The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA) of 2008 changed the landscape of mental health and substance use disorder coverage in the United States. The MHPAEA's comprehensiveness compared with past parity laws, including its extension of parity to plan management strategies, the so-called nonquantitative treatment limitations (NQTL), led to significant improvements in mental health care coverage. In this article, we review the history of this landmark legislation and its recent expansions to new populations, describe past research on the effects of this and other mental health/substance use disorder parity laws, and describe some directions for future research, including NQTL compliance issues, effects of parity on individuals with severe mental illness, and measurement of benefits other than mental health care use.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


Literature Cited

  1. Andersen M. 1.  2015. Heterogeneity and the effect of mental health parity mandates on the labor market. J. Health Econ. 43:74–84 [Google Scholar]
  2. 2. APA (Am. Psychol. Assoc.). 2014. 2014 Mental health parity survey APA Washington, DC: https://www.apa.org/helpcenter/parity-survey-2014.pdf [Google Scholar]
  3. 3. ASPE (Off. Assist. Secr. Plan. Eval.). 2016. Health insurance marketplaces 2016 open enrollment period: January enrollment report Issue Brief, Jan. 7, ASPE Washington, DC: https://aspe.hhs.gov/system/files/pdf/167981/MarketPlaceEnrollJan2016.pdf [Google Scholar]
  4. Azzone V, Frank RG, Normand S-LT, Burnam MA. 4.  2011. Effect of insurance parity on substance abuse treatment. Psychiatr. Serv. 62:129–34 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bao Y, Sturm R. 5.  2004. The effects of state mental health parity legislation on perceived quality of insurance coverage, perceived access to care, and use of mental health specialty care. Health Serv. Res. 39:1361–77 [Google Scholar]
  6. Barry CL, Busch SH. 6.  2007. Do state parity laws reduce the financial burden on families of children with mental health care needs?. Health Serv. Res. 42:1061–84 [Google Scholar]
  7. Barry CL, Frank RG, McGuire TG. 7.  2006. The costs of mental health parity: still an impediment?. Health Aff 25:623–34 [Google Scholar]
  8. Barry CL, Huskamp HA, Goldman HH. 8.  2010. A political history of federal mental health and addiction insurance parity. Milbank Q 88:404–33 [Google Scholar]
  9. Barry CL, McGinty EE, Pescosolido BA, Goldman HH. 9.  2014. Stigma, discrimination, treatment effectiveness, and policy: public views about drug addiction and mental illness. Psychiatr. Serv. 65:1269–72 [Google Scholar]
  10. Barry CL, Ridgely MS. 10.  2008. Mental health and substance abuse insurance parity for federal employees: How did health plans respond?. J. Policy Anal. Manag. 27:155–70 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bartlett J, Manderscheid R. 11.  2016. What does mental health parity really mean for the care of people with serious mental illness?. Psychiatr. Clin. N. Am. 39:331–42 [Google Scholar]
  12. Beck AT. 12.  1967. Depression: Clinical, Experimental, and Theoretical Aspects Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press [Google Scholar]
  13. Berndt ER, Finkelstein SN, Greenberg PE, Howland RH, Keith A. 13.  et al. 1998. Workplace performance effects from chronic depression and its treatment. J. Health Econ. 17:511–35 [Google Scholar]
  14. Beronio K, Glied S, Frank RG. 14.  2014. How the Affordable Care Act and Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act greatly expand coverage of behavioral health care. J. Behav. Health Serv. Res. 41:410–28 [Google Scholar]
  15. Berry KN, Huskamp HA, Goldman HH, Barry CL. 15.  2015. A tale of two states: Do consumers see mental health insurance parity when shopping on state exchanges?. Psychiatr. Serv. 66:565–67 [Google Scholar]
