1932

Abstract

Longstanding racial/ethnic inequalities in morbidity and mortality persist in the United States. Although the determinants of health inequalities are complex, social and structural factors produced by inequitable and racialized systems are recognized as contributing sources. Social epigenetics is an emerging area of research that aims to uncover biological pathways through which social experiences affect health outcomes. A growing body of literature links adverse social exposures to epigenetic mechanisms, namely DNA methylation, offering a plausible pathway through which health inequalities may arise. This review provides an overview of social epigenetics and highlights existing literature linking social exposures—i.e., psychosocial stressors, racism, discrimination, socioeconomic position, and neighborhood social environment—to DNA methylation in humans. We conclude with a discussion of social epigenetics as a mechanistic link to health inequalities and provide suggestions for future social epigenetics research on health inequalities.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-052020-105613
2022-04-05
2024-10-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/publhealth/43/1/annurev-publhealth-052020-105613.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-052020-105613&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. 1. 
    Akinyemiju T, Do AN, Patki A, Aslibekyan S, Zhi D et al. 2018. Epigenome-wide association study of metabolic syndrome in African-American adults. Clin. Epigenetics 10:49
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 2. 
    Alfano R, Guida F, Galobardes B, Chadeau-Hyam M, Delpierre C et al. 2019. Socioeconomic position during pregnancy and DNA methylation signatures at three stages across early life: epigenome-wide association studies in the ALSPAC birth cohort. Int. J. Epidemiol. 48:130–44
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 3. 
    Appleton AA, Armstrong DA, Lesseur C, Lee J, Padbury JF et al. 2013. Patterning in placental 11-B hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase methylation according to prenatal socioeconomic adversity. PLOS ONE 8:9e74691
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 4. 
    Arias E, Tejada-Vera B, Ahmad F 2021. Provisional life expectancy estimates for January through June, 2020. Vital Stat. Rapid Release Rep. 010 Natl. Cent. Health Stat. Hyattsville, MD:
    [Google Scholar]
  5. 5. 
    Aristizabal MJ, Anreiter I, Halldorsdottir T, Odgers CL, McDade TW et al. 2019. Biological embedding of experience: a primer on epigenetics. PNAS 117:3823261–69
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 6. 
    Austin MK, Chen E, Ross KM, McEwen LM, Maclsaac JL et al. 2018. Early-life socioeconomic disadvantage, not current, predicts accelerated epigenetic aging of monocytes. Psychoneuroendocrinology 97:131–34
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 7. 
    Bagby SP, Martin D, Chung ST, Rajapakse N 2019. From the outside in: biological mechanisms linking social and environmental exposures to chronic disease and to health disparities. Am. J. Public Health 109:S1S56–63
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 8. 
    Bailey ZD, Feldman JM, Bassett MT. 2021. How structural racism works—racist policies as a root cause of U.S. racial health inequities. N. Engl. J. Med. 384:8768–73
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 9. 
    Bailey ZD, Krieger N, Agénor M, Graves J, Linos N, Bassett MT. 2017. Structural racism and health inequities in the USA: evidence and interventions. Lancet 389:100771453–63
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 10. 
    Bale TL. 2011. Sex differences in prenatal epigenetic programming of stress pathways. Stress 14:4348–56
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 11. 
    Bale TL, Epperson CN. 2015. Sex differences and stress across the lifespan. Nat. Neurosci. 18:101413–20
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 12. 
    Banda Y, Kvale MN, Hoffmann TJ, Hesselson SE, Ranatunga D et al. 2015. Characterizing race/ethnicity and genetic ancestry for 100,000 subjects in the Genetic Epidemiology Research on Adult Health and Aging (GERA) Cohort. Genetics 200:41285–95
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 13. 
    Bannister AJ, Kouzarides T. 2011. Regulation of chromatin by histone modifications. Cell Res 21:3381–95
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 14. 
    Barcelona de Mendoza V, Huang Y, Crusto CA, Sun YV, Taylor JY. 2018. Perceived racial discrimination and DNA methylation among African American women in the InterGEN study. Biol. Res. Nurs. 20:2145–52
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 15. 
    Barker DJP. 1995. Fetal origins of coronary heart disease. BMJ 311:6998171–74
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 16. 
