1932

Abstract

The United States relies primarily on market forces to determine prices for drugs, whereas most other industrialized countries use a variety of approaches to determine drug prices. Branded drug companies have patents and market exclusivity periods in most industrialized countries. During this period, pharmaceutical companies are allowed to set their list price as high as they prefer in the United States owing to the absence of government price control mechanisms that exist in other countries. Insured patients often pay a percentage of the list price, and cost sharing creates some pressure to lower the list price. Pharmacy benefit managers negotiate with drug companies for lower prices by offering the drug company favorable formulary placement and fewer utilization controls. However, these approaches appear to be less effective, compared with other countries’ approaches to containing branded drug prices, because prices are substantially higher in the United States. Other industrialized countries employ various forms of rate setting and price regulation, such as external reference pricing, therapeutic valuation, and health technology assessment to determine the appropriate price.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094305
2020-04-01
2024-04-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/publhealth/41/1/annurev-publhealth-040119-094305.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094305&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. 1. 
    3 Axis Advis. LLC 2019. Analysis of PBM spread pricing in Michigan Medicaid managed care Rep., 3 Axis Advis. LLC, East Providence, RI. https://www.3axisadvisors.com/projects/2019/4/28/analysis-of-pbm-spread-pricing-in-michigan-medicaid-managed-care
  2. 2. 
    Abdel Rida N, Mohamed Ibrahim MI, Babar ZU, Owusu Y 2017. A systematic review of pharmaceutical pricing policies in developing countries. J. Pharm. Health Serv. Res. 8:4213–26
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 3. 
    Anderson GF, Bai G. 2019. Reforming direct and indirect remuneration in Medicare Part D. Health Affairs Blog Feb. 19. https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20190215.708286/full/
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 4. 
    Anderson GF, Hussey P, Petrosyan V 2019. It's still the prices, stupid: why the US spends so much on health care, and a tribute to Uwe Reinhardt. Health Aff 38:187–95
    [Google Scholar]
  5. 5. 
    Assoc. Access. Med 2018. Generic drug access and savings in the U.S Rep., Assoc. Access. Med Washington, DC: https://accessiblemeds.org/sites/default/files/2018_aam_generic_drug_access_and_savings_report.pdf
  6. 6. 
    Bai G, Anderson GF. 2016. US hospitals are still using chargemaster markups to maximize revenues. Health Aff 35:91658–64
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 7. 
    Bai G, Sen AP, Anderson GF 2018. Pharmacy benefit managers, brand-name drug prices, and patient cost sharing. Ann. Intern. Med. 168:6436–37
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 8. 
    Bai G, Socal MP, Anderson GF 2019. Policy options to help self-insured employers improve PBM contracting efficiency. Health Affairs Blog May 29. https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20190529.43197/full/
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 9. 
    Bilinski A, Neumann P, Cohen J, Thorat T, McDaniel K, Salomon JA 2017. When cost-effective interventions are unaffordable: Integrating cost-effectiveness and budget impact in priority setting for global health programs. PLOS Med 14:10e1002397
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 10. 
    Bruhn WE, Fracica EA, Makary MA 2018. Group purchasing organizations, health care costs, and drug shortages. JAMA 320:181859–60
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 11. 
    Cameron A, Ewen M, Ross-Degnan D, Ball D, Laing R 2009. Medicine prices, availability, and affordability in 36 developing and middle-income countries: a secondary analysis. Lancet 373:9659240–49
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 12. 
    Charlton V, Littlejohns P, Kieslich K, Mitchell P, Rumbold B et al. 2017. Cost effective but unaffordable: an emerging challenge for health systems. BMJ 356:j1402
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 13. 
    Chicoye A, Chhabra A, Holstrom S, Mehin N 2009. France—pharmaceuticals. Global health technology assessment road map. Roadmap, Int. Soc. Pharm. Outcomes Res Lawrenceville, NJ: https://tools.ispor.org/htaroadmaps/France.asp
  14. 14. 
    Claxton G, Rae M, Long M, Damico M, Whitmore H 2018. Employer health benefit 2018 annual survey Rep., Kaiser Fam. Found San Francisco: http://files.kff.org/attachment/Report-Employer-Health-Benefits-Annual-Survey-2018
  15. 15. 
