The use of social network theory and analysis methods as applied to public health has expanded greatly in the past decade, yielding a significant academic literature that spans almost every conceivable health issue. This review identifies several important theoretical challenges that confront the field but also provides opportunities for new research. These challenges include () measuring network influences, () identifying appropriate influence mechanisms, () the impact of social media and computerized communications, () the role of networks in evaluating public health interventions, and () ethics. Next steps for the field are outlined and the need for funding is emphasized. Recently developed network analysis techniques, technological innovations in communication, and changes in theoretical perspectives to include a focus on social and environmental behavioral influences have created opportunities for new theory and ever broader application of social networks to public health topics.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


Literature Cited

  1. Alexander C, Piazza M, Mekos D, Valente T. 1.  2001. Peers, schools, and adolescent cigarette smoking. J. Adolesc. Health 29:122–30 [Google Scholar]
  2. Allem J-P, Escobedo P, Chu K-H, Soto DW, Cruz TB, Unger JB. 2.  2016. Campaigns and counter campaigns: reactions on Twitter to e-cigarette education. Tob. Control https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052757 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bavelas A. 3.  1950. Communication patterns in task-oriented groups. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 22:6725–30 [Google Scholar]
  4. Beninger K, Fry A, Jago N, Lepps H, Nass L, Silvester H. 4.  2014. Research Using Social Media; Users’ Views London: NatCen Soc. Res. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bond RM, Fariss CJ, Jones JJ, Kramer ADI, Marlow C. 5.  et al. 2012. A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature 489:295–98 [Google Scholar]
  6. Borgatti SP. 6.  2002. NetDraw Software for Network Visualization Lexingon, KY: Anal. Technol https://sites.google.com/site/netdrawsoftware/home [Google Scholar]
  7. Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Johnson JC. 7.  2013. Analyzing Social Networks Los Angeles: Sage [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown CH, Mohr DC, Gallo CG, Mader C, Palinkas L. 8.  et al. 2013. A computational future for preventing HIV in minority communities: how advanced technology can improve implementation of effective programs. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 63:S72–84 [Google Scholar]
  9. Burt RS. 9.  1987. Social contagion and innovation: cohesion versus structural equivalence. Am. J. Sociol. 92:61287–335 [Google Scholar]
  10. Campbell R, Starkey F, Holliday J, Audrey S, Bloor M. 10.  et al. 2008. An informal school-based peer-led intervention for smoking prevention in adolescence (assist): a cluster randomised trial. Lancet 371:1595–602 [Google Scholar]
  11. Centola D. 11.  2010. The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment. Science 329:1194–97 [Google Scholar]
  12. Christakis NA, Fowler JH. 12.  2007. The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. N. Engl. J. Med. 357:4370–79 [Google Scholar]
  13. Chu K-H, Sidhu AK, Valente TW. 13.  2015. Electronic cigarette marketing online: a multi-site, multi-product comparison. JMIR Public Health Surveill 1:2e11 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cobb NK, Jacobs MA, Saul J, Wileyto EP, Graham AL. 14.  2014. Diffusion of an evidence-based smoking cessation intervention through Facebook: a randomised controlled trial study protocol. BMJ Open 4:1e004089 [Google Scholar]
  15. Coleman JS, Katz E, Menzel H. 15.  1966. Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study New York: Bobbs-Merrill [Google Scholar]