  16. Bishop TF, Press MJ, Keyhani S, Pincus HA. 16.  2014. Acceptance of insurance by psychiatrists and the implications for access to mental health care. JAMA Psychiatr 71:176–81 [Google Scholar]
  17. Buchmueller TC, Cooper PF, Jacobson M, Zuvekas SH. 17.  2007. Parity for whom? Exemptions and the extent of state mental health parity legislation. Health Aff 26:w483–87 [Google Scholar]
  18. Busch AB, Huskamp HA, Normand SL, Young AS, Goldman H, Frank RG. 18.  2006. The impact of parity on major depression treatment quality in the Federal Employees' Health Benefits Program after parity implementation. Med. Care 44:506–12 [Google Scholar]
  19. Busch AB, Yoon F, Barry CL, Azzone V, Normand SL. 19.  et al. 2013. The effects of mental health parity on spending and utilization for bipolar, major depression, and adjustment disorders. Am. J. Psychiatr. 170:180–87 [Google Scholar]
  20. Busch SH, Barry CL. 20.  2008. New evidence on the effects of state mental health mandates. Inquiry 45:308–22 [Google Scholar]
  21. Busch SH, Epstein AJ, Harhay MO, Fiellin DA, Un H. 21.  et al. 2014. The effects of federal parity on substance use disorder treatment. Am. J. Manag. Care 20:76–82 [Google Scholar]
  22. Busch SH, Golberstein E, Meara E. 22.  2014. The FDA and ABCs: unintended consequences of antidepressant warnings on human capital. J. Hum. Resour. 49:540–71 [Google Scholar]
  23. Busch SH, Mcginty EE, Stuart EA, Huskamp HA, Gibson TB. 23.  et al. 2017. Was federal parity associated with changes in out-of-network mental health care use and spending?. BMC Health Serv. Res. 17:315 [Google Scholar]
  24. Butler AC, Chapman JE, Forman EM, Beck AT. 24.  2006. The empirical status of cognitive-behavioral therapy: a review of meta-analyses. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 26:17–31 [Google Scholar]
  25. Cseh A. 25.  2008. Labor market consequences of state mental health parity mandates. Forum Health Econ. Policy 11:21–34 [Google Scholar]
  26. Cummings NA, O'Donohue WT. 26. , eds. 2011. Understanding the Behavioral Healthcare Crisis: The Promise of Integrated Care and Diagnostic Reform London: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  27. Dave D, Mukerjee S. 27.  2011. Mental health parity legislation, cost-sharing and substance-abuse treatment admissions. Health Econ 20:161–83 [Google Scholar]
  28. Drake RE, Skinner JS, Bond GR, Goldman HH. 28.  2009. Social security and mental illness: reducing disability with supported employment. Health Aff 28:761–70 [Google Scholar]
  29. Ellis A. 29.  1957. Rational psychotherapy and individual psychology. J. Individ. Psychol. 13:38–44 [Google Scholar]
  30. Ettner SL, Harwood JM, Thalmayer A, Ong MK, Xu H. 30.  et al. 2016. The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act evaluation study: impact on specialty behavioral health utilization and expenditures among “carve-out” enrollees. J. Health Econ. 50:131–43 [Google Scholar]
  31. Feldman J, Kazdin AE. 31.  1995. Parent management training for oppositional and conduct problem children. Clin. Psychol. 48:3–5 [Google Scholar]
  32. Frank RG. 32.  2017. Realizing the promise of parity legislation for mental health. JAMA Psychiatry 74:117–18 [Google Scholar]
  33. Goldman HH, Frank RG, Burnam MA, Huskamp HA, Ridgely MS. 33.  et al. 2006. Behavioral health insurance parity for federal employees. N. Engl. J. Med. 354:1378–86 [Google Scholar]
  34. Goodell S. 34.  2015. Enforcing mental health parity. Health Policy Brief, Nov. 9. Health Aff https://doi.org/10.1377/hpb2015.16 [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  35. Goplerud E. 35.  2013. Consistency of Large Employer and Group Health Plan Benefits with Requirements of the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 Washington, DC: Off. Assist. Secr. Plan. Eval. (ASPE) https://aspe.hhs.gov/system/files/pdf/117351/mhpaeAct_0.pdf [Google Scholar]
