Creating more physical activity–supportive built environments is recommended by the World Health Organization for controlling noncommunicable diseases. The IPEN (International Physical Activity and Environment Network) Adult Study was undertaken to provide international evidence on associations of built environments with physical activity and weight status in 12 countries on 5 continents ( > 14,000). This article presents reanalyzed data from eight primary papers to identify patterns of findings across studies. Neighborhood environment attributes, whether measured objectively or by self-report, were strongly related to all physical activity outcomes (accelerometer-assessed total physical activity, reported walking for transport and leisure) and meaningfully related to overweight/obesity. Multivariable indexes of built environment variables were more strongly related to most outcomes than were single-environment variables. Designing activity-supportive built environments should be a higher international health priority. Results provide evidence in support of global initiatives to increase physical activity and control noncommunicable diseases while achieving sustainable development goals.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


Literature Cited

  1. 1. 
    Adams MA, Chapman J, Sallis JF, Frank LDInt. Phys. Act. Environ. Netw. (IPEN) Study Coord. Cent 2012. Built environment and physical activity: GIS templates and variable naming conventions for the IPEN studies Rep., Int. Phys. Act. Environ. Netw. (IPEN), Univ. Calif San Diego: http://www.ipenproject.org/documents/methods_docs/IPEN_GIS_TEMPLATES.pdf
  2. 2. 
    Adams MA, Frank LD, Schipperijn J, Smith G, Chapman J et al. 2014. International variation in neighborhood walkability, transit, and recreation environments using geographic information systems: the IPEN Adult Study. Int. J. Health Geogr. 13:43
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 3. 
    Adams MA, Ryan S, Kerr J, Sallis JF, Patrick K et al. 2009. Validation of the Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale (NEWS) items using geographic information systems. J. Phys. Act. Health 6:S113–23
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 4. 
    Adlakha D, Hipp JA, Brownson RC 2016. Adaptation and evaluation of the Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale in India (NEWS-India). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 13:401
    [Google Scholar]
  5. 5. 
    Adlakha D, Hipp JA, Sallis JF, Brownson RC 2018. Exploring neighborhood environments and active commuting in Chennai, India. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15:91840
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 6. 
    Bauman AE, Reis RS, Sallis JF, Wells JC, Loos RJ et al. 2012. Correlates of physical activity: Why are some people physically active and others not?. Lancet 380:258–71
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 7. 
    Blacksher E, Lovasi GS. 2012. Place-focused physical activity research, human agency, and social justice in public health: taking agency seriously in studies of the built environment. Health Place 18:172–79
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 8. 
    Bornstein DB, Pate RR, Pratt M 2009. A review of the national physical activity plans of six countries. J. Phys. Act. Health 6:Suppl. 2S245–64
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 9. 
    Brownson RC, Hoehner CM, Day K, Forsyth A, Sallis JF 2009. Measuring the built environment for physical activity: state of the science. Am. J. Prev. Med. 36:S99–123
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 10. 
    Cain KL. 2014. Accelerometer scoring protocol for the IPEN-Adult Study Rep., Int. Phys. Act. Environ. Netw. (IPEN), Univ. Calif San Diego: http://www.ipenproject.org/documents/methods_docs/IPEN_Protocol.pdf
  11. 11. 
    Cain KL, Geremia CM, Conway TL, Frank LD, Chapman JE et al. 2018. Development and reliability of a streetscape observation instrument for international use: MAPS-Global. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 15:19
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 12. 
    Cao X, Mokhtarian PL, Handy SL 2009. Examining the impacts of residential self‐selection on travel behaviour: a focus on empirical findings. Transp. Rev. 29:3359–95
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 13. 
    Carlson SA, Fulton JE, Pratt M, Yang Z, Adams EK 2015. Inadequate physical activity and health care expenditures in the United States. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 57:4315–23
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 14. 
    Cerin E, Cain KL, Conway TL, Van Dyck D, Hinckson E et al. 2014. Neighborhood environments and objectively measured physical activity in 11 countries. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 46:122253–64
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 15. 
    Cerin E, Cain KL, Oyeyemi AL, Owen N, Conway TL et al. 2016. Correlates of agreement between accelerometry and self-reported physical activity. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 48:61075–84
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 16. 
