1932

Abstract

Among the challenges facing research translation—the effort to move evidence into policy and practice—is that key questions chosen by investigators and funders may not always align with the information priorities of decision makers, nor are the findings always presented in a form that is useful for or relevant to the decisions at hand. This disconnect is a problem particularly for population health, where the change agents who can make the biggest difference in improving health behaviors and social and environmental conditions are generally nonscientists outside of the health professions. To persuade an audience that does not read scientific journals, strong science may not be enough to elicit change. Achieving influence in population health often requires four ingredients for success: research that is responsive to user needs, an understanding of the decision-making environment, effective stakeholder engagement, and strategic communication. This article reviews the principles and provides examples from a national and local initiative.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-082214-110901
2015-03-18
2024-06-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/publhealth/36/1/annurev-publhealth-082214-110901.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-082214-110901&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Ackermann RT, Holmes AM, Saha C. 1.  2013. Designing a natural experiment to evaluate a national health care-community partnership to prevent type 2 diabetes. Prev. Chronic Dis. 10:E12 [Google Scholar]
  2. 2. ASTHO (Assoc. State Territorial Health Officials) Primary care. ASTHO, Arlington, VA. http://www.astho.org/programs/access/primary-care/ [Google Scholar]
  3. Bernhardt JM, Mays D, Kreuter MW. 3.  2011. Dissemination 2.0: closing the gap between knowledge and practice with new media and marketing. J. Health Commun. 16:Suppl. 132–44 [Google Scholar]
  4. Best A, Stokols D, Green LW, Leischow S, Holmes B, Buchholz K. 4.  2003. An integrative framework for community partnering to translate theory into effective health promotion strategy. Am. J. Health Promot. 18:168–76 [Google Scholar]
  5. Briones RL, Kuch B, Fisher Liu B, Jin Y. 5.  2011. Keeping up with the digital age: how the American Red Cross uses social media to build relationships. Public Relat. Rev. 37:37–43 [Google Scholar]
  6. Brownson RC, Chriqui JF, Stamatakis KA. 6.  2009. Understanding evidence-based public health policy. Am. J. Public Health 99:1576–83 [Google Scholar]
  7. 7. Camden Coalit. Healthc. Provid 2014. About the coalition. Camden Coalit. Healthc. Provid., Camden, NJ. http://www.camdenhealth.org/about/about-the-coalition/history/ [Google Scholar]
  8. 8. Cent. Soc. Health 2014. Education: It matters more to health than ever before. Issue Brief, Jan. Cent. Soc. Health, Va. Commonw. Univ., Richmond. http://societyhealth.vcu.edu/DownFile.ashx?fileid=1739 [Google Scholar]
  9. 9. Cent. Soc. Health 2014. Education: It Matters More to Health Than Ever Before YouTube video, 3:23, posted by Robert Wood Johnson Found. on Jan. 8. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C8N4wka3wak [Google Scholar]
  10. 10. Cent. Soc. Health 2014. Why education matters to health: exploring the causes. Issue Brief, April. Cent. Soc. Health, Va. Commonw. Univ., Richmond. http://www.societyhealth.vcu.edu/DownFile.ashx?fileid=1795 [Google Scholar]
  11. 11. Cent. Soc. Health 2014. Why Education Matters to Health: Exploring the Causes YouTube video, 4:33, posted by Robert Wood Johnson Found. on April 29. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3rsdBBFAN8 [Google Scholar]
  12. 12. Cent. Soc. Health 2014. Education: Your lifespan is closely tied to the amount of education you received or completed. Cent. Soc. Health, Va. Commonw. Univ., Richmond. http://www.societyhealth.vcu.edu/Landing.aspx?nav=310 [Google Scholar]