  36. Hanson KW. 36.  1998. Public opinion and the mental health parity debate: lessons from the survey literature. Psychiatr. Serv. 49:1059–66 [Google Scholar]
  37. Harris KM, Carpenter C, Bao Y. 37.  2006. The effects of state parity laws on the use of mental health care. Med. Care 44:499–505 [Google Scholar]
  38. Harwood JM, Azocar F, Thalmayer A, Xu H, Ong MK. 38.  et al. 2017. The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act Evaluation Study: impact on specialty behavioral health care utilization and spending among carve-in enrollees. Med. Care 55:164–72 [Google Scholar]
  39. Hollon SD. 39.  2010. Aaron T. Beck: the cognitive revolution in theory and therapy. Bringing Psychotherapy Research to Life: Understanding Change Through the Work of Leading Clinical Researchers LG Castonguay, J Muran, L Angus, JA Hayes, N Ladany, T Anderson 63–74 Washington, DC: Am. Psychol. Assoc. [Google Scholar]
  40. Horgan CM, Hodgkin D, Stewart MT, Quinn A, Merrick EL. 40.  et al. 2016. Health plans’ early response to federal parity legislation for mental health and addiction services. Psychiatr. Serv. 67:162–68 [Google Scholar]
  41. Klick J, Markowitz S. 41.  2006. Are mental health insurance mandates effective? Evidence from suicides. Health Econ 15:83–97 [Google Scholar]
  42. Lang M. 42.  2013. The impact of mental health insurance laws on state suicide rates. Health Econ 22:73–88 [Google Scholar]
  43. McConnell KJ. 43.  2013. The effect of parity on expenditures for individuals with severe mental illness. Health Serv. Res. 48:1634–52 [Google Scholar]
  44. McConnell KJ, Gast SH, McFarland BH. 44.  2012. The effect of comprehensive behavioral health parity on choice of provider. Med. Care 50:527–33 [Google Scholar]
  45. McConnell KJ, Gast SH, Ridgely MS, Wallace NT, Jacuzzi N. 45.  et al. 2012. Behavioral health insurance parity: Does Oregon's experience presage the national experience with the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act?. Am. J. Psychiatry 169:31–38 [Google Scholar]
  46. McConnell KJ, Ridgely MS, McCarty D. 46.  2012. What Oregon's parity law can tell us about the Federal Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act and spending on substance abuse treatment services. Drug Alcohol. Depend 124:340–46 [Google Scholar]
  47. McGinty EE, Busch SH, Stuart EA, Huskamp HA, Gibson TB. 47.  et al. 2015. Federal parity law associated with increased probability of using out-of-network substance use disorder treatment services. Health Aff 34:1331–39 [Google Scholar]
  48. McGuire TG. 48.  2016. Achieving mental health care parity might require changes in payments and competition. Health Aff 35:1029–35 [Google Scholar]
  49. 49. Ment. Health Subst. Use Disorder Parity Task Force. 2016. Final Report Washington, DC: Exec. Off. Pres https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/mental-health-substance-use-disorder-parity-task-force-final-report.pdf [Google Scholar]
  50. Michelson D, Davenport C, Dretzke J, Barlow J, Day C. 50.  2013. Do evidence-based interventions work when tested in the “real world?” A systematic review and meta-analysis of parent management training for the treatment of child disruptive behavior. Clin. Child Fam. Psychol. Rev. 16:18–34 [Google Scholar]
  51. Montz E, Layton T, Busch AB, Ellis RP, Rose S, McGuire TG. 51.  2016. Risk-adjustment simulation: Plans may have incentives to distort mental health and substance use coverage. Health Aff 35:1022–28 [Google Scholar]
  52. Newhouse JP. 52.  1993. Free for All? Lessons from the RAND Health Insurance Experiment Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  53. Pacula RL, Sturm R. 53.  2000. Mental health parity legislation: much ado about nothing?. Health Serv. Res. 35:263–75 [Google Scholar]
