Food Matrix and Macronutrient Digestion

Literature Cited

1. Aguilera JM. 2019. The food matrix: implications in processing, nutrition and health. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 59:3612–29
   [Google Scholar]
2. Amoako DB, Awika JM. 2019. Resistant starch formation through intrahelical V-complexes between polymeric proanthocyanidins and amylose. Food Chem 285:326–33
   [Google Scholar]
3. Armand M, Pasquier B, André M, Borel P, Senft M et al. 1999. Digestion and absorption of 2 fat emulsions with different droplet sizes in the human digestive tract. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 70:1096–106
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bach Knudsen KE. 2001. The nutritional significance of “dietary fibre” analysis. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 90:3–20
   [Google Scholar]
5. Baer DJ, Gebauer SK, Novotny JA. 2012. Measured energy value of pistachios in the human diet. Br. J. Nutr. 107:120–25
   [Google Scholar]
6. Baer D, Gebauer S, Novotny J. 2014. Atwater factors overestimate the calorie content of walnuts. FASEB J 28:S1371.1
   [Google Scholar]
7. Baer DJ, Novotny JA. 2019. Metabolizable energy from cashew nuts is less than that predicted by Atwater factors. Nutrients 11:33
   [Google Scholar]
8. Barbé F, Le Feunteun S, Laroche B, Dupont D 2012. Mathematical modelling of milk proteins digestion dynamics. IFAC Proc. Volumes 45:1437–41
   [Google Scholar]
9. Barbé F, Ménard O, Le Gouar Y, Buffière C, Famelart M-H et al. 2013. The heat treatment and the gelation are strong determinants of the kinetics of milk proteins digestion and of the peripheral availability of amino acids. Food Chem 136:1203–12
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bax M-L, Aubry L, Ferreira C, Daudin J-D, Gatellier P et al. 2012. Cooking temperature is a key determinant of in vitro meat protein digestion rate: investigation of underlying mechanisms. J. Agric. Food Chem. 60:2569–76
    [Google Scholar]
11. Bax M-L, Buffière C, Hafnaoui N, Gaudichon C, Savary-Auzeloux I et al. 2013. Effects of meat cooking, and of ingested amount, on protein digestion speed and entry of residual proteins into the colon: a study in minipigs. PLOS ONE 8:4e61252
    [Google Scholar]
12. Berg T, Singh J, Hardacre A, Boland MJ. 2012. The role of cotyledon cell structure during in vitro digestion of starch in navy beans. Carbohydr. Polym. 87:1678–88
    [Google Scholar]
13. Bhattarai RR, Dhital S, Mense A, Gidley MJ, Shi Y-C. 2018. Intact cellular structure in cereal endosperm limits starch digestion in vitro. Food Hydrocoll 2:139–48
    [Google Scholar]
14. Bhattarai RR, Dhital S, Wu P, Chen XD, Gidley MJ. 2017. Digestion of isolated legume cells in a stomach-duodenum model: three mechanisms limit starch and protein hydrolysis. Food Funct 8:2573–82
    [Google Scholar]
15. Bindels LB, Munoz RRS, Gomes-Neto JC, Mutemberezi V, Martínez I et al. 2017. Resistant starch can improve insulin sensitivity independently of the gut microbiota. Microbiome 5:12
    [Google Scholar]
16. Blaak E, Antoine JM, Benton D, Björck I, Bozzetto L et al. 2012. Impact of postprandial glycaemia on health and prevention of disease. Obes. Rev. 13:923–84
    [Google Scholar]
17. Blachier F, Mariotti F, Huneau J-F, Tomé D. 2007. Effects of amino acid–derived luminal metabolites on the colonic epithelium and physiopathological consequences. Amino Acids 33:547–62
    [Google Scholar]
18. Bonnaire L, Sandra S, Helgason T, Decker EA, Weiss J, McClements DJ. 2008. Influence of lipid physical state on the in vitro digestibility of emulsified lipids. J. Agric. Food Chem. 56:3791–97
    [Google Scholar]