    Beach SRH, Brody GH, Todorov AA, Gunter TD, Philibert RA 2010. Methylation at SLC6A4 is linked to family history of child abuse: an examination of the Iowa Adoptee sample. Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 153B:2710–13
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 17. 
    Beach SRH, Brody GH, Todorov AA, Gunter TD, Philibert RA 2011. Methylation at 5HTT mediates the impact of child sex abuse on women's antisocial behavior: an examination of the Iowa Adoptee sample. Psychosom. Med. 73:183–87
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 18. 
    Bird A. 2007. Perceptions of epigenetics. Nature 447:7143396–98
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 19. 
    Borghol N, Suderman M, McArdle W, Racine A, Hallett M et al. 2012. Associations with early-life socio-economic position in adult DNA methylation. Int. J. Epidemiol. 41:162–74
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 20. 
    Bowleg L. 2012. The problem with the phrase women and minorities: intersectionality—an important theoretical framework for public health. Am. J. Public Health 102:71267–73
    [Google Scholar]
  21. 21. 
    Brockie TN, Heinzelmann M, Gill J 2013. A framework to examine the role of epigenetics in health disparities among Native Americans. Nurs. Res. Pract. 2013:410395
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 22. 
    Brody GH, Miller GE, Yu T, Beach SRH, Chen E 2016. Supportive family environments amelioratethe link between racial discrimination and epigenetic aging: areplication across two longitudinal cohorts. Psychol. Sci. 27:4530–41
    [Google Scholar]
  23. 23. 
    Brown KM, Hui Q, Huang Y, Taylor JY, Prescott L et al. 2019. Association between stress and coping with DNA methylation of blood pressure-related genes among African American women. Chron. Stress 3:2470547019879088
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 24. 
    Brunst KJ, Tignor N, Just A, Liu Z, Lin X et al. 2018. Cumulative lifetime maternal stress and epigenome-wide placental DNA methylation in the PRISM cohort. Epigenetics 13:6665–81
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 25. 
    Burris HH, Baccarelli AA, Wright RO, Wright RJ 2016. Epigenetics: linking social and environmental exposures to preterm birth. Pediatr. Res. 79:1–2136–40
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 26. 
    Cardoso JB, Padilla YC, Sampson M. 2010. Racial and ethnic variation in the predictors of maternal parenting stress. J. Soc. Serv. Res. 36:5429–44
    [Google Scholar]
  27. 27. 
    Chitrala KN, Hernandez DG, Nalls MA, Mode NA, Zonderman AB et al. 2020. Race-specific alterations in DNA methylation among middle-aged African Americans and Whites with metabolic syndrome. Epigenetics 15:5462–82
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 28. 
    Coker ES, Gunier R, Huen K, Holland N, Eskenazi B. 2018. DNA methylation and socioeconomic status in a Mexican-American birth cohort. Clin. Epigenetics 10:161
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 29. 
    Conching AKS, Thayer Z. 2019. Biological pathways for historical trauma to affect health: a conceptual model focusing on epigenetic modifications. Soc. Sci. Med. 230:74–82
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 30. 
    Crimmins EM, Thyagarajan B, Levine ME, Weir DR, Faul J. 2021. Associations of age, sex, race/ethnicity, and education with 13 epigenetic clocks in a nationally representative U.S. sample: the Health and Retirement Study. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 76:61117–23
    [Google Scholar]
  31. 31. 
    Cunliffe VT. 2015. Experience-sensitive epigenetic mechanisms, developmental plasticity, and the biological embedding of chronic disease risk. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Syst. Biol. Med. 7:253–71
    [Google Scholar]
  32. 32. 
    Cunliffe VT. 2016. The epigenetic impacts of social stress: How does social adversity become biologically embedded?. Epigenomics 8:121653–69
    [Google Scholar]
  33. 33. 
    de Mestral C, Stringhini S. 2017. Socioeconomic status and cardiovascular disease: an update. Curr. Cardiol. Rep. 19:11115
    [Google Scholar]
  34. 34. 
    DeLano K, Folger AT, Ding L, Ji H, Yolton K et al. 2020. Associations between maternal community deprivation and infant DNA methylation of the SLC6A4 gene. Front. Public Health 8:557195
    [Google Scholar]
  35. 35. 
    Dennis AC, Chung EO, Lodge EK, Martinez RA, Wilbur RE. 2021. Looking back to leap forward: a framework for operationalizing the structural racism construct in minority and immigrant health research. Ethn. Dis. 31:Suppl.301–10
    [Google Scholar]
  36. 36. 