  16. de la Haye K, Robins G, Mohr P, Wilson C. 16.  2010. Obesity-related behaviors in adolescent friendship networks. Soc. Netw. 32:3161–67 [Google Scholar]
  17. Diamond JM. 17.  1999. Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies New York: Norton [Google Scholar]
  18. Dyal SR. 18.  2016. Network influences on behavior: a summary of Tom Valente's keynote address at Sunbelt xxxv: the annual meeting of the International Network for Social Network Analysis. Connections 35:252–57 [Google Scholar]
  19. Ennett ST, Bauman KE. 19.  1993. Peer group structure and adolescent cigarette smoking: a social network analysis. J. Health Soc. Behav. 34:3226–36 [Google Scholar]
  20. Entwisle B, Rindfuss RR, Guilkey DK, Chamratrithirong A, Curran SR, Sawangdee Y. 20.  1996. Community and contraceptive choice in rural Thailand: a case study of Nang Rong. Demography 33:11–11 [Google Scholar]
  21. Evans H, Ginnis S, Bartlett J. 21.  2015. #SocialEthics: A Guide to Embedding Ethics in Social Media Research London: Wisdom of the Crowd [Google Scholar]
  22. Foxcroft DR, Moreira MT, Almeida Santimano NM, Smith LA. 22.  2015. Social norms information for alcohol misuse in university and college students. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 1:CD006748 [Google Scholar]
  23. Freedman AM, Kuester SA, Jernigan J. 23.  2013. Evaluating public health resources: What happens when funding disappears?. Prev. Chronic. Dis. 10:E190 [Google Scholar]
  24. Freeman LC. 24.  2004. The Development of Social Network Analysis: A Study in the Sociology of Science Vancouver, BC/North Charleston, SC: Empirical Press/BookSurge [Google Scholar]
  25. Fujimoto K, Valente TW, Pentz MA. 25.  2009. Network structural influences on the adoption of evidence-based prevention in communities. J. Community Psychol. 37:7830–45 [Google Scholar]
  26. Fung BCM, Wang K, Chen R, Yu PS. 26.  2010. Privacy-preserving data publishing: a survey of recent developments. ACM Comput. Surv. 42:41–53 [Google Scholar]
  27. Gayen K, Raeside R. 27.  2010. Social networks and contraception practice of women in rural Bangladesh. Soc. Sci. Med. 71:91584–92 [Google Scholar]
  28. Gesell SB, Barkin SL, Sommer EC, Thompson JR, Valente TW. 28.  2016. Increases in network ties are associated with increased cohesion among intervention participants. Health Educ. Behav. 43:2208–16 [Google Scholar]
  29. Gross CP, Cruz-Correa M, Canto MI, McNeil-Solis C, Valente TW, Powe NR. 29.  2002. The adoption of ablation therapy for Barrett's esophagus: a cohort study of gastroenterologists. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 97:2279–86 [Google Scholar]
  30. Hall JA, Valente TW. 30.  2007. Adolescent smoking networks: the effects of influence and selection on future smoking. Addict. Behav. 32:123054–59 [Google Scholar]
  31. Harriman S, Patel J. 31.  2014. The ethics and editorial challenges of Internet-based research. BMC Med 12:1124 [Google Scholar]
  32. Heckathorn DD. 32.  1997. Respondent-driven sampling: a new approach to the study of hidden populations. Soc. Probl. 44:2174–99 [Google Scholar]
  33. Hether HJ, Murphy ST, Valente TW. 33.  2016. A social network analysis of supportive interactions on prenatal sites. Digit. Health 2:1–12 [Google Scholar]
  34. Hinz O, Skiera B, Barrot C, Becker JU. 34.  2011. Seeding strategies for viral marketing: an empirical comparison. J. Mark. 75:655–71 [Google Scholar]
  35. Holmes L. 35.  2014. Lab rats, one and all: that unsettling Facebook experiment. Monkey See Pop-Culture News and Analysis from NPR June 30. http://www.npr.org/sections/monkeysee/2014/06/30/326923945/lab-rats-one-and-all-that-unsettling-facebook-experiment [Google Scholar]
  36. House JS, Umberson D, Landis KR. 36.  1988. Structures and processes of social support. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 14:293–318 [Google Scholar]
