1932

Abstract

▪ Abstract 

Public reporting of provider performance is becoming increasingly commonplace. In this chapter, we first review studies of prior public reports (or report cards) that show real but small impact on provider attempts to improve quality, on consumers' impressions of providers, and even on consumer selection of providers. Among other factors, two potential explanations for the low level of impact are that, in most early reports, the large majority of providers have been labeled “average” and consumers may have had difficulty understanding the statistical assessments. In response, some current report card producers are using or considering a variety of methods to increase the number of distinctions among providers and the ease of comprehension of the labels used. Therefore, we also consider the advantages and disadvantages of several novel approaches to analyzing and reporting provider performance.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102210
2006-04-21
2024-06-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102210
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102210
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error