Implications of Social Media for a Changing Work Landscape

Literature Cited

1. Abad-Santos A. 2020. How Ellen DeGeneres's facade of kindness crumbled. Vox Aug. 7. https://www.vox.com/21357113/ellen-degeneres-canceled-mean-backlash-toxic-workplace#:∼:text=Dakota%20Johnson's%20confrontational%20interview%20left,and%20celebrity%20scion%20Dakota%20Johnson
   [Google Scholar]
2. Abroms LC. 2019. Public health in the era of social media. Am. J. Public Health 109:Suppl. 2S130–31
   [Google Scholar]
3. Alghawi IA, Yan J, Wei C. 2014. Professional or interactive: CEOs’ image strategies in the microblogging context. Comput. Hum. Behav. 41:184–89
   [Google Scholar]
4. Ali M, Sapiezynski P, Bogen M, Korolova A, Mislove A, Rieke A. 2019. Discrimination through optimization: how Facebook's ad delivery can lead to biased outcomes. Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact. 3:CSCW1–30
   [Google Scholar]
5. Azucar D, Marengo D, Settanni M. 2018. Predicting the Big 5 personality traits from digital footprints on social media: a meta-analysis. Personal. Individ. Differ. 124:150–59
   [Google Scholar]
6. Banks GC, Dionne SD, Mast MS, Sayama H. 2022. Leadership in the digital era: a review of who, what, when, where, and why. Leadersh. Q. 33:5101634
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bartels J, van Vuuren M, Ouwerkerk JW. 2019. My colleagues are my friends: the role of Facebook contacts in employee identification. Manag. Commun. Q. 33:3307–28
   [Google Scholar]
8. Belinda CD, Westerman JW, Bergman SM. 2018. Recruiting with ethics in an online era: integrating corporate social responsibility with social media to predict organizational attractiveness. J. Vocat. Behav. 109:101–17
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bitektine A. 2011. Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: the case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Acad. Manag. Rev. 36:1151–79
   [Google Scholar]
10. Blevins DP, Ragozzino R. 2019. On social media and the formation of organizational reputation: how social media are increasing cohesion between organizational reputation and traditional media for stakeholders. Acad. Manag. Rev. 44:1219–22
    [Google Scholar]
11. Bosch C, Sonnentag S, Pinck AS. 2018. What makes for a good break? A diary study on recovery experiences during lunch break. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 91:1134–57
    [Google Scholar]
12. Boyle PD, Cucchiara A. 2018. Social movements and HR: the impact of #MeToo White Pap. Cornell Cent. Adv. Hum. Resour. Stud., Cornell Univ. Ithaca, NY:
13. Brewer MB. 1991. The social self: on being the same and different at the same time. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 17:5475–82
    [Google Scholar]
14. Cao X, Yu L. 2019. Exploring the influence of excessive social media use at work: a three-dimension usage perspective. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 46:83–92
    [Google Scholar]
15. Carpentier M, Van Hoye G, Weijters B. 2019. Attracting applicants through the organization's social media page: signaling employer brand personality. J. Vocat. Behav. 115:103326
    [Google Scholar]
16. Chamorro-Premuzic T, Winsborough D, Sherman RA, Hogan R. 2016. New talent signals: Shiny new objects or a brave new world?. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 9:3621–40
    [Google Scholar]
17. Chen Y, Rui H, Whinston AB. 2021. Tweet to the top? Social media personal branding and career outcomes. MIS Q. 45:2499–533
    [Google Scholar]
18. Clay J. 2018. How Twitter, Instagram and other social media are transforming diplomacy. USC News Summer. https://news.usc.edu
    [Google Scholar]