19. Bornhorst GM, Rutherfurd SM, Roman MJ, Burri BJ, Moughan PJ, Singh RP. 2014. Gastric pH distribution and mixing of soft and rigid food particles in the stomach using a dual-marker technique. Food Biophys 9:292–300
    [Google Scholar]
20. Capuano E. 2016. The behaviour of dietary fibre in the gastrointestinal tract determines its physiological effect. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 57:163543–64
    [Google Scholar]
21. Capuano E, Oliviero T, Fogliano V, Pellegrini N. 2018a. Role of the food matrix and digestion on calculation of the actual energy content of food. Nutr. Rev. 76:274–89
    [Google Scholar]
22. Capuano E, Oliviero T, van Boekel MAJS. 2017. Modeling food matrix effects on chemical reactivity: challenges and perspectives. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 58:162814–28
    [Google Scholar]
23. Capuano E, Pellegrini N. 2019. An integrated look at the effect of structure on nutrient bioavailability in plant foods. J. Sci. Food Agric. 99:493–98
    [Google Scholar]
24. Capuano E, Pellegrini N, Ntone E, Nikiforidis CV. 2018b. In vitro lipid digestion in raw and roasted hazelnut particles and oil bodies. Food Funct 9:2508–16
    [Google Scholar]
25. Carnielli VP, Luijendijk IH, Van Goudoever JB, Sulkers EJ, Boerlage AA et al. 1996. Structural position and amount of palmitic acid in infant formulas: effects on fat, fatty acid, and mineral balance. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 23:553–60
    [Google Scholar]
26. Carstensen M, Thomsen C, Gotzsche O, Holst JJ, Schrezenmeir J, Hermansen K. 2004. Differential postprandial lipoprotein responses in type 2 diabetic men with and without clinical evidence of a former myocardial infarction. Rev. Diabet. Stud. 1:4175–84
    [Google Scholar]
27. Castro-Acosta ML, Stone SG, Mok JE, Mhajan RK, Fu C-I et al. 2017. Apple and blackcurrant polyphenol-rich drinks decrease postprandial glucose, insulin and incretin response to a high-carbohydrate meal in healthy men and women. J. Nutr. Biochem. 49:53–62
    [Google Scholar]
28. Cavonius LR, Albers E, Undeland I. 2016. In vitro bioaccessibility of proteins and lipids of pH-shift processed Nannochloropsis oculata microalga. Food Funct 7:42016–24
    [Google Scholar]
29. Cervantes-Paz B, de Jesús, Ornelas-Paz J, Ruiz-Cruz S, Rios-Velasco C, Ibarra-Junquera V et al. 2017. Effects of pectin on lipid digestion and possible implications for carotenoid bioavailability during pre-absorptive stages: a review. Food Res. Int. 99:917–27
    [Google Scholar]
30. Christensen MS, Høy C-E. 1996. Effects of dietary triacylglycerol structure on triacylglycerols of resultant chylomicrons from fish oil- and seal oil-fed rats. Lipids 31:341–44
    [Google Scholar]
31. Christensen R, Lorenzen JK, Svith CR, Bartels EM, Melanson EL et al. 2009. Effect of calcium from dairy and dietary supplements on faecal fat excretion: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Obes. Rev. 10:475–86
    [Google Scholar]
32. Corstens MN, Berton-Carabin CC, Schroën K, Viau M, Meynier A. 2018. Emulsion encapsulation in calcium-alginate beads delays lipolysis during dynamic in vitro digestion. J. Funct. Foods 46:394–402
    [Google Scholar]
33. Dangin M, Boirie Y, Guillet C, Beaufrère B. 2002. Influence of the protein digestion rate on protein turnover in young and elderly subjects. J. Nutr. 132:3228S–33
    [Google Scholar]
34. Dhital S, Bhattarai RR, Gorham J, Gidley MJ. 2016. Intactness of cell wall structure controls the in vitro digestion of starch in legumes. Food Funct 7:1367–79
    [Google Scholar]
35. Dhital S, Shrestha AK, Gidley MJ. 2010. Relationship between granule size and in vitro digestibility of maize and potato starches. Carbohydr. Polym. 82:480–88
    [Google Scholar]
