1932

Abstract

Safety climate is a collective construct derived from individuals' shared perceptions of the various ways that safety is valued in the workplace. Research over the past 35 years shows that safety climate is an important predictor of safety behavior and safety outcomes such as accidents and injury. We first review the conceptual foundations of safety climate and explore how the construct can be applied to different levels of analysis. We then review ways that safety climate influences individual processes of sense making, motivation, and work behavior. Next, we explore the impact of safety climate on organization-level outcomes related to both safety and productivity. We conclude with suggestions for future research and practice to support the overall safety of people and organizations.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062414
2016-03-21
2024-06-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/orgpsych/3/1/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062414.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062414&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Bahrami MA, Chalak M, Montazeralfaraj R, Dehghani Tafti A. 2014. Iranian nurses' perception of patient safety culture. Iranian Red Crescent Med. J. 16:4e11894 [Google Scholar]
  2. Barbaranelli C, Petitta L, Probst TM. 2015. Does safety climate predict safety performance in Italy and the USA? Cross-cultural validation of a theoretical model of safety climate. Accid. Anal. Prev. 77:35–44 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bergman ME, Payne SC, Taylor AB, Beus JM. 2014. The shelf life of a safety climate assessment: How long until the relationship with safety-critical incidents expires?. J. Bus. Psychol. 29:4519–40 [Google Scholar]
  4. Beus JM, Bergman ME, Payne SC. 2010. The influence of organizational tenure on safety climate strength: a first look. Accid. Anal. Prev. 42:51431–37 [Google Scholar]
  5. Beus JM, Jarrett SM, Bergman ME, Payne SC. 2012. Perceptual equivalence of psychological climates within groups: when agreement indices do not agree. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 85:3454–71 [Google Scholar]
  6. Borman WC, Motowidlo SJ. 1993. Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. Personnel Selection in Organizations N Schmitt, WC Borman 71–98 San Francisco: Jossey-Bass [Google Scholar]
  7. Brondino M, Silva SA, Pasini M. 2012. Multilevel approach to organizational and group safety climate and safety performance: co-workers as the missing link. Saf. Sci. 50:91847–56 [Google Scholar]
  8. Burke MJ, Sarpy SA, Tesluk PE, Smith-Crowe K. 2002. General safety performance: a test of a grounded theoretical model. Pers. Psychol. 55:2429–57 [Google Scholar]
  9. Carless SA. 2004. Does psychological empowerment mediate the relationship between psychological climate and job satisfaction?. J. Bus. Psychol. 18:4405–25 [Google Scholar]
  10. Carr JZ, Schmidt AM, Ford J, DeShon RP. 2003. Climate perceptions matter: a meta-analytic path analysis relating molar climate, cognitive and affective states, and individual level work outcomes. J. Appl. Psychol. 88:4605–19 [Google Scholar]
  11. Cavazza N, Serpe A. 2009. Effects of safety climate on safety norm violations: exploring the mediating role of attitudinal ambivalence toward personal protective equipment. J. Saf. Res. 40:4277–83 [Google Scholar]
  12. Christian MS, Bradley JC, Wallace JC, Burke MJ. 2009. Workplace safety: a meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. J. Appl. Psychol. 94:51103–27 [Google Scholar]
  13. Clarke S. 2006. The relationship between safety climate and safety performance: a meta-analytic review. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 11:4315–27 [Google Scholar]
  14. Clarke S. 2010. An integrative model of safety climate: linking psychological climate and work attitudes to individual safety outcomes using meta-analysis. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 83:3553–78 [Google Scholar]
  15. Clarke S. 2013. Safety leadership: a meta-analytic review of transformational and transactional leadership styles as antecedents of safety behaviours. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 86:122–49 [Google Scholar]
  16. Clarke S, Cooper CL. 2004. Managing the Risk of Workplace Stress: Health and Safety Hazards London: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  17. Colakoglu S, Lepak DP, Hong Y. 2006. Measuring HRM effectiveness: considering multiple stakeholders in a global context. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 16:2209–18 [Google Scholar]