    Cerin E, Conway TL, Adams MA, Barnett A, Cain KL et al. 2018. Objectively-assessed destination accessibility and physical activity in adults from 10 countries: an analysis of moderators and perceptions as mediators. Soc. Sci. Med. 211:8282–93
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 17. 
    Cerin E, Conway TL, Cain KL, Kerr J, De Bourdeaudhuij I et al. 2013. Sharing good NEWS across the world: developing comparable scores across 12 countries for the Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale (NEWS). BMC Public Health 13:309
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 18. 
    Cerin E, Conway TL, Saelens BE, Frank LD, Sallis JF 2009. Cross-validation of the factorial structure of the Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale (NEWS) and its abbreviated form (NEWS-A). Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 6:32
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 19. 
    Cerin E, Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Frank LD 2008. Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale: validity and development of a short form. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 38:1682–91
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 20. 
    Christian H, Knuiman M, Divitini M, Foster S, Hooper P et al. 2017. A longitudinal analysis of the influence of the neighborhood environment on recreational walking within the neighborhood: results from RESIDE. Environ. Health Perspect. 125:077009
    [Google Scholar]
  21. 21. 
    Christiansen LB, Cerin E, Badland H, Kerr J, Davey R et al. 2016. International comparisons of the associations between objective measures of the built environment and transport-related walking and cycling: IPEN adult study. J. Transp. Health 3:467–78
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 22. 
    Cochrane T, Yu Y, Davey R, Cerin E, Cain KL et al. 2019. Associations of built environment and proximity of food outlets with body weight: analysis from 14 cities in 10 countries. Prev. Med. 129105874
  23. 23. 
    Community Prev. Serv. Task Force 2017. Physical activity: built environment approaches combining transportation system interventions with land use and environmental design. The Guide to Community Preventive Services: The Community Guide https://www.thecommunityguide.org/findings/physical-activity-built-environment-approaches
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 24. 
    Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML et al. 2003. International Physical Activity Questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 35:1381–95
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 25. 
    Danaei G, Ding EL, Mozaffarian D, Taylor B, Rehm J et al. 2009. The preventable causes of death in the United States: Comparative risk assessment of dietary, lifestyle, and metabolic risk factors. PLOS Med 28:; 6:4e1000058 https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article%3Fid%3D10.1371/journal.pmed.1000058
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 26. 
    De Bourdeaudhuij I, Van Dyck D, Salvo D, Davey R, Reis RS et al. 2015. International study of perceived neighbourhood environmental attributes and body mass index: IPEN Adult Study in 12 countries. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 12:62
    [Google Scholar]
  27. 27. 
    Ding D, Gebel K. 2012. Built environment, physical activity, and obesity: What have we learned from reviewing the literature?. Health Place 18:100–5
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 28. 
    Dowd KP, Szeklicki R, Minetto MA, Murphy MH, Polito A et al. 2018. A systematic literature review of reviews on techniques for physical activity measurement in adults: a DEDIPAC study. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 15:115
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 29. 
    Foster S, Giles-Corti B. 2008. The built environment, neighborhood crime and constrained physical activity: an exploration of inconsistent findings. Prev. Med. 47:3241–51
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 30. 
    Fox J, Weisberg S. 2011. An R Companion to Applied Regression Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage, 2nd ed..
  31. 31. 
    Frank LD, Andresen M, Schmid TL 2004. Obesity relationships with community design, physical activity, and time spent in cars. Am. J. Prev. Med. 27:287–96
    [Google Scholar]
  32. 32. 
    Frank LD, Engelke PO, Schmid TL 2003. Health and Community Design: The Impact of the Built Environment on Physical Activity Washington, DC: Island
  33. 33. 
    Frank LD, Fox EH, Ulmer JM, Chapman JE, Kershaw SE et al. 2017. International comparison of observation-specific spatial buffers: maximizing the ability to estimate physical activity. Int. J. Health Geogr. 16:4
    [Google Scholar]
  34. 34. 
    Frank LD, Iroz-Elardo N, MacLeod KE, Hong A 2019. Pathways from built environment to health: a conceptual framework linking behavior and exposure-based impacts. J. Transp. Health 12:319–35
    [Google Scholar]
  35. 35. 
    Frank LD, Sallis JF, Conway TL, Chapman JE, Saelens BE, Bachman W 2006. Many pathways from land use to health: associations between neighborhood walkability and active transportation, body mass index, and air quality. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 72:75–87
    [Google Scholar]
  36. 36. 