  37. Huang GC, Unger JB, Soto D, Fujimoto K, Pentz MA. 37.  et al. 2014. Peer influences: the impact of online and offline friendship networks on adolescent smoking and alcohol use. J. Adolesc. Health 54:5508–14 [Google Scholar]
  38. Hunter RF, McAneney H, Davis M, Tully MA, Valente TW, Kee F. 38.  2015. “Hidden” social networks in behavior change interventions. Am. J. Public Health 105:3513–16 [Google Scholar]
  39. Hutton L, Henderson T. 39.  2013. An architecture for ethical and privacy-sensitive social network experiments. ACM SIGMETRICS Perform. Eval. Rev. 40:490–95 [Google Scholar]
  40. Hutton L, Henderson T. 40.  2015. “I didn't sign up for this!”: informed consent in social network research. Proc. Int. AAAI Conf. Web Soc. Media, 9th, Oxford178–87 Palo Alto, CA: Assoc. Adv. Artif. Intell. [Google Scholar]
  41. Iyengar R, Van den Bulte C, Valente TW. 41.  2011. Opinion leadership and social contagion in new product diffusion. Mark. Sci. 30:2195–212 [Google Scholar]
  42. Kadushin C. 42.  2005. Who benefits from network analysis: ethics of social network research. Soc. Netw. 27:2139–53 [Google Scholar]
  43. Kadushin C. 43.  2012. Understanding Social Networks: Theories, Concepts, and Findings New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  44. Katz E. 44.  1957. The two-step flow of communication: an up-to-date report on an hypothesis. Public Opin. Q. 21:61–78 [Google Scholar]
  45. Kelly JA, Amirkhanian YA, Kabakchieva E, Vassileva S, Vassilev B. 45.  et al. 2006. Prevention of HIV and sexually transmitted diseases in high risk social networks of young Roma (Gypsy) men in Bulgaria: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 333:1098–98 [Google Scholar]
  46. Kim DA, Hwong AR, Stafford D, Hughes DA, O'Malley AJ. 46.  et al. 2015. Social network targeting to maximise population behaviour change: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet 386:145–53 [Google Scholar]
  47. Klovdahl AS. 47.  2005. Social network research and human subjects protection: towards more effective infectious disease control. Soc. Netw. 27:2119–37 [Google Scholar]
  48. Kramer ADI, Guillory JE, Hancock JT. 48.  2014. Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. PNAS 111:248788–90 [Google Scholar]
  49. Kwait J, Marconi K, Helitzer D, Rodieck MW, Randall T, Celentano D. 49.  1999. Ryan White Care Act Title I funding priorities and unmet service needs in Baltimore, Maryland. Policy Stud. J. 27:4855–71 [Google Scholar]
  50. Kwasnicka D, Dombrowski SU, White M, Sniehotta F. 50.  2016. Theoretical explanations for maintenance of behaviour change: a systematic review of behaviour theories. Health Psychol. Rev. 10:277–96 [Google Scholar]
  51. Lazer D, Pentland A, Adamic L, Aral S, Barabasi A-L. 51.  et al. 2009. Social science: computational social science. Science 323:721–23 [Google Scholar]
  52. Lerman K, Yan X, Wu X-Z. 52.  2016. The “majority illusion” in social networks. PLOS ONE 11:2e0147617 [Google Scholar]
  53. Lewis K, Kaufman J, Gonzalez M, Wimmer A, Christakis N. 53.  2008. Tastes, ties, and time: a new social network dataset using Facebook.com. Soc. Netw. 30:4330–42 [Google Scholar]
  54. Lomas J. 54.  1991. Opinion leaders versus audit and feedback to implement practice guidelines: delivery after previous cesarean section. JAMA 265:172202–7 [Google Scholar]
  55. Luke DA, Harris JK. 55.  2007. Network analysis in public health: history, methods, and applications. Annu. Rev. Public Health 28:69–93 [Google Scholar]
  56. Markham A, Buchanan E. 56.  2012. Ethical Decision-Making and Internet Research Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee (Version 2.0) Chicago: Assoc. Internet Res. [Google Scholar]
  57. McCormick TH, Lee H, Cesare N, Shojaie A, Spiro ES. 57.  2015. Using Twitter for demographic and social science research: tools for data collection and processing. Sociol. Methods Res. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124115605339 [Google Scholar]