  13. 13. Cent. Soc. Health 2014. Engaging Richmond. Cent. Soc. Health, Va. Commonw. Univ., Richmond. http://www.societyhealth.vcu.edu/Page.aspx?nav=283 [Google Scholar]
  14. 14. City St. Louis Plan. Comm 2013. City of St. Louis Sustainability Plan. St. Louis, MO: City St. Louis https://www.stlouis-mo.gov/government/departments/planning/documents/upload/130219%20STL%20Sustainability%20Plan.pdf [Google Scholar]
  15. Cochran PAL, Marshall CA, Garcia-Downing C, Kendall E, Cook D. 15.  et al. 2008. Indigenous ways of knowing: implications for participatory research and community. Am. J. Public Health 1:22–27 [Google Scholar]
  16. 16. Comm. Educ. Fund Member organizations. Comm. Educ. Fund., Washington, DC. http://cef.org/who-we-are/member-organizations/ [Google Scholar]
  17. 17. CTSA (Clin. Transl. Sci. Awards) Consort. Community Engagem. Key Funct. Comm. Task Force, Natl. Inst. Health 2011. Principles of Community Engagement. Atlanta: Cent. Dis. Control Prev., Agency for Toxic Subst. Dis. Registr, 2nd. Ed. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/communityengagement/pdf/PCE_Report_508_FINAL.pdf [Google Scholar]
  18. Dent B, Torguson J, Hodler T. 18.  2008. Cartography: Thematic Map Design New York: McGraw-Hill, 6th ed.. [Google Scholar]
  19. Diez Roux AV. 19.  2011. Complex systems thinking and current impasses in health disparities research. Am. J. Public Health 101:1627–34 [Google Scholar]
  20. Dobbins M, DeCorby K, Twiddy T. 20.  2004. A knowledge transfer strategy for public health decision makers. Worldviews Evid. Based Nurs. 1:120–28 [Google Scholar]
  21. Dobbins M, Rosenbaum P, Plews N, Law M, Fysh A. 21.  2007. Information transfer: What do decision makers want and need from researchers?. Implement. Sci. 2:20 [Google Scholar]
  22. Drake BF, Elder K. 22.  2013. Chronic disease in St. Louis: progress for better health Policy Brief, Dec. For the Sake of All, Wash. Univ., St. Louis Univ., St. Louis, MO. http://forthesakeofall.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/policy-brief-51.pdf [Google Scholar]
  23. Entwistle VA, Renfrew MJ, Yearley S, Forrester J, Lamont T. 23.  1998. Lay perspectives: advantages for health research. BMJ 316:463–66 [Google Scholar]
  24. 24. Fed. Reserve Bank 2012. Investing in What Works for America's Communities: Essays on People Place and Purpose. San Francisco: Fed. Reserve Bank San Franc., Low Income Invest. Fund [Google Scholar]
  25. Flanagan W. 25.  2010. Social media marketing. Proc. Conf. Corpor. Commun.9 New York: Corp. Commun. Int. Baruch Coll. /CUNY [Google Scholar]
  26. Fontanarosa PB, DeAngelis CD. 26.  2002. Basic science and translational research in JAMA. JAMA 287:1728 [Google Scholar]
  27. 27. For the Sake of All 2014. A Report on the Health and Well-Being of African Americans in St. Louis—and Why It Matters for Everyone. St. Louis, MO: Wash. Univ. St. Louis, Saint Louis Univ. [Google Scholar]
  28. Gagnon ML. 28.  2011. Moving knowledge to action through dissemination and exchange. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 64:25–31 [Google Scholar]
  29. Glasgow RE, Vinson C, Chambers D, Khoury MJ, Kaplan RM, Hunter C. 29.  2012. National Institutes of Health approaches to dissemination and implementation science: current and future directions. Am. J. Public Health 102:1274–81 [Google Scholar]
  30. Goodman MS, Gilbert KL. 30.  2013. Segregation: divided cities lead to differences in health Policy Brief, Nov. For the Sake of All, Wash. Univ., St. Louis Univ., St. Louis, MO. http://forthesakeofall.files.wordpress.com/2013/11/policy-brief-4.pdf [Google Scholar]
  31. Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, Straus SE, Tetroe J. 31.  et al. 2006. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map?. J. Contin. Educ. Health Prof. 26:13–24 [Google Scholar]