    DeSantis CE, Siegel RL, Sauer AG, Miller KD, Fedewa SA et al. 2016. Cancer statistics for African Americans, 2016: progress and opportunities in reducing racial disparities. CA Cancer J. Clin. 66:4290–308
    [Google Scholar]
  37. 37. 
    Devaney JM, Wang S, Furbert-Harris P, Apprey V, Ittmann M et al. 2015. Genome-wide differentially methylated genes in prostate cancer tissues from African-American and Caucasian men. Epigenetics 10:4319–28
    [Google Scholar]
  38. 38. 
    Dhingra R, Nwanaji-Enwerem JC, Samet M, Ward-Caviness CK. 2018. DNA methylation age—environmental influences, health impacts, and its role in environmental epidemiology. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 5:3317–27
    [Google Scholar]
  39. 39. 
    Dunn EC, Soare TW, Zhu Y, Simpkin AJ, Suderman MJ et al. 2019. Sensitive periods for the effect of childhood adversity on DNA methylation: results from a prospective, longitudinal study. Biol. Psychiatry 85:10838–49
    [Google Scholar]
  40. 40. 
    Dunn GA, Morgan CP, Bale TL. 2011. Sex-specificity in transgenerational epigenetic programming. Horm. Behav. 59:3290–95
    [Google Scholar]
  41. 41. 
    Essex MJ, Thomas Boyce W, Hertzman C, Lam LL, Armstrong JM et al. 2013. Epigenetic vestiges of early developmental adversity: childhood stress exposure and DNA methylation in adolescence. Child Dev 84:158–75
    [Google Scholar]
  42. 42. 
    Evans L, Engelman M, Mikulas A, Malecki K 2021. How are social determinants of health integrated into epigenetic research? A systematic review. Soc. Sci. Med. 273:113738
    [Google Scholar]
  43. 43. 
    Ferrucci L, Gonzalez-Freire M, Fabbri E, Simonsick E, Tanaka T et al. 2020. Measuring biological aging in humans: a quest. Aging Cell 19:2e13080
    [Google Scholar]
  44. 44. 
    Fiorito G, McCrory C, Robinson O, Carmeli C, Rosales CO et al. 2019. Socioeconomic position, lifestyle habits and biomarkers of epigenetic aging: a multi-cohort analysis. Aging 11:72045–70
    [Google Scholar]
  45. 45. 
    Fryar CD, Chen T-C, Xianfen L. 2012. Prevalence of uncontrolled risk factors for cardiovascular disease: United States, 1999–2010 NCHS Data Brief. 103 Natl. Cent. Health Stat. Hyattsville, MD:
    [Google Scholar]
  46. 46. 
    Fryar CD, Ostchega Y, Hales CM, Kruszon-Moran D, Guangyu Z. 2017. Hypertension prevalence and control among adults: United States, 2015–2016. NCHS Data Brief. 289 Natl. Cent. Health Stat. Hyattsville, MD:
    [Google Scholar]
  47. 47. 
    George A, Hardy R, Castillo Fernandez J, Kelly Y, Maddock J 2021. Life course socioeconomic position and DNA methylation age acceleration in mid-life. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 75:111084–90
    [Google Scholar]
  48. 48. 
    Geronimus AT. 2001. Understanding and eliminating racial inequalities in women's health in the United States: the role of the weathering conceptual framework. J. Am. Med. Women's Assoc. 56:4 133–36:149–50
    [Google Scholar]
  49. 49. 
    Geronimus AT. 2013. Deep integration: letting the epigenome out of the bottle without losing sight of the structural origins of population health. Am. J. Public Health 103:Suppl. 1S56–63
    [Google Scholar]
  50. 50. 
    Geronimus AT, Hicken M, Keene D, Bound J 2006.. “ Weathering” and age patterns of allostatic load scores among blacks and whites in the United States. Am. J. Public Health 96:5826–33
    [Google Scholar]
  51. 51. 
    Giurgescu C, Nowak AL, Gillespie S, Nolan TS, Anderson CM et al. 2019. Neighborhood environment and DNA methylation: implications for cardiovascular disease risk. J. Urban Health 96:S123–34
    [Google Scholar]
  52. 52. 
