1932
0

Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior

Volume 4, 2017

Trust Repair

Abstract

Trust is critical for building and maintaining relationships and for effectively working together. When trust is broken, it has serious consequences for both individuals and organizations. In this review we examine the research on how to repair broken trust. We begin by defining trust, how it is broken, how the actor's violation is attributed, and what it means to repair it. We then discuss two dominant trust repair strategies: short-term and long-term. Short-term strategies include verbal statements such as excuses, apologies, and denials, and compensatory arrangements such as repayment for a loss. Longer-term strategies include structural rearrangements of the relationship (e.g., contracts, monitoring), reframing the violation (e.g., attempts to shift blame, mitigate perceptions of harm), granting forgiveness, and remaining silent. Lastly, we discuss concerns for the future of trust research such as construct clarity, measurement, and contextual considerations.

Keyword(s): apology, interpersonal trust, interpersonal trust repair

Erratum

An erratum has been published for this article:
Erratum: Trust Repair
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113147
2017-03-21
2025-06-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/orgpsych/4/1/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113147.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113147&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Alge BJ. 2001. Effects of computer surveillance on perceptions of privacy and procedural justice. J. Appl. Psychol. 86:797–804 [Google Scholar]
  2. Alge BJ, Greenberg J, Brinsfield C. 2006. An identity-based model of organizational monitoring: Integrating information privacy and organizational justice. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management JJ Martocchio 71–135 Oxford, UK: Elsevier Sci. Publ. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bandura A. 1971. Social Learning Theory New York: Gen. Learning Press [Google Scholar]
  4. Bell GG, Oppenheimer RJ, Bastien A. 2002. Trust deterioration in an international buyer-supplier relationship. J. Bus. Ethics 36:65–78 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bennett M, Earwaker D. 1994. Victims' responses to apologies: the effects of offender responsibility and offense severity. J. Soc. Psychol. 134:457–64 [Google Scholar]
  6. Benoit WL. 2015. Accounts, Excuses, and Apologies: Image Repair Theory and Research Albany, NY: SUNY Press [Google Scholar]
  7. Bies RJ, Shapiro DL. 1987. Interactional fairness judgments: the influence of causal accounts. Soc. Justice Res. 1:199–218 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bies RJ, Tripp TM. 1996. Beyond distrust: “getting even” and the need for revenge. See Kramer & Tyler 1996 246–60
  9. Biros DP, Hass MC, Wiers K, Twitchell D, Adkins M. et al. 2005. Task performance under deceptive conditions: using military scenarios in deception detection research Presented at Annu. Hawaii Int. Conf. Syst. Sci., 38th, Big Island, HI [Google Scholar]
  10. Bottom WP, Gibson K, Daniels SE, Murnighan JK. 2002. When talk is not cheap: substantive penance and expressions of intent in rebuilding cooperation. Organ. Sci. 13:497–513 [Google Scholar]
  11. Branzei O, Vertinsky I, Camp RD II. 2007. Culture-contingent signs of trust in emergent relationships. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 104:61–82 [Google Scholar]
  12. Butler MH, Dahlin SK, Fife ST. 2002. “Languaging” factors affecting clients' acceptance of forgiveness intervention in marital therapy. J. Marital Fam. Ther. 28:285–98 [Google Scholar]
  13. Butler MH, Hall LG, Yorgason JB. 2013. The paradoxical relation of the expression of offense to forgiving: a survey of therapists’ conceptualizations. Am. J. Fam. Ther. 41:415–36 [Google Scholar]
  14. Coombs WT, Holladay SJ. 2008. Comparing apology to equivalent crisis response strategies: clarifying apology's role and value in crisis communication. Public Relat. Rev. 34:252–57 [Google Scholar]
  15. Crant JM, Bateman TS. 1993. Assignment of credit and blame for performance outcomes. Acad. Manag. J. 36:7–27 [Google Scholar]
  16. Crisp CB, Jarvenpaa SL. 2013. Swift trust in global virtual teams: trusting beliefs and normative actions. J. Pers. Psychol. 12:45–56 [Google Scholar]