  32. Hood NE, Brewer T, Jackson R, Wewers ME. 32.  2010. Survey of community engagement in NIH-funded research. Clin. Transl. Sci. 3:19–22 [Google Scholar]
  33. Horowitz CR, Robinson M, Seifer S. 33.  2009. Community-based participatory research from the margin to the mainstream: Are researchers prepared?. Circulation 19:2633–42 [Google Scholar]
  34. Howard PN, Duffy A, Freelon D, Hussain M, Mari W, Mazaid M. 34.  2011. Opening closed regimes: What was the role of social media during the Arab spring? Work. Pap. 2011.1. Proj. Inf. Technol. Polit. Islam., Univ. Wash., Seattle. http://pitpi.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/2011_Howard-Duffy-Freelon-Hussain-Mari-Mazaid_pITPI.pdf [Google Scholar]
  35. Hudson DL. 35.  2013. How can we improve mental health in St. Louis? Invest in our community and raise awareness. Policy Brief, Oct. For the Sake of All, Wash. Univ., St. Louis Univ., St. Louis, MO. http://forthesakeofall.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/policy-brief-3.pdf [Google Scholar]
  36. 36. Inst. Med 2001. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press [Google Scholar]
  37. 37. Inst. Med 2011. For the Public's Health: The Role of Measurement in Action and Accountability. Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press [Google Scholar]
  38. 38. Inst. Med 2012. Primary Care and Public Health: Exploring Integration to Improve Population Health. Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press [Google Scholar]
  39. 39. Inst. Med 2013. The CTSA Program at NIH: Opportunities for Advancing Clinical and Translational Research. Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press [Google Scholar]
  40. Israel BA, Eng E, Schulz AJ, Parker EA. 40.  2005. Methods in Community-Based Participatory Research for Health San Francisco: Jossey-Bass [Google Scholar]
  41. Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB. 41.  1998. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu. Rev. Public Health 19:173–202 [Google Scholar]
  42. Izumi BT, Schulz AJ, Israel BA, Reyes AG. 42.  2010. The one-pager: a practical policy advocacy tool for translating community-based participatory research into action. Prog. Community Health Partnersh.: Res. Educ. Action 4:2141–47 [Google Scholar]
  43. Joiner R. 43.  2013. Can segregation make you sick? Researchers study effects of health. St. Louis Beacon Nov. 6. https://www.stlbeacon.org/#!/content/33545/segregation_and_health_110513?coverpage=4266 [Google Scholar]
  44. Kania J, Kramer M. 44.  2011. Collective impact. Stanford Soc. Innov. Rev. Winter:36–41 [Google Scholar]
  45. Kreuter MW, Bernhardt JM. 45.  2009. Reframing the dissemination challenge: a marketing and distribution perspective. Am. J. Public Health 99:2123–27 [Google Scholar]
  46. Kreuter MW, Wray RJ. 46.  2003. Tailored and targeted health communication: strategies for enhancing information relevance. Am. J. Health Behav. 2:Suppl. 3S227–32 [Google Scholar]
  47. Leischow SJ, Best A, Trochim WM, Clark PI, Gallagher RS. 47.  et al. 2008. Systems thinking to improve the public's health. Am. J. Prev. Med. 35:S196–203 [Google Scholar]
  48. Loiselle CG, Semenic S, Côté B. 48.  2005. Sharing empirical knowledge to improve breastfeeding promotion and support: description of a research dissemination project. Worldviews Evid.-Based Nurs. 2:25–32 [Google Scholar]
  49. MacEachren AM. 49.  1995. How Maps Work: Representation, Visualization, and Design New York: Guilford Press [Google Scholar]
  50. McBride T, Coburn A, MacKinney C, Mueller K, Slifkin R, Wakefield M. 50.  2008. Bridging health research and policy: effective dissemination strategies. J. Public Health Manag. Pract. 14:150–54 [Google Scholar]
  51. McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, Keesey J, Hicks J. 51.  et al. 2003. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N. Engl. J. Med. 348:2635–45 [Google Scholar]
