Public health research has witnessed a rapid development in the use of location, environmental, behavioral, and biophysical sensors that provide high-resolution objective time-stamped data. This burgeoning field is stimulated by the development of novel multisensor devices that collect data for an increasing number of channels and algorithms that predict relevant dimensions from one or several data channels. Global positioning system (GPS) tracking, which enables geographic momentary assessment, permits researchers to assess multiplace personal exposure areas and the algorithm-based identification of trips and places visited, eventually validated and complemented using a GPS-based mobility survey. These methods open a new space-time perspective that considers the full dynamic of residential and nonresidential momentary exposures; spatially and temporally disaggregates the behavioral and health outcomes, thus replacing them in their immediate environmental context; investigates complex time sequences; explores the interplay among individual, environmental, and situational predictors; performs life-segment analyses considering infraindividual statistical units using case-crossover models; and derives recommendations for just-in-time interventions.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


Literature Cited

  1. Arentze TA, Dijst M, Dugundij E, Joh C-H, Kapoen L. 1.  et al. 2001. New activity diary format: design and limited empirical evidence. Transp. Res. Rec. 1768:79–88 [Google Scholar]
  2. Auld J, Williams CA, Mohammadian AK, Nelson PC. 2.  2009. An automated GPS-based prompted recall survey with learning algorithms. J. Transp. Lett. 1:59–79 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bohte W, Maat K. 3.  2009. Deriving and validating trip purposes and travel modes for multi-day GPS-based travel surveys: a large-scale application in the Netherlands. Transp. Res. Part C 17:285–97 [Google Scholar]
  4. Brondeel R, Pannier B, Chaix B. 4.  2015. Using GPS, GIS, and accelerometer data to predict transportation modes. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 47:2669–75 [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown BB, Wilson L, Tribby CP, Werner CM, Wolf J. 5.  et al. 2014. Adding maps (GPS) to accelerometry data to improve study participants' recall of physical activity: a methodological advance in physical activity research. Br. J. Sports Med. 48:1054–58 [Google Scholar]
  6. Burgoine T, Jones AP, Namenek Brouwer RJ, Benjamin Neelon SE. 6.  2015. Associations between BMI and home, school and route environmental exposures estimated using GPS and GIS: Do we see evidence of selective daily mobility bias in children?. Int. J. Health Geogr. 14:8 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bussmann JB, Martens WL, Tulen JH, Schasfoort FC, van den Berg-Emons HJ, Stam HJ. 7.  2001. Measuring daily behavior using ambulatory accelerometry: the activity monitor. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 33:349–56 [Google Scholar]
  8. Carlson JA, Jankowska MM, Meseck K, Godbole S, Natarajan L. 8.  et al. 2015. Validity of PALMS GPS scoring of active and passive travel compared with SenseCam. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 47:662–67 [Google Scholar]
  9. Cerin E, Baranowski T, Barnett A, Butte N, Hughes S. 9.  et al. 2016. Places where preschoolers are (in)active: an observational study on Latino preschoolers and their parents using objective measures. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act 13:29 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cetateanu A, Luca B-A, Popescu AA, Page A, Cooper A, Jones A. 10.  2016. A novel methodology for identifying environmental exposures using GPS data. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 30:1944–60 [Google Scholar]
  11. Chaix B, Kestens Y, Duncan DT, Brondeel R, Méline J. 11.  et al. 2016. A GPS-based methodology to analyze environment-health associations at the trip level: case-crossover analyses of built environments and walking. Am. J. Epidemiol. 184:570–78 [Google Scholar]
