1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
  4. Volume 7, 2020
  5. Article

Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior

Volume 7, 2020

Perceived Organizational Support: Why Caring About Employees Counts

Abstract

According to organizational support theory (OST), employees develop a general perception concerning the extent to which their work organization values their contribution and cares about their well-being (perceived organizational support, or POS). We explain OST and review empirical POS findings relevant to OST's main propositions, including new findings that suggest changes to OST. Major antecedents of POS include fairness, support from leaders, and human resource practices and work conditions, especially to the extent that employees perceive these as the discretionary choices of organizations. Among more recent findings, the average level of POS has modestly increased over the past three decades in the United States. Furthermore, POS appears to have stronger positive outcomes in Eastern cultures than Western cultures. Some additional promising recent areas of research on POS include trickle-down effects, POS of groups, and POS as relevant to creativity and innovation, positive emotional outcomes, and well-being.

Keyword(s): employee well-being, fairness, leadership, perceived organizational support, social exchange theory, socioemotional benefits
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012119-044917
2020-01-21
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/orgpsych/7/1/annurev-orgpsych-012119-044917.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012119-044917&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Amabile TM. 1988. A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 10:123–67
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Amabile TM. 1996. Creativity in Context Boulder, CO: Westview
  3. Armeli S, Eisenberger R, Fasolo P, Lynch P 1998. Perceived organizational support and police performance: the moderating influence of socioemotional needs. J. Appl. Psychol. 83:288–97
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Ashforth BE, Humphrey RH 1993. Emotional labor in service roles: the influence of identity. Acad. Manag. Rev 18:88–115
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bakker AB, Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP, Taris TW 2008. Work engagement: an emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work Stress 22:187–200
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Baran B, Shanock LR, Miller L 2012. Advancing organizational support theory into the twenty-first century world of work. J. Bus. Psychol. 27:123–47
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Barnette JJ. 2000. Effects of stem and Likert response option reversals on survey internal consistency: If you feel the need, there is a better alternative to using those negatively worded stems. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 60:361–70
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bedeian AG. 2007. Even if the tower is “ivory,” it isn't “white:” understanding the consequences of faculty cynicism. Acad. Manag. Learn. Edu. 6:9–32
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Bell SJ, Menguc B. 2002. The employee-organization relationship, organizational citizenship behaviors, and superior service quality. J. Retailing. 78:131–46
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Berson Y, Oreg S, Dvir T 2008. CEO values, organizational culture and firm outcomes. J. Organ. Behav. 29:615–33
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Bowen DE, Schneider B. 1995. Winning the Service Game Boston, MA: Harvard Bus. Sch. Press
  12. Byrne ZS, Hochwarter WA. 2008. Perceived organizational support and performance: relationships across levels of organizational cynicism. J. Manag. Psychol. 23:54–72
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Caesens G, Marique G, Hanin D, Stinglhamber F 2016. The relationship between perceived organizational support and proactive behaviour directed towards the organization. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 25:398–411
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Caesens G, Stinglhamber F, Demoulin S, De Wilde M 2017. Perceived organizational support and employees’ well-being: the mediating role of organizational dehumanization. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 26:527–40
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Casper W, Martin J, Buffardi L, Erdwins C 2002. Work-family conflict, perceived organizational support, and organizational commitment among employed mothers. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 7:99–108
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen Z, Eisenberger R, Johnson KM, Sucharski IL, Aselage J 2009. Perceived organizational support and extra-role performance: Which leads to which?. J. Soc. Psychol. 149:119–24
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Chen ZX, Aryee S, Lee C 2005. Test of a mediation model of perceived organizational support. J. Vocat. Behav. 66:457–70