19. Cone S, Gold K, Harris A, Ladak S. 2022. Workplace conduct still needs improvement after #MeToo. Bloomberg Law Oct. 24. https://news.bloomberglaw.com/daily-labor-report/workplace-conduct-still-needs-improvement-after-metoo
    [Google Scholar]
20. Crijns H, Cauberghe V, Hudders L, Claeys A-S. 2017. How to deal with online consumer comments during a crisis? The impact of personalized organizational responses on organizational reputation. Comput. Hum. Behav. 75:619–31
    [Google Scholar]
21. Cropanzano R, Keplinger K, Lambert BK, Caza B, Ashford SJ. 2023. The organizational psychology of gig work: an integrative conceptual review. J. Appl. Psychol. 108:492–519
    [Google Scholar]
22. Davis J, Wolff H-G, Forret ML, Sullivan SE. 2020. Networking via LinkedIn: an examination of usage and career benefits. J. Vocat. Behav. 118:103396
    [Google Scholar]
23. Denner N, Viererbl B, Koch T. 2023. Effects of repeated corrections of misinformation on organizational trust: more is not always better. Int. J. Strateg. Commun. 17:139–53
    [Google Scholar]
24. Dubina KS, Kim J-L, Colato J, Rieley MJ. 2022. Projections overview and highlights, 2021–31. BLRS Monthly Labor Review Nov. https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2022/article/projections-overview-and-highlights-2021-31.htm#:∼:text=The%202.0%2Dpercent%20annual%20output,over%20the%202011%E2%88%9221%20decade
    [Google Scholar]
25. Elefant C. 2011. The power of social media: legal issues & best practices for utilities engaging social media. Energy Law J. 32:11–56
    [Google Scholar]
26. Ellmer M, Reichel A. 2021. Mind the channel! An affordance perspective on how digital voice channels encourage or discourage employee voice. Hum. Resour. Manag. J. 31:1259–76
    [Google Scholar]
27. Ernst BA, Banks GC, Loignon AC, Frear KA, Williams CE et al. 2021. Virtual charismatic leadership and signaling theory: a prospective meta-analysis in five countries. Leadersh. Q. 33:5101541
    [Google Scholar]
28. Etter M, Ravasi D, Colleoni E. 2019. Social media and the formation of organizational reputation. Acad. Manag. Rev. 44:128–52
    [Google Scholar]
29. Gallagher J, Safdar K, Terlep S. 2020. Adidas Tweeted against racism. Its Black workers say that isn't enough. Wall Street Journal June 8. https://www.wsj.com/articles/workers-press-adidas-estee-lauder-others-to-act-on-racism-diversity-11591660452
    [Google Scholar]
30. Gelfand MJ, Leslie LM, Keller K, de Dreu C. 2012. Conflict cultures in organizations: how leaders shape conflict cultures and their organizational-level consequences. J. Appl. Psychol. 97:61131–47
    [Google Scholar]
31. Gibbs JL, Kim H, Ki S. 2019. Investigating the role of control and support mechanisms in members’ sense of virtual community. Commun. Res. 46:1117–45
    [Google Scholar]
32. Gloor JL, Cooper CD, Bowes-Sperry L, Chawla N. 2022. Risqué business? Interpersonal anxiety and humor in the #MeToo era. J. Appl. Psychol. 107:6932–50
    [Google Scholar]
33. Groves RM. 2011. Three eras of survey research. Public Opin. Q. 75:5861–71
    [Google Scholar]
34. Hao K. 2021. She exposed how Facebook enabled global political manipulation. Now she's telling her story. MIT Technology Review July 29. https://www.technologyreview.com/2021/07/29/1030260/facebook-whistleblower-sophie-zhang-global-political-manipulation/
    [Google Scholar]
35. Haslam SA, Reicher SD, Selvanathan HP, Gaffney AM, Steffens NK et al. 2022. Examining the role of Donald Trump and his supporters in the 2021 assault on the U.S. Capitol: a dual-agency model of identity leadership and engaged followership. Leadersh. Q. 34:2101622
    [Google Scholar]
36. Heavey C, Simsek Z, Kyprianou C, Risius M. 2020. How do strategic leaders engage with social media? A theoretical framework for research and practice. Strateg. Manag. J. 41:81490–1527