    Goosby BJ, Cheadle JE, Mitchell C. 2018. Stress-related biosocial mechanisms of discrimination and African American health inequities. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 44:319–40
    [Google Scholar]
  53. 53. 
    Hatch SL, Dohrenwend BP. 2007. Distribution of traumatic and other stressful life events by race/ethnicity, gender, SES and age: a review of the research. Am. J. Community Psychol. 40:3–4313–32
    [Google Scholar]
  54. 54. 
    Horvath S, Raj K. 2018. DNA methylation-based biomarkers and the epigenetic clock theory of ageing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 19:6371–84
    [Google Scholar]
  55. 55. 
    Houtepen LC, Hardy R, Maddock J, Kuh D, Anderson EL et al. 2018. Childhood adversity and DNA methylation in two population-based cohorts. Transl. Psychiatry 8:1266
    [Google Scholar]
  56. 56. 
    Howland MA, Sandman CA, Glynn LM. 2017. Developmental origins of the human hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Expert Rev. Endocrinol. Metab. 12:5321–39
    [Google Scholar]
  57. 57. 
    Huang JY, Gavin AR, Richardson TS, Rowhani-Rahbar A, Siscovick DS et al. 2016. Accounting for life-course exposures in epigenetic biomarker association studies: early life socioeconomic position, candidate gene DNA methylation, and adult cardiometabolic risk. Am. J. Epidemiol. 184:7520–31
    [Google Scholar]
  58. 58. 
    Hughes A, Smart M, Gorrie-Stone T, Hannon E, Mill J et al. 2018. Socioeconomic position and DNA methylation age acceleration across the life course. Am. J. Epidemiol. 187:112346–54
    [Google Scholar]
  59. 59. 
    Jones PA. 2012. Functions of DNA methylation: islands, start sites, gene bodies and beyond. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13:7484–92
    [Google Scholar]
  60. 60. 
    Kandaswamy R, Hannon E, Arseneault L, Mansell G, Sugden K et al. 2021. DNA methylation signatures of adolescent victimization: analysis of a longitudinal monozygotic twin sample. Epigenetics 16:11116986
    [Google Scholar]
  61. 61. 
    Kertes DA, Bhatt SS, Kamin HS, Hughes DA, Rodney NC, Mulligan CJ 2017. BNDF methylation in mothers and newborns is associated with maternal exposure to war trauma. Clin. Epigenetics 9:68
    [Google Scholar]
  62. 62. 
    Kertes DA, Kamin HS, Hughes DA, Rodney NC, Bhatt S, Mulligan CJ. 2016. Prenatal maternal stress predicts methylation of genes regulating the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical system in mothers and newborns in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Child Dev 87:161–72
    [Google Scholar]
  63. 63. 
    King KE, Kane JB, Scarbrough P, Hoyo C, Murphy SK. 2016. Neighborhood and family environment of expectant mothers may influence prenatal programming of adult cancer risk: discussion and an illustrative DNA methylation example. Biodemogr. Soc. Biol. 62:187–104
    [Google Scholar]
  64. 64. 
    Kogan SM, Cho J, Beach SRH, Smith AK, Nishitani S. 2018. Oxytocin receptor gene methylation and substance use problems among young African American men. Drug Alcohol Depend 192:309–15
    [Google Scholar]
  65. 65. 
    Krieger N. 2001. A glossary for social epidemiology. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 55:10693–700
    [Google Scholar]
  66. 66. 
    Krieger N. 2001. Theories for social epidemiology in the 21st century: an ecosocial perspective. Int. J. Epidemiol. 30:4668–77
    [Google Scholar]
  67. 67. 
    Krieger N. 2005. Embodiment: a conceptual glossary for epidemiology. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 59:5350–55
    [Google Scholar]
  68. 68. 
    Krieger N. 2005. Stormy weather: race, gene expression, and the science of health disparities. Am. J. Public Health 95:122155–60
    [Google Scholar]
  69. 69. 
    Kuzawa CW, Sweet E. 2009. Epigenetics and the embodiment of race: developmental origins of US racial disparities in cardiovascular health. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 21:12–15
    [Google Scholar]
  70. 70. 
    Laubach ZM, Perng W, Cardenas A, Rifas-Shiman SL, Oken E et al. 2019. Socioeconomic status and DNA methylation from birth through mid-childhood: a prospective study in Project Viva. Epigenomics 11:121413–27
    [Google Scholar]
  71. 71. 