  18. Conchie SM. 2013. Transformational leadership, intrinsic motivation, and trust: a moderated-mediated model of workplace safety. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 18:2198–210 [Google Scholar]
  19. Curcuruto M, Guglielmi D, Mariani MG. 2013. Organizational citizenship for safety: psycho-social processes of mediation. Psicol. Soc. 8:2229–48 [Google Scholar]
  20. Curcuruto M, Mariani MG, Conchie S, Violante F. 2015. The role of prosocial and proactive safety behaviors in predicting safety performance. Saf. Sci. 80:317–23 [Google Scholar]
  21. Day DV, Griffin MA, Louw KR. 2014. The climate and culture of leadership in organizations. See Schneider & Barbera 2014 101–17
  22. Deci EL, Ryan RM. 2002. Self-determination research: reflection and future direction. Handbook of Self-Determination Research EL Deci, RM Ryan 431–42 Rochester, NY: Univ. Rochester Press [Google Scholar]
  23. Dedobbeleer N, Beland F. 1991. A safety climate measure for construction sites. J. Saf. Res. 22:297–103 [Google Scholar]
  24. DeJoy DM. 2005. Behavior change versus culture change: divergent approaches to managing workplace safety. Saf. Sci. 43:2105–299 [Google Scholar]
  25. DeJoy DM, Della LJ, Vandenberg RJ, Wilson MG. 2010. Making work safer: testing a model of social exchange and safety management. J. Saf. Res. 41:2163–71 [Google Scholar]
  26. Flin R, Mearns K, O'Connor P, Bryden R. 2000. Measuring safety climate: identifying common features. Saf. Sci. 34:177–92 [Google Scholar]
  27. Gagné M. 2014. The Oxford Handbook of Work Engagement, Motivation, and Self-Determination Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  28. Gagné M, Deci EL. 2005. Self-determination theory and work motivation. J. Organ. Behav. 26:4331–62 [Google Scholar]
  29. Geller E, Roberts D, Gilmore MR. 1996. Predicting propensity to actively care for occupational safety. J. Saf. Res. 27:11–8 [Google Scholar]
  30. Gonzalez-Roma V, Peiro JM, Tordera N. 2002. An examination of the antecedents and moderator influences of climate strength. J. Appl. Psychol. 87:3465–73 [Google Scholar]
  31. Greenglass ER. 2002. Proactive coping and quality of life management. Beyond Coping: Meeting Goals, Visions, and Challenges E Frydenberg 37–62 New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  32. Griffin MA, Cordery J, Soo C. 2015. Dynamic safety capability: how organizations proactively change core safety systems. Organ. Psychol. Rev. doi: 10.1177/2041386615590679 [Google Scholar]
  33. Griffin MA, Hodkiewicz MR, Dunster J, Kanse L, Parkes KR. et al. 2014. A conceptual framework and practical guide for assessing fitness-to-operate in the offshore oil and gas industry. Accid. Anal. Prev. 68:156–71 [Google Scholar]
  34. Griffin MA, Neal A. 2000. Perceptions of safety at work: a framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 5:3347–58 [Google Scholar]
  35. Griffin MA, Talati Z. 2014. Safety leadership. The Oxford Handbook of Leadership and Organizations DV Day 638–56 New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  36. Grote G. 2007. Understanding and assessing safety culture through the lens of organizational management of uncertainty. Saf. Sci. 45:6637–52 [Google Scholar]
  37. Grote G. 2009. Management of Uncertainty: Theory and Application in the Design of Systems and Organizations London: Springer [Google Scholar]
  38. Guldenmund FW. 2000. The nature of safety culture: a review of theory and research. Saf. Sci. 34:1215–57 [Google Scholar]
  39. Hahn SE, Murphy LR. 2008. A short scale for measuring safety climate. Saf. Sci. 46:71047–66 [Google Scholar]
  40. Harzing A-W. 2006. Response styles in cross-national survey research: a 26-country study. Int. J. Cross Cultur. Manag. 6:2243–66 [Google Scholar]
  41. Hoffmann B, Müller V, Rochon J, Gondan M, Müller B, Albay Z. et al. 2014. Effects of a team-based assessment and intervention on patient safety culture in general practice: an open randomised controlled trial. BMJ Qual. Saf. 23:135–46 [Google Scholar]
  42. Hofmann DA, Morgeson FP. 1999. Safety-related behavior as a social exchange: the role of perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange. J. Appl. Psychol. 84:2286–96 [Google Scholar]
  43. Hofmann DA, Morgeson FP, Gerras SJ. 2003. Climate as a moderator of the relationship between leader-member exchange and content specific citizenship: safety climate as an exemplar. J. Appl. Psychol. 88:1170–78 [Google Scholar]
  44. Hofmann DA, Tetrick LE. 2003. Health and Safety in Organizations: A Multi-Level Perspective. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass [Google Scholar]
