1932

Abstract

Accurate measures of productivity growth are an important policy tool but are difficult to obtain in South African circumstances. In this article, we review work on the measurement of farm-level productivity in South Africa since the earliest attempts at multifactor indices in the early 1990s. The focus is on total factor productivity, but single input measures such as labor and land productivity (yields) are also discussed. Measurements using time-series and cross-sectional data are discussed separately, along with measures to explain the effect of climate change. Data deficiencies are also pointed out. The article concludes that international collaboration should be maintained if important issues such as the COVID-19 impact, food security, climate change, and labor market shocks are to be successfully addressed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-111920-014135
2022-10-05
2024-12-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/resource/14/1/annurev-resource-111920-014135.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-111920-014135&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Arnade C, Khatri Y, Schimmelpfennig D, Thirtle C, Van Zyl J. 2000. A long-run profit function and a review of returns to R&D. See Thirtle et al. 2000 234–45
  2. Avkiran NK. 2011. Association of DEA super-efficiency estimates with financial ratios: investigating the case of Chinese banks. Omega 39:323–34
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bhorat H, Kanbur R, Stanwix B. 2014. Estimating the impact of minimum wages on employment, wages, and non-wage benefits: the case of agriculture in South Africa. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 96:1402–19
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Block S 2016. The decline and rise of agricultural productivity in Sub-Saharan Africa since 1961. African Successes, Vol. 4: Sustainable Growth S Edwards, S Johnson, DN Weil 13–68 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Boatemaa S, Drimie S, Pereira L. 2018. Addressing food and nutrition security in South Africa: a review of policy responses since 2002. Afr. J. Agric. Res. Econ. 13:264–79
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bundy C. 1979. The Rise and Fall of the South African Peasantry London: Heinemann
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Chaminuka P, Bientema N, Flaherty K, Liebenberg F. 2019. Public agricultural research and development spending in South Africa—update. Agrekon 58:7–20
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cofré-Bravo G, Klerkx L, Engler A. 2019. Combinations of bonding, bridging, and linking social capital for farm innovation: how farmers configure different support networks. J. Rural Stud. 69:53–64
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Conradie B. 2019. Designing for successful land reform for the extensive grazing sector. S. Afr. J. Agric. Ext. 47:1–12
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Conradie B, Genis A. 2020. Efficiency of a mixed farming system in a marginal winter rainfall area of the Overberg, South Africa, with implications for thinking about sustainability. Agrekon 59:387–400
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Conradie B, Genis A, Greyling J, Piesse J. 2021. District level agricultural total factor productivity for the Karoo, South Africa: 1952–2002. Agrekon 60:128–44
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Conradie B, Piesse J. 2015. Productivity benchmarking of free-range sheep operations: technical efficiency, correlates of productivity and dominant technology variants for Laingsburg, South Africa. Agrekon 54:1–17
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Conradie B, Piesse J. 2016. Ranking perceived risk to farmers: How important is the environment?. Afr. J. Agric. Res. Econ. 11:263–76
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Conradie B, Piesse J, Stephens J. 2019a. The changing environment: efficiency, vulnerability and changes in land use in the South African Karoo, 2012–2014. Environ. Dev. 32:100453
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Conradie B, Piesse J, Strauss J. 2021. Impact of heat and moisture stress on crop productivity: evidence from the Langgewens Research Farm. S. Afr. J. Sci. 117:8898
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Conradie B, Piesse J, Thirtle C. 2009a. District level total factor productivity in agriculture: Western Cape Province, South Africa, 1952–2002. Agric. Econ. 40:265–80
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Conradie B, Piesse J, Thirtle C. 2009b. What is the appropriate level of aggregation for productivity indices? Comparing district, regional and national measures. Agrekon 48:9–20
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Conradie B, Piesse J, Thirtle C, Vink N. 2019b. South African wine grape production, 2005–2015: regional comparisons of scale and technical efficiencies and total factor productivity. Agrekon 58:53–65
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Devereux S, Waidler J. 2017. Why does malnutrition persist in South Africa despite social grants? Food Secur. Work. Pap. 002, DST-NRF Cent. Excell. Food Secur., Univ. West. Cape, S. Afr. https://foodsecurity.ac.za/publications/why-does-malnutrition-persist-in-south-africa-despite-social-grants/
    [Google Scholar]
  20. D'Haese M, Calus M, Kirsten J, Van Huylenbroeck G, Bostyn F 2001. Efficiency analysis of small scale wool production in the former Transkei, South Africa. Agrekon 40:316–30
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Dlamini T, Liebenberg F. 2015. The aggregate economic benefits of the National Cultivar Trials for Maize in South Africa with specific reference to the Highveld region. Agrekon 54:43–61
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Dyer M, Mills R, Conradie B, Piesse J. 2015. Harvest of hope: the contribution of peri-urban agriculture in South African townships. Agrekon 54:71–84