  58. McNeill WH. 58.  1989. Plagues and Peoples New York: Anchor Books [Google Scholar]
  59. Mercken L, Snijders TAB, Steglich C, Vertiainen E, De Vries H. 59.  2010. Smoking-based selection and influence in gender-segregated friendship networks: a social network analysis of adolescent smoking: social network analysis of adolescent smoking. Addiction 105:71280–89 [Google Scholar]
  60. Moody J, Brynildsen WD, Osgood DW, Feinberg ME, Gest S. 60.  2011. Popularity trajectories and substance use in early adolescence. Soc. Netw. 33:2101–12 [Google Scholar]
  61. Morris M. 61. Int. Union Sci. Study Popul. 2004. Network Epidemiology: A Handbook for Survey Design and Data Collection Oxford, UK/New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  62. Mouttapa M, Valente T, Gallaher P, Rohrbach LA, Unger JB. 62.  2004. Social network predictors of bullying and victimization. Adolescence 39:154315–35 [Google Scholar]
  63. 63. Natl. Cent. Chronic Dis. Prev. Health Promot. (US) Off. Smok. Health. 2012. Preventing Tobacco Use Among Youth and Young Adults: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta: Cent. Dis. Control Prev. [Google Scholar]
  64. Neaigus A, Friedman SR, Curtis R, Des Jarlais DC, Furst RT. 64.  et al. 1994. The relevance of drug injectors’ social and risk networks for understanding and preventing HIV infection. Soc. Sci. Med. 38:167–78 [Google Scholar]
  65. Palinkas L, Spear SE, Mendon SJ, Villamar J, Valente TW. 65.  et al. 2015. Measuring sustainment of prevention programs and initiatives: a study protocol. Implement. Sci. 11:95 [Google Scholar]
  66. Pallotti F, Tubaro P, Casilli A, Valente TW. 66.  2016. “You see yourself like in a mirror”: the effects of Internet-mediated personal networks on body image and eating disorders Work. Pap., Cent. Bus. Netw. Anal., Univ. Greenwich. http://gala.gre.ac.uk/15685/1/2016_CBNA%232_Pallotti%20et%20al.pdf [Google Scholar]
  67. Poirier J, Cobb NK. 67.  2012. Social influence as a driver of engagement in a web-based health intervention. J. Med. Internet Res. 14:1e36 [Google Scholar]
  68. Provan KG, Milward HB. 68.  1995. A preliminary theory of interorganizational network effectiveness: a comparative study of four community mental health systems. Adm. Sci. Q. 40:11–33 [Google Scholar]
  69. Richards P, Amara J, Ferme MC, Kamara P, Mokuwa E. 69.  et al. 2015. Social pathways for Ebola virus disease in rural Sierra Leone, and some implications for containment. PLOS Negl. Trop. Dis. 9:4e0003567 [Google Scholar]
  70. Rogers EM, Kincaid DL. 70.  1981. Communication Networks: Toward a New Paradigm for Research New York: Free Press [Google Scholar]
  71. Schölmerich VLN, Kawachi I. 71.  2016. Translating the socio-ecological perspective into multilevel interventions: gaps between theory and practice. Health Educ. Behav. 43:117–20 [Google Scholar]
  72. Shalizi CR, Thomas AC. 72.  2011. Homophily and contagion are generically confounded in observational social network studies. Sociol. Methods Res. 40:2211–39 [Google Scholar]
  73. Shin H-S, Valente TW, Riggs NR, Huh J, Spruijt-Metz D. 73.  et al. 2014. The interaction of social networks and child obesity prevention program effects: the pathways trial. Obesity 22:61520–26 [Google Scholar]
  74. Siettos CI, Anastassopoulou C, Russo L, Grigoras C, Mylonakis E. 74.  2016. Forecasting and control policy assessment for the Ebola virus disease (EVD) epidemic in Sierra Leone using small-world networked model simulations. BMJ Open 6:1e008649 [Google Scholar]
  75. Snee H. 75.  2008. Web 2.0 as a Social Science Research Tool London: Br. Libr. ESRC Gov. Place. Scheme http://www.bl.uk/reshelp/bldept/socsci/socint/web2/web2.pdf [Google Scholar]
  76. Valente TW. 76.  1995. Network Models of the Diffusion of Innovations Cresskill, NJ: Hampton [Google Scholar]