  45. Hofstede G. 1996. The cultural relativity of organizational practices and theories. The Effective Manager: Perspectives and Illustrations243–62 Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publ./Maidenhead, UK: Open Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  46. Hollnagel E. 2009. Safer Complex Industrial Environments: A Human Factors Approach Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press [Google Scholar]
  47. Hollnagel E, Paries J, Woods DD, Wreathall J. 2011. Resilience Engineering in Practice: A Guidebook Burlington, VA: Ashgate [Google Scholar]
  48. Hopkins A. 2009. Thinking about process safety indicators. Saf. Sci. 47:4460–65 [Google Scholar]
  49. Hsu SH, Lee C-C, Wu M-C, Takano K. 2008. A cross-cultural study of organizational factors on safety: Japanese versus Taiwanese oil refinery plants. Accid. Anal. Prev. 40:124–34 [Google Scholar]
  50. Huang YH, Ho M, Smith GS, Chen PY, Mith S. 2006. Safety climate and self-reported injury: assessing the mediating role of employee safety control. Accid. Anal. Prev. 38:3425–33 [Google Scholar]
  51. Hulsheger UR, Anderson N, Salgado JF. 2009. Team-level predictors of innovation at work: a comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. J. Appl. Psychol. 94:51128–45 [Google Scholar]
  52. James LR, James LA, Ashe DK. 1990. The meaning of organizations: the role of cognitions and values. Organizational Climate and Culture B Schneider 40–84 San Francisco: Jossey-Bass [Google Scholar]
  53. Jiang L, Probst TM. 2015. The relationship between safety-production conflict and employee safety outcomes: testing the impact of multiple organizational climates. Work Stress 29:2171–89 [Google Scholar]
  54. Kahn WA. 1990. Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Acad. Manag. J. 33:4692–724 [Google Scholar]
  55. Kongsvik T, Fenstad J, Wendelborg C. 2012. Between a rock and a hard place: accident and near-miss reporting on offshore service vessels. Saf. Sci. 50:91839–46 [Google Scholar]
  56. Kouabenan DR. 2009. Role of beliefs in accident and risk analysis and prevention. Saf. Sci. 47:6767–76 [Google Scholar]
  57. Kozlowski SWJ, Klein KJ. 2000. A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions SWJ Kozlowski, KJ Klein 3–90 San Francisco, Jossey-Bass [Google Scholar]
  58. Latham GP, Pinder CC. 2005. Work motivation theory and research at the dawn of the twenty-first century. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 56:485–516 [Google Scholar]
  59. Litwin GH, Stringer RA. 1968. Motivation and Organizational Climate Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  60. Luria G, Rafaeli A. 2008. Testing safety commitment in organizations through interpretations of safety artifacts. J. Saf. Res. 39:5519–28 [Google Scholar]
  61. Luria G, Zohar D, Erev I. 2008. The effect of workers' visibility on effectiveness of intervention programs: supervisory-based safety interventions. J. Saf. Res. 39:3273–80 [Google Scholar]
  62. Macey WH, Schneider B. 2008. The meaning of employee engagement. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 1:13–30 [Google Scholar]
  63. Manzey D, Marold J. 2009. Occupational accidents and safety: the challenge of globalization. Saf. Sci. 47:723–26 [Google Scholar]
  64. Mearns K. 2009. From reactive to proactive—Can LPIs deliver?. Saf. Sci. 47:4491–92 [Google Scholar]
  65. Mearns K, Flin R, Gordon R, Fleming M. 1998. Measuring safety climate on offshore installations. Work Stress 12:3238–54 [Google Scholar]
  66. Mearns K, Hope L, Ford MT, Tetrick LE. 2010. Investment in workforce health: exploring the implications for workforce safety climate and commitment. Accid. Anal. Prev. 42:51445–54 [Google Scholar]
  67. Mearns K, Reader T. 2008. Organizational support and safety outcomes: an un-investigated relationship?. Saf. Sci. 46:3388–97 [Google Scholar]
  68. Mearns K, Whitaker SM, Flin R. 2001. Benchmarking safety climate in hazardous environments: a longitudinal, interorganizational approach. Risk Anal. 21:4771–86 [Google Scholar]
  69. Mearns K, Yule S. 2009. The role of national culture in determining safety performance: challenges for the global oil and gas industry. Saf. Sci. 47:6777–85 [Google Scholar]
  70. Morrow PC, Crum MR. 1998. The effects of perceived and objective safety risk on employee outcomes. J. Vocat. Behav. 53:2300–13 [Google Scholar]
  71. Nahrgang JD, Morgeson FP, Hofmann DA. 2011. Safety at work: a meta-analytic investigation of the link between job demands, job resources, burnout, engagement, and safety outcomes. J. Appl. Psychol. 96:171–94 [Google Scholar]