    Lawn RB, Anderson EL, Suderman M, Simpkin AJ, Gaunt TR et al. 2018. Psychosocial adversity and socioeconomic position during childhood and epigenetic age: analysis of two prospective cohort studies. Hum. Mol. Genet. 27:71301–8
    [Google Scholar]
  72. 72. 
    Lawrence KG, Kresovich JK, O'Brien KM, Hoang TT, Xu Z et al. 2020. Association of neighborhood deprivation with epigenetic aging using 4 clock metrics. JAMA Netw. Open 3:11e2024329
    [Google Scholar]
  73. 73. 
    Lei M-K, Beach SRH, Simons RL, Philibert RA. 2015. Neighborhood crime and depressive symptoms among African American women: genetic moderation and epigenetic mediation of effects. Soc. Sci. Med. 146:120–28
    [Google Scholar]
  74. 74. 
    Lei M-K, Simons RL, Beach SRH, Philibert RA. 2019. Neighborhood disadvantage and biological aging: using marginal structural models to assess the link between neighborhood census variables and epigenetic aging. J. Gerontol. Ser. B 74:7e50–59
    [Google Scholar]
  75. 75. 
    Levine ME. 2020. Assessment of epigenetic clocks as biomarkers of aging in basic and population research. J. Gerontol. Ser. A 75:3463–65
    [Google Scholar]
  76. 76. 
    Li R, Fang J, Huo B, Su Y-S, Wang J et al. 2017. Leucine-rich repeat neuronal protein 4 (LRRN4) potentially functions in dilated cardiomyopathy. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 10:99925
    [Google Scholar]
  77. 77. 
    Liu Z, Chen BH, Assimes TL, Ferrucci L, Horvath S, Levine ME. 2019. The role of epigenetic aging in education and racial/ethnic mortality disparities among older U.S. women. Psychoneuroendocrinology 104:18–24
    [Google Scholar]
  78. 78. 
    Logan JR. 2013. The persistence of segregation in the 21st century metropolis. City Community 12:2 https://doi.org/10.1111/cico.12021
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  79. 79. 
    Lu AT, Quach A, Wilson JG, Reiner AP, Aviv A et al. 2019. DNA methylation GrimAge strongly predicts lifespan and healthspan. Aging 11:2303–27
    [Google Scholar]
  80. 80. 
    Marini S, Davis KA, Soare TW, Zhu Y, Suderman MJ et al. 2020. Adversity exposure during sensitive periods predicts accelerated epigenetic aging in children. Psychoneuroendocrinology 113:104484
    [Google Scholar]
  81. 81. 
    Martin CL, Ward-Caviness CK, Dhingra R, Zikry TM, Galea S et al. 2021. Neighborhood environment, social cohesion, and epigenetic aging. Aging 13:67883–99
    [Google Scholar]
  82. 82. 
    Martin EM, Fry RC. 2018. Environmental influences on the epigenome: exposure-associated DNA methylation in human populations. Annu. Rev. Public Health 39:309–33
    [Google Scholar]
  83. 83. 
    Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, Driscoll AK. 2021. Births: final data for 2019 Natl. Vital Stat. Rep. 70(2) Natl. Cent. Health Stat. Hyattsville, MD:
    [Google Scholar]
  84. 84. 
    Marzi SJ, Sugden K, Arseneault L, Belsky DW, Burrage J et al. 2018. Analysis of DNA methylation in young people: limited evidence for an association between victimization stress and epigenetic variation in blood. Am. J. Psychiatry 175:6517–29
    [Google Scholar]
  85. 85. 
    McCrory C, Fiorito G, Ni Cheallaigh C, Polidoro S, Karisola P et al. 2019. How does socio-economic position (SEP) get biologically embedded? A comparison of allostatic load and the epigenetic clock(s). Psychoneuroendocrinology 104:64–73
    [Google Scholar]
  86. 86. 
    McDade TW, Ryan CP, Jones MJ, Hoke MK, Borja J et al. 2019. Genome-wide analysis of DNA methylation in relation to socioeconomic status during development and early adulthood. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 169:13–11
    [Google Scholar]
  87. 87. 