  12. Chaix B, Kestens Y, Duncan S, Merrien C, Thierry B. 12.  et al. 2014. Active transportation and public transportation use to achieve physical activity recommendations? A combined GPS, accelerometer, and mobility survey study. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act 11:124 [Google Scholar]
  13. Chaix B, Kestens Y, Perchoux C, Karusisi N, Merlo J, Labadi K. 13.  2012. An interactive mapping tool to assess individual mobility patterns in neighborhood studies. Am. J. Prev. Med. 43:440–50 [Google Scholar]
  14. Chaix B, Méline J, Duncan S, Merrien C, Karusisi N. 14.  et al. 2013. GPS tracking in neighborhood and health studies: a step forward for environmental exposure assessment, a step backward for causal inference?. Health Place 21:46–51 [Google Scholar]
  15. Chaix B, Merlo J, Evans D, Leal C, Havard S. 15.  2009. Neighbourhoods in eco-epidemiologic research: delimiting personal exposure areas. A response to Riva, Gauvin, Apparicio and Brodeur. Soc. Sci. Med. 69:1306–10 [Google Scholar]
  16. Chambers T, Pearson AL, Kawachi I, Rzotkiewicz Z, Stanley J. 16.  et al. 2017. Kids in space: measuring children's residential neighborhoods and other destinations using activity space GPS and wearable camera data. Soc. Sci. Med. 193:41–50 [Google Scholar]
  17. Chambers T, Pearson AL, Stanley J, Smith M, Barr M. 17.  et al. 2017. Children's exposure to alcohol marketing within supermarkets: an objective analysis using GPS technology and wearable cameras. Health Place 46:274–80 [Google Scholar]
  18. Christian WJ. 18.  2012. Using geospatial technologies to explore activity-based retail food environments. Spat. Spatio-Temporal Epidemiol. 3:287–95 [Google Scholar]
  19. Costa S, Ogilvie D, Dalton A, Westgate K, Brage S, Panter J. 19.  2015. Quantifying the physical activity energy expenditure of commuters using a combination of global positioning system and combined heart rate and movement sensors. Prev. Med. 81:339–44 [Google Scholar]
  20. Dessing D, de Vries SI, Graham JMA, Pierik FH. 20.  2014. Active transport between home and school assessed with GPS: a cross-sectional study among Dutch elementary school children. BMC Public Health 14:227 [Google Scholar]
  21. Doherty ST. 21.  2012. Exploring blood glucose variation over geographical space. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 14:276–84 [Google Scholar]
  22. Doherty ST, Lemieux CJ, Canally C. 22.  2014. Tracking human activity and well-being in natural environments using wearable sensors and experience sampling. Soc. Sci. Med. 106:83–92 [Google Scholar]
  23. Doherty ST, Oh P. 23.  2012. A multi-sensor monitoring system of human physiology and daily activities. Telemed. J. E Health 18:185–92 [Google Scholar]
  24. Duncan DT, Regan SD, Chaix B. 24. 2018 Operational neighborhood definitions in neighborhood health research: spatial misclassification and other issues. Neighborhoods and Health ed. DT Duncan, I Kawachi Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press 2nd ed press [Google Scholar]
  25. Duncan DT, Tamura K, Regan SD, Athens J, Elbel B. 25.  et al. 2017. Quantifying spatial misclassification in exposure to noise complaints among low-income housing residents across New York City neighborhoods: a global positioning system (GPS) study. Ann. Epidemiol. 27:67–75 [Google Scholar]
  26. Dunton GF, Almanza E, Jerrett M, Wolch J, Pentz MA. 26.  2014. Neighborhood park use by children: use of accelerometry and global positioning systems. Am. J. Prev. Med. 46:136–42 [Google Scholar]
  27. Dunton GF, Dzubur E, Intille S. 27.  2016. Feasibility and performance test of a real-time sensor-informed context-sensitive ecological momentary assessment to capture physical activity. J. Med. Internet Res. 18:e106 [Google Scholar]
  28. El Aarbaoui T, Méline J, Brondeel R, Chaix B. 28.  2017. Short-term association between personal exposure to noise and heart rate variability: the RECORD MultiSensor Study. Environ. Pollut. 231:703–11 [Google Scholar]
  29. Ellis K, Godbole S, Marshall S, Lanckriet G, Staudenmayer J, Kerr J. 29.  2014. Identifying active travel behaviors in challenging environments using GPS, accelerometers, and machine learning algorithms. Front. Public Health 2:36 [Google Scholar]