  72. Naveh E, Katz-Navon T. 2015. A longitudinal study of an intervention to improve road safety climate: climate as an organizational boundary spanner. J. Appl. Psychol. 100:1216–26 [Google Scholar]
  73. Neal A, Griffin MA. 2006. A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels. J. Appl. Psychol. 91:4946–53 [Google Scholar]
  74. Neal A, Griffin MA, Hart P. 2000. The impact of organizational climate on safety climate and individual behavior. Saf. Sci. 34:99–109 [Google Scholar]
  75. Ostroff C, Kinicki AJ, Tamkins MM. 2003. Organizational Culture and Climate: Part Three The Work Environment Hoboken, NJ: Wiley [Google Scholar]
  76. Parker SK. 2014. Beyond motivation: job and work design for development, health, ambidexterity, and more. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 65:1661–91 [Google Scholar]
  77. Parker SK, Axtell CM, Turner N. 2001. Designing a safer workplace: importance of job autonomy, communication quality, and supportive supervisors. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 6:3211–28 [Google Scholar]
  78. Parker SK, Bindl U, Strauss K. 2010. Making things happen: a model of proactive motivation. J. Manag. 36:4827–56 [Google Scholar]
  79. Parker SK, Turner N, Griffin MA. 2003. Designing healthy work. See Hofmann & Tetrick 2003 91–130
  80. Parker SK, Williams HM, Turner N. 2006. Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. J. Appl. Psychol. 91:3636–52 [Google Scholar]
  81. Payne SC, Bergman ME, Beus JM, Rodríguez JM, Henning JB. 2009. Safety climate: leading or lagging indicator of safety outcomes?. J. Loss Prev. Process Industries 22:6735–39 [Google Scholar]
  82. Payne SC, Bergman ME, Rodríguez JM, Beus JM, Henning JB. 2010. Leading and lagging: process safety climate-incident relationships at one year. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 23:6806–12 [Google Scholar]
  83. Probst TM. 2015. Organizational safety climate and supervisor safety enforcement: multilevel explorations of the causes of accident underreporting. J. Appl. Psychol. 1001899–907 [Google Scholar]
  84. Probst TM, Brubaker TL, Barsotti A. 2008. Organizational under-reporting of injury rates: an examination of the moderating effect of organizational safety climate. J. Appl. Psychol. 93:1147–54 [Google Scholar]
  85. Reader TW, Noort MC, Shorrock S, Kirwan B. 2015. Safety sans frontières: an international safety culture model. Risk Anal.: Int. J. 35:5770–89 [Google Scholar]
  86. Reason JT. 1997. Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate [Google Scholar]
  87. Reason JT. 2008. The Human Contribution: Unsafe Acts, Accidents and Heroic Recoveries Manchester, UK: Ashgate [Google Scholar]
  88. Roberts KH. 1990. Some characteristics of one type of high reliability organization. Organ. Sci. 1:2160–76 [Google Scholar]
  89. Ryan RM, Deci EL. 2001. On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 52:141–66 [Google Scholar]
  90. Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB, Salanova M. 2006. The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: a cross-national study. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 66:4701–16 [Google Scholar]
  91. Schneider B, Barbera KM. 2014. The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Climate and Culture Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  92. Schneider B, Ehrhart MG, Macey WH. 2013. Organizational climate and culture. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 64:361–88 [Google Scholar]
  93. Scott N, Fleming M, Kelloway EK. 2014. Understanding why employees behave safely from a self-determination theory perspective. See Gagné 2014 276–94
  94. Simard M, Marchand A. 1995. A multilevel analysis of organizational factors related to the taking of safety initiatives by work groups. Saf. Sci. 21:113–29 [Google Scholar]
  95. Sinclair RR, Martin JE, Sears LE. 2010. Labor unions and safety climate: perceived union safety values and retail employee safety outcomes. Accid. Anal. Prev. 42:51477–87 [Google Scholar]
  96. Singer S, Meterko M, Baker L, Gaba D, Falwell A, Rosen A. 2007. Workforce perceptions of hospital safety culture: development and validation of the patient safety climate in healthcare organizations survey. Health Serv. Res. 42:51999–2021 [Google Scholar]
  97. Tesluk P, Quigley NR. 2003. Group and normative influence in health and safety designing healthy work: perspective from taking a broad view on team effectiveness. See Hofmann & Tetrick, pp. 131–72