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Chiaburu DS, Chakrabarty S, Wang J, Li N 2015. Organizational support and citizenship behaviors: a comparative cross-cultural meta-analysis. Manag. Int. Rev. 55:707–36
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Chiaburu DS, Peng AC, Oh IS, Banks GC, Lomeli LC 2013. Antecedents and consequences of employee organizational cynicism: a meta-analysis. J. Vocat. Behav. 83:181–97
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Clarke M, Patrickson M. 2008. The new covenant of employability. Employee Relat 30:121–41
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Colquitt JA. 2001. On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. J. Appl. Psychol. 86:386–400
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Connelly CE, Gallagher DG, Gilley KM 2007. Organizational and client commitment among contracted employees: a replication and extension with temporary workers. J. Vocat. Behav. 70:326–35
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Coyle-Shapiro JA, Morrow PC. 2006. Organizational and client commitment among contracted employees. J. Vocat. Behav. 68:416–31
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Coyle‐Shapiro JA, Morrow PC, Kessler I 2006. Serving two organizations: exploring the employment relationship of contracted employees. Hum. Resour. Manag. 45:561–83
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Cropanzano R, Mitchell MS. 2005. Social exchange theory: an interdisciplinary review. J. Manag. 31:874–900
     [Google Scholar]
  26. DeJoy DM, Schaffer BS, Wilson MG, Vandenberg RJ, Butts MM 2004. Creating safer workplaces: assessing the determinants and role of safety climate. J. Saf. Res. 35:81–90
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Dewett T. 2006. Exploring the role of risk in employee creativity. J. Creative Behav. 40:27–45
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Eisenberger R, Armeli S, Rexwinkel B, Lynch PD, Rhoades L 2001. Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. J. Appl. Psychol. 86:42–51
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Eisenberger R, Cummings J, Armeli S, Lynch P 1997. Perceived organizational support, discretionary treatment, and job satisfaction. J. Appl. Psychol. 82:812–20
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Eisenberger R, Fasolo P, Davis-LaMastro V 1990. Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation. J. Appl. Psychol. 75:51–59
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Eisenberger R, Huntington R, Hutchison S, Sowa D 1986. Perceived organizational support. J. Appl. Psychol. 71:500–7
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Eisenberger R, Karagonlar G, Stinglhamber F, Neves P, Becker TE et al. 2010. Leader–member exchange and affective organizational commitment: the contribution of supervisor's organizational embodiment. J. Appl. Psychol. 95:1085–103
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Eisenberger R, Rhoades L, Cameron J 1999. Does pay for performance increase or decrease perceived self-determination and intrinsic motivation?. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 77:1026–40
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Eisenberger R, Rockstuhl T, Shoss MK, Wen X, Dulebohn J 2019. Is the employee-organization relationship dying or thriving. ? J. Appl. Psychol. 104:1036–57
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Eisenberger R, Stinglhamber F. 2011. Perceived Organizational Support: Fostering Enthusiastic and Productive Employees Washington, DC: APA
  36. Eisenberger R, Zheng D, Yu J, Zhang J, Joo M-K et al. 2018. Employee reciprocation of favorable treatment: the missing role of gratitude Paper presented at the 33rd Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology Chicago:
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Erdogan B, Enders J. 2007. Support from the top: supervisors' perceived organizational support as a moderator of leader-member exchange to satisfaction and performance relationships. J. Appl. Psychol. 92:321–30
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Farber HS. 2005. Short(er) shrift: the decline in worker-firm attachment in the United States. Laid Off, Laid Low: Political and Economic Consequences of Employment Insecurity K Newman 10–37 New York: Columbia Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Ford MT, Wang Y, Jin J, Eisenberger R 2018. Chronic and episodic anger and gratitude toward the organization: relationships with organizational and supervisor supportiveness and extrarole behavior. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 23:175–87
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Frear KA, Donsbach J, Theilgard N, Shanock LR 2018. Supported supervisors are more supportive, but why? A multilevel study of mechanisms and outcomes. J. Bus. Psychol. 33:55–69
     [Google Scholar]
  41. George JM, Reed TF, Ballard KA, Colin J, Fielding J 1993. Contact with AIDS patients as a source of work-related distress: effects of organizational and social support. Acad. Manag. J. 36:157–71
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Gonzalez-Morales MG, Kernan MC, Becker TE, Eisenberger R 2018. Defeating abusive supervision: training supervisors to support subordinates. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 23:151–62