  54. Park-Lee E, Lipari RN, Hedden SL, Copello EAP, Kroutil LA. 54.  2016. Receipt of services for substance use and mental health issues among adults: results from the 2015 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. NSDUH Data Rev Sept. https://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/NSDUH-ServiceUseAdult-2015/NSDUH-ServiceUseAdult-2015/NSDUH-ServiceUseAdult-2015.htm [Google Scholar]
  55. Popovici I, Maclean JC, French MT. 55.  2017. The effects of health insurance parity laws for substance use disorder treatment on traffic fatalities: evidence of unintended benefits. NBER Work. Pap. 23388
  56. Prendergast M, Podus D, Finney J, Greenwell L, Roll J. 56.  2006. Contingency management for treatment of substance use disorders: a meta-analysis. Addiction 101:1546–60 [Google Scholar]
  57. Ridgely MS, Burnam MA, Barry CL, Goldman HH, Hennessy KD. 57.  2006. Health plans respond to parity: managing behavioral health care in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program. Milbank Q 84:201–18 [Google Scholar]
  58. Rosenbach M, Lake T, Young C, Conroy W, Quinn B. 58.  et al. 2003. Effects of the Vermont Mental Health and Substance Abuse Parity Law Washington, DC: US Dep. Health Hum. Serv. [Google Scholar]
  59. Stuart EA, McGinty EE, Kalb L, Huskamp HA, Busch SH. 59.  et al. 2017. Increased service use among children with autism spectrum disorder associated with mental health parity law. Health Aff 36:337–45 [Google Scholar]
  60. Thalmayer AG, Friedman SA, Azocar F, Harwood JM, Ettner SL. 60.  2017. The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA) Evaluation Study: impact on quantitative treatment limits. Psychiatr. Serv. 68:435–42 [Google Scholar]
  61. Thomas KC, Ellis AR, Konrad TR, Holzer CE, Morrissey JP. 61.  2009. County-level estimates of mental health professional shortage in the United States. Psychiatr. Serv. 60:1323–28 [Google Scholar]
  62. Tone A. 62.  2009. The Age of Anxiety: A History of America's Turbulent Affair with Tranquilizers New York: Basic Books [Google Scholar]
  63. 63. US Dep. Health Hum. Serv. 1999. Mental Health: A Report of the Surgeon General Rockville, MD: Natl. Inst. Ment. Health https://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/ps/access/NNBBHS.pdf [Google Scholar]
  64. 64. US Dep. Health Hum. Serv. 2015. Medicaid and Children's Health Insurance Programs; Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008; the application of Mental Health parity requirements to coverage offered by Medicaid managed care organizations, the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), and alternative benefit plans. Fed. Regist. 80:6919418–52 https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-04-10/pdf/2015-08135.pdf [Google Scholar]
  65. 65. US Dep. Health Hum. Serv., Subst. Abuse Ment. Health Serv. Adm. 2013. Report to Congress on Nation's Substance Abuse and Mental Health Workforce Issues Rockville, MD: US Dep. Health Hum. Serv., Subst. Abuse Ment. Health Serv. Adm https://store.samhsa.gov/shin/content/PEP13-RTC-BHWORK/PEP13-RTC-BHWORK.pdf [Google Scholar]
  66. 66. US Dep. Treas., US Dep. Labor, US Dep. Health Hum. Serv. 2010. Interim final rules under the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008. Fed. Regist. 75:215410–51 https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2010-02-02/pdf/2010-2167.pdf [Google Scholar]
  67. 67. US GAO (Gov. Account. Off.). 2011. Mental Health and Substances Use. Employers' Insurance Coverage Maintained or Enhanced Since Parity Act, but Effect of Coverage on Enrollees Varied.GAO–12-63 Washington, DC: US GAO http://www.gao.gov/assets/590/586550.pdf [Google Scholar]
  68. Wen H, Cummings JR, Hockenberry JM, Gaydos LM, Druss BG. 68.  2013. State parity laws and access to treatment for substance use disorder in the United States: implications for federal parity legislation. JAMA Psychiatry 70:1355–62 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error