  17. Croson R, Boles T, Murnighan JK. 2003. Cheap talk in bargaining experiments: lying and threats in ultimatum games. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 51:143–59 [Google Scholar]
  18. Cross S, Madson L. 1997. Models of the self: self-construals and gender. Psychol. Bull. 122:5–37 [Google Scholar]
  19. Daft RL, Lengel RH. 1984. Information richness: a new approach to managerial behavior and organizational design. Res. Organ. Behav. 6:191–233 [Google Scholar]
  20. Davis MH. 1994. Empathy: A Social Psychological Approach Boulder, CO: Westview Press [Google Scholar]
  21. De Cremer D. 2010. To pay or to apologize? On the psychology of dealing with unfair offers in a dictator game. J. Econ. Psychol. 31:843–48 [Google Scholar]
  22. Dewulf A, Gray B, Putnam LL, Lewicki RJ, Aarts N. et al. 2009. Disentangling approaches to framing in conflict and negotiation research: a meta-paradigmatic perspective. Hum. Relat. 62:155–93 [Google Scholar]
  23. Dietz G, Gillespie N, Chao G. 2010. Unraveling the complexities of trust and culture. Trust: A Cultural Perspective MNK Saunders, D Skinner, G Dietz, N Gillespie, RJ Lewicki 3–41 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  24. Dimoka A. 2010. What does the brain tell us about trust and distrust? Evidence from a functional neuroimaging study. MIS Q 34:373–A7 [Google Scholar]
  25. Dirks KT, Kim PH, Ferrin DL, Cooper CD. 2011. Understanding the effects of substantive responses on trust following a transgression. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 114:87–103 [Google Scholar]
  26. Dirks KT, Lewicki RJ, Zaheer A. 2009. Repairing relationships within and between organizations: building a conceptual foundation. Acad. Manag. Rev. 34:68–84 [Google Scholar]
  27. Effron DA, Lucas BJ, O'Connor K. 2015. Hypocrisy by association: when organizational membership increases condemnation for wrongdoing. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 130:147–59 [Google Scholar]
  28. Effron DA, Miller DT. 2015. Do as I say, not as I've done: suffering for a misdeed reduces the hypocrisy of advising others against it. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 131:16–32 [Google Scholar]
  29. Enright RD, Fitzgibbons RP. 2000. Helping Clients Forgive: An Empirical Guide for Resolving Anger and Restoring Hope Washington, DC: Am. Psychol. Assoc. [Google Scholar]
  30. Farrell J, Rabin M. 1996. Cheap talk. J. Econ. Perspect. 10:103–18 [Google Scholar]
  31. Fehr R, Gelfand MJ. 2010. When apologies work: how matching apology components to victims’ self-construals facilitates forgiveness. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 113:37–50 [Google Scholar]
  32. Fehr R, Gelfand MJ, Nag M. 2010. The road to forgiveness: a meta-analytic synthesis of its situational and dispositional correlates. Psychol. Bull. 136:894–914 [Google Scholar]
  33. Ferguson AJ, Peterson RS. 2015. Sinking slowly: Diversity in propensity to trust predicts downward trust spirals in small groups. J. Appl. Psychol. 100:1012–24 [Google Scholar]
  34. Ferrin DL, Bligh MC, Kohles JC. 2007a. Can I trust you to trust me? A theory of trust, monitoring, and cooperation in interpersonal and intergroup relationships. Group Organ. Manag. 32:465–99 [Google Scholar]
  35. Ferrin DL, Kim PH, Cooper CD, Dirks KT. 2007b. Silence speaks volumes: the effectiveness of reticence in comparison to apology and denial for responding to integrity- and competence-based trust violations. J. Appl. Psychol. 92:893–908 [Google Scholar]
  36. Fitness J. 2001. Betrayal, rejection, revenge, and forgiveness: an interpersonal script approach. Interpersonal Rejection73–103 New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  37. Folkenflik D, Deggans E. 2014. Bill Cosby remains silent on sexual assault allegations. NPR Nov. 17. http://www.npr.org/2014/11/17/364641081/cosby-remains-silent-on-sexual-assault-allegations [Google Scholar]
  38. Galinsky A, Schweitzer ME. 2015. Friend and Foe: When to Cooperate, When to Compete, and How to Succeed at Both New York: Penguin Random House [Google Scholar]
  39. Gillespie N, Dietz G. 2009. Trust repair after an organization-level failure. Acad. Manag. Rev. 34:127–45 [Google Scholar]
  40. Goffman E. 1971. Relations in Public New York: Basic Books [Google Scholar]