    CMS (Cent. Medicare Medicaid Serv.) 2016. Chapter 6—Part D drugs and formulary requirements. Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit Manual Publ 100–18 CMS Baltimore, MD: https://www.cms.gov/medicare/prescription-drug-coverage/prescriptiondrugcovcontra/downloads/part-d-benefits-manual-chapter-6.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 16. 
    CMS (Cent. Medicare Medicaid Serv.) 2018. Medicaid Drug Rebate Program. Medicaid.gov. https://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid/prescription-drugs/medicaid-drug-rebate-program/index.html
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 17. 
    CMS (Cent. Medicare Medicaid Serv.) 2019. CMS announces new model to lower drug prices in Medicare Part D and transformative updates to existing model for Medicare Advantage Press Release, Jan. 18. https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/press-releases/cms-announces-new-model-lower-drug-prices-medicare-part-d-and-transformative-updates-existing-model
  18. 18. 
    Cook A, Math. Policy Res 2009. Pricing mechanisms used by the federal government to contain prescription drug costs Memorandum prepared for the Department of Health and Human Services’ Conference on Pharmaceutical Pricing Practices, Utilization and Costs, Georgetown University Washington, DC: Aug 8–9 https://aspe.hhs.gov/pricing-mechanisms-used-federal-government-contain-prescription-drug-costs
  19. 19. 
    Counc. Econ. Advis 2018. Reforming biopharmaceutical pricing at home and abroad Rep., Counc. Econ. Advis., Exec. Off. Pres. US Washington, DC: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/CEA-Rx-White-Paper-Final2.pdf
  20. 20. 
    Dakin H, Devlin N, Feng Y, Rice N, O'Neill P, Parkin D 2015. The influence of cost‐effectiveness and other factors on nice decisions. Health Econ 24:101256–71
    [Google Scholar]
  21. 21. 
    Danzon PM. 2018. Differential pricing of pharmaceuticals: theory, evidence and emerging issues. Pharmacoeconomics 36:121395–405
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 22. 
    Danzon PM, Chao L-W. 2000. Cross-national price differences for pharmaceuticals: how large, and why. J. Health Econ. 19:159–95
    [Google Scholar]
  23. 23. 
    Danzon PM, Furukawa MF. 2003. Prices and availability of pharmaceuticals: evidence from nine countries. Health Aff 22:Suppl. 1W3–52136
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 24. 
    Danzon PM, Mulcahy AW, Towse AK 2015. Pharmaceutical pricing in emerging markets: effects of income, competition, and procurement. Health Econ 24:2238–52
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 25. 
    Dave CV, Kesselheim AS, Fox ER, Qiu P, Hartzema A 2017. High generic drug prices and market competition: a retrospective cohort study. Ann. Intern. Med. 167:3145–51
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 26. 
    DeJong C, Aguilar T, Tseng C-W, Lin GA, Boscardin WJ, Dudley RA 2016. Pharmaceutical industry-sponsored meals and physician prescribing patterns for Medicare beneficiaries. JAMA Intern. Med. 176:81114–22
    [Google Scholar]
  27. 27. 
    Fein AJ. 2018. Building a new drug wholesaler compensation model: What happens as brand inflation slows. Drug Channels July 24. https://www.drugchannels.net/2018/07/building-new-drug-wholesaler.html
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 28. 
    Frerick A. 2016. The cloak of social responsibility: pharmaceutical corporate charity. Tax Notes 153:91151
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 29. 
    Garrett JB, Tayler WB, Bai G, Socal MP, Trujillo AJ, Anderson GF 2019. Consumer responses to price disclosure in direct-to-consumer pharmaceutical advertising. JAMA Intern. Med. 179:3435–37
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 30. 
    Gornall J, Hoey A, Ozieranski P 2016. A pill too hard to swallow: how the NHS is limiting access to high priced drugs. BMJ 354:i4117
    [Google Scholar]
  31. 31. 
    Horvath JC, Anderson GF. 2019. The states as important laboratories for federal prescription drug cost-containment efforts. JAMA 321:161561–62
    [Google Scholar]
  32. 32. 
    Humphries B, Xie F. 2019. Canada's amendment to patented drug price regulation: a prescription for global drug cost control. JAMA 321:161565–66
    [Google Scholar]
  33. 33. 