    [Google Scholar]
37. Heilweil R. 2020. Your Slack DMs aren't as private as you think. Vox April 2. https://www.vox.com/recode/2020/1/24/21079275/slack-private-messages-privacy-law-enforcement-lawsuit
    [Google Scholar]
38. Hickman L, Thapa S, Tay L, Cao M, Srinivasan P. 2022. Text preprocessing for text mining in organizational research: review and recommendations. Organ. Res. Methods 25:1114–46
    [Google Scholar]
39. Holland P, Jeske D. 2017. Changing role of social media at work: implications for recruitment and selection. Electronic HRM in the Smart Era T Bondarouk, HJM Ruël, Parry E 287–310 Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publ
    [Google Scholar]
40. Houghton DJ, Hodder A. 2021. Understanding trade union usage of social media: a case study of the Public and Commercial Services union on Facebook and Twitter. New Technol. Work Employ. 36:2219–39
    [Google Scholar]
41. Howardson GN, Behrend TS. 2016. Coming full circle with reactions: understanding the structure and correlates of trainee reactions through the affect circumplex. Acad. Manag. Learn. Educ. 15:3471–92
    [Google Scholar]
42. Jaidka K, Giorgi S, Schwartz HA, Kern ML, Ungar LH, Eichstaedt JC. 2020. Estimating geographic subjective well-being from Twitter: a comparison of dictionary and data-driven language methods. PNAS 117:1910165–71
    [Google Scholar]
43. Johnson S, Keplinger K, Kirk J, Barnes L. 2019. Has sexual harassment at work decreased since #MeToo?. Harvard Business Review July 18. https://hbr.org/2019/07/has-sexual-harassment-at-work-decreased-since-metoo
    [Google Scholar]
44. Kaplan AM, Haenlein M. 2010. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Bus. Horiz. 53:159–68
    [Google Scholar]
45. Kemp S. 2022. Digital 2022: July Global Statshot Report. DataReportal July 21. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2022-july-global-statshot
    [Google Scholar]
46. Kern ML, Park G, Eichstaedt JC, Schwartz HA, Sap M et al. 2016. Gaining insights from social media language: methodologies and challenges. Psychol. Method. 21:4507–25
    [Google Scholar]
47. Kerr A, Waddington J. 2014. E-communications: An aspect of union renewal or merely doing things electronically?. Br. J. Ind. Relat. 52:4658–81
    [Google Scholar]
48. Kim S, Park Y, Niu Q. 2017. Micro-break activities at work to recover from daily work demands. J. Organ. Behav. 38:128–44
    [Google Scholar]
49. Kobayashi VB, Mol ST, Berkers HA, Kismihók G, Den Hartog DN. 2018. Text mining in organizational research. Organ. Res. Methods 21:3733–65
    [Google Scholar]
50. Kosinski M, Wang Y, Lakkaraju H, Leskovec J. 2016. Mining big data to extract patterns and predict real-life outcomes. Psychol. Methods 21:493–506
    [Google Scholar]
51. Kroeper KM, Williams HE, Murphy MC. 2022. Counterfeit diversity: how strategically misrepresenting gender diversity dampens organizations’ perceived sincerity and elevates women's identity threat concerns. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 122:399–426
    [Google Scholar]
52. Krouse S. 2021. How Google spies on its employees. The Information Sept. 23. https://www.theinformation.com/articles/how-google-spies-on-its-employees
    [Google Scholar]
53. Kwahk K-Y, Park D-H. 2016. The effects of network sharing on knowledge-sharing activities and job performance in enterprise social media environments. Comput. Hum. Behav. 55:826–39
    [Google Scholar]
54. Landers RN, Marin S. 2021. Theory and technology in organizational psychology: a review of technology integration paradigms and their effects on the validity of theory. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 8:235–58