36. Dhital S, Warren FJ, Butterworth PJ, Ellis PR, Gidley MJ. 2017. Mechanisms of starch digestion by α-amylase—structural basis for kinetic properties. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 57:875–92
    [Google Scholar]
37. Dias CB, Zhu X, Thompson AK, Singh H, Garg ML. 2019. Effect of the food form and structure on lipid digestion and postprandial lipaemic response. Food Funct 10:112–24
    [Google Scholar]
38. Dikeman CL, Fahey GC Jr. 2006. Viscosity as related to dietary fiber: a review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 46:649–63
    [Google Scholar]
39. Drouin-Chartier J-P, Tremblay AJ, Maltais-Giguère J, Charest A, Guinot L et al. 2017. Differential impact of the cheese matrix on the postprandial lipid response: a randomized, crossover, controlled trial. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 106:1358–65
    [Google Scholar]
40. Dupont D, Mandalari G, Molle D, Jardin J, Léonil J et al. 2010. Comparative resistance of food proteins to adult and infant in vitro digestion models. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 54:767–80
    [Google Scholar]
41. Duque-Estrada P, Berton-Carabin CC, Nieuwkoop M, Dekkers BL, Janssen AE, Van Der Goot AJ. 2019. Protein oxidation and in vitro gastric digestion of processed soy-based matrices. J. Agric. Food Chem. 67:9591–600
    [Google Scholar]
42. Edwards CH, Grundy MM, Grassby T, Vasilopoulou D, Frost GS et al. 2015a. Manipulation of starch bioaccessibility in wheat endosperm to regulate starch digestion, postprandial glycemia, insulinemia, and gut hormone responses: a randomized controlled trial in healthy ileostomy participants. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 102:791–800
    [Google Scholar]
43. Edwards CH, Warren FJ, Campbell GM, Gaisford S, Royall PG et al. 2015b. A study of starch gelatinisation behaviour in hydrothermally-processed plant food tissues and implications for in vitro digestibility. Food Funct 6:3634–41
    [Google Scholar]
44. Englyst HN, Cummings JH. 1987. Digestion of polysaccharides of potato in the small intestine of man. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 45:423–31
    [Google Scholar]
45. Espinal-Ruiz M, Parada-Alfonso F, Restrepo-Sánchez L-P, Narváez-Cuenca C-E, McClements DJ. 2014. Impact of dietary fibers [methyl cellulose, chitosan, and pectin] on digestion of lipids under simulated gastrointestinal conditions. Food Funct 5:3083–95
    [Google Scholar]
46. Evenepoel P, Geypens B, Luypaerts A, Hiele M, Ghoos Y, Rutgeerts P. 1998. Digestibility of cooked and raw egg protein in humans as assessed by stable isotope techniques. J. Nutr. 128:1716–22
    [Google Scholar]
47. Ezeogu LI, Duodu KG, Emmambux MN, Taylor JR. 2008. Influence of cooking conditions on the protein matrix of sorghum and maize endosperm flours. Cereal Chem 85:397–402
    [Google Scholar]
48. Faist V, Erbersdobler HF. 2001. Metabolic transit and in vivo effects of melanoidins and precursor compounds deriving from the Maillard reaction. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 45:1–12
    [Google Scholar]
49. FAO 2011. Dietary protein quality evaluation in human nutrition Rep. Expert Consult., FAO, Rome
50. Ferrua MJ, Kong F, Singh RP. 2011. Computational modeling of gastric digestion and the role of food material properties. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 22:480–91
    [Google Scholar]
51. Ferrua MJ, Singh RP. 2010. Modeling the fluid dynamics in a human stomach to gain insight of food digestion. J. Food Sci. 75:R151–62
    [Google Scholar]
52. Freitas D, Le Feunteun S 2019. Inhibitory effect of black tea, lemon juice, and other beverages on salivary and pancreatic amylases: what impact on bread starch digestion? A dynamic in vitro study. Food Chem 297:124885