  41. Goffman E. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience New York: Harper Row [Google Scholar]
  42. Gold GJ, Weiner B. 2000. Remorse, confession, group identity, and expectancies about repeating a transgression. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 22:291–300 [Google Scholar]
  43. Gonos G. 1977. “Situation” versus “frame”: The “interactionist” and the “structuralist” analysis of everyday life. Am. Sociol. Rev.854–67 [Google Scholar]
  44. Grosse CU. 2002. Managing communication within virtual intercultural teams. Bus. Commun. Q. 65:22–38 [Google Scholar]
  45. Gunderson PR, Ferrari JR. 2008. Forgiveness of sexual cheating in romantic relationships: effects of discovery method, frequency of offense, and presence of apology. N. Am. J. Psychol. 10:1–14 [Google Scholar]
  46. Guo SL, Lumineau F, Lewicki RJ. 2017. Revisiting the foundations of organizational distrust. Found. Trends Manag In press [Google Scholar]
  47. Haesevoets T, Reinders Folmer C, De Cremer D, Van Hiel A. 2013. Money isn't all that matters: the use of financial compensation and apologies to preserve relationships in the aftermath of distributive harm. J. Econ. Psychol. 35:95–107 [Google Scholar]
  48. Hann I-H, Kai-Lung H, Sang-Yong T, Png IP. 2007. Overcoming online information privacy concerns: an information-processing theory approach. J. Manag. Inform. Syst. 24:13–42 [Google Scholar]
  49. Hareli S, Eisikovits Z. 2006. The role of communicating social emotions accompanying apologies in forgiveness. Motiv. Emot. 30:189–97 [Google Scholar]
  50. Heider F. 1958. The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations New York: Wiley [Google Scholar]
  51. Hodgson LK, Wertheim EH. 2007. Does good emotion management aid forgiving? Multiple dimensions of empathy, emotion management and forgiveness of self and others. J. Soc. Pers. Relat. 24:931–49 [Google Scholar]
  52. Jarvenpaa SL, Leidner DE. 1999. Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organ. Sci. 10:791 [Google Scholar]
  53. Kiesler S, Sproull L. 1992. Group decision making and communication technology. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 52:96–123 [Google Scholar]
  54. Kim PH, Dirks KT, Cooper CD. 2009. The repair of trust: a dynamic bilateral perspective and multilevel conceptualization. Acad. Manag. Rev. 34:401–22 [Google Scholar]
  55. Kim PH, Dirks KT, Cooper CD, Ferrin DL. 2006. When more blame is better than less: the implications of internal versus external attributions for the repair of trust after a competence- versus integrity-based trust violation. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 99:49–65 [Google Scholar]
  56. Kim PH, Ferrin DL, Cooper CD, Dirks KT. 2004. Removing the shadow of suspicion: the effects of apology versus denial for repairing competence- versus integrity-based trust violations. J. Appl. Psychol. 89:104–18 [Google Scholar]
  57. Klackl J, Pfundmair M, Agroskin D, Jonas E. 2013. Who is to blame? Oxytocin promotes nonpersonalistic attributions in response to a trust betrayal. Biol. Psychol. 92:387–94 [Google Scholar]
  58. Kosfeld M, Heinrichs M, Zak PJ, Fischbacher U, Fehr E. 2005. Oxytocin increases trust in humans. Nature 435:673–76 [Google Scholar]
  59. Kramer RM, Lewicki RJ. 2010. Repairing and enhancing trust: approaches to reducing organizational trust deficits. Acad. Manag. Ann. 4:245–77 [Google Scholar]
  60. Kramer RM, Pittinsky TL. 2012. Restoring Trust in Organizations and Leaders: Enduring Challenges and Emerging Answers New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  61. Kramer RM, Tyler TR. 1996. Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage [Google Scholar]
  62. Lewicki RJ, Brinsfield C. 2012. Measuring trust beliefs and behaviours. Handbook of Research Methods on Trust F Lyon, G Möllering, MNK Saunders 29–39 Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar [Google Scholar]
  63. Lewicki RJ, Bunker BB. 1995. Trust in relationships: a model of trust development and decline. Conflict, Cooperation and Justice BB Bunker, JZ Rubin 133–73 San Francisco: Jossey-Bass [Google Scholar]
  64. Lewicki RJ, Bunker BB. 1996. Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships. See Kramer & Tyler 1996 114–39
  65. Lewicki RJ, McAllister DJ, Bies RJ. 1998. Trust and distrust: new relationships and realities. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23:438–58 [Google Scholar]