    [Google Scholar]
55. Lauriano LA, Coacci T. 2023. Losing control: the uncertain management of concealable stigmas when work and social media collide. Acad. Manag. J. 66:1222–47
    [Google Scholar]
56. Leigh A, Melwani S. 2019. #BlackEmployeesMatter: mega-threats, identity fusion, and enacting positive deviance in organizations. Acad. Manag. Rev. 44:3546–91
    [Google Scholar]
57. Leonardi PM. 2015. Ambient awareness and knowledge acquisition: using social media to learn “who knows what” and “who knows whom. MIS Q. 39:4747–62
    [Google Scholar]
58. Leonardi PM. 2018. Social media and the development of shared cognition: the roles of network expansion, content integration, and triggered recalling. Organ. Sci. 29:4547–68
    [Google Scholar]
59. Leung FF, Gu FF, Li Y, Zhang JZ, Palmatier RW. 2022. Influencer marketing effectiveness. J. Mark. 86:693–115
    [Google Scholar]
60. Luqman A, Talwar S, Masood A, Dhir A. 2021. Does enterprise social media use promote employee creativity and well-being?. J. Bus. Res. 131:40–54
    [Google Scholar]
61. Makrides A, Vrontis D, Christofi M. 2020. The Gold Rush of digital marketing: assessing prospects of building brand awareness overseas. Bus. Perspect. Res. 8:14–20
    [Google Scholar]
62. Mann J. 2022. Staff say “stay away from Twitter 2.0” in blind reviews due to its “toxic” culture under Elon Musk. Business Insider Dec. 11. https://www.businessinsider.com/twitter-staff-stay-away-toxic-culture-elon-musk-blind-reviews-2022-12
    [Google Scholar]
63. Martin G, Parry E, Flowers P. 2015. Do social media enhance constructive employee voice all of the time or just some of the time?. Hum. Resour. Manag. J. 25:4541–62
    [Google Scholar]
64. Mathieu JE, Kukenberger MR, D'Innocenzo L, Reilly G. 2015. Modeling reciprocal team cohesion-performance relationships, as impacted by shared leadership and members’ competence. J. Appl. Psychol. 100:3713–34
    [Google Scholar]
65. Matthews MJ, Matthews SH, Wang D, Kelemen TK. 2022. Tweet, like, subscribe! Understanding leadership through social media use. Leadersh. Q. 33:1101580
    [Google Scholar]
66. McFarland LA, Ployhart RE. 2015. Social media: a contextual framework to guide research and practice. J. Appl. Psychol. 100:61653–77
    [Google Scholar]
67. Methot JR, Rosado-Solomon EH, Downes PE, Gabriel AS. 2021. Office chitchat as a social ritual: the uplifting yet distracting effects of daily small talk at work. Acad. Manag. J. 64:51445–71
    [Google Scholar]
68. Morelli NA, Illingworth AJ. 2019. The next wave of Internet-based recruitment. The Cambridge Handbook of Technology and Employee Behavior RN Landers 59–99 New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
69. Morrison EW. 2014. Employee voice and silence. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 1:173–97
    [Google Scholar]
70. Neeley TB, Leonardi PM. 2018. Enacting knowledge strategy through social media: passable trust and the paradox of nonwork interactions. Strateg. Manag. J. 39:3922–46
    [Google Scholar]
71. Nikolaou I. 2014. Social networking web sites in job search and employee recruitment. Int. J. Sel. Assess. 22:2179–89
    [Google Scholar]
72. Ollier-Malaterre A, Rothbard NP, Berg JM. 2013. When worlds collide in cyberspace: how boundary work in online social networks impacts professional relationships. Acad. Manag. Rev. 38:4645–69
    [Google Scholar]
73. Olmstead K, Lampe C, Ellison NB. 2016. Social media and the workplace. Pew Research Center June 22. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2016/06/22/social-media-and-the-workplace/
    [Google Scholar]
74. Oracle 2022. 37% of consumers trust social media influencers over brands. Oracle May 3. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/37-of-consumers-trust-social-media-influencers-over-brands-301538111.html