    Frank LD, Sallis JF, Saelens BE, Leary L, Cain K et al. 2010. The development of a walkability index: application to the Neighborhood Quality of Life Study. Br. J. Sports Med. 44:924–33
    [Google Scholar]
  37. 37. 
    Freedson PS, Melanson E, Sirard J 1998. Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 30:5777–81
    [Google Scholar]
  38. 38. 
    Giles-Corti B, Sallis JF, Sugiyama T, Frank LD, Lowe M, Owen N 2015. Translating active living research into policy and practice: one important pathway to chronic disease prevention. J. Public Health Policy 36:2231–43
    [Google Scholar]
  39. 39. 
    Giles-Corti B, Vernez-Moudon A, Reis R, Turrell G, Dannenberg AL et al. 2016. City planning and population health: a global challenge. Lancet 388:2912–24
    [Google Scholar]
  40. 40. 
    Gonçalves PB, Hallal PC, Hino AAF, Reis RS 2017. Individual and environmental correlates of objectively measured physical activity and sedentary time in adults from Curitiba, Brazil. Int. J. Public Health 62:7831–40
    [Google Scholar]
  41. 41. 
    Guthold R, Stevens GA, Riley LM, Bull FC 2018. Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1⋅9 million participants. Lancet Glob. Health 6:10e1077–86
    [Google Scholar]
  42. 42. 
    Hansen AY, Umstattd Meyer MR, Lenardson JD, Hartley D 2015. Built environments and active living in rural and remote areas: a review of the literature. Curr. Obes. Rep. 4:4484–93
    [Google Scholar]
  43. 43. 
    Hooper P, Giles-Corti B, Knuiman M 2014. Evaluating the implementation and active living impacts of a state government planning policy designed to create walkable neighborhoods in Perth, Western Australia. Am. J. Health Promot. 28:S3S5–18
    [Google Scholar]
  44. 44. 
    Jáuregui A, Pratt M, Lamadrid-Figueroa H, Hernández B, Rivera JA, Salvo D 2016. Perceived neighborhood environment and physical activity: the international physical activity and environment network adult study in Mexico. Am. J. Prev. Med. 51:2271–79
    [Google Scholar]
  45. 45. 
    Kerr J, Emond JA, Badland H, Reis R, Sarmiento O et al. 2016. Perceived neighborhood environmental attributes associated with walking and cycling for transport among adult residents of 17 cities in 12 countries: the IPEN study. Environ. Health Perspect. 124:3290–98
    [Google Scholar]
  46. 46. 
    Kerr J, Sallis JF, Owen N, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Cerin E et al. 2013. Advancing science and policy through a coordinated international study of physical activity and built environments: IPEN methods. J. Phys. Act. Health 10:581–601
    [Google Scholar]
  47. 47. 
    Kohl HW 3rd, Craig CL, Lambert EV, Inoue S, Alkandari JR et al. 2012. The pandemic of physical inactivity: global action for public health. Lancet 380:9838294–305
    [Google Scholar]
  48. 48. 
    Lee IM, Shiroma EJ, Lobelo F, Puska P, Blair SN et al. 2012. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet 380:9838219–29
    [Google Scholar]
  49. 49. 
    Levine J. 2006. Zoned Out: Regulation, Markets, and Choices in Transportation and Metropolitan Land Use Washington, DC: Resources for the Future
  50. 50. 
    Mayne SL, Auchincloss AH, Michael YL 2015. Impact of policy and built environment changes on obesity‐related outcomes: a systematic review of naturally occurring experiments. Obes. Rev. 16:5362–75
    [Google Scholar]
  51. 51. 
    Mueller N, Rojas-Rueda D, Cole-Hunter T, de Nazelle A, Dons E et al. 2015. Health impact assessment of active transportation: a systematic review. Prev. Med. 76:103–14
    [Google Scholar]
  52. 52. 
    Owen N, Humpel N, Leslie E, Bauman A, Sallis JF 2004. Understanding environmental influences on walking: review and research agenda. Am. J. Prev. Med. 27:67–76
    [Google Scholar]
  53. 53. 
    Oyeyemi AL, Conway TL, Adedoyin RA, Akinroye KK, Aryeetey R et al. 2017. Construct validity of the Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale for Africa. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 49:3482–91
    [Google Scholar]
  54. 54. 