  66. Lewicki RJ, Polin B. 2012. The art of the apology: the structure and effectiveness of apologies in trust repair. See Kramer & Pittinsky 2012 95–128
  67. Lewicki RJ, Polin B, Lount RB. 2016. An exploration of the structure of effective apologies. Negotiation Confl. Manag. Res. 9:177–96 [Google Scholar]
  68. Lewicki RJ, Tomlinson E. 2014. Trust, trust development and trust repair. The Handbook of Conflict Resolution M Deutsch, P Coleman, E Marcus San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 3rd ed.. [Google Scholar]
  69. Lewicki RJ, Tomlinson EC, Gillespie N. 2006. Models of interpersonal trust development: Theoretical approaches, empirical evidence, and future directions. J. Manag. 32:991–1022 [Google Scholar]
  70. Lewicki RJ, Wiethoff C. 2000. Trust, trust development, and trust repair. The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and Practice M Deutsch, PT Coleman 86–107 San Francisco: Jossey-Bass [Google Scholar]
  71. Lind EA. 1995. Justice and authority relations in organizations. Organizational Politics, Justice, and Support: Managing the Social Climate of the Workplace R Cropanzano, KM Kacmar 83–96 Westport, CT: Quorum Books [Google Scholar]
  72. Lind EA, Kray L, Thompson L. 2001. Primacy effects in justice judgments: testing predictions from fairness heuristic theory. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 85:189–210 [Google Scholar]
  73. Lind EA, Tyler TR. 1988. The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice New York: Plenum [Google Scholar]
  74. Lount RB Jr., Zhong C-B, Sivanathan N, Murnighan JK. 2008. Getting off on the wrong foot: the timing of a breach and the restoration of trust. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 34:1601–12 [Google Scholar]
  75. Lumineau F. 2014. How contracts influence trust and distrust. J. Manag. doi: 10.1177/0149206314556656 [Google Scholar]
  76. Maio GR, Thomas G, Fincham FD, Carnelley KB. 2008. Unraveling the role of forgiveness in family relationships. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 94:307–19 [Google Scholar]
  77. Malhotra D, Lumineau F. 2011. Trust and collaboration in the aftermath of conflict: the effects of contract structure. Acad. Manag. J. 54:981–98 [Google Scholar]
  78. Malhotra D, Murnighan JK. 2002. The effects of contracts on interpersonal trust. Adm. Sci. Q. 47:534–59 [Google Scholar]
  79. Matzat U, Snijders C. 2012. Rebuilding trust in online shops on consumer review sites: sellers’ responses to user-generated complaints. J. Comput.-Med. Commun 1862–79 [Google Scholar]
  80. Mayer RC, Davis JH, Schoorman FD. 1995. An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20:709–34 [Google Scholar]
  81. McAllister DJ. 1995. Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Acad. Manag. J. 38:24–59 [Google Scholar]
  82. McCullough ME, Worthington EL Jr., Rachal KC. 1997. Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 73:321–36 [Google Scholar]
  83. McKnight DH, Chervany NL. 2001. Trust and distrust definitions: One bite at a time. Trust in Cyber-Societies: Integrating the Human and Artificial Perspectives R Falcone, M Singh, YH Tan 27–54 Berlin: Springer Verlag [Google Scholar]
  84. McKnight DH, Cummings LL, Chervany NL. 1998. Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23:473–90 [Google Scholar]
  85. Meyerson D, Weick KE, Kramer RM. 1996. Swift trust and temporary groups. See Kramer & Tyler 1996 166–95
  86. Minsky MA. 1975. A framework for representing knowledge. The Psychology of Computer Vision PH Winston 211–77 New York: McGraw-Hill [Google Scholar]
  87. Morris JH, Moberg DJ. 1994. Work organizations as contexts for trust and betrayal. Citizen Espionage: Studies in Trust and Betrayal TR Sarbin, RM Carney, C Eoyang 163–87 Westport, CT: Praeger Publ./Greenwood Publ. Gr. [Google Scholar]
  88. Nakayachi K, Watabe M. 2005. Restoring trustworthiness after adverse events: the signaling effects of voluntary “Hostage Posting” on trust. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 97:1–17 [Google Scholar]
  89. Neale MA, Bazerman MH. 1985. The effects of framing and negotiator overconfidence on bargaining behaviors and outcomes. Acad. Manag. J. 28:34–49 [Google Scholar]
  90. Osgood CE. 1962. An Alternative to War or Surrender Urbana, IL: Univ. Ill. Press [Google Scholar]