    [Google Scholar]
53. Giang TM, Gaucel S, Brestaz P, Anton M, Meynier A et al. 2016. Dynamic modeling of in vitro lipid digestion: individual fatty acid release and bioaccessibility kinetics. Food Chem 194:1180–88
    [Google Scholar]
54. Gilani GS, Cockell KA, Sepehr E. 2005. Effects of antinutritional factors on protein digestibility and amino acid availability in foods. J. AOAC Int. 88:967–87
    [Google Scholar]
55. Gilani GS, Xiao CW, Cockell KA. 2012. Impact of antinutritional factors in food proteins on the digestibility of protein and the bioavailability of amino acids and on protein quality. Br. J. Nutr. 108:S315–32
    [Google Scholar]
56. Goff HD, Repin N, Fabek H, El Khoury D, Gidley MJ 2018. Dietary fibre for glycaemia control: towards a mechanistic understanding. Bioact. Carbohydr. Diet. Fibre 14:39–53
    [Google Scholar]
57. Golding M, Wooster TJ, Day L, Xu M, Lundin L et al. 2011. Impact of gastric structuring on the lipolysis of emulsified lipids. Soft Matter 7:3513–23
    [Google Scholar]
58. Graham DY, Sackman JW. 1983. Solubility of calcium soaps of long-chain fatty acids in simulated intestinal environment. Dig. Dis. Sci. 28:733–36
    [Google Scholar]
59. Grassby T, Picout DR, Mandalari G, Faulks RM, Kendall CWC et al. 2014. Modelling of nutrient bioaccessibility in almond seeds based on the fracture properties of their cell walls. Food Funct 5:3096–106
    [Google Scholar]
60. Groopman EE, Carmody RN, Wrangham RW. 2015. Cooking increases net energy gain from a lipid-rich food. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 156:11–18
    [Google Scholar]
61. Grundy MML, Carrière F, Mackie AR, Gray DA, Butterworth PJ, Ellis PR. 2016a. The role of plant cell wall encapsulation and porosity in regulating lipolysis during the digestion of almond seeds. Food Funct 7:69–78
    [Google Scholar]
62. Grundy MML, Edwards CH, Mackie AR, Gidley MJ, Butterworth PJ, Ellis PR. 2016b. Re-evaluation of the mechanisms of dietary fibre and implications for macronutrient bioaccessibility, digestion and postprandial metabolism. Br. J. Nutr. 116:816–33
    [Google Scholar]
63. Grundy MML, Quint J, Rieder A, Ballance S, Dreiss CA et al. 2017. The impact of oat structure and β-glucan on in vitro lipid digestion. J. Funct. Foods 38:378–88
    [Google Scholar]
64. Jakobek L. 2015. Interactions of polyphenols with carbohydrates, lipids and proteins. Food Chem 175:556–67
    [Google Scholar]
65. Johnston K, Thomas EL, Bell JD, Frost G, Robertson MD. 2009. Resistant starch improves insulin sensitivity in metabolic syndrome. Diabet. Med. 27:4391–97
    [Google Scholar]
66. Kamei M, Ohgaki S, Kanbe T, Niiya I, Mizutani H et al. 1995. Effects of highly hydrogenated soybean oil and cholesterol on plasma, liver cholesterol, and fecal steroids in rats. Lipids 30:533–39
    [Google Scholar]
67. Kan L, Oliviero T, Verkerk R, Fogliano V, Capuano E. 2020. Interaction of bread and berry polyphenols affects starch digestibility and polyphenols bio-accessibility. J. Funct. Foods 68:103924
    [Google Scholar]
68. Kaplan RJ, Greenwood CE. 1998. Poor digestibility of fully hydrogenated soybean oil in rats: a potential benefit of hydrogenated fats and oils. J. Nutr. 128:875–80
    [Google Scholar]
69. Kaur L, Maudens E, Haisman DR, Boland MJ, Singh H. 2014. Microstructure and protein digestibility of beef: the effect of cooking conditions as used in stews and curries. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 55:612–20
    [Google Scholar]
70. Kondjoyan A, Daudin J-D, Santé-Lhoutellier V. 2015. Modelling of pepsin digestibility of myofibrillar proteins and of variations due to heating. Food Chem 172:265–71
    [Google Scholar]