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Galloway C, Conradie B, Prozesky H, Esler K. 2018. Are private and social goals aligned in pasture-based dairy production?. J. Clean. Prod. 175:402–8
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Gandidzanwa C, Liebenberg F. 2016. Towards a new capital formation series for machinery in South African agriculture. Agrekon 55:216–36
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Gandidzanwa C, Liebenberg F, Meyer F, Conradie B. 2019. Quality agricultural machinery in South Africa. Agrekon 58:42–52
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Greyling JC, Pardey PG. 2019. Measuring maize in South Africa: the shifting structure of production during the twentieth century, 1904–2015. Agrekon 58:21–41
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Gwebu JZ, Matthews N. 2018. Metafrontier analysis of commercial and smallholder tomato production: a South African case. S. Afr. J. Sci. 114:55–62
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Henning JIF. 2011. Financial benchmarking analysis: Northern Cape farmers M. Com. Thesis, Univ. Free State Bloemfontein, S. Afr:.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Henning JIF, Strydom DB, Willemse BJ, Matthews N 2013. Financial measurements to rank farms in the Northern Cape, South Africa, using Data Envelopment Analysis Presented at the 19th International Farm Management Congress Warsaw, Poland: July 21–26
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Hosu SY, Cishe EN, Luswazi PN. 2016. Vulnerability to climate change in the Eastern Cape province of South Africa: What does the future hold for smallholder crop farmers?. Agrekon 55:133–67
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Hough DL. 2009. Applied Risk Management in Agriculture Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Jordaan H, Grové B, Matthews N. 2013. Investigating potential financial gains from using production inputs more efficiently. Agrekon 52:87–100
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Jury MR. 2020. Climate trends in the Cape Town area, South Africa. Water SA 46:438–47
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Khatri Y, Schimmelpfennig D, Thirtle C, Van Zyl J. 1996. Refining returns to research and development in South African commercial agriculture. Agrekon 35:283–90
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Khatri Y, Thirtle C. 2000. Cointegration and modelling the length and shape of the research lag. See Thirtle et al. 2000 203–18
  36. Khatri Y, Thirtle C, Van Zyl J 1995. South African agricultural competitiveness: a profit function approach to the effects of policies and technology. Agricultural Competitiveness: Market Forces and Policy Choice GH Peters, DD Hedley 670–84 Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth Publ.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Khatri Y, Thirtle C, Van Zyl J. 2000. The effects of policy and technology: a profit function approach. See Thirtle et al. 2000 219–33
  38. Kirsten J, Stander R, Haankuku C. 2011. South Africa: private agricultural research and innovation ASTI Country Note, Int. Food Policy Res. Inst. Washington, DC:
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Kryszak Ł, Świerczyńska K, Staniszewski J. 2021. Measuring total factor productivity in agriculture: a bibliometric review. Int. J. Emerg. Mark. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-04-2020-0428
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  40. Liebenberg F, Pardey PG 2010. South African agricultural production and productivity patterns. The Shifting Patterns of Agricultural Production and Productivity Worldwide J Alston, B Babcott, PG Pardey 383–408 Ames, IA: Iowa State Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Liebenberg F, Pardey PG. 2011. South African agricultural R&D: policies and public institutions, 1880–2007. Agrekon 50:1–15
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Liebenberg F, Pardey PG. 2012. A long-run view of South African agricultural production and productivity. Afr. J. Agric. Res. Econ. 7:14–38
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Liebenberg F, Pardey P, Kirsten J, Beddow J 2015. Re-estimating South African agricultural output value, quantity and price aggregates, 1910–2010. Agrekon 54:1–27
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Matthews N, Jordaan H, Grové B. 2015. Efficient resource use and farmer-to-farmer skill transfers: the case of Eksteenskuil raisin producers, South Africa Presented at the 20th International Farm Management Congress Quebec City, Canada: July 12–17
    [Google Scholar]
  45. McKenzie C, Weiner D, Vink N. 1989. Land use, agricultural productivity and farming systems in southern Africa Res. Rep., Dev. Bank South. Afr. Midrand:
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Mdlulwa Z, Masemola M, Chaminuka P, Madyo S. 2019. Economic analysis of new generation vaccines for control of lumpy skin disease and Rift Valley Fever in South Africa. Agrekon 58:125–40
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Mkhabela T. 2005. Technical efficiency in a vegetable based mixed-cropping sector in Tugela Ferry, Msinga District, KwaZulu-Natal. Agrekon 44:187–204
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Mkhabela T, Piesse J, Thirtle C, Vink N. 2010. Modelling efficiency with farm-produced inputs: dairying in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Agrekon 49:102–21
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Naledzani Z, Nhundu K, Chaminuka P, Machethe CL, Liebenberg F. 2019. Economic value of quality restrictions on the wheat industry in South Africa. Agrekon 58:102–12
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Nevondo TT, Chaminuka P, Nhundu K, Liebenberg F. 2019. Economic returns from investment in beef cattle improvement research in South Africa. Agrekon 58:113–24
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Ngwenya SA, Battese GE, Fleming EM. 1997. The relationship between farm size and the technical inefficiency of production of wheat farmers in the Eastern Free State province of South Africa. Agrekon 36:283–302