  77. Valente TW. 77.  1996. Social network thresholds in the diffusion of innovations. Soc. Netw. 18:169–89 [Google Scholar]
  78. Valente TW. 78.  2002. Evaluating Health Promotion Programs New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  79. Valente TW. 79.  2010. Social Networks and Health: Models, Methods, and Applications Oxford/New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  80. Valente TW. 80.  2012. Network interventions. Science 337:49–53 [Google Scholar]
  81. Valente TW. 81.  2015. Social networks and health behavior. Health Behavior: Theory, Research, and Practice K Glanz, BK Rimer, K Viswanath 205–22 New York: Wiley, 5th ed.. [Google Scholar]
  82. Valente TW, Coronges KA, Stevens GD, Cousineau MR. 82.  2008. Collaboration and competition in a children's health initiative coalition: a network analysis. Eval. Progr. Plan. 31:4392–402 [Google Scholar]
  83. Valente TW, Dougherty L, Stammer E. 83.  2017. Response bias over time: interviewer learning and missing data in egocentric network surveys. Submitted
  84. Valente TW, Dyal SR, Chu K-H, Wipfli H, Fujimoto K. 84.  2015. Diffusion of innovations theory applied to global tobacco control treaty ratification. Soc. Sci. Med. 145:89–97 [Google Scholar]
  85. Valente TW, Fujimoto K, Palmer P, Tanjasiri SP. 85.  2010. A network assessment of community-based participatory research: linking communities and universities to reduce cancer disparities. Am. J. Public Health 100:71319–25 [Google Scholar]
  86. Valente TW, Fujimoto K, Soto D, Ritt-Olson A, Unger JB. 86.  2013. A comparison of peer influence measures as predictors of smoking among predominately Hispanic/Latino high school adolescents. J. Adolesc. Health 52:3358–64 [Google Scholar]
  87. Valente TW, Palinkas LA, Czaja S, Chu K-H, Brown CH. 87.  2015. Social network analysis for program implementation. PLOS ONE 10:6e0131712 [Google Scholar]
  88. Valente TW, Rogers EM. 88.  1995. The origins and development of the diffusion of innovations paradigm as an example of scientific growth. Sci. Commun. 16:3242–73 [Google Scholar]
  89. Valente TW, Saba WP. 89.  1998. Mass media and interpersonal influence in a reproductive health communication campaign in Bolivia. Commun. Res. 25:196–124 [Google Scholar]
  90. Valente TW, Watkins SC, Jato MN, Van Der Straten A, Tsitsol L-PM. 90.  1997. Social network associations with contraceptive use among Cameroonian women in voluntary associations. Soc. Sci. Med. 45:5677–87 [Google Scholar]
  91. Vanhems P, Barrat A, Cattuto C, Pinton J-F, Khanafer N. 91.  et al. 2013. Estimating potential infection transmission routes in hospital wards using wearable proximity sensors. PLOS ONE 8:9e73970 [Google Scholar]
  92. Wesolowski A, Buckee CO, Bengtsson L, Wetter E, Lu X, Tatem AJ. 92.  2014. Commentary: Containing the Ebola outbreak—the potential and challenge of mobile network data. PLOS Curr 6: https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.outbreaks.0177e7fcf52217b8b634376e2f3efc5e [Google Scholar]
  93. West E, Barron DN, Dowsett J, Newton JN. 93.  1999. Hierarchies and cliques in the social networks of health care professionals: implications for the design of dissemination strategies. Soc. Sci. Med. 48:5633–46 [Google Scholar]
  94. 94. Work. Party Internet-Mediat. Res. 2013. Ethics Guidelines for Internet-Mediated Research. Leicester, UK: Br. Psychol. Soc. [Google Scholar]
  95. Yeung K-T, Martin JL. 95.  2003. The looking glass self: an empirical test and elaboration. Soc. Forces 81:3843–79 [Google Scholar]
  96. Zappa P, Lomi A. 96.  2015. The analysis of multilevel networks in organizations: models and empirical tests. Organ. Res. Methods. 18:3542–69 [Google Scholar]
  97. Zimmer M. 97.  2010. “But the data is already public”: on the ethics of research in Facebook. Ethics Inf. Technol. 12:4313–25 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error