71. Kong F, Singh R. 2008. A model stomach system to investigate disintegration kinetics of solid foods during gastric digestion. J. Food Sci. 73:E202–10
    [Google Scholar]
72. Lacroix M, Bon C, Bos C, Léonil J, Benamouzig R et al. 2008. Ultra high temperature treatment, but not pasteurization, affects the postprandial kinetics of milk proteins in humans. J. Nutr. 138:2342–47
    [Google Scholar]
73. Le Bourvellec C, Renard C 2012. Interactions between polyphenols and macromolecules: quantification methods and mechanisms. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 52:213–48
    [Google Scholar]
74. Li H, Dhital S, Gidley MJ, Gilbert RG. 2019. A more general approach to fitting digestion kinetics of starch in food. Carbohydr. Polym. 225:115244
    [Google Scholar]
75. Liu W-C, Halley PJ, Gilbert RG. 2010. Mechanism of degradation of starch, a highly branched polymer, during extrusion. Macromolecules 43:2855–64
    [Google Scholar]
76. Lorenzen JK, Astrup A. 2011. Dairy calcium intake modifies responsiveness of fat metabolism and blood lipids to a high-fat diet. Br. J. Nutr. 105:1823–31
    [Google Scholar]
77. Love R, Lentle R, Asvarujanon P, Hemar Y, Stafford K. 2013. An expanded finite element model of the intestinal mixing of digesta. Food Dig 4:26–35
    [Google Scholar]
78. Ludwig DS. 2002. The glycemic index: physiological mechanisms relating to obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. JAMA 287:2414–23
    [Google Scholar]
79. Luo Q, Borst JW, Westphal AH, Boom RM, Janssen AE. 2017. Pepsin diffusivity in whey protein gels and its effect on gastric digestion. Food Hydrocoll 66:318–25
    [Google Scholar]
80. Luo Q, Chen D, Boom RM, Janssen AE. 2018. Revisiting the enzymatic kinetics of pepsin using isothermal titration calorimetry. Food Chem 268:94–100
    [Google Scholar]
81. Luo Q, Sewalt E, Borst JW, Westphal AH, Boom RM, Janssen AE. 2019. Analysis and modeling of enhanced green fluorescent protein diffusivity in whey protein gels. Food Res. Int. 120:449–55
    [Google Scholar]
82. Maki KC, Pelkman CL, Finocchiaro ET, Kelley KM, Lawless AL et al. 2012. Resistant starch from high-amylose maize increases insulin sensitivity in overweight and obese men. J. Nutr. 142:717–23
    [Google Scholar]
83. Malagelada J-R, Go VL, Summerskill W. 1979. Different gastric, pancreatic, and biliary responses to solid-liquid or homogenized meals. Dig. Dis. Sci. 24:101–10
    [Google Scholar]
84. Maljaars P, Peters H, Mela D, Masclee A 2008a. Ileal brake: a sensible food target for appetite control. A review. Physiol. Behav. 95:271–81
    [Google Scholar]
85. Maljaars P, Symersky T, Kee B, Haddeman E, Peters H, Masclee A. 2008b. Effect of ileal fat perfusion on satiety and hormone release in healthy volunteers. Int. J. Obes. 32:1633–39
    [Google Scholar]
86. Mandalari G, Merali Z, Ryden P, Chessa S, Bisignano C et al. 2018. Durum wheat particle size affects starch and protein digestion in vitro. Eur. J. Nutr. 57:319–25
    [Google Scholar]
87. Marciani L, Faulks R, Wickham MS, Bush D, Pick B et al. 2008. Effect of intragastric acid stability of fat emulsions on gastric emptying, plasma lipid profile and postprandial satiety. Br. J. Nutr. 101:919–28
    [Google Scholar]
88. McDougall GJ, Stewart D. 2005. The inhibitory effects of berry polyphenols on digestive enzymes. Biofactors 23:189–95
    [Google Scholar]
89. Melito C, Tovar J. 1995. Cell-walls limit in-vitro protein digestibility in processed legume seeds. Food Chem 53:305–7
    [Google Scholar]
90. Mennah-Govela YA, Singh RP, Bornhorst GM. 2019. Buffering capacity of protein-based model food systems in the context of gastric digestion. Food Funct 10:6074–87
    [Google Scholar]