    [Google Scholar]
75. Oswald FL, Behrend TS, Putka DJ, Sinar E. 2020. Big data in industrial-organizational psychology and human resource management: forward progress for organizational research and practice. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 7:505–33
    [Google Scholar]
76. Pelling EL, White KM. 2009. The theory of planned behavior applied to young people's use of social networking web sites. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 12:6755–59
    [Google Scholar]
77. Pew Research Center 2021. Social media fact sheet. Pew Research Center Apr. 7. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/social-media/
    [Google Scholar]
78. Pillemer J, Rothbard NP. 2018. Friends without benefits: understanding the dark sides of workplace friendship. Acad. Manag. Rev. 43:4635–60
    [Google Scholar]
79. Qin C, Zhu H, Xu T, Zhu C, Ma C et al. 2020. An enhanced neural network approach to person-job fit in talent recruitment. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 38:21–33
    [Google Scholar]
80. Raghuram S, Hill NS, Gibbs JL, Maruping LM. 2019. Virtual work: bridging research clusters. Acad. Manag. Ann. 13:1308–41
    [Google Scholar]
81. Ravid DM, Tomczak DL, White JC, Behrend TS. 2020. EPM 20/20: a review, framework, and research agenda for electronic performance monitoring. J. Manag. 46:1100–26
    [Google Scholar]
82. Ray S, Herman N, Sen I. 2021. Disruptive transformation fueling gig economies. 2021 IEEE Technology and Engineering Management Conference1–7 New York: IEEE
    [Google Scholar]
83. Roth PL, Bobko P, Van Iddekinge CH, Thatcher JB. 2016. Social media in employee-selection-related decisions: a research agenda for uncharted territory. J. Manag. 42:1269–98
    [Google Scholar]
84. Roth PL, Thatcher JB, Bobko P, Matthews KD, Ellingson JE, Goldberg CB. 2020. Political affiliation and employment screening decisions: the role of similarity and identification processes. J. Appl. Psychol. 105:5472–86
    [Google Scholar]
85. Rothbard NP, Ramarajan L, Ollier-Malaterre A, Lee SS. 2022. OMG! My boss just friended me: how evaluations of colleagues’ disclosure, gender, and rank shape personal/professional boundary blurring online. Acad. Manag. J. 65:135–65
    [Google Scholar]
86. Roulin N, Levashina J. 2019. LinkedIn as a new selection method: psychometric properties and assessment approach. Pers. Psychol. 72:2187–211
    [Google Scholar]
87. Rubin BF. 2019. Amazon's worldwide worker walkout is just the tip of employee activism. CNET Oct. 17. https://www.cnet.com/culture/amazons-worldwide-worker-walkout-is-just-the-tip-of-employees-activism/
    [Google Scholar]
88. Schaarschmidt M, Walsh G, Ivens S. 2021. Digital war for talent: how profile reputations on company rating platforms drive job seekers’ application intentions. J. Vocat. Behav. 131:103644
    [Google Scholar]
89. Schnatterly K, Gangloff KA, Tuschke A. 2018. CEO wrongdoing: a review of pressure, opportunity, and rationalization. J. Manag. 44:62405–32
    [Google Scholar]
90. Schneider B, González-Romá V, Ostroff C, West MA. 2017. Organizational climate and culture: reflections on the history of the constructs in the Journal of Applied Psychology. J. Appl. Psychol. 102:468–82
    [Google Scholar]
91. Schoolov K. 2022. Unions are forming at Starbucks, Apple and Google. Here's why workers are organizing now. CNBC Aug. 5. https://www.cnbc.com/2022/08/05/why-starbucks-apple-and-google-are-unionizing-now-for-the-first-time.html
    [Google Scholar]
92. Schou PK, Bucher E. 2023. Divided we fall: the breakdown of gig worker solidarity in online communities. New Technol. Work Employ 38:3472–92
