1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Public Health
  4. Volume 41, 2020
  5. Article

Annual Review of Public Health

Volume 41, 2020

Autonomous Vehicles and Public Health

Abstract

Autonomous vehicles (AVs) have the potential to shape urban life and significantly modify travel behaviors. “Autonomous technology” means technology that can drive a vehicle without active physical control or monitoring by a human operator. The first AV fleets are already in service in US cities. AVs offer a variety of automation, vehicle ownership, and vehicle use options. AVs could increase some health risks (such as air pollution, noise, and sedentarism); however, if proper regulated, AVs will likely reduce morbidity and mortality from motor vehicle crashes and may help reshape cities to promote healthy urban environments. Healthy models of AV use include fully electric vehicles in a system of ridesharing and ridesplitting. Public health will benefit if proper policies and regulatory frameworks are implemented before the complete introduction of AVs into the market.

Keyword(s): autonomous vehicles, built environment, environmental health, public health, self-driving cars, transportation
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094035
2020-04-01
2024-10-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/publhealth/41/1/annurev-publhealth-040119-094035.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094035&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. 1. 
    Adams I, Hobson A. 2016.. Self-driving cars will make organ shortages even worse. . Slate, Dec. 30. https://slate.com/technology/2016/12/self-driving-cars-will-exacerbate-organ-shortages.html
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 2. 
    Ainsalu J, Arffman V, Bellone M, Ellner M, Haapamäki T, et al. 2018.. State of the art of automated buses. . Sustainability 10:(9):3118
     [Google Scholar]
  3. 3. 
    Amato F, Cassee FR, Denier van der Gon HAC, Gehrig R, Gustafsson M, et al. 2014.. Urban air quality: the challenge of traffic non-exhaust emissions. . J. Hazard. Mater. 275::31–36
     [Google Scholar]
  4. 4. 
    Anenberg S, Miller J, Henze D, Minjares R. 2019.. A global snapshot of the air pollution-related health impacts of transportation sector emissions in 2010 and 2015. . Rep., Int. Counc. Clean Transp. (ICCT), Washington, DC:. https://theicct.org/sites/default/files/publications/Global_health_impacts_transport_emissions_2010-2015_20190226.pdf
  5. 5. 
    Antoun M, Edwards KM, Sweeting J, Ding D. 2017.. The acute physiological stress response to driving: a systematic review. . PLOS ONE 12:(10):e0185517
     [Google Scholar]
  6. 6. 
    Basner M, McGuire S. 2018.. WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region: a systematic review on environmental noise and effects on sleep. . Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15:(3):E519
     [Google Scholar]
  7. 7. 
    Bel G, Holst M. 2018.. Evaluation of the impact of bus rapid transit on air pollution. . Transport Policy 63::209–20
     [Google Scholar]
  8. 8. 
    Besser LM, Marcus M, Frumkin H. 2008.. Commute time and social capital in the U.S. . Am. J. Prev. Med. 34:(3):207–11
     [Google Scholar]
  9. 9. 
    Brown AL. 2015.. Effects of road traffic noise on health: from burden of disease to effectiveness of interventions. . Procedia Environ. Sci. 30::3–9
     [Google Scholar]
  10. 10. 
    Brown AL, Van Kamp I. 2017.. WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region: a systematic review of transport noise interventions and their impacts on health. . Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 14::E873
     [Google Scholar]
  11. 11. 
    BTS (Bur. Transp. Stat.). 2017.. National household travel survey daily travel quick facts. . Bureau of Transportation Statistics. https://www.bts.gov/statistical-products/surveys/national-household-travel-survey-daily-travel-quick-facts
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 12. 
    Chang D. 2008.. Comparison of crash fatalities by sex and age group. Res. Note DOT HS 810 853, Natl. Cent. Stat. Anal. Washington, DC:. https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/810853
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 13. 
    Christian TJ. 2012.. Automobile commuting duration and the quantity of time spent with spouse, children, and friends. . Prev. Med. 55:(3):215–18
     [Google Scholar]
  14. 14. 