91. Merrill A, Watt B. 1973. Energy value of foods—basis and derivation. Agric. Handb. 74: US Dept. of Agric. Washington, DC: https://www.ars.usda.gov/arsuserfiles/80400535/data/classics/usda%20handbook%2074.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
92. Minekus M, Jelier M, Xiao J-Z, Kondo S, Iwatsuki K et al. 2005. Effect of partially hydrolyzed guar gum (PHGG) on the bioaccessibility of fat and cholesterol. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 69:932–38
    [Google Scholar]
93. Mishra S, Hardacre A, Monro J 2012. Food structure and carbohydrate digestibility. Carbohydrates: Comprehensive Studies on Glycobiology and Glycotechnology C-F Chang 289–316 London: IntechOpen
    [Google Scholar]
94. Moxon TE, Gouseti O, Bakalis S. 2016. In silico modelling of mass transfer & absorption in the human gut. J. Food Eng. 176:110–20
    [Google Scholar]
95. Moxon TE, Nimmegeers P, Telen D, Fryer PJ, Van Impe J, Bakalis S. 2017. Effect of chyme viscosity and nutrient feedback mechanism on gastric emptying. Chem. Eng. Sci. 171:318–30
    [Google Scholar]
96. Nguyen GT, Sopade PA. 2018. Modeling starch digestograms: computational characteristics of kinetic models for in vitro starch digestion in food research. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 17:1422–45
    [Google Scholar]
97. Novev JK, Doostmohammadi A, Zöttl A, Yeomans JM. 2020. Mesoscale modelling of polymer aggregate digestion. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 3:122–33
    [Google Scholar]
98. Novotny JA, Gebauer SK, Baer DJ. 2012. Discrepancy between the Atwater factor predicted and empirically measured energy values of almonds in human diets. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 96:296–301
    [Google Scholar]
99. Nyemb K, Guérin-Dubiard C, Pézennec S, Jardin J, Briard-Bion V et al. 2016. The structural properties of egg white gels impact the extent of in vitro protein digestion and the nature of peptides generated. Food Hydrocoll 54:315–27
    [Google Scholar]
100. Oberli M, Marsset-Baglieri A, Airinei G, Santé-Lhoutellier V, Khodorova N et al. 2015. High true ileal digestibility but not postprandial utilization of nitrogen from bovine meat protein in humans is moderately decreased by high-temperature, long-duration cooking. J. Nutr. 145:2221–28
     [Google Scholar]
101. Oria MP, Hamaker BR, Axtell JD, Huang C-P 2000. A highly digestible sorghum mutant cultivar exhibits a unique folded structure of endosperm protein bodies. PNAS 97:5065–70
     [Google Scholar]
102. Pallares AP, Miranda BA, Truong NQA, Kyomugasho C, Chigwedere CM et al. 2018. Process-induced cell wall permeability modulates the in vitro starch digestion kinetics of common bean cotyledon cells. Food Funct 9:6544–54
     [Google Scholar]
103. Pasini G, Simonato B, Giannattasio M, Peruffo AD, Curioni A. 2001. Modifications of wheat flour proteins during in vitro digestion of bread dough, crumb, and crust: an electrophoretic and immunological study. J. Agric. Food Chem. 49:2254–61
     [Google Scholar]
104. Pasquier B, Armand M, Castelain C, Guillon F, Borel P et al. 1996. Emulsification and lipolysis of triacylglycerols are altered by viscous soluble dietary fibres in acidic gastric medium in vitro. Biochem. J. 314:269–75
     [Google Scholar]
105. Pérez S, Bertoft E. 2010. The molecular structures of starch components and their contribution to the architecture of starch granules: a comprehensive review. Starch-Stärke 62:389–420
     [Google Scholar]
106. Pirillo A, Norata GD, Catapano AL. 2014. Postprandial lipemia as a cardiometabolic risk factor. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 30:1489–503
     [Google Scholar]
107. Primo-Martin C, Van Nieuwenhuijzen N, Hamer R, Van Vliet T. 2007. Crystallinity changes in wheat starch during the bread-making process: starch crystallinity in the bread crust. J. Cereal Sci. 45:219–26
