cropanzano R. 2017. The impact of stereotypes and supervisor perceptions of employee work–family conflict on job performance ratings. Hum. Relat. 70:119–45 [Google Scholar]
  78. Lyness KS, Heilman ME. 2006. When fit is fundamental: performance evaluations and promotions of upper-level female and male managers. J. Appl. Psychol. 91:777–85 [Google Scholar]
  79. Lyness KS, Judiesch MK. 2008. Can a manager have a life and a career? International and multisource perspectives on work-life balance and career advancement potential. J. Appl. Psychol. 93:789–805 [Google Scholar]
  80. Lyness KS, Judiesch MK. 2014. Gender egalitarianism and work–life balance for managers: multisource perspectives in 36 countries. Appl. Psychol. 63:96–129 [Google Scholar]
  81. Lyness KS, Judiesch MK, Erkovan HE. 2018. The work-family interface and careers in the global workplace: insights from cross-national research. The Cambridge Handbook of the Global Work-Family Interface KM Shockley, W Shen, RC Johnson, pp. 497–516 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press In press [Google Scholar]
  82. Lyness KS, Kropf MB. 2005. The relationships of national gender equality and organizational support with work-family balance: a study of European managers. Hum. Relat. 58:33–60 [Google Scholar]
  83. Lyness KS, Schrader CA. 2006. Moving ahead or just moving? An examination of gender differences in senior corporate management appointments. Group Organ. Manag. 31:651–76 [Google Scholar]
  84. Lyness KS, Thompson DE. 1997. Above the glass ceiling? A comparison of matched samples of female and male executives. J. Appl. Psychol. 82:359–75 [Google Scholar]
  85. Lyness KS, Thompson DE. 2000. Climbing the corporate ladder: Do female and male executives follow the same route?. J. Appl. Psychol. 85:86–101 [Google Scholar]
  86. McGregor J. 2017. The number of women CEOs in the Fortune 500 is at an all-time high—of 32. The Washington Post June 7. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/on-leadership/wp/2017/06/07/the-number-of-women-ceos-in-the-fortune-500-is-at-an-all-time-high-of-32/?utm_term=.99657904eb0a
  87. Mills MJ, Grotto AR. 2017. Who can have it all and how? An empirical examination of gender and work–life considerations among senior executives. Gend. Manag. 32:82–97 [Google Scholar]
  88. Muller-Kahle MI, Schiehll E. 2013. Gaining the ultimate power edge: women in the dual role of CEO and Chair. Leadersh. Q. 24:666–79 [Google Scholar]
  89. Murphy W, Kram K. 2014. Strategic Relationships at Work: Creating your Circle of Mentors, Sponsors, and Peers for Success in Business and Life New York: McGraw-Hill
  90. Ng ES, Sears GJ. 2017. The glass ceiling in context: the influence of CEO gender, recruitment practices and firm internationalisation on the representation of women in management. Hum. Resour. Manag. J. 27:133–51 [Google Scholar]
  91. Nishii LH. 2013. The benefits of climate for inclusion for gender-diverse groups. Acad. Manag. J. 56:1754–74 [Google Scholar]
  92. O'Neil DA, Hopkins MM, Bilimoria D. 2015. A framework for developing women leaders: applications to executive coaching. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 51:253–76 [Google Scholar]
  93. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2017. The Pursuit of Gender Equality: An Uphill Battle Paris: OECD Publ.