  98. Tucker S, Chmiel N, Turner N, Hershcovis MS, Stride CB. 2008. Perceived organizational support for safety and employee safety voice: the mediating role of coworker support for safety. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 13:4319–30 [Google Scholar]
  99. Tucker S, Turner N. 2015. Sometimes it hurts when supervisors don't listen: the antecedents and consequences of safety voice among young workers. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 20:172–81 [Google Scholar]
  100. Turner N, Tucker S, Kelloway EK. 2015. Prevalence and demographic differences in microaccidents and safety behaviors among young workers in Canada. J. Saf. Res. 53:39–43 [Google Scholar]
  101. Vincent C. 2011. Patient Safety London: Wiley [Google Scholar]
  102. Vinodkumar MN, Bhasi M. 2010. Safety management practices and safety behaviour: assessing the mediating role of safety knowledge and motivation. Accid. Anal. Prev. 42:62082–93 [Google Scholar]
  103. Wallace JC, Chen G. 2006. A multilevel integration of personality, climate, self-regulation, and performance. Pers. Psychol. 59:3529–57 [Google Scholar]
  104. Wallace JC, Popp E, Mondore S. 2006. Safety climate as a mediator between foundation climates and occupational accidents: a group-level investigation. J. Appl. Psychol. 91:3681–88 [Google Scholar]
  105. Weick KE. 1995. Sensemaking in Organizations Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage [Google Scholar]
  106. Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM. 2007. Managing the Unexpected: Resilient Performance in the Age of Uncertainty San Francisco: Jossey-Bass [Google Scholar]
  107. Wu TC, Liu CW, Lu MC. 2007. Safety climate in university and college laboratories: impact of organizational and individual factors. J. Saf. Res. 38:191–102 [Google Scholar]
  108. Zohar D. 1980. Safety climate in industrial organizations: theoretical and applied implications. J. Appl. Psychol. 65:196–102 [Google Scholar]
  109. Zohar D. 2000. A group-level model of safety climate: testing the effect of group climate on microaccidents in manufacturing jobs. J. Appl. Psychol. 85:4587–96 [Google Scholar]
  110. Zohar D. 2002a. The effects of leadership dimensions, safety climate, and assigned priorities on minor injuries in work groups. J. Organ. Behav. 23:175–92 [Google Scholar]
  111. Zohar D. 2002b. Modifying supervisory practices to improve subunit safety: a leadership-based intervention model. J. Appl. Psychol. 87:1156–63 [Google Scholar]
  112. Zohar D. 2003. Safety climate: conceptual and measurement issues. Handbook of Occupational Health Psychology JC Quick, LE Tetrick 123–42 Washington, DC: APA [Google Scholar]
  113. Zohar D. 2008. Safety climate and beyond: a multi-level multi-climate framework. Saf. Sci. 46:3376–87 [Google Scholar]
  114. Zohar D. 2010. Thirty years of safety climate research: reflections and future directions. Accid. Anal. Prev. 42:51517–22 [Google Scholar]
  115. Zohar D. 2011. Safety climate: conceptual and measurement issues. Handbook of Occupational Health Psychology JC Quick, LE Tetrick 141–64 Washington, DC: APA, 2nd ed.. [Google Scholar]
  116. Zohar D. 2014. Safety climate: conceptualization, measurement, and improvement. See Schneider & Barbera 2014 317–34
  117. Zohar D, Erev I. 2007. On the difficulty of promoting workers' safety behaviour: overcoming the underweighting of routine risks. Int. J. Risk Assess. Manag. 7:2122–36 [Google Scholar]
  118. Zohar D, Huang Y-h, Lee J, Robertson M. 2014. A mediation model linking dispatcher leadership and work ownership with safety climate as predictors of truck driver safety performance. Accid. Anal. Prev. 62:17–25 [Google Scholar]
  119. Zohar D, Huang Y-h, Lee J, Robertson MM. 2015. Testing extrinsic and intrinsic motivation as explanatory variables for the safety climate–safety performance relationship among long-haul truck drivers. Trans. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 30:84–96 [Google Scholar]
  120. Zohar D, Luria G. 2005. A multilevel model of safety climate: cross-level relationships between organization and group-level climates. J. Appl. Psychol. 90:4616–28 [Google Scholar]
  121. Zohar D, Luria G. 2010. Group leaders as gatekeepers: testing safety climate variations across levels of analysis. Appl. Psychol.: Int. Rev. 59:4647–73 [Google Scholar]
  122. Zohar D, Polachek T. 2014. Discourse-based intervention for modifying supervisory communication as leverage for safety climate and performance improvement: a randomized field study. J. Appl. Psychol. 99:1113–24 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062414
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062414
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error