     [Google Scholar]
108. Robertson MD, Bickerton AS, Dennis AL, Vidal H, Frayn KN. 2005. Insulin-sensitizing effects of dietary resistant starch and effects on skeletal muscle and adipose tissue metabolism. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 82:559–67
     [Google Scholar]
109. Rovalino-Córdova AM, Aguirre Montesdoca V, Capuano E 2021. A mechanistic model to study the effect of the cell wall on starch digestion in intact cotyledon cells. Carbohydr. Polym. 253:117351
     [Google Scholar]
110. Rovalino-Córdova AM, Fogliano V, Capuano E. 2018. A closer look to cell structural barriers affecting starch digestibility in beans. Carbohydr. Polym. 181:994–1002
     [Google Scholar]
111. Rovalino-Córdova AM, Fogliano V, Capuano E. 2019. The effect of cell wall encapsulation on macronutrients digestion: a case study in kidney beans. Food Chem 286:557–66
     [Google Scholar]
112. Shrestha AK, Ng CS, Lopez-Rubio A, Blazek J, Gilbert EP, Gidley MJ. 2010. Enzyme resistance and structural organization in extruded high amylose maize starch. Carbohydr. Polym. 80:699–710
     [Google Scholar]
113. Sicard J, Mirade P-S, Portanguen S, Clerjon S, Kondjoyan A. 2018. Simulation of the gastric digestion of proteins of meat bolus using a reaction–diffusion model. Food Funct 9:6455–69
     [Google Scholar]
114. Smith TJ, Karl JP, Wilson MA, Whitney CC, Barrett A et al. 2019. Glycaemic regulation, appetite and ex vivo oxidative stress in young adults following consumption of high-carbohydrate cereal bars fortified with polyphenol-rich berries. Br. J. Nutr. 121:1026–38
     [Google Scholar]
115. Soerensen KV, Thorning TK, Astrup A, Kristensen M, Lorenzen JK. 2014. Effect of dairy calcium from cheese and milk on fecal fat excretion, blood lipids, and appetite in young men. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 99:984–91
     [Google Scholar]
116. Syahariza Z, Sar S, Hasjim J, Tizzotti MJ, Gilbert RG. 2013. The importance of amylose and amylopectin fine structures for starch digestibility in cooked rice grains. Food Chem 136:742–49
     [Google Scholar]
117. Taghipoor M, Barles G, Georgelin C, Licois J-R, Lescoat P. 2014. Digestion modeling in the small intestine: impact of dietary fiber. Math. Biosci. 258:101–12
     [Google Scholar]
118. Taghipoor M, Lescoat P, Licois J-R, Georgelin C, Barles G. 2012. Mathematical modeling of transport and degradation of feedstuffs in the small intestine. J. Theor. Biol. 294:114–21
     [Google Scholar]
119. Tan S-Y, Peh EW-Y, Marangoni AG, Henry CJ. 2017. Effects of liquid oil versus oleogel co-ingested with a carbohydrate-rich meal on human blood triglycerides, glucose, insulin and appetite. Food Funct 8:241–49
     [Google Scholar]
120. Tessier R, Khodorova N, Calvez J, Kapel R, Quinsac A et al. 2020. 15N and ²H intrinsic labeling demonstrate that real digestibility in rats of proteins and amino acids from sunflower protein isolate is almost as high as that of goat whey. J. Nutr. 150:450–57
     [Google Scholar]
121. Thevenot J, Cauty C, Legland D, Dupont D, Floury J. 2017. Pepsin diffusion in dairy gels depends on casein concentration and microstructure. Food Chem 223:54–61
     [Google Scholar]
122. Thorning TK, Raben A, Bendsen NT, Jørgensen HH, Kiilerich P et al. 2016. Importance of the fat content within the cheese-matrix for blood lipid profile, faecal fat excretion, and gut microbiome in growing pigs. Int. Dairy J. 61:67–75
     [Google Scholar]
123. Tonda A, Grosvenor A, Clerens S, Le Feunteun S 2017. In silico modeling of protein hydrolysis by endoproteases: a case study on pepsin digestion of bovine lactoferrin. Food Funct 8:4404–13
     [Google Scholar]