    McDade TW, Ryan CP, Jones MJ, MacIsaac JL, Morin AM et al. 2017. Social and physical environments early in development predict DNA methylation of inflammatory genes in young adulthood. PNAS 114:297611–16
    [Google Scholar]
  88. 88. 
    McGuinness D, McGlynn LM, Johnson PC, MacIntyre A, Batty GD et al. 2012. Socio-economic status is associated with epigenetic differences in the pSoBid cohort. Int. J. Epidemiol. 41:1151–60
    [Google Scholar]
  89. 89. 
    Min Y, Anugu P, Butler KR, Hartley TA, Mwasongwe S et al. 2017. Cardiovascular disease burden and socioeconomic correlates: findings from the Jackson Heart Study. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 6:8e004416
    [Google Scholar]
  90. 90. 
    Montoya-Williams D, Quinlan J, Clukay C, Rodney NC, Kertes DA, Mulligan CJ. 2018. Associations between maternal prenatal stress, methylation changes in IGF1 and IGF2, and birth weight. J. Dev. Orig. Health Dis. 9:2215–22
    [Google Scholar]
  91. 91. 
    Mulligan CJ, D'Errico NC, Stees J, Hughes DA 2012. Methylation changes at NR3C1 in newborns associate with maternal prenatal stress exposure and newborn birth weight. Epigenetics 7:8853–57
    [Google Scholar]
  92. 92. 
    Muntaner C, Eaton WW, Miech R, O'Campo P. 2004. Socioeconomic position and major mental disorders. Epidemiol. Rev. 26:153–62
    [Google Scholar]
  93. 93. 
    Musemwa N, Gadegbeku CA. 2017. Hypertension in African Americans. Curr. Cardiol. Rep 19:12129
    [Google Scholar]
  94. 94. 
    Nam Y, Wikoff N, Sherraden M. 2015. Racial and ethnic differences in parenting stress: evidence from a statewide sample of new mothers. J. Child Fam. Stud. 24:2278–88
    [Google Scholar]
  95. 95. 
    Needham BL, Smith JA, Zhao W, Wang X, Mukherjee B et al. 2015. Life course socioeconomic status and DNA methylation in genes related to stress reactivity and inflammation: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Epigenetics 10:10958–69
    [Google Scholar]
  96. 96. 
    Obermann-Borst SA, Heijmans BT, Eilers PHC, Tobi EW, Steegers EAP et al. 2012. Periconception maternal smoking and low education are associated with methylation of INSIGF in children at the age of 17 months. J. Dev. Orig. Health Dis. 3:5315–20
    [Google Scholar]
  97. 97. 
    Olden K, Lin Y-S, Gruber D, Sonawane B. 2014. Epigenome: biosensor of cumulative exposure to chemical and nonchemical stressors related to environmental justice. Am. J. Public Health 104:101816–21
    [Google Scholar]
  98. 98. 
    Olden K, Olden HA, Lin Y-S. 2015. The role of the epigenome in translating neighborhood disadvantage into health disparities. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 2:2163–70
    [Google Scholar]
  99. 99. 
    Omi M, Winant H. 2018. Racial Formation in the United States New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
  100. 100. 
    Ostlund BD, Conradt E, Crowell SE, Tyrka AR, Marsit CJ, Lester BM. 2016. Prenatal stress, fearfulness, and the epigenome: exploratory analysis of sex differences in DNA methylation of the glucocorticoid receptor gene. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 10:147
    [Google Scholar]
  101. 101. 
    Palma-Gudiel H, Córdova-Palomera A, Eixarch E, Deuschle M, Fañanás L 2015. Maternal psychosocial stress during pregnancy alters the epigenetic signature of the glucocorticoid receptor gene promoter in their offspring: a meta-analysis. Epigenetics 10:10893–902
    [Google Scholar]
  102. 102. 
    Piletič K, Kunej T. 2016. MicroRNA epigenetic signatures in human disease. Arch. Toxicol. 90:102405–19
    [Google Scholar]
  103. 103. 
    Radtke KM, Ruf M, Gunter HM, Dohrmann K, Schauer M et al. 2011. Transgenerational impact of intimate partner violence on methylation in the promoter of the glucocorticoid receptor. Transl. Psychiatry 1:7e21
    [Google Scholar]
  104. 104. 