    Ikegami N, Anderson GF. 2012. In Japan, all-payer rate setting under tight government control has proved to be an effective approach to containing costs. Health Aff 31:51049–56
    [Google Scholar]
  34. 34. 
    Johns Hopkins Drug Access Affordabil. Initiat 2019. Pharmaceuticals: innovation, access, and affordability chartbook https://www.jhsph.edu/research/affiliated-programs/johns-hopkins-drug-access-and-affordability-initiative/research/chartbooks/
  35. 35. 
    Kanavos P, Ferrario A, Vandoros S, Anderson GF 2013. Higher US branded drug prices and spending compared to other countries may stem partly from quick uptake of new drugs. Health Aff 32:4753–61
    [Google Scholar]
  36. 36. 
    Kang SY, DiStefano MJ, Socal MP, Anderson GF 2019. Using external reference pricing in Medicare Part D to reduce drug price differentials with other countries. Health Aff 38:5804–11
    [Google Scholar]
  37. 37. 
    Kang SY, Sen A, Bai G, Anderson GF 2019. Financial eligibility criteria and medication coverage for independent charity patient assistance programs. JAMA 322:5422–29
    [Google Scholar]
  38. 38. 
    Levin J, Ballreich J, Socal M, Bai G, Anderson G 2019. Consolidated drug purchasing across federal agencies: a policy to decrease cost sharing for Medicare beneficiaries. J. Health Care Finance 46: http://www.healthfinancejournal.com/index.php/johcf/article/view/186/190
    [Google Scholar]
  39. 39. 
    Liese BH, Schubert L. 2009. Official development assistance for health—how neglected are neglected tropical diseases? An analysis of health financing. Int. Health 1:2141–47
    [Google Scholar]
  40. 40. 
    Liljenquist D, Bai G, Anderson GF 2018. Addressing generic-drug market failures—the case for establishing a nonprofit manufacturer. N. Engl. J. Med. 378:201857–59
    [Google Scholar]
  41. 41. 
    Mamiya H. 2018. Update of drug pricing system in Japan Rep., Minist. Health Welf Tokyo: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/11123000/000335166.pdf
  42. 42. 
    Maniadakis N, Kourlaba G, Shen J, Holtorf A 2017. Comprehensive taxonomy and worldwide trends in pharmaceutical policies in relation to country income status. BMC Health Serv. Res 17:371
    [Google Scholar]
  43. 43. 
    Morgan S, Grootendorst P, Lexchin J, Cunningham C, Greyson D 2011. The cost of drug development: a systematic review. Health Policy 100:14–17
    [Google Scholar]
  44. 44. 
    NICE (Natl. Inst. Health Clin. Excell.) 2008. Social value judgements: principles for the development of NICE guidance. , 2nd ed.. Rep., NICE London: https://www.nice.org.uk/Media/Default/About/what-we-do/Research-and-development/Social-Value-Judgements-principles-for-the-development-of-NICE-guidance.pdf
  45. 45. 
    NICE (Natl. Inst. Health Clin. Excell.) 2018. Guide to the methods of technology appraisal 2013: process and methods Rep. PMG9, NICE London: https://www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg9/resources/guide-to-the-methods-of-technology-appraisal-2013-pdf-2007975843781
  46. 46. 
    OIG (Off. Insp. Gen.), US DHHS (Dep. Health Hum. Serv.) 2019. Fraud and abuse: removal of safe harbor protection for rebates involving prescription pharmaceuticals and creation of new safe harbor protection for certain point-of-sale reductions in price on prescription pharmaceuticals and certain pharmacy benefit manager service fees. Fed. Regist 84:2340–63
    [Google Scholar]
  47. 47. 
    Paris V, Belloni A. 2013. Value in pharmaceutical pricing country profile: Australia Rep., OECD Paris: https://www.oecd.org/health/Value-in-Pharmaceutical-Pricing-Australia.pdf
  48. 48. 
    Paris V, Belloni A. 2019. Value in pharmaceutical pricing Health Work. Pap. 63, OECD Paris: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/5k43jc9v6knx-en.pdf
  49. 49. 
    Prescription Drug Pricing Reduction Act of 2019. S.2543, 116th Congr 2019.
  50. 50. 