  91. Reeder GD, Brewer MB. 1979. A schematic model of dispositional attribution in interpersonal perception. Psychol. Rev. 86:61–79 [Google Scholar]
  92. Ren H, Gray B. 2009. Repairing relationship conflict: how violation types and culture influence the effectiveness of restoration rituals. Acad. Manag. Rev. 34:105–26 [Google Scholar]
  93. Robinson SL. 1996. Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Adm. Sci. Q. 41:574–99 [Google Scholar]
  94. Robinson SL, Dirks KT, Ozcelik H. 2004. Untangling the knot of trust and betrayal. Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Dilemmas and Approaches RM Kramer, KS Cook 327–41 New York: Russell Sage Found. [Google Scholar]
  95. Rousseau DM, Sitkin SB, Burt RS, Camerer C. 1998. Not so different after all: a cross-discipline view of trust. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23:393–404 [Google Scholar]
  96. Rusbult CE, Verette J, Whitney GA, Slovik LF, Lipkus I. 1991. Accommodation processes in close relationships: theory and preliminary empirical evidence. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 60:53–78 [Google Scholar]
  97. Saunders MNK, Skinner D, Gillespie N, Lewicki RJ. 2010. Organizational Trust: A Cultural Perspective Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  98. Scher SJ, Darley JM. 1997. How effective are the things people say to apologize? Effects of the realization of the apology speech act. J. Psycholinguist. Res. 26:127–40 [Google Scholar]
  99. Schlenker BR, Darby BW. 1981. The use of apologies in social predicaments. Soc. Psychol. Q. 44:271–78 [Google Scholar]
  100. Shapiro DL. 1991. The effects of explanations on negative reactions to deceit. Adm. Sci. Q. 36:614–30 [Google Scholar]
  101. Shapiro DL, Buttner EH, Barry B. 1994. Explanations: What factors enhance their perceived adequacy. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 58:346–68 [Google Scholar]
  102. Shaw JC, Wild E, Colquitt JA. 2003. To justify or excuse?: A meta-analytic review of the effects of explanations. J. Appl. Psychol. 88:444–58 [Google Scholar]
  103. Simons T. 2002. Behavioral integrity: the perceived alignment between managers’ words and deeds as a research focus. Organ. Sci. 13:18–35 [Google Scholar]
  104. Sitkin SB, Roth NL. 1993. Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic “remedies” for trust/distrust. Organ. Sci. 4:367–92 [Google Scholar]
  105. Tomlinson EC, Dineen BR, Lewicki RJ. 2004. The road to reconciliation: antecedents of victim willingness to reconcile following a broken promise. J. Manag. 30:165–87 [Google Scholar]
  106. Tomlinson EC, Mayer RC. 2009. The role of casual attribution dimensions in trust repair. Acad. Manag. Rev. 34:85–104 [Google Scholar]
  107. Tranfinow D, Bromgard IK, Finlay KA, Ketelaar T. 2005. The role of affect in determining the attributional weight of immoral behaviors. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 31:935–48 [Google Scholar]
  108. Utz S, Matzat U, Snijders C. 2009. On-line reputation systems: the effects of feedback comments and reactions on building and rebuilding trust in on-line auctions. Int. J. Electron. Commerce 13:95–118 [Google Scholar]
  109. Weiner B. 1986. Attribution, emotion, and action. Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundations of Social Behavior RM Sorrentino, ET Higgins 281–312 New York: Guilford Press [Google Scholar]
  110. Weiner B, Amirkhan J, Folkes VS, Verette JA. 1987. An attributional analysis of excuse giving: studies of a naive theory of emotion. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 52:316–24 [Google Scholar]
  111. Williams M. 2012. Building and rebuilding trust: why perspective taking matters. See Kramer & Pittinsky 2012 171–84
  112. Zheng J, Veinott E, Bos N, Olson J, Olson G. 2002. Trust without touch: jumpstarting long-distance trust with initial social activities Presented at Conf. Human Factors Comput. Syst., Minneapolis, MN [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113147
Loading
Trust Repair
Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 4, 287 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113147
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113147
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113147
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error