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Nhemachena CR, Kirsten JF, Liebenberg F. 2019. Estimating and attributing benefits from wheat varietal innovations in South African agriculture. Agrekon 58:68–85
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Nhundu K, Chaminuka P, Booyse M, Nemakhavhani S. 2019. Yield and economic benefits of the national cultivar trials for wheat in South Africa: 1998–2016. Agrekon 58:86–101
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Nyam YS, Matthews N, Bahta YT. 2020. Improving livelihoods of smallholder farmers through region specific strategies: a case study of South African sheep production. Agrekon 59:1–15
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Oude Lansink A, Silva E 2004. Non-parametric production analysis of pesticides use in the Netherlands. J. Prod. Anal. 21:49–65
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Piesse J, Conradie B, Thirtle C, Vink N. 2018. Efficiency in wine grape production: comparing long-established and newly developed regions of South Africa. Agric. Econ. 49:203–12
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Piesse J, Hadley D, Thirtle C, Van Zyl J. 2000a. The effects of the 1992 drought on productivity in the former homelands: an application of the Malmquist index. See Thirtle et al. 2000 149–59
  58. Piesse J, Sartorius von Bach H, Thirtle C, Van Zyl J. 2000b. Farm size and efficiency of smallholder agriculture. See Thirtle et al. 2000 133–48
  59. Qi L, Bravo-Ureta BE, Cabrera VE 2015. From cold to hot: climatic effects and productivity in Wisconsin dairy farms. J. Dairy Sci. 98:8664–67
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Sartorius von Bach HJ, Townsend RF, Van Zyl J. 1998. Technical inefficiency of commercial maize producers in South Africa: a stochastic frontier production function approach. Agrekon 37:162–70
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Schimmelpfennig D, Thirtle C, Van Zyl J, Arnade C, Khatri Y. 2000. Short and long-run returns to agricultural R&D in South Africa, or will the real rate of return please stand up?. Agric. Econ. 23:1–15
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Talanow K, Topp EN, Loos J, Martín-López B. 2021. Farmers’ perceptions of climate change and adaptation strategies in South Africa's Western Cape. J. Rural Stud. 81:203–19
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Tibesigwa B, Visser M, Turpie J. 2017. Climate change and South Africa's commercial farms: an assessment of impacts on specialised horticulture, crop, livestock and mixed farming systems. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 19:607–36
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Thirtle C, Lin L, Piesse J. 2003. The impact of research-led agricultural productivity growth on poverty reduction in Africa, Asia and Latin America. World Dev. 31:1959–75
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Thirtle C, Piesse J, Gouse M. 2005. Agricultural technology, productivity and employment: policies for poverty reduction. Agrekon 44:37–59
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Thirtle C, Sartorius von Bach HS, Van Zyl J. 1993. Total factor productivity in South African agriculture, 1947–91. Dev. South. Afr. 10:301–18
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Thirtle C, Sartorius von Bach H, Van Zyl J. 2000a. Measuring total factor productivity growth in South African commercial agriculture, 1947–91. See Thirtle et al. 2000 83–107
  68. Thirtle C, Townsend RF, Amadi J, Lusigi A, Van Zyl J. 1998. The rate of return on expenditures of the South African Agricultural Research Council (ARC). Agrekon 37:612–22
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Thirtle C, Van Zyl J. 2000. Explaining total factor productivity growth: the returns to research and extension in commercial agriculture. See Thirtle et al. 2000 190–202
  70. Thirtle C, Van Zyl J, Vink N, eds. 2000. South African Agriculture at the Crossroads London: Macmillan
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Townsend RF, Kirsten J, Vink N 1998. Farm size, productivity and returns to scale in agriculture revisited: a case study of wine producers in South Africa. Agric. Econ. 19:175–80
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Townsend RF, Thirtle C. 2000. R&D and crop level supply response in maize, sorghum and wheat. See Thirtle et al. 2000 246–63
  73. Townsend RF, Thirtle C. 2001. Is livestock research unproductive? Separating health maintenance from improvement research. Agric. Econ. 25:3177–89
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Townsend RF, Van Zyl J. 1998. Estimation of the rate of return to wine grape research and technology development expenditures in South Africa. Agrekon 37:189–210
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Van Zyl J 1996. The relationship between farm size and efficiency. Agricultural Land Reform in South Africa: Policies, Markets and Mechanisms J Van Zyl, JF Kirsten, HP Binswanger Cape Town: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Van Zyl J. 2000. Farm size and efficiency in South African commercial agriculture. See Thirtle et al. 2000 117–32
  77. Van Zyl J, Thirtle C. 1998. Comment: The relationship between farm size and the technical efficiency of production of wheat farmers in the eastern Free State. Agrekon 37:110–16
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Van Zyl J, Van Schalkwyk H, Thirtle C. 2000. Sources of profitability: relative prices and productivity. See Thirtle et al. 2000 108–16
  79. Vink N. 2012. The long-term economic consequences of agricultural marketing legislation in South Africa. S. Afr. J. Econ. 80:553–66
    [Google Scholar]
  80. World Bank 2017. South Africa economic update: innovation for productivity and inclusiveness Work. Pap. 119695 World Bank Washington, DC:
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-111920-014135
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-111920-014135
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error