Introduction to the Symposium: Causal Inference and Public Health

Literature Cited

1. 1. 

   Bareinboim E, Pearl J 2013. A general algorithm for deciding transportability of experimental results. J. Causal Inference 1:107–34
   [Google Scholar]
2. 2. 

   Bind M-A 2019. Causal modeling in environmental health. Annu. Rev. Public Health 40:23–43
   [Google Scholar]
3. 3. 

   Bind M-A, Vanderweele TJ, Coull BA, Schwartz JD 2016. Causal mediation analysis for longitudinal data with exogenous exposure. Biostatistics 17:122–34
   [Google Scholar]
4. 4. 

   Cole SR, Stuart EA 2010. Generalizing evidence from randomized clinical trials to target populations: the ACTG 320 trial. Am. J. Epidemiol. 172:107–15
   [Google Scholar]
5. 5. 

   Ford CL, Harawa NT 2010. A new conceptualization of ethnicity for social epidemiologic and health equity research. Soc. Sci. Med. 71:251–58
   [Google Scholar]
6. 6. 

   Galea S, Vaughan R 2016. A public health of consequence. Am. J. Public Health 106:10–11
   [Google Scholar]
7. 7. 

   Glymour MM, Spiegelman D 2017. Evaluating public health interventions: 5. Causal inference in public health research—Do sex, race, and biological factors cause health outcomes?. Am. J. Public Health 107:81–85
   [Google Scholar]
8. 8. 

   Green LW, Nasser M 2018. Furthering dissemination and implementation research: the need for more attention to external validity. Dissemination and Implementation Research: Translating Science to Practice R Brownson, G Colditz, E Parker 305–26 New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 2nd ed..
   [Google Scholar]
9. 9. 

   Haber N, Smith ER, Moscoe E, Andrews K, Audy R et al. 2018. Causal language and strength of inference in academic and media articles shared in social media (CLAIMS): a systematic review. PLOS ONE 13:e0196346
   [Google Scholar]
10. 10. 

    Hernán MA 2016. Does water kill? A call for less casual causal inferences. Ann. Epidemiol. 26:674–80
    [Google Scholar]
11. 11. 

    Hernán MA 2018. The C-word: Scientific euphemisms do not improve causal inference from observational data. Am. J. Public Health 108:616–19
    [Google Scholar]
12. 12. 

    Hernán MA, Robins JM 2006. Estimating causal effects from epidemiological data. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 60:578–86
    [Google Scholar]
13. 13. 

    Huebschmann AG, Leavitt IM, Glasgow RE 2019. Making health research matter: a call to increase attention to external validity. Annu. Rev. Public Health 40:45–63
    [Google Scholar]
14. 14. 

    Kaufman J 2019. Commentary: Causal inference for social exposures. Annu. Rev. Public Health 40:7–21
    [Google Scholar]
15. 15. 

    Krieger N, Davey Smith G 2016. The tale wagged by the DAG: broadening the scope of causal inference and explanation for epidemiology. Int. J. Epidemiol. 45:1787–808
    [Google Scholar]
16. 16. 

    Robins JM, Weissman MB 2016. Commentary: Counterfactual causation and streetlamps: What is to be done?. Int. J. Epidemiol. 45:1830–35
    [Google Scholar]
17. 17. 

    Sen M, Wasow O 2016. Race as a bundle of sticks: designs that estimate effects of seemingly immutable characteristics. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 19:499–522
    [Google Scholar]
18. 18. 

    Vandenbroucke JP, Broadbent A, Pearce N 2016. Causality and causal inference in epidemiology: the need for a pluralistic approach. Int. J. Epidemiol. 45:1776–86
    [Google Scholar]
19. 19. 

    VanderWeele TJ, Robinson WR 2014. On the causal interpretation of race in regressions adjusting for confounding and mediating variables. Epidemiology 25:473–84
    [Google Scholar]
20. 20. 

    Westreich D, Edwards JK, Lesko CR, Cole SR, Stuart EA 2018. Target validity and the hierarchy of study designs. Am. J. Epidemiol. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwy228
    [Crossref]
21. 21. 

    Westreich D, Edwards JK, Lesko CR, Stuart E, Cole SR 2017. Transportability of trial results using inverse odds of sampling weights. Am. J. Epidemiol. 186:1010–14
    [Google Scholar]