  52. McGuire WJ. 52.  1991. Theoretical foundations of campaigns. Public Communication Campaigns RE Rice, CK Atkin 43–65 Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 2nd ed.. [Google Scholar]
  53. Minkler M. 53.  2010. Linking science and policy through community-based participatory research to study and address health disparities. Am. J. Public Health 100:Suppl. 1S81–87 [Google Scholar]
  54. Mittman BS, Tonesk X, Jacobson PD. 54.  1992. Implementing clinical practice guidelines: social influence strategies and practitioner behavior change. QRB Qual. Rev. Bull. 18:413–22 [Google Scholar]
  55. Morris ZS, Wooding S, Grant J. 55.  2011. The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research. J. R. Soc. Med. 104:510–20 [Google Scholar]
  56. 56. Natl. Cent. Health Stat 2011. Health, United States, 2010: With Special Feature on Death and Dying. Hyattsville, MD: Natl. Cent. Health Stat. [Google Scholar]
  57. 57. NCAI (Natl. Congr. Am. Indians) Policy Res. Cent./MSU Cent. Native Health Partners 2102. Walk Softly and Listen Carefully: Building Research Relationships with Tribal Communities. Washington, DC/Bozeman, MT: NCAI Policy Res. Cent. Montana State Univ. Cent. Native Health Partn. [Google Scholar]
  58. 58. NIH (Natl. Inst. Health) 2014. Implementation science information and resources Fogarty Int. Cent., NIH, Bethesda, Md. http://www.fic.nih.gov/researchtopics/pages/implementationscience.aspx [Google Scholar]
  59. Niederdeppe J, Bu QL, Borah P, Kindig DA, Robert SA. 59.  2008. Message design strategies to raise public awareness of social determinants of health and population health disparities. Milbank Q. 86:481–513 [Google Scholar]
  60. Noonan RK, Wilson KM, Mercer SL. 60.  2012. Navigating the road ahead: public health challenges and the interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation. Am. J. Community Psychol. 50:572–80 [Google Scholar]
  61. Norman DA. 61.  2004. Emotional Design: Why We Love (Or Hate) Everyday Things New York: Basic Books [Google Scholar]
  62. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. 62.  2013. Prevalence of obesity among adults: United States, 2011–2012. NCHS Data Brief 131:1–8 [Google Scholar]
  63. 63. PCORI (Patient-Cent. Outcomes Res. Inst.), Method. Comm 2013. The PCORI Methodology Report. Washington, DC: PCORI http://www.pcori.org/research-we-support/research-methodology-standards [Google Scholar]
  64. Purnell J. 64.  2013. How can we save lives—and save money—in St. Louis? Invest in economic and educational opportunity. Policy Brief, Aug. For the Sake of All, Wash. Univ., St. Louis Univ., St. Louis, MO. http://forthesakeofall.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/policy-brief-1.pdf [Google Scholar]
  65. Ratzan SC. 65.  2011. Our new “social” communication age in health. J. Health Commun. 16:803–4 [Google Scholar]
  66. Reardon R, Lavis J, Gibson J. 66.  2006. From Research to Practice: A Knowledge Transfer Planning Guide Toronto: Inst. Work Health [Google Scholar]
  67. Revere D, Turner AM, Madhavan A, Rambo N, Bugni PF. 67.  et al. 2007. Understanding the information needs of public health practitioners: a literature review to inform design of an interactive digital knowledge management system. J. Biomed. Inform. 40:410–21 [Google Scholar]
  68. 68. Robert Wood Johnson Found 2010. A New Way to Talk About the Social Determinants of Health Princeton, NJ: Robert Wood Johnson Found http://www.rwjf.org/content/dam/farm/reports/reports/2010/rwjf63023 [Google Scholar]
  69. Robins D, Holmes J. 69.  2008. Aesthetics and credibility in web site design. Inf. Process. Manag. 44:386–99 [Google Scholar]
  70. Rudolph L, Caplan J, Ben-Moshe K, Dillon L. 70.  2013. Health in All Policies: A Guide for State and Local Governments. Washington, DC/Oakland, CA: Am. Public Health Assoc./Public Health Inst. [Google Scholar]