124. Törrönen R, Sarkkinen E, Tapola N, Hautaniemi E, Kilpi K, Niskanen L. 2010. Berries modify the postprandial plasma glucose response to sucrose in healthy subjects. Br. J. Nutr. 103:1094–97
     [Google Scholar]
125. Van Aken GA, Bomhof E, Zoet FD, Verbeek M, Oosterveld A. 2011. Differences in in vitro gastric behaviour between homogenized milk and emulsions stabilised by Tween 80, whey protein, or whey protein and caseinate. Food Hydrocoll 25:781–88
     [Google Scholar]
126. van der Sman R, Houlder S, Cornet S, Janssen A. 2020. Physical chemistry of gastric digestion of proteins gels. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 2:45–60
     [Google Scholar]
127. Verkempinck S, Salvia-Trujillo L, Garcia MI, Hendrickx M, Grauwet T. 2019. From single to multiresponse modelling of food digestion kinetics: the case of lipid digestion. J. Food Eng. 260:40–49
     [Google Scholar]
128. Verlinden BE, Nicolaï BM, De Baerdemaeker J. 1995. The starch gelatinization in potatoes during cooking in relation to the modelling of texture kinetics. J. Food Eng. 24:165–79
     [Google Scholar]
129. Vors C, Pineau G, Gabert L, Drai J, Louche-Pélissier C et al. 2013. Modulating absorption and postprandial handling of dietary fatty acids by structuring fat in the meal: a randomized crossover clinical trial. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 97:23–36
     [Google Scholar]
130. Waldron KW, Smith AC, Parr AJ, Ng A, Parker ML. 1997. New approaches to understanding and controlling cell separation in relation to fruit and vegetable texture. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 8:213–21
     [Google Scholar]
131. Wang S, Li C, Copeland L, Niu Q, Wang S 2015. Starch retrogradation: a comprehensive review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 14:568–85
     [Google Scholar]
132. Wang S, Zhang X, Wang S, Copeland L 2016. Changes of multi-scale structure during mimicked DSC heating reveal the nature of starch gelatinization. Sci. Rep. 6:28271
     [Google Scholar]
133. Wang Y, Chao C, Huang H, Wang S, Wang S et al. 2019. Revisiting mechanisms underlying digestion of starches. J. Agric. Food Chem. 67:8212–26
     [Google Scholar]
134. Wilcox MD, Brownlee IA, Richardson JC, Dettmar PW, Pearson JP. 2014. The modulation of pancreatic lipase activity by alginates. Food Chem 146:479–84
     [Google Scholar]
135. Windey K, De Preter V, Verbeke K. 2012. Relevance of protein fermentation to gut health. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 56:184–96
     [Google Scholar]
136. Wong JH, Lau T, Cai N, Singh J, Pedersen JF et al. 2009. Digestibility of protein and starch from sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) is linked to biochemical and structural features of grain endosperm. J. Cereal Sci. 49:73–82
     [Google Scholar]
137. Ye A, Cui J, Dalgleish D, Singh H. 2016. Formation of a structured clot during the gastric digestion of milk: impact on the rate of protein hydrolysis. Food Hydrocoll 52:478–86
     [Google Scholar]
138. Yu W, Tao K, Gilbert RG. 2018. Improved methodology for analyzing relations between starch digestion kinetics and molecular structure. Food Chem 264:284–92
     [Google Scholar]
139. Zahir M, Fogliano V, Capuano E. 2018. Food matrix and processing modulate in vitro protein digestibility in soybeans. Food Funct 9:6326–36
     [Google Scholar]
140. Zeleznak K, Hoseney R. 1986. The role of water in the retrogradation of wheat starch gels and bread crumb. Cereal Chem 63:407–11
     [Google Scholar]
141. Zou W, Sissons M, Gidley MJ, Gilbert RG, Warren FJ. 2015. Combined techniques for characterising pasta structure reveals how the gluten network slows enzymic digestion rate. Food Chem 188:559–68
     [Google Scholar]