    Reuben A, Sugden K, Arseneault L, Corcoran DL, Danese A et al. 2020. Association of neighborhood disadvantage in childhood with DNA methylation in young adulthood. JAMA Netw. Open 3:6e206095
    [Google Scholar]
  105. 105. 
    Roberts AL, Gladish N, Gatev E, Jones MJ, Chen Y et al. 2018. Exposure to childhood abuse is associated with human sperm DNA methylation. Transl. Psychiatry 8:1194
    [Google Scholar]
  106. 106. 
    Roberts D. 2011. Fatal Invention: How Science, Politics, and Big Business Re-create Race in the Twenty-First Century New York: New Press
    [Google Scholar]
  107. 107. 
    Saban KL, Mathews HL, DeVon HA, Janusek LW 2014. Epigenetics and social context: implications for disparity in cardiovascular disease. Aging Dis 5:5346–55
    [Google Scholar]
  108. 108. 
    Salihu HM, Das R, Morton L, Huang H, Paothong A et al. 2016. Racial differences in DNA-methylation of CpG sites within preterm-promoting genes and gene variants. Matern. . Child Health J 20:81680–87
    [Google Scholar]
  109. 109. 
    Santos HP, Bhattacharya A, Martin EM, Addo K, Psioda M et al. 2019. Epigenome-wide DNA methylation in placentas from preterm infants: association with maternal socioeconomic status. Epigenetics 14:8751–65
    [Google Scholar]
  110. 110. 
    Santos HP, Nephew BC, Bhattacharya A, Tan X, Smith L et al. 2018. Discrimination exposure and DNA methylation of stress-related genes in Latina mothers. Psychoneuroendocrinology 98:131–38
    [Google Scholar]
  111. 111. 
    Serpeloni F, Radtke K, de Assis SG, Henning F, Nätt D, Elbert T. 2017. Grandmaternal stress during pregnancy and DNA methylation of the third generation: an epigenome-wide association study. Transl. Psychiatry 7:8e1202
    [Google Scholar]
  112. 112. 
    Sharkey P. 2008. The intergenerational transmission of context. Am. J. Sociol. 113:4931–69
    [Google Scholar]
  113. 113. 
    Shields AE. 2017. Epigenetic signals of how social disadvantage “gets under the skin”: a challenge to the public health community. Epigenomics 9:3223–29
    [Google Scholar]
  114. 114. 
    Shields AE, Wise LA, Ruiz-Narvaez EA, Seddighzadeh B, Byun HM et al. 2016. Childhood abuse, promoter methylation of leukocyte NR3C1 and the potential modifying effect of emotional support. Epigenomics 8:111507–17
    [Google Scholar]
  115. 115. 
    Simons RL, Lei MK, Beach SRH, Philibert RA, Cutrona CE et al. 2016. Economic hardship and biological weathering: the epigenetics of aging in a U.S. sample of black women. Soc. Sci. Med. 150:192–200
    [Google Scholar]
  116. 116. 
    Smith JA, Zhao W, Wang X, Ratliff SM, Mukherjee B et al. 2017. Neighborhood characteristics influence DNA methylation of genes involved in stress response and inflammation: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Epigenetics 12:8662–73
    [Google Scholar]
  117. 117. 
    Straughen JK, Sipahi L, Uddin M, Misra DP, Misra VK. 2015. Racial differences in IGF1 methylation and birth weight. Clin. Epigenetics 7:147
    [Google Scholar]
  118. 118. 
    Stringhini S, Polidoro S, Sacerdote C, Kelly RS, van Veldhoven K et al. 2015. Life-course socioeconomic status and DNA methylation of genes regulating inflammation. Int. J. Epidemiol. 44:41320–30
    [Google Scholar]
  119. 119. 
    Sumner JA, Colich NL, Uddin M, Armstrong D, McLaughlin KA 2019. Early experiences of threat, but not deprivation, are associated with accelerated biological aging in children and adolescents. Biol. Psychiatry 85:3268–78
    [Google Scholar]
  120. 120. 
    Sutherland S, Brunwasser SM 2018. Sex differences in vulnerability to prenatal stress: a review of the recent literature. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 20:11102
    [Google Scholar]
  121. 121. 
    Tehranifar P, Wu H-C, Fan X, Flom JD, Ferris JS et al. 2014. Early life socioeconomic factors and genomic DNA methylation in mid-life. Epigenetics 8:123–27
    [Google Scholar]
  122. 122. 