  71. Scullion PA. 71.  2002. Issues in research: effective dissemination strategies. Nurse Res. 10:65–77 [Google Scholar]
  72. Shore N, Brazauskas R, Drew E, Wong KA, Moy L. 72.  et al. 2011. Understanding community-based processes for research ethics review: a national study. Am. J. Public Health 101:Suppl.1S359–64 [Google Scholar]
  73. Tate WF. 73.  2013. How does health influence school dropout? Policy Brief, Sept. For the Sake of All, Wash. Univ., St. Louis Univ., St. Louis, MO. http://forthesakeofall.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/policy-brief-2.pdf [Google Scholar]
  74. Viswanathan M, Ammerman A, Eng E, Gartlehner G, Lohr KN. 74.  et al. 2004. Community-Based Participatory Research: Assessing the Evidence Evid. Rep./Technol. Assess. No. 99. RTI—Univ. NC Evid.-Based Pract. Cent. AHRQ Publ. 04-E022-2 Rockville, MD: Agency Healthc. Res. Qual. [Google Scholar]
  75. Waddill P, McDaniel M. 75.  1992. Pictorial enhancement of text memory: limitations imposed by picture type and comprehension skill. Mem. Cognit. 20:472–82 [Google Scholar]
  76. Wagner EH, Glasgow RE, Davis C, Bonomi AE, Provost L. 76.  et al. 2001. Quality improvement in chronic illness care: a collaborative approach. Jt. Comm. J. Qual. Improv. 27:63–80 [Google Scholar]
  77. Wallace J, Nwosu B, Clarke M. 77.  2012. Barriers to the uptake of evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a systematic review of decision makers' perceptions. BMJ Open 2:5 pii:e001220 [Google Scholar]
  78. Wallerstein N, Duran B. 78.  2010. Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research: the intersection of science and practice to improve health equity. Am. J. Public Health 100:Suppl. 1S40–46 [Google Scholar]
  79. Wallerstein NB, Duran B. 79.  2006. Using community-based participatory research to address health disparities. Health Promot. Pract. 7:312–23 [Google Scholar]
  80. Wandersman A, Duffy J, Flaspohler P, Noonan R, Lubell K. 80.  et al. 2008. Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: the interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation. Am. J. Community Psychol. 41:171–81 [Google Scholar]
  81. Waters RD, Burnett E, Lamm A, Lucas J. 81.  2009. Engaging stakeholders through social networking: how nonprofit organizations are using Facebook. Public Relat. Rev. 35:102–6 [Google Scholar]
  82. Westcott S. 82.  2007. Face time: Charities flock to social-networking Web sites to reach out to new people, spark discussion, and help raise money. Chron. Philanthr. 19:39 http://philanthropy.com/article/Face-Time/54580/ [Google Scholar]
  83. Woolf SH. 83.  2008. The meaning of translational research and why it matters. JAMA 299:211–13 [Google Scholar]
  84. Woolf SH. 84.  2014. Connecting the dots between education, health and opportunity. Ideas Blog June 27. Investing in What Works for America's Communities, San Francisco. http://www.whatworksforamerica.org/connecting-the-dots-between-education-health-and-opportunity/#.U7mslk1OWpo [Google Scholar]
  85. Woolf SH, Aron L. 85.  Panel on Understanding Cross-National Health Differences Among High-Income Countries, Natl. Res. Counc., Comm. Popul., Div. Behav. Soc. Sci. Educ., Board on Popul. Health Public Health Pract., Inst. Med 2013. U.S. Health in International Perspective: Shorter Lives, Poorer Health Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press [Google Scholar]
  86. Zimmerman E, Woolf SH. 86.  2014. Understanding the Relationship Between Education and Health Discuss. Pap. Roundtable Popul. Health, Inst. Med Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Sci http://www.iom.edu/Global/Perspectives/2014/UnderstandingTheRelationship.aspx [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-082214-110901
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-082214-110901
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error