  30. Epstein DH, Tyburski M, Craig IM, Phillips KA, Jobes ML. 30.  et al. 2014. Real-time tracking of neighborhood surroundings and mood in urban drug misusers: application of a new method to study behavior in its geographical context. Drug Alcohol. Depend 134:22–29 [Google Scholar]
  31. Feng T, Timmermans HJP. 31.  2013. Transportation mode recognition using GPS and accelerometer data. Transp. Res. Part C 37:118–30 [Google Scholar]
  32. Freisthler B, Lipperman-Kreda S, Bersamin M, Gruenewald PJ. 32.  2014. Tracking the when, where, and with whom of alcohol use: integrating ecological momentary assessment and geospatial data to examine risk for alcohol-related problems. Alcohol Res 36:29–38 [Google Scholar]
  33. Gell NM, Rosenberg DE, Carlson J, Kerr J, Belza B. 33.  2015. Built environment attributes related to GPS measured active trips in mid-life and older adults with mobility disabilities. Disabil. Health J. 8:290–95 [Google Scholar]
  34. Gell NM, Wadsworth DD. 34.  2014. How do they do it: working women meeting physical activity recommendations. Am. J. Health Behav. 38:208–17 [Google Scholar]
  35. Hägerstrand T. 35.  1970. What about people in regional science?. Pap. Reg. Sci. Assoc. 24:1–12 [Google Scholar]
  36. Hajna S, Kestens Y, Daskalopoulou SS, Joseph L, Thierry B. 36.  et al. 2016. Neighbourhood walkability and home neighbourhood-based physical activity: an observational study of adults with type 2 diabetes. BMC Public Health 16:957 [Google Scholar]
  37. Harrison F, Burgoine T, Corder K, van Sluijs EM, Jones A. 37.  2014. How well do modelled routes to school record the environments children are exposed to? A cross-sectional comparison of GIS-modelled and GPS-measured routes to school. Int. J. Health Geogr. 13:5 [Google Scholar]
  38. Helbich M, Emmichoven MJ, Dijst MJ, Kwan MP, Pierik FH, Vries SI. 38.  2016. Natural and built environmental exposures on children's active school travel: a Dutch global positioning system-based cross-sectional study. Health Place 39:101–9 [Google Scholar]
  39. Heron KE, Smyth JM. 39.  2010. Ecological momentary interventions: incorporating mobile technology into psychosocial and health behaviour treatments. Br. J. Health Psychol. 15:1–39 [Google Scholar]
  40. Hirsch JA, Winters M, Ashe MC, Clarke PJ, McKay HA. 40.  2016. Destinations that older adults experience within their GPS activity spaces: relation to objectively measured physical activity. Environ. Behav. 48:55–77 [Google Scholar]
  41. Holliday KM, Howard AG, Emch M, Rodriguez DA, Rosamond WD, Evenson KR. 41.  2017. Deriving a GPS monitoring time recommendation for physical activity studies of adults. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 49:939–47 [Google Scholar]
  42. Hurvitz PM, Moudon AV, Kang B, Saelens BE, Duncan GE. 42.  2014. Emerging technologies for assessing physical activity behaviors in space and time. Front. Public Health 2:2 [Google Scholar]
  43. Inagami S, Cohen DA, Finch BK. 43.  2007. Non-residential neighborhood exposures suppress neighborhood effects on self-rated health. Soc. Sci. Med. 65:1779–91 [Google Scholar]
  44. Intille SS, Lester J, Sallis JF, Duncan G. 44.  2012. New horizons in sensor development. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 44:S24–31 [Google Scholar]
  45. James P, Jankowska M, Marx C, Hart JE, Berrigan D. 45.  et al. 2016. “Spatial energetics”: integrating data from GPS, accelerometry, and GIS to address obesity and inactivity. Am. J. Prev. Med. 51:792–800 [Google Scholar]
  46. James P, Weissman J, Wolf J, Mumford K, Contant CK. 46.  et al. 2016. Comparing GPS, log, survey, and accelerometry to measure physical activity. Am. J. Health Behav. 40:123–31 [Google Scholar]
  47. Jansen M, Ettema D, Pierik F, Dijst M. 47.  2016. Sports facilities, shopping centers or homes: What locations are important for adults' physical activity? A cross-sectional study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 13:287 [Google Scholar]
  48. Kelly P, Doherty AR, Hamilton A, Matthews A, Batterham AM. 48.  et al. 2012. Evaluating the feasibility of measuring travel to school using a wearable camera. Am. J. Prev. Med. 43:546–50 [Google Scholar]
  49. Kerr J, Duncan S, Schipperijn J. 49.  2011. Using global positioning systems in health research: a practical approach to data collection and processing. Am. J. Prev. Med. 41:532–40 [Google Scholar]