    Oyeyemi AL, Kasoma SS, Onywera VO, Assah F, Adedoyin RA et al. 2016. NEWS for Africa: adaptation and reliability of a built environment questionnaire for physical activity in seven African countries. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 13:33
    [Google Scholar]
  55. 55. 
    Phys. Act. Guidel. Advis. Comm 2018. Physical activity guidelines advisory committee scientific report Rep., US Dep. Health Hum. Serv Washington, DC: https://health.gov/paguidelines/second-edition/report/
  56. 56. 
    Powell-Wiley TM, Moore K, Allen N, Block R, Evenson KR et al. 2017. Associations of neighborhood crime and safety and with changes in body mass index and waist circumference: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Am. J. Epidemiol. 186:3280–88
    [Google Scholar]
  57. 57. 
    Pucher J, Dill J, Handy S 2010. Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: an international review. Prev. Med. 50:S106–25
    [Google Scholar]
  58. 58. 
    R Dev. Core Team 2011. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. The R Project for Statistical Computing http://www.R-project.org
    [Google Scholar]
  59. 59. 
    Reis RS, Hino AAF, Rech CR, Kerr J, Hallal PC 2013. Walkability and physical activity: findings from Curitiba, Brazil. Am. J. Prev. Med. 45:3269–75
    [Google Scholar]
  60. 60. 
    Reis RS, Salvo D, Ogilvie D, Lambert EV, Goenka S et al. 2016. Scaling up physical activity interventions worldwide: stepping up to larger and smarter approaches to get people moving. Lancet 388:100511337–48
    [Google Scholar]
  61. 61. 
    Saelens BE, Handy SL. 2008. Built environment correlates of walking: a review. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 40:S7S550–66
    [Google Scholar]
  62. 62. 
    Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Black JB, Chen D 2003. Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity: an environmental scale evaluation. Am. J. Public Health 93:1552–58
    [Google Scholar]
  63. 63. 
    Sallis JF, Bull F, Guthold R, Heath GW, Inoue S et al. 2016. Progress in physical activity over the Olympic quadrennium. Lancet 388:100511325–36
    [Google Scholar]
  64. 64. 
    Sallis JF, Cerin E, Conway TL, Adams MA, Frank LD et al. 2016. Physical activity in relation to urban environments in 14 cities worldwide: cross-sectional study. Lancet 387:100342207–17
    [Google Scholar]
  65. 65. 
    Sallis JF, Cervero RB, Ascher W, Henderson KA, Kraft MK, Kerr J 2006. An ecological approach to creating active living communities. Annu. Rev. Public Health 27:297–322
    [Google Scholar]
  66. 66. 
    Sallis JF, Cutter CL, Lou D, Spoon C, Wilson AL et al. 2014. Active living research: creating and using evidence to support childhood obesity prevention. Am. J. Prev. Med. 46:2195–207
    [Google Scholar]
  67. 67. 
    Sallis JF, Linton LS, Kraft MK, Cutter CL, Kerr J et al. 2009. The Active Living Research Program: six years of grantmaking. Am. J. Prev. Med. 36:2 Suppl.S10–21
    [Google Scholar]
  68. 68. 
    Sallis JF, Owen N. 2015. Ecological models of health behavior. Health Behavior: Theory, Research, and Practice K Glanz, BK Rimer, V Viswanath 43–64 San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer, 5th ed..
    [Google Scholar]
  69. 69. 
    Sallis JF, Saelens BE, Frank LD, Conway TL, Slymen DJ et al. 2009. Neighborhood built environment and income: examining multiple health outcomes. Soc. Sci. Med. 68:1285–93
    [Google Scholar]
  70. 70. 
    Sallis JF, Spoon C, Cavill N, Engelberg J, Gebel K et al. 2015. Co-benefits of designing communities for active living: an exploration of literature. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 12:30
    [Google Scholar]
  71. 71. 
    Salvo D, Adlakha D, Hipp A, Brownson R, Pratt M 2018. Is physical activity in middle-income countries driven by necessity or choice? Exploring the roles of motor-vehicle ownership and socioeconomic status on transport-based physical activity in Cuernavaca, Mexico and Chennai, India. J. Phys. Act. Health 15:10S113 Abstract )
    [Google Scholar]
  72. 72. 
    Salvo D, Reis RS, Sarmiento OL, Pratt M 2014. Overcoming the challenges of conducting physical activity and built environment research in Latin America: IPEN Latin America. Prev. Med. 69:S86–92
    [Google Scholar]
  73. 73. 