  94. Ohlott PJ, Ruderman MN, McCauley CD. 1994. Gender differences in managers' developmental job experiences. Acad. Manag. J. 37:46–67 [Google Scholar]
  95. Parboteeah KP, Hoegl M, Cullen JB. 2008. Managers' gender role attitudes: a country institutional profile approach. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 39:795–813 [Google Scholar]
  96. Paustian-Underdahl SC, Walker LS, Woehr DJ. 2014. Gender and perceptions of leadership effectiveness: a meta-analysis of contextual moderators. J. Appl. Psychol. 99:1129–45 [Google Scholar]
  97. Peus C, Braun S, Knipfer K. 2015. On becoming a leader in Asia and America: empirical evidence from women managers. Leadersh. Q. 26:55–67 [Google Scholar]
  98. Powell GN, Butterfield DA. 2015. Correspondence between self- and good-manager descriptions: examining stability and change over four decades. J. Manag. 41:1745–73 [Google Scholar]
  99. Prime J, Moss-Racusin CA. 2009. Engaging Men in Gender Initiatives: What Change Agents Need to Know New York: Catalyst
  100. Prime J, Otterman M, Salib ER. 2014. Engaging men through inclusive leadership. Gender in Organizations: Are Men Allies or Adversaries to Women's Career Advancement? RJ Burke, DA Major 385–404 Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publ. [Google Scholar]
  101. Pryce P, Sealy R. 2013. Promoting women to MD in investment banking: multi-level influences. Gend. Manag. J. 28:448–67 [Google Scholar]
  102. Ragins BR. 1997. Diversified mentoring relationships in organizations: a power perspective. Acad. Manag. Rev. 22:482–521 [Google Scholar]
  103. Ragins BR, Ehrhardt K, Lyness KS, Murphy DD, Capman JF. 2017. Anchoring relationships at work: high-quality mentors and other supportive work relationships as buffers to ambient racial discrimination. Pers. Psychol. 70:211–56 [Google Scholar]
  104. Ragins BR, Sundstrom E. 1989. Gender and power in organizations: a longitudinal perspective. Psychol. Bull. 105:51–88 [Google Scholar]
  105. Ramaswami A, Dreher GF, Bretz R, Wiethoff C. 2010. Gender, mentoring, and career success: the importance of organizational context. Pers. Psychol. 63:385–405 [Google Scholar]
  106. Ramaswami A, Huang J-C, Dreher G. 2014. Interaction of gender, mentoring, and power distance on career attainment: a cross-cultural comparison. Hum. Relat. 67:153–73 [Google Scholar]
  107. Rosette AS, Tost LP. 2010. Agentic women and communal leadership: how role prescriptions confer advantage to top women leaders. J. Appl. Psychol. 95:221–35 [Google Scholar]
  108. Rudman LA, Fairchild K. 2004. Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: the role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 87:157–76 [Google Scholar]
  109. Rudman LA, Moss-Racusin CA, Phelan JE, Nauts S. 2012. Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 48:165–79 [Google Scholar]
  110. Ruedin D. 2012. The representation of women in national parliaments: a cross-national comparison. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 28:96–109 [Google Scholar]
  111. Ruggiero KM, Taylor DM. 1995. Coping with discrimination: how disadvantaged group members perceive the discrimination that confronts them. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 68:826–38 [Google Scholar]
  112. Ryan MK, Haslam SA. 2007. The glass cliff: exploring the dynamics surrounding the appointment of women to precarious leadership positions. Acad. Manag. Rev. 32:549–72 [Google Scholar]
  113. Savickas ML. 2012. Life design: a paradigm for career intervention in the 21st Century. Counsel. Dev. 90:13–19 [Google Scholar]
  114. Schein VE. 1973. The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics. J. Appl. Psychol. 57:95–100 [Google Scholar]
  115. Schein VE. 1975. Relations between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics among female managers. J. Appl. Psychol. 60:340–44 [Google Scholar]
  116. Schiebinger L, Gilmartin SK. 2010. Housework is an academic issue. Academe 96:39–44 [Google Scholar]
  117. Sojo VE, Wood RE, Wood SA, Wheeler MA. 2016. Reporting requirements, targets, and quotas for women in leadership. Leadersh. Q. 27:519–36 [Google Scholar]
  118. S&P Global Market Intelligence. 2016. Gender gap at blue chip companies is closing, S&P global market intelligence report shows. S&P Global Sept. 28. https://marketintelligence.spglobal.com/our-thinking/newsroom/gender-gap-at-blue-chip-companies-is-closing-s-p-global-market-intelligence-report-shows