  50. Kerr J, Marshall SJ, Godbole S, Chen J, Legge A. 50.  et al. 2013. Using the SenseCam to improve classifications of sedentary behavior in free-living settings. Am. J. Prev. Med. 44:290–96 [Google Scholar]
  51. Kestens Y, Lebel A, Daniel M, Thériault M, Pampalon R. 51.  2010. Using experienced activity spaces to measure foodscape exposure. Health Place 16:1094–103 [Google Scholar]
  52. Kirchner TR, Shiffman S. 52.  2016. Spatio-temporal determinants of mental health and well-being: advances in geographically-explicit ecological momentary assessment (GEMA). Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 51:1211–23 [Google Scholar]
  53. Lin M, Hsu W-J, Lee ZQ. 53.  2013. Detecting modes of transport from unlabelled positioning sensor data. J. Locat. Based Serv. 7:272–90 [Google Scholar]
  54. Loh M, Sarigiannis D, Gotti A, Karakitsios S, Pronk A. 54.  et al. 2017. How sensors might help define the external exposome. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 14:434 [Google Scholar]
  55. Miller HJ, Tribby CP, Brown BB, Smith KR, Werner CM. 55.  et al. 2015. Public transit generates new physical activity: evidence from individual GPS and accelerometer data before and after light rail construction in a neighborhood of Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. Health Place 36:8–17 [Google Scholar]
  56. Nahum-Shani I, Smith SN, Spring BJ, Collins LM, Witkiewitz K. 56.  et al. 2016. Just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) in mobile health: key components and design principles for ongoing health behavior support. Ann. Behav. Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-016-9830-8 [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  57. Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Donaire-Gonzalez D, Foraster M, Martinez D, Cisneros A. 57.  2014. Using personal sensors to assess the exposome and acute health effects. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 11:7805–19 [Google Scholar]
  58. O'Loughlin G, Cullen SJ, McGoldrick A, O'Connor S, Blain R. 58.  et al. 2013. Using a wearable camera to increase the accuracy of dietary analysis. Am. J. Prev. Med. 44:297–301 [Google Scholar]
  59. Oliver M, Badland H, Mavoa S, Duncan MJ, Duncan S. 59.  2010. Combining GPS, GIS, and accelerometry: methodological issues in the assessment of location and intensity of travel behaviors. J. Phys. Act Health 7:102–8 [Google Scholar]
  60. Oliver M, Mavoa S, Badland H, Parker K, Donovan P. 60.  et al. 2015. Associations between the neighbourhood built environment and out of school physical activity and active travel: an examination from the Kids in the City study. Health Place 36:57–64 [Google Scholar]
  61. Panter J, Costa S, Dalton A, Jones A, Ogilvie D. 61.  2014. Development of methods to objectively identify time spent using active and motorised modes of travel to work: How do self-reported measures compare?. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act 11:116 [Google Scholar]
  62. Perchoux C, Kestens Y, Brondeel R, Chaix B. 62.  2015. Accounting for the daily locations visited in the study of the built environment correlates of recreational walking (the RECORD Cohort Study). Prev. Med. 81:142–49 [Google Scholar]
  63. Piasecki TM, Jahng S, Wood PK, Robertson BM, Epler AJ. 63.  et al. 2011. The subjective effects of alcohol-tobacco co-use: an ecological momentary assessment investigation. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 120:557–71 [Google Scholar]
  64. Rainham DG, Bates CJ, Blanchard CM, Dummer TJ, Kirk SF, Shearer CL. 64.  2012. Spatial classification of youth physical activity patterns. Am. J. Prev. Med. 42:e87–96 [Google Scholar]
  65. Rasi H, Kuivila H, Pölkki T, Bloigu R, Rintamäki H, Tourula M. 65.  2017. A descriptive quantitative study of 7- and 8-year-old children's outdoor recreation, cold exposure and symptoms in winter in Northern Finland. Int. J. Circumpolar Health 76:1298883 [Google Scholar]
  66. Sadler RC, Clark AF, Wilk P, O'Connor C, Gilliland JA. 66.  2016. Using GPS and activity tracking to reveal the influence of adolescents' food environment exposure on junk food purchasing. Can. J. Public Health 107:5346 [Google Scholar]