    Clark C, Paunovic K. 2018.. WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region: a systematic review on environmental noise and quality of life, wellbeing and mental health. . Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15:(11):E2400
     [Google Scholar]
  15. 15. 
    Clendinning EA. 2018.. Driving future sounds: imagination, identity and safety in electric vehicle noise design. . Sound Stud. 4:(1):61–76
     [Google Scholar]
  16. 16. 
    Cohen S, Shirazi S, Curtis T. 2017.. Can we advance social equity with shared, autonomous and electric vehicles? Policy Brief, Inst. Transp. Stud., Univ. Calif., Davis. http://www.transformca.org/sites/default/files/3R.Equity.Indesign.Final_.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 17. 
    Cohn J, Ezike R, Martin J, Donkor K, Ridgway M, Balding M. 2019.. Examining the equity impacts of autonomous vehicles: a travel demand model approach. . Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board, 2673::23–35
     [Google Scholar]
  18. 18. 
    Cottrell ND, Barton BK. 2013.. The role of automation in reducing stress and negative affect while driving. . Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 14:(1):53–68
     [Google Scholar]
  19. 19. 
    Creger H, Espino J, Sanchez AS. 2019.. Autonomous vehicle heaven or hell? Creating a transportation revolution that benefits all. Rep., Greenlining Inst., Oakland:. http://greenlining.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/R4_AutonomousVehiclesReportSingle_2019_2.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 20. 
    CSPC (Cent. Study Pres. Congr.). 2017.. The autonomous vehicle revolution: fostering innovation with smart regulation. Rep., CSPC, Washington, DC:
     [Google Scholar]
  21. 21. 
    Dalrymple G. 2013.. Minimum sound requirements for hybrid and electric vehicles. Draft Environ. Assess. Docket NHTSA-2011-0100, US Dep. Transp. Natl. Highw. Traffic Saf. Adm., Washington, DC:. https://www.nhtsa.gov/staticfiles/rulemaking/pdf/Quiet_Cars_Draft_EA.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 22. 
    de Nazelle A, Bode O, Orjuela JP. 2017.. Comparison of air pollution exposures in active versus passive travel modes in European cities: a quantitative review. . Environ. Int. 99::151–60
     [Google Scholar]
  23. 23. 
    de Nazelle A, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Antó JM, Brauer M, Briggs D, et al. 2011.. Improving health through policies that promote active travel: a review of evidence to support integrated health impact assessment. . Environ. Int. 37:(4):766–77
     [Google Scholar]
  24. 24. 
    Dons E, Götschi T, Nieuwenhuijsen M, de Nazelle A, Anaya E, et al. 2015.. Physical Activity through Sustainable Transport Approaches (PASTA): protocol for a multi-centre, longitudinal study. . BMC Public Health 15:(1):1126
     [Google Scholar]
  25. 25. 
    Etherington D. 2019.. Over 1,400 self-driving vehicles are now in testing by 80+ companies across the US. . Techcrunch, June 11. https://techcrunch.com/2019/06/11/over-1400-self-driving-vehicles-are-now-in-testing-by-80-companies-across-the-u-s/
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 26. 
    2016.. Technology and the future of cities. Rep. Pres., Exec. Off. Pres., Washington, DC:. https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/whitehouse.gov/files/images/Blog/PCAST%20Cities%20Report%20_%20FINAL.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  27. 27. 
    Fagnant DJ, Kockelman KM. 2014.. The travel and environmental implications of shared autonomous vehicles, using agent-based model scenarios. . Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 40::1–13
     [Google Scholar]
  28. 28. 
    Favarò FM, Nader N, Eurich SO, Tripp M, Varadaraju N. 2017.. Examining accident reports involving autonomous vehicles in California. . PLOS ONE 12::e0184952
     [Google Scholar]
  29. 29. 
    Frumkin H, Haines A. 2019.. Global environmental change and noncommunicable disease risks. . Annu. Rev. Public Health 40::261–82
     [Google Scholar]
  30. 30. 