  119. Stamarski CS, Son Hing LS. 2015. Gender inequalities in the workplace: the effects of organizational structures, processes, practices, and decision makers' sexism. Front. Psychol. 6:1400 [Google Scholar]
  120. Stead V, Elliott C. 2009. Women's Leadership Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan
  121. Stewart P. 1988. Women and men in groups: a status characteristics approach to interaction. Status Generalization: New Theory and Research M Webster Jr., M Foschi 69–85 Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  122. Stone P. 2007. Opting out? Why Women Really Quit Careers and Head Home Berkeley, CA: Univ. Calif. Press
  123. Stone P, Hernandez LA. 2013. The all-or-nothing workplace: flexibility stigma and opting out among professional-managerial women. J. Soc. Issues 69:235–56 [Google Scholar]
  124. Stone P, Lovejoy M. 2004. Fast-track women and the “choice” to stay home. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 596:62–83 [Google Scholar]
  125. Sturm RE, Taylor SN, Atwater LE, Braddy PW. 2014. Leader self-awareness: an examination and implications of women's under-prediction. J. Organ. Behav. 35:657–77 [Google Scholar]
  126. Sugiyama K, Cavanagh KV, van Esch C, Billimoria D, Brown C. 2016. Inclusive leadership development: drawing from pedagogies of women's and general leadership development programs. J. Manag. Educ. 40:253–92 [Google Scholar]
  127. Taylor SN, Sturm RE, Atwater LE, Braddy PW. 2016. Underestimating one's leadership impact: Are women leaders more susceptible?. Organ. Dyn 45:132–38 [Google Scholar]
  128. Terjesen S, Sealy R, Singh V. 2009. Women directors on corporate boards: a review and research agenda. Corp. Gov. 17:320–37 [Google Scholar]
  129. Terjesen S, Singh V. 2008. Female presence on corporate boards: a multi-country study of environmental context. J. Bus. Ethics 83:55–63 [Google Scholar]
  130. U.S. Department of Education. 2014. Table 318.30. Bachelor's, master's, and doctor's degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions, by sex of student and discipline division: 2012–13. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS). https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d14/tables/dt14_318.30.asp
  131. Valerio AM, Sawyer K. 2016. The men who mentor women. Harvard Business Review Dec. 16. https://hbr.org/2016/12/the-men-who-mentor-women
  132. Vial AC, Napier JL, Brescoll VL. 2016. A bed of thorns: female leaders and the self-reinforcing cycle of illegitimacy. Leadersh. Q. 27:400–14 [Google Scholar]
  133. Vinkenburg CJ, van Engen ML, Eagly AH, Johannesen-Schmidt MC. 2011. An exploration of stereotypical beliefs about leadership styles: Is transformational leadership a route to women's promotion?. Leadersh. Q. 22:10–21 [Google Scholar]
  134. Wayne SJ, Lemmon G, Hoobler JM, Cheung GW, Wilson MS. 2017. The ripple effect: a spillover model of the detrimental impact of work–family conflict on job success. J. Organ. Behav. 38:876–94 [Google Scholar]
  135. Wellington W, Kropf MB, Gerkovich PR. 2003. What's holding women back?. Harv. Bus. Rev. 81:18–19 [Google Scholar]
  136. Williams MJ, Tiedens LZ. 2015. A meta-analysis of penalties for women's implicit and explicit leadership behaviors Presented at Acad. Manag. Vancouver, Canada:
  137. Williams MJ, Tiedens LZ. 2016. The subtle suspension of backlash: a meta-analysis of penalties for women's implicit and explicit dominance behavior. Psychol. Bull. 142:165–97 [Google Scholar]
  138. Wood W, Eagly AH. 2002. A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychol. Bull. 128:699–727 [Google Scholar]
  139. World Econ. Forum 2016. The Global Gender Gap Report 2016 Geneva: World Econ. Forum http://reports.weforum.org/global-gender-gap-report-2016
  140. World Econ. Forum. 2017. Accelerating Gender Parity in the Fourth Industrial Revolution: An Agenda for Leaders to Shape the Future of Education, Gender and Work Geneva: World Econ. Forum
  141. World Values Survey. 2014. Wave 5, 2005–2008, Official Aggregate v. 20140429. 3 World Values Survey Association. Aggregate File Producer: Asep/JDS, Madrid, Spain. http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org
  142. Wright S. 2016. Competence, warmth, and expectations: an integration of status characteristics theory and the stereotype content model PhD Thesis Univ. Ariz http://hdl.handle.net/10150/556454
  143. Yoder JD. 2001. Making leadership work more effectively for women. J. Soc. Issues 57:815–28 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104739
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104739
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error