    Thayer ZM, Kuzawa CW. 2011. Biological memories of past environments: epigenetic pathways to health disparities. Epigenetics 6:7798–803
    [Google Scholar]
  123. 123. 
    Tung J, Gilad Y. 2013. Social environmental effects on gene regulation. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 70:224323–39
    [Google Scholar]
  124. 124. 
    Turecki G, Meaney MJ. 2016. Effects of the social environment and stress on glucocorticoid receptor gene methylation: a systematic review. Biol. Psychiatry 79:287–96
    [Google Scholar]
  125. 125. 
    van der Laan LC, Meeks KAC, Chilunga FP, Agyemang C, Venema A et al. 2020. Epigenome-wide association study for perceived discrimination among sub-Saharan African migrants in Europe—the RODAM study. Sci. Rep. 10:4919
    [Google Scholar]
  126. 126. 
    Vick AD, Burris HH. 2017. Epigenetics and health disparities. Curr. Epidemiol. Rep. 4:131–37
    [Google Scholar]
  127. 127. 
    Vidal AC, Neelon SEB, Liu Y, Tuli AM, Fuemmeler BF et al. 2014. Maternal stress, preterm birth, and DNA methylation at imprint regulatory sequences in humans. Genet. Epigenetics 6:37–44
    [Google Scholar]
  128. 128. 
    Vidrascu EM, Bashore AC, Howard TD, Moore JB 2019. Effects of early- and mid-life stress on DNA methylation of genes associated with subclinical cardiovascular disease and cognitive impairment: a systematic review. BMC Med. Genet. 20:139
    [Google Scholar]
  129. 129. 
    Vitale AM, Matigian NA, Cristino AS, Nones K, Ravishankar S et al. 2017. DNA methylation in schizophrenia in different patient-derived cell types. npj Schizophr 3:6
    [Google Scholar]
  130. 130. 
    Wang S, Dorsey TH, Terunuma A, Kittles RA, Ambs S, Kwabi-Addo B 2012. Relationship between tumor DNA methylation status and patient characteristics in African-American and European-American women with breast cancer. PLOS ONE 7:5e37928
    [Google Scholar]
  131. 131. 
    Wang X, Falkner B, Zhu H, Shi H, Su S et al. 2013. A genome-wide methylation study on essential hypertension in young African American males. PLOS ONE 8:1e53938
    [Google Scholar]
  132. 132. 
    Ward-Caviness CK, Pu S, Martin CL, Galea S, Uddin M et al. 2020. Epigenetic predictors of all-cause mortality are associated with objective measures of neighborhood disadvantage in an urban population. Clin. Epigenetics 12:144
    [Google Scholar]
  133. 133. 
    Williams DR, Collins C. 2001. Racial residential segregation: a fundamental cause of racial disparities in health. Public Health Rep 116:13
    [Google Scholar]
  134. 134. 
    Williams DR, Lawrence JA, Davis BA. 2019. Racism and health: evidence and needed research. Annu. Rev. Public Health 40:105–25
    [Google Scholar]
  135. 135. 
    Williams DR, Mohammed SA. 2009. Discrimination and racial disparities in health: evidence and needed research. J. Behav. Med. 32:120–47
    [Google Scholar]
  136. 136. 
    Wolf EJ, Maniates H, Nugent N, Maihofer AX, Armstrong D et al. 2018. Traumatic stress and accelerated DNA methylation age: a meta-analysis. Psychoneuroendocrinology 92:123–34
    [Google Scholar]
  137. 137. 
    Wright ML, Huang Y, Hui Q, Newhall K, Crusto C et al. 2017. Parenting stress and DNA methylation among African Americans in the InterGEN study. J. Clin. Transl. Sci. 1:6328–33
    [Google Scholar]
  138. 138. 
    Wu S, Gennings C, Wright RJ, Wilson A, Burris HH et al. 2018. Prenatal stress, methylation in inflammation-related genes, and adiposity measures in early childhood: the programming research in obesity, growth environment and social stress cohort study. Psychosom. Med. 80:134–41
    [Google Scholar]
  139. 139. 
    Xia Y, Ding Y, Liu X, Chen X, Cheng S et al. 2014. Racial/ethnic disparities in human DNA methylation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1846:1258–62
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-052020-105613
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-052020-105613
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error