    Gen. Motors. 2018.. 2018 self-driving safety report. Rep., Gen. Motors, Detroit, MI:. https://www.gm.com/content/dam/company/docs/us/en/gmcom/gmsafetyreport.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  31. 31. 
    Groshen EL, Helper S, Macduffie JP, Carson C. 2018.. Preparing U.S. workers and employers for an autonomous vehicle future. Rep., Secur. Am. Futur. Energy, Washington, DC:. https://avworkforce.secureenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Groshen-et-al-Report-June-2018-1.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  32. 32. 
    Guski R, Schreckenberg D, Schuemer R. 2017.. WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region: a systematic review on environmental noise and annoyance. . Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 14:(12):E1539
     [Google Scholar]
  33. 33. 
    Gwilliam K, Kojima M, Johnson T. 2004.. Reducing air pollution from urban transport. Rep., World Bank, Washington, DC:. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/989711468328204490/pdf/304250PAPER0Reducing0air0pollution.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  34. 34. 
    Health Effects Inst. 2018.. State of Global Air/2018. A special report on global exposure to air pollution and its disease burden. Rep., Health Effects Inst., Boston:. https://www.stateofglobalair.org/sites/default/files/soga-2018-report.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  35. 35. 
    Henaghan J, ed. 2018.. Preparing communities for autonomous vehicles. Rep., Am. Plan. Assoc., Chicago:. https://planning-org-uploaded-media.s3.amazonaws.com/document/Autonomous-Vehicles-Symposium-Report.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  36. 36. 
    Inst. Med. Natl. Acad. 2006.. Organ Donation: Opportunities for Action. Washington, DC:: Natl. Acad. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  37. 37. 
    Int. Transp. Forum. 2016.. Shared mobility innovation for liveable cities. Rep., Int. Transp. Forum, Paris:. https://www.itf-oecd.org/sites/default/files/docs/shared-mobility-liveable-cities.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  38. 38. 
    KPMG Int. 2019.. 2019 autonomous vehicles readiness index: assessing countries’ preparedness for autonomous vehicles. Rep. 136024-G, KPMG Int. Amstelveen, Neth., https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/xx/pdf/2019/02/2019-autonomous-vehicles-readiness-index.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  39. 39. 
    Lang NS, Rüßmann M, Chua J, Doubara X. 2017.. Making autonomous vehicles a reality: lessons from Boston and beyond. Rep., Boston Consult. Group (BCG), Boston:. http://image-src.bcg.com/Images/BCG-Making-Autonomous-Vehicles-a-Reality-Oct-2017_tcm9-173687.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  40. 40. 
    Levin P. 2018.. Why self-driving cars will cause sprawl (according to an Italian Physicist). . Medium, March 14. https://medium.com/99-mph/introducing-the-marchetti-a-unit-of-measure-for-transit-379aa51170a4
    [Google Scholar]
  41. 41. 
    Litman T. 2016.. The hidden traffic safety solution: public transportation. Rep., Am. Public Transp. Assoc., Washington, DC:. https://www.apta.com/wp-content/uploads/Resources/resources/reportsandpublications/Documents/APTA-Hidden-Traffic-Safety-Solution-Public-Transportation.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  42. 42. 
    Litman T. 2019.. Autonomous vehicle implementation predictions: implications for transport planning. Rep., Vic. Transp. Policy Inst., Vic., BC. https://www.vtpi.org/avip.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  43. 43. 
    Lutin JM. 2018.. Not if, but when: autonomous driving and the future of transit. . J. Public Transp. 21:(1):92–103
     [Google Scholar]
  44. 44. 
    Luttrell K, Weaver M, Harris M. 2015.. The effect of autonomous vehicles on trauma and health care. . J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 79:(4):678–82
     [Google Scholar]
  45. 45. 
    Mariotti A. 2015.. The effects of chronic stress on health: new insights into the molecular mechanisms of brain-body communication. . Futur. Sci. OA 1:(3):FS023
     [Google Scholar]
  46. 46. 