    Rémuzat C, Toumi M, Falissard B 2013. New drug regulations in France: what are the impacts on market access? Part 1—Overview of new drug regulations in France. J. Mark. Access Health Policy 1:120891
    [Google Scholar]
  51. 51. 
    Rodríguez-Monguió R, Rovira J, Seoane-Vázquez E 2007. Analysis of the World Bank's pharmaceutical lending. Health Policy 81:1102–16
    [Google Scholar]
  52. 52. 
    Ross JS, Kesselheim AS. 2013. Prescription-drug coupons—no such thing as a free lunch. N. Engl. J. Med. 369:131188–89
    [Google Scholar]
  53. [Google Scholar]
  54. 54. 
    Ruff P, Al-Sukhun S, Blanchard C, Shulman LN 2016. Access to cancer therapeutics in low- and middle-income countries. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. Educ. Book 36:58–65
    [Google Scholar]
  55. 55. 
    Sauvage P. 2008. Pharmaceutical pricing in France: a critique. Eurohealth 14:26–8
    [Google Scholar]
  56. 56. 
    Schweitzer SO, Comanor WS. 2011. Prices of pharmaceuticals in poor countries are much lower than in wealthy countries. Health Aff 30:81553–61
    [Google Scholar]
  57. 57. 
    Socal MP, Bai G, Anderson GF 2019. Favorable formulary placement of branded drugs in Medicare prescription drug plans when generics are available. JAMA Intern. Med. 179:6832–33
    [Google Scholar]
  58. 58. 
    Swanson A. 2015. Big pharmaceutical companies are spending far more on marketing than research. Washington Post Feb. 11. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/02/11/big-pharmaceutical-companies-are-spending-far-more-on-marketing-than-research/
    [Google Scholar]
  59. 59. 
    Towse AK. 2019. HTA in Japan: failing to meet international good practice?. OHE News March 15. https://www.ohe.org/news/hta-japan-failing-meet-international-good-practice
    [Google Scholar]
  60. 60. 
    Trusheim MR, Cassidy WM, Bach PB 2018. Alternative state-level financing for hepatitis C treatment—the “Netflix model. .” JAMA 320:191977–78
    [Google Scholar]
  61. 61. 
    US CBO (Congr. Budg. Off.) 2007. Prescription drug pricing in the private sector Rep., US CBO Washington, DC: https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/110th-congress-2007-2008/reports/01-03-prescriptiondrug.pdf
  62. 62. 
    US DHHS (Dep. Health Hum. Serv.) 2018. Comparison of U.S. and international prices for top Medicare Part B drugs by total expenditures. Exec. Summ., Off. Assist. Secr. Plann. Eval Washington, DC: https://aspe.hhs.gov/system/files/pdf/259996/ComparisonUSInternationalPricesTopSpendingPartBDrugs.pdf
  63. 63. 
    US DHHS (Dep. Health Hum. Serv.) 2018. HHS advances payment model to lower drug costs for patients News Release, Oct. 25. https://www.hhs.gov/about/news/2018/10/25/hhs-advances-payment-model-to-lower-drug-costs-for-patients.html
  64. 64. 
    US FDA (Food Drug Adm.) 2017. Generic competition and drug prices. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/center-drug-evaluation-and-research/generic-competition-and-drug-prices
    [Google Scholar]
  65. 65. 
    US FDA (Food Drug Adm.) 2018. Generic drug facts Fact Sheet, US FDA Silver Spring, MD: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/generic-drugs/generic-drug-facts
  66. 66. 
    US GAO (Gov. Account. Off.) 2019. Use of pharmacy benefit managers and efforts to manage drug expenditures and utilization GAO-19-498, US GAO Washington, DC: https://waysandmeans.house.gov/sites/democrats.waysandmeans.house.gov/files/documents/Medicare%20Part%20D%20GAO%20Report.pdf
  67. 67. 
    Wagner JL, McCarthy E. 2004. International differences in drug prices. Annu. Rev. Public Health 25:475–95
    [Google Scholar]
  68. 68. 
    Wenzl M, Paris V. 2018. Pharmaceutical reimbursement and pricing in Germany Rep., OECD Paris: https://www.oecd.org/health/health-systems/Pharmaceutical-Reimbursement-and-Pricing-in-Germany.pdf
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094305
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094305
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error