    Salvo D, Reis RS, Stein AD, Rivera J, Martorell R, Pratt M 2014. Characteristics of the built environment in relation to objectively measured physical activity among Mexican adults, 2011. Prev. Chron. Dis. 11:E147
    [Google Scholar]
  74. 74. 
    Salvo D, Sarmiento OL, Reis RS, Hino AAF, Bolivar MA et al. 2017. Where Latin Americans are physically active, and why does it matter? Findings from the IPEN-Adult study in Bogota, Colombia; Cuernavaca, Mexico; and Curitiba, Brazil. Prev. Med. 103:S27–33
    [Google Scholar]
  75. 75. 
    Salvo D, Torres C, Villa U, Rivera JA, Sarmiento OL et al. 2015. Accelerometer-based physical activity levels among Mexican adults and their relation with sociodemographic characteristics and BMI: a cross-sectional study. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 12:179
    [Google Scholar]
  76. 76. 
    Schipperijn J, Cerin E, Adams MA, Reis R, Smith G et al. 2017. Access to parks and physical activity: an eight country comparison. Urban For. Urban Green 27:253–63
    [Google Scholar]
  77. 77. 
    Sugiyama T, Cerin E, Owen N, Oyeyemi AL, Conway TL et al. 2014. Perceived neighborhood environment attributes associated with adults' recreational walking: IPEN Adult study in 12 countries. Health Place 28:22–30
    [Google Scholar]
  78. 78. 
    Sugiyama T, Wijndaele K, Koohsari MJ, Tanamas SK, Dunstan DW, Owen N 2016. Adverse associations of car time with markers of cardio-metabolic risk. Prev. Med. 83:26–30
    [Google Scholar]
  79. 79. 
    Ulmer JM, Wolf KL, Backman DR, Tretheway RL, Blain CJ et al. 2016. Multiple health benefits of urban tree canopy: the mounting evidence for a green prescription. Health Place 42:54–62
    [Google Scholar]
  80. 80. 
    U. N 2011. Political declaration of the high-level meeting of the General Assembly on the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases Rep., U. N. Gen. Assem New York: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/710899?ln=en
  81. 81. 
    U. N 2018. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision New York: Dep. Econ. Soc. Aff., Popul. Div., U. N https://population.un.org/wup/Publications/
  82. 82. 
    van Buuren S. 2011. Multiple imputation of multilevel data. Handbook of Advanced Multilevel Analysis JJ Hox, JK Roberts 173–96 Abingdon, UK: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
  83. 83. 
    van Buuren S, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K 2011. mice: multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. J. Stat. Softw. 45:1–67
    [Google Scholar]
  84. 84. 
    Van Dyck D, Cardon G, Deforche B, Owen N, De Bourdeaudhuij I 2011. Relationships between neighborhood walkability and adults' physical activity: How important is residential self-selection. Health Place 17:41011–14
    [Google Scholar]
  85. 85. 
    Van Dyck D, Cardon G, Deforche B, Sallis JF, Owen N, De Bourdeaudhuij I 2010. Neighborhood SES and walkability are related to physical activity behavior in Belgian adults. Prev. Med. 50:Suppl. 1S74–79
    [Google Scholar]
  86. 86. 
    Warnes GR, Bolker B, Lumley T, Johnson RC 2015. gmodels: various R programming tools for model fitting. R package version 2.16.2 https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gmodels
    [Google Scholar]
  87. 87. 
    WHO (World Health Organ.) 2009. Global health risks: mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks Rep., WHO, Geneva. https://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/GlobalHealthRisks_report_full.pdf
  88. 88. 
    WHO (World Health Organ.) 2013. Global action plan for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases, 20132020 Rep., WHO, Geneva. https://www.who.int/nmh/events/ncd_action_plan/en/
    [Google Scholar]
  89. 89. 
    WHO (World Health Organ.) 2018. Global action plan for physical activity 2018–2030: more active people for a healthier world Rep., WHO, Geneva. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/272722/9789241514187-eng.pdf
  90. 90. 
    Wood SN. 2006. Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC
  91. 91. 
    Yu E, Lippert AM. 2016. Neighborhood crime rate, weight‐related behaviors, and obesity: a systematic review of the literature. Sociol. Compass 10:3187–207
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error