  67. Sadler RC, Gilliland JA. 67.  2015. Comparing children's GPS tracks with geospatial proxies for exposure to junk food. Spat. Spatio-Temporal Epidemiol. 14–15:55–61 [Google Scholar]
  68. Saelens BE, Vernez Moudon A, Kang B, Hurvitz PM, Zhou C. 68.  2014. Relation between higher physical activity and public transit use. Am. J. Public Health 104:854–59 [Google Scholar]
  69. Scully JY, Vernez Moudon A, Hurvitz PM, Aggarwal A, Drewnowski A. 69.  2017. GPS or travel diary: comparing spatial and temporal characteristics of visits to fast food restaurants and supermarkets. PLOS ONE 12:e0174859 [Google Scholar]
  70. Shearer C, Rainham D, Blanchard C, Dummer T, Lyons R, Kirk S. 70.  2015. Measuring food availability and accessibility among adolescents: moving beyond the neighbourhood boundary. Soc. Sci. Med. 133:322–30 [Google Scholar]
  71. Shen L, Stopher PR. 71.  2014. Review of GPS travel survey and GPS data-processing methods. Transp. Rev. 34:316–34 [Google Scholar]
  72. Shiffman S, Stone AA, Hufford MR. 72.  2008. Ecological momentary assessment. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 4:1–32 [Google Scholar]
  73. Signal LN, Smith MB, Barr M, Stanley J, Chambers TJ. 73.  et al. 2017. Kids'Cam: an objective methodology to study the world in which children live. Am. J. Prev. Med. 53:e89–95 [Google Scholar]
  74. Southward EF, Page AS, Wheeler BW, Cooper AR. 74.  2012. Contribution of the school journey to daily physical activity in children aged 11–12 years. Am. J. Prev. Med. 43:201–4 [Google Scholar]
  75. Stopher PR, Collins A. 75.  2005. Conducting a GPS prompted recall survey over the Internet Presented at Annu. Meet. Transp. Res. Board, 84th Washington, DC: [Google Scholar]
  76. Thierry B, Chaix B, Kestens Y. 76.  2013. Detecting activity locations from raw GPS data: a novel kernel-based algorithm. Int. J. Health Geogr. 12:14 [Google Scholar]
  77. Troped PJ, Wilson JS, Matthews CE, Cromley EK, Melly SJ. 77.  2010. The built environment and location-based physical activity. Am. J. Prev. Med. 38:429–38 [Google Scholar]
  78. van Wel L Huss A, Bachmann P, Zahner M, Kromhout H. 78.  et al. 2017. Context-sensitive ecological momentary assessments; integrating real-time exposure measurements, data-analytics and health assessment using a smartphone application. Environ. Int. 103:8–12 [Google Scholar]
  79. Vanwolleghem G, Schipperijn J, Gheysen F, Cardon G, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Van Dyck D. 79.  2016. Children's GPS-determined versus self-reported transport in leisure time and associations with parental perceptions of the neighborhood environment. Int. J. Health Geogr. 15:16 [Google Scholar]
  80. Welk GJ. 80.  2002. Physical Activity Assessments for Health-Related Research Champaign, IL: Hum. Kinet. [Google Scholar]
  81. Wijndaele K, Westgate K, Stephens SK, Blair SN, Bull FC. 81.  et al. 2015. Utilization and harmonization of adult accelerometry data: review and expert consensus. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 47:2129–39 [Google Scholar]
  82. Wolf J, Oliveira M, Thompson M. 82.  2003. Impact of underreporting on mileage and travel time estimates: results from global positioning system-enhanced household travel survey. Transp. Res. Rec. 1854:188–98 [Google Scholar]
  83. Wray TB, Merrill JE, Monti PM. 83.  2014. Using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to assess situation-level predictors of alcohol use and alcohol-related consequences. Alcohol Res 36:19–27 [Google Scholar]
  84. Zandieh R, Martinez J, Flacke J, Jones P, van Maarseveen M. 84.  2016. Older adults' outdoor walking: inequalities in neighbourhood safety, pedestrian infrastructure and aesthetics. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 13:1179 [Google Scholar]
  85. Zenk SN, Schulz AJ, Matthews SA, Odoms-Young A, Wilbur J. 85.  et al. 2011. Activity space environment and dietary and physical activity behaviors: a pilot study. Health Place 17:1150–61 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

Supplementary Data

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error