Scholars and practitioners alike in recent years have suggested that real and lasting progress in the fight against gun violence requires changing the social norms and attitudes that perpetuate violence and the use of guns. The Cure Violence model is a public health approach to gun violence reduction that seeks to change individual and community attitudes and norms about gun violence. It considers gun violence to be analogous to a communicable disease that passes from person to person when left untreated. Cure Violence operates independently of, while hopefully not undermining, law enforcement. In this article, we describe the theoretical basis for the program, review existing program evaluations, identify several challenges facing evaluators, and offer directions for future research.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


Literature Cited

  1. Bell K, Salmon A, Bowers M, Bell J, McCullough L. 1.  2010. Smoking, stigma and tobacco ‘denormalization’: further reflections on the use of stigma as a public health tool. A commentary on Social Science & Medicine's Stigma, Prejudice, Discrimination and Health Special Issue (67: 3). Soc. Sci. Med. 70:795–99 [Google Scholar]
  2. Berkowitz AD. 2.  2003. Applications of social norms theory to other health and social justice issues. The Social Norms Approach to Preventing School and College Age Substance Abuse: A Handbook for Educators, Counselors, Clinicians HW Perkins 259–79 San Francisco: Jossey-Bass [Google Scholar]
  3. Butts JA, Roman C. 3.  2013. Cure Violence Evaluation Plan New York: Res. Eval. Cent., John Jay Coll. Crim. Justice, City Univ. NY http://johnjayrec.nyc/2013/02/01/cv2013/ [Google Scholar]
  4. Fox AM, Katz CM, Choate DE, Hedberg EC. 4.  2015. Evaluation of the Phoenix TRUCE project: a replication of Chicago CeaseFire. Justice Q. 32:85–115 [Google Scholar]
  5. Hemenway D. 5.  2013. Preventing gun violence by changing social norms. JAMA Intern. Med. 173:1167–68 [Google Scholar]
  6. Kennedy DM. 6.  2010. Taking criminology seriously: narratives, norms, networks, and common ground. Youth Gangs and Community Intervention: Research, Practice, and Evidence R Chaskin 206–21 New York: Columbia Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  7. Kennedy DM. 7.  2011. Don't Shoot: One Man, A Street Fellowship, and the End of Violence in Inner-City America New York: Bloomsbury [Google Scholar]
  8. Melde C, Gavazzi S, McGarrell E, Bynum T. 8.  2011. On the efficacy of targeted gang interventions: Can we identify those most at risk?. Youth Violence Juv. Justice 9:279–94 [Google Scholar]
  9. Picard-Fritsche S, Cerniglia L. 9.  2013. Testing a Public Health Approach to Gun Violence: An Evaluation of Crown Heights Save Our Streets, a Replication of the Cure Violence Model New York: Cent. Court Innov. [Google Scholar]
  10. Skogan WG, Hartnett SM, Bump N, Dubois J. 10.  2009. Evaluation of CeaseFire-Chicago Evanston, IL: Inst. Policy Res., Northwest. Univ. [Google Scholar]
  11. Telep CW, Weisburd D. 11.  2012. What is known about the effectiveness of police practices in reducing crime and disorder?. Police Q. 15:331–57 [Google Scholar]
  12. Webster DW, Mendel Whitehill J, Vernick JS, Curriero FC. 12.  2012. Effects of Baltimore's Safe Streets program on gun violence: a replication of Chicago's CeaseFire program. J. Urban Health 90:27–40 [Google Scholar]
  13. Webster DW, Mendel Whitehill J, Vernick JS, Parker EM. 13.  2012. Evaluation of Baltimore's Safe Streets Program: Effects on Attitudes, Participants' Experiences, and Gun Violence Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Cent. Prev. Youth Violence [Google Scholar]
  14. Welsh BC, Braga AA, Sullivan CJ. 14.  2014. Serious youth violence and innovative prevention: on the emerging link between public health and criminology. Justice Q. 31:500–23 [Google Scholar]
  15. Wilson JM, Chermak S. 15.  2011. Community-driven violence reduction programs: examining Pittsburgh's One Vision One Life. Criminol. Public Policy 10:993–1027 [Google Scholar]
  16. Wilson JM, Chermak S, McGarrell EF. 16.  2011. Community-Based Violence Prevention: An Assessment of Pittsburgh's One Vision One Life Program Santa Monica: RAND [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error