    Mattisson K, Håkansson C, Jakobsson K. 2015.. Relationships between commuting and social capital among men and women in southern Sweden. . Environ. Behav. 47:(7):734–53
     [Google Scholar]
  47. 47. 
    Maxmen A. 2018.. Self-driving car dilemmas reveal that moral choices are not universal. . Nature 562::469–70
     [Google Scholar]
  48. 48. 
    Metz D. 2018.. Developing policy for urban autonomous vehicles: impact on congestion. . Urban Sci. 2:(2):33
     [Google Scholar]
  49. 49. 
    Mokdad AH, Ballestros K, Echko M, Glenn S, Olsen HE, et al. 2018.. The state of US health, 1990–2016: burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors among US states. . JAMA 319:(14):1444–72
     [Google Scholar]
  50. 50. 
    Mueller N, Rojas-Rueda D, Basagaña X, Cirach M, Cole-Hunter T, et al. 2017.. Urban and transport planning related exposures and mortality: a health impact assessment for cities. . Environ. Health Perspect. 125:(1):89–96
     [Google Scholar]
  51. 51. 
    Mueller N, Rojas-Rueda D, Cole-Hunter T, de Nazelle A, Dons E, et al. 2015.. Health impact assessment of active transportation: a systematic review. . Prev. Med. 76::103–14
     [Google Scholar]
  52. 52. 
    Mueller N, Rojas-Rueda D, Khreis H, Cirach M, Milà C, et al. 2018.. Socioeconomic inequalities in urban and transport planning related exposures and mortality: a health impact assessment study for Bradford, UK. . Environ. Int. 121::931–41
     [Google Scholar]
  53. 53. 
    Natl. Cancer Inst. 2019.. Electromagnetic fields and cancer. Fact Sheet, Natl. Cancer Inst., Bethesda, MD:. https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/radiation/electromagnetic-fields-fact-sheet
    [Google Scholar]
  54. 54. 
    Natl. Cent. Stat. Anal. 2018.. 2017 fatal motor vehicle crashes: overview. Res. Note DOT HS 812 603, Natl. Highw. Traffic Saf. Adm. (NHTSA), Washington, DC:. https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/812603
    [Google Scholar]
  55. 55. 
    Natl. Saf. Counc. 2017.. Cannabis (marijuana) and driving. Res. Document., Natl. Saf. Counc., Itasca, IL:. https://www.nsc.org/Portals/0/Documents/NSCDocuments_Advocacy/Divisions/ADID/Position-on-Cannabis-and-Driving.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  56. 56. 
    Natl. Toxicol. Progr. 2018.. The toxicology and carcinogenesis studies in Hsd:Sprague Dawley SD rats exposed to whole-body radio frequency radiation at a frequency (900 mhz) and modulations (GSM and CDMA) used by cell phones. NTP Tech. Rep. 595, Natl. Toxicol. Progr. (NTP), Research Triangle Park, NC:. https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/htdocs/lt_rpts/tr595_508.pdf?utm_source=direct&utm_medium=prod&utm_campaign=ntpgolinks&utm_term=tr595
    [Google Scholar]
  57. 57. 
    Natl. Transp. Comm. 2018.. Changing driving laws to support automated vehicles. Policy Pap., Natl. Transp. Comm., Melbourne:. https://www.ntc.gov.au/sites/default/files/assets/files/NTC%20Policy%20Paper%20-%20Changing%20driving%20laws%20to%20support%20automated%20vehicles.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  58. 58. 
    NHTSA (Natl. Highw. Traffic Saf. Adm.). 2019.. Drug-impaired driving. . NHTSA. https://www.nhtsa.gov/risky-driving/drug-impaired-driving
    [Google Scholar]
  59. 59. 
    NHTSA (Natl. Highw. Traffic Saf. Adm.). 2019.. Highly automated or “self-driving” vehicles. Rep., NHTSA, Washington, DC:. https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.dot.gov/files/documents/14269-overview_of_automated_vehicle_technology_042319_v1b.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  60. 60. 