    [Google Scholar]
93. Spence M. 1973. Job market signaling. Q. J. Econ. 87:3355–74
    [Google Scholar]
94. Srivastava A, Bartol KM, Locke EA. 2006. Empowering leadership in management teams: effects on knowledge sharing, efficacy, and performance. Acad. Manag. J. 49:61239–51
    [Google Scholar]
95. Srivastava SB, Goldberg A, Manian VG, Potts C. 2018. Enculturation trajectories: language, cultural adaptation, and individual outcomes in organizations. Manag. Sci. 64:31348–64
    [Google Scholar]
96. Statistica Research Department 2021. Influencer marketing worldwide. Statista accessed Aug. 5, 2023. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1092819/global-influencer-market-size
    [Google Scholar]
97. Statista Research Department 2023a. Biggest social media platforms 2023, ranked by number of users. Statista accessed Aug. 5, 2023, https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/
    [Google Scholar]
98. Statista Research Department 2023b. Paid social ad spend in the U.S. 2022. Statista accessed Aug. 5, 2023. https://www.statista.com/statistics/736971/social-media-ad-spend-usa/
    [Google Scholar]
99. Statt N. 2019. Google accused of spying with new tool that flags large employee meetings. The Verge Oct. 23. https://www.theverge.com/2019/10/23/20929524/google-surveillance-tool-accused-employee-activism-protests-union-organizing
    [Google Scholar]
100. Su C. 2012. Who knows who knows what in the group? The effects of communication network centralities, use of digital knowledge repositories, and work remoteness on organizational members’ accuracy in expertise recognition. Commun. Res. 39:5614–40
     [Google Scholar]
101. Thornthwaite L, Balnave N, Barnes A. 2018. Unions and social media: prospects for gender inclusion. Gend. Work Organ. 25:4401–17
     [Google Scholar]
102. Treem JW, Leonardi PM. 2013. Social media use in organizations: exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Ann. Int. Commun. Assoc. 36:1143–89
     [Google Scholar]
103. Tsai W-HS, Men LR. 2017. Social CEOs: the effects of CEOs’ communication styles and parasocial interaction on social networking sites. New Media Soc. 19:111848–67
     [Google Scholar]
104. Tur B, Harstad J, Antonakis J. 2021. Effect of charismatic signaling in social media settings: evidence from TED and Twitter. Leadersh. Q. 33:5101476
     [Google Scholar]
105. Twitter 2016. New research: the value of influencers on Twitter. Twitter May 16. https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/a/2016/new-research-the-value-of-influencers-on-twitter#
     [Google Scholar]
106. Van Bavel JJ, Baicker K, Boggio PS, Capraro V, Cichocka A et al. 2020. Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nat. Hum. Behav. 4:5460–71
     [Google Scholar]
107. Van Iddekinge CH, Lanivich SE, Roth PL, Junco E. 2016. Social media for selection? Validity and adverse impact potential of a Facebook-based assessment. J. Manag. 42:71811–35
     [Google Scholar]
108. van Zoonen W, Verhoeven JWM, Vliegenthart R. 2016. How employees use Twitter to talk about work: a typology of work-related tweets. Comput. Hum. Behav. 55:329–39
     [Google Scholar]
109. Vosoughi S, Roy D, Aral S. 2018. The spread of true and false news online. Science 359:63801146–51
     [Google Scholar]
110. Walker M, Matsa KE. 2021. News consumption across social media in 2021. Pew Research Center Sept. 20. https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2021/09/20/news-consumption-across-social-media-in-2021/
     [Google Scholar]
111. Wang B, Liu Y, Parker SK. 2020. How does the use of information communication technology affect individuals? A work design perspective. Acad. Manag. Ann. 14:2695–725
     [Google Scholar]