    Nieuwenhuijsen MJ. 2016.. Urban and transport planning, environmental exposures and health-new concepts, methods and tools to improve health in cities. . Environ. Health. 15:(Suppl. 1):38
     [Google Scholar]
  61. 61. 
    Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Gascon M, Martinez D, Ponjoan A, Blanch J, et al. 2018.. Air pollution, noise, blue space, and green space and premature mortality in Barcelona: a mega cohort. . Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15:(11):E2405
     [Google Scholar]
  62. 62. 
    Off. Surg. Gen. 2016.. Facing addiction in America: the Surgeon General's report on alcohol, drugs, and health. Rep., US Dep. Health Hum. Serv., Washington, DC:. https://addiction.surgeongeneral.gov/sites/default/files/surgeon-generals-report.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  63. 63. 
    Rissel C, Curac N, Greenaway M, Bauman A. 2012.. Physical activity associated with public transport use—a review and modelling of potential benefits. . Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 9:(7):2454–78
     [Google Scholar]
  64. 64. 
    Rojas-Rueda D. 2017.. Autonomous vehicles and mental health. . J. Urban Des. Ment. Health 3:(2):1
     [Google Scholar]
  65. 65. 
    Rojas-Rueda D, de Nazelle A, Tainio M, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, et al. 2011.. The health risks and benefits of cycling in urban environments compared with car use: health impact assessment study. . BMJ 343::d4521
     [Google Scholar]
  66. 66. 
    Rojas-Rueda D, de Nazelle A, Teixidó O, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ. 2013.. Health impact assessment of increasing public transport and cycling use in Barcelona: a morbidity and burden of disease approach. Appendix. . Prev. Med. 57:(5):573–79
     [Google Scholar]
  67. 67. 
    Rojas-Rueda D, de Nazelle A, Teixidó O, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ. 2012.. Replacing car trips by increasing bike and public transport in the greater Barcelona metropolitan area: a health impact assessment study. . Environ. Int. 49::100–9
     [Google Scholar]
  68. 68. 
    Rojas-Rueda D, Turner MC. 2016.. Commentary: diesel, cars, and public health. . Epidemiology 27:(2):159–62
     [Google Scholar]
  69. 69. 
    2018.. Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles. Tech. Pap. J3016_201806, SAE Int., Warrendale, PA:. https://www.sae.org/standards/content/j3016_201806/
    [Google Scholar]
  70. 70. 
    Saelens BE, Moudon AV, Kang B, Hurvitz PM, Zhou C. 2014.. Relation between higher physical activity and public transit use. . Am. J. Public Health 104:(5):854–59
     [Google Scholar]
  71. 71. 
    Shankardass K, Muntaner C, Kokkinen L, Shahidi FV, Freiler A, et al. 2018.. The implementation of Health in All Policies initiatives: a systems framework for government action. . Health Res. Policy Syst. 16:(1):26
     [Google Scholar]
  72. 72. 
    Song J-T, Lee G, Kwon J, Park J-W, Choi H, Lim S. 2014.. The association between long working hours and self-rated health. . Ann. Occup. Environ. Med. 26:(1):2
     [Google Scholar]
  73. 73. 
    Soteropoulos A, Berger M, Ciari F. 2019.. Impacts of automated vehicles on travel behaviour and land use: an international review of modelling studies. . Transp. Rev. 39::29–49
     [Google Scholar]
  74. 74. 
    State Calif. 2019.. Key autonomous vehicle definitions. . State of California Department of Motor Vehicles. https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/dmv/detail/vr/autonomous/definitions
    [Google Scholar]
  75. 75. 
    Thakur P, Kinghorn R, Grace R. 2016.. Urban form and function in the autonomous era. . In Australasian Transport Research Forum 2016 Proceedings, Melbourne, Australia, November 16–18, 2016 . https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1331/7a7e63709dffcf3bc921d224ccf7053e8778.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  76. 76. 
    Timmers VRJH, Achten PAJ. 2016.. Non-exhaust PM emissions from electric vehicles. . Atmos. Environ. 134::10–17
     [Google Scholar]
  77. 77. 
    UN Dep. Econ. Soc. Aff. 2018.. World urbanization prospects: the 2018 revision. Rep. ST/ESA/SER.A/420, UN, New York:. https://population.un.org/wup/Publications/Files/WUP2018-Report.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  78. 78. 
    US Dep. Transp. 2018.. Automated vehicles 3.0. Preparing for the future of transportation. Rep., US Dep. Transp., Washington, DC:. https://www.transportation.gov/sites/dot.gov/files/docs/policy-initiatives/automated-vehicles/320711/preparing-future-transportation-automated-vehicle-30.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  79. 79. 
    US Energy Inf. Adm. 2018.. Autonomous vehicles: uncertainties and energy implications. Rep., US Dep. Energy, Washington, DC:. https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/pdf/AV.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  80. 80. 
    US EPA (Environ. Prot. Agency). 2019.. Global greenhouse gas emissions data. . Greenhouse Gas Emissions. https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/global-greenhouse-gas-emissions-data
    [Google Scholar]
  81. 81. 
    US Organ Procure. Transplant. Netw. 2019.. Deceased donors recovered in the U.S. by circumstance of death. . National Data. https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/data/view-data-reports/national-data/
    [Google Scholar]
  82. 82. 
    Verheijen E, Jabben J. 2010.. Effect of electric cars on traffic noise and safety. RIVM Lett. Rep. 680300009/2010, Natl. Inst. Public Health Environ. (RIVM), Bilthoven, Neth:.
    [Google Scholar]
  83. 83. 
    Vert C, Nieuwenhuijsen M, Gascon M, Grellier J, Fleming LE, et al. 2019.. Health benefits of physical activity related to an urban riverside regeneration. . Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16:(3):462
     [Google Scholar]
  84. 84. 
    Wang H, Horton R. 2015.. Tackling climate change: the greatest opportunity for global health. . Lancet 386::1798–99
     [Google Scholar]
  85. 85. 
    Waymo. 2018.. On the road to fully self-driving. Saf. Rep., WAYMO, Mountain View, CA:. https://waymo.com/safety/
    [Google Scholar]
  86. 86. 
    WHO (World Health Organ.). 2018.. Global status report on road safety 2018. Rep., WHO, Geneva:. https://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/road_safety_status/2018/en/
    [Google Scholar]
  87. 87. 
    WHO (World Health Organ.). 2018.. Health and climate change. COP24 Spec. Rep., WHO, Geneva:. https://www.who.int/globalchange/publications/COP24-report-health-climate-change/en/
    [Google Scholar]
  88. 88. 
    WHO (World Health Organ.) Eur. Cent. Environ. Health. 2011.. Burden of disease from environmental noise: quantification of healthy life years lost in Europe. Rep., WHO Reg. Off. Eur., Bonn, Ger:. http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/136466/e94888.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  89. 89. 
    WHO (World Health Organ.) Reg. Off. Eur. 2012.. Addressing the social determinants of health: the urban dimension and the role of local government. Rep., WHO Reg. Off. Eur., Copenhagen:. http://www.euro.who.int/en/publications/abstracts/addressing-the-social-determinants-of-health-the-urban-dimension-and-the-role-of-local-government
    [Google Scholar]
  90. 90. 
    Xiao C, Goryakin Y, Cecchini M. 2019.. Physical activity levels and new public transit: a systematic review and meta-analysis. . Am. J. Prev. Med. 56:(3):464–73
     [Google Scholar]
  91. 91. 
    Zhang W. 2017.. The interaction between land use and transportation in the era of shared autonomous vehicles: a simulation model. PhD Diss., Sch. City Reg. Plann., Ga. Inst. Technol., Atlanta:. https://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/58665
    [Google Scholar]
  92. 92. 
    Zmud J, Goodin G, Moran M, Kalra N, Thorn E. 2017.. Strategies to Advance Automated and Connected Vehicles. Washington, DC:: Natl. Acad. Press
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094035
Loading
Autonomous Vehicles and Public Health
Annual Review of Public Health 41, 329 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094035
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094035
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094035
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error