112. Wang Q, Lau RYK, Xie H. 2021. The impact of social executives on firms’ mergers and acquisitions strategies: a difference-in-differences analysis. J. Bus. Res. 123:343–54
     [Google Scholar]
113. Wang X, Reger RK, Pfarrer MD. 2021. Faster, hotter, and more linked in: managing social disapproval in the social media era. Acad. Manag. Rev. 46:2275–98
     [Google Scholar]
114. Wenger EC, Snyder WM. 2000. Communities of practice: the organizational frontier. Harv. Bus. Rev. 78:1139–46
     [Google Scholar]
115. White JC, Ravid DM, Siderits IO, Behrend TS. 2022. An urgent call for I-O psychologists to produce timelier technology research. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 15:3441–59
     [Google Scholar]
116. Whiting SW, Podsakoff PM, Pierce JR. 2008. Effects of task performance, helping, voice, and organizational loyalty on performance appraisal ratings. J. Appl. Psychol. 93:1125–39
     [Google Scholar]
117. Wilkie D. 2013. Virtual whistle-blowing: employees bypass internal channels to expose wrongdoing. SHRM July 16. https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/employee-relations/pages/virtual-whistle-blowing-bypass-internal-channels-expose-wrongdoing.aspx#:∼:text=Ideally%2C%20employees%20would%20report%20illegal,compromised%20investigation%20into%20workplace%20wrongdoing
     [Google Scholar]
118. Winslow CJ, Sabat IE, Anderson AJ, Kaplan SA, Miller SJ. 2019. Development of a measure of informal workplace social interactions. Front. Psychol. 10:2043
     [Google Scholar]
119. Woo D, Endacott CG, Myers KK. 2022. Navigating water cooler talks without the water cooler: uncertainty and information seeking during remote socialization. Manag. Commun. Q. 37:2251–80
     [Google Scholar]
120. Wood AJ, Lehdonvirta V, Graham M. 2018. Workers of the Internet unite? Online freelancer organisation among remote gig economy workers in six Asian and African countries. New Technol. Work Employ. 33:295–112
     [Google Scholar]
121. Xu H, Zhang N, Zhou L. 2020. Validity concerns in research using organic data. J. Manag. 46:71257–74
     [Google Scholar]
122. Yee RWY, Miquel-Romero M-J, Cruz-Ros S. 2021. Why and how to use enterprise social media platforms: the employee's perspective. J. Bus. Res. 137:517–26
     [Google Scholar]
123. Yildirim P. 2020. How social media is shaping political campaigns Podcast, Knowledge at Wharton Aug. 17. https://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/podcast/knowledge-at-wharton-podcast/how-social-media-is-shaping-political-campaigns/
124. Yost AB, Behrend TS, Howardson G, Badger Darrow J, Jensen JM. 2019. Reactance to electronic surveillance: a test of antecedents and outcomes. J. Bus. Psychol. 34:171–86
     [Google Scholar]
125. Youyou W, Kosinski M, Stillwell D. 2015. Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans. PNAS 112:41036–40
     [Google Scholar]
126. Yu L, Cao X, Liu Z, Wang J. 2018. Excessive social media use at work: exploring the effects of social media overload on job performance. Inf. Technol. People 31:61091–112
     [Google Scholar]
127. Zhang C, Yu MC, Marin S. 2021. Exploring public sentiment on enforced remote work during COVID-19. J. Appl. Psychol. 106:6797–810
     [Google Scholar]
128. Zhang L, Van Iddekinge CH, Arnold JD, Roth PL, Lievens F et al. 2020. What's on job seekers’ social media sites? A content analysis and effects of structure on recruiter judgments and predictive validity. J. Appl. Psychol. 105:121530–46
     [Google Scholar]
129. Zhang X, Gao Y, Yan X, de Pablos PO, Sun Y, Cao X. 2015. From e-learning to social-learning: mapping development of studies on social media-supported knowledge management. Comput. Hum. Behav. 51:803–11
     [Google Scholar]