     [Google Scholar]
  43. González‐Romá V, Fortes‐Ferreira L, Peiro JM 2009. Team climate, climate strength and team performance. A longitudinal study. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 82:511–36
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Gouldner AW. 1960. The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement. Am. Sociol. Rev. 25:161–78
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Grandey AA. 2003. When “the show must go on”: surface acting and deep acting as determinants of emotional exhaustion and peer-rated service delivery. Acad. Manag. J. 46:86–96
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Hofmann DA, Morgeson FP. 1999. Safety-related behavior as a social exchange: the role of perceived organizational support and leader–member exchange. J. Appl. Psychol. 84:286–96
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Ilies R, Dimotakis N, De Pater IE 2010. Psychological and physiological reactions to high workloads: implications for well-being. Pers. Psychol. 63:407–36
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Janssen O. 2004. How fairness perceptions make innovative behavior more or less stressful. J. Organ. Behav. 25:201–15
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Jawahar I, Stone T, Kisamore J 2007. Role conflict and burnout: the direct and moderating effects of political skill and perceived organizational support on burnout dimensions. Int. J. Stress Manag. 14:142–59
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Karriker JH, Williams ML. 2009. Organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior: a mediated multifoci model. J. Manag. 35:112–35
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Khazanchi S, Masterson SS. 2011. Who and what is fair matters: a multi‐foci social exchange model of creativity. J. Organ. Behav. 32:86–106
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Kinnunen U, Feldt T, Mäkikangas A 2008. Testing the effort-reward imbalance model among Finnish managers: the role of perceived organizational support. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 13:114–27
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Kumar Mishra S. 2014. Linking perceived organizational support to emotional labor. Pers. Rev. 43:845–60
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Kurtessis JN, Eisenberger R, Ford MT, Buffardi LC, Stewart KA, Adis CS 2017. Perceived organizational support: a meta-analytic evaluation of organizational support theory. J. Manag. 43:1854–84
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Lambert SJ. 2000. Added benefits: the link between work-life benefits and organizational citizenship behavior. Acad. Manag. J. 43:801–15
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Lawler EJ. 2001. An affect theory of social exchange. Am. J. Sociol. 107:321–52
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Lawler EJ, Thye SR. 1999. Bringing emotions into social exchange theory. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 25:217–44
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Levinson H. 1965. Reciprocation: the relationship between man and organization. Adm. Sci. Q. 9:370–90
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Liden RC, Wayne SJ, Kraimer ML, Sparrowe RT 2003. The dual commitments of contingent workers: an examination of contingents' commitment to the agency and the organization. J. Organ. Behav. 24:609–25
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Magni M, Pennarola F. 2008. Intra-organizational relationships and technology acceptance. Int. J. Inform. Manag. 28:517–23
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Marique G, Stinglhamber F, Desmette D, Caesens G, De Zanet F 2013. The relationship between perceived organizational support and affective commitment: a social identity perspective. Group Organ. Manag. 38:68–100
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Masterson SS. 2001. A trickle-down model of organizational justice: relating employees' and customers' perceptions of and reactions to fairness. J. Appl. Psychol. 86:594–604
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Matos K, Galinsky E, Bond JT 2017. 2016 National Study of Employers Alexandria, VA: Soc. Hum. Resour. Manag https://www.shrm.org/hr-today/trends-and-forecasting/research-and-surveys/Documents/National%20Study%20of%20Employers.pdf
  64. Meyer JP, Allen NJ. 1991. A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 1:61–89
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Meyer JP, Allen NJ, Smith CA 1993. Commitment to organizations and occupations: extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. J. Appl. Psychol. 78:538–51
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Meyer JP, Becker TE, Van Dick R 2006. Social identities and commitments at work: toward an integrative model. J. Organ. Behav. 27:665–83
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Meyer JP, Morin AJ, Vandenberghe C 2015. Dual commitment to organization and supervisor: a person-centered approach. J. Vocat. Behav. 88:56–72
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Meyer JP, Stanley DJ, Herscovitch L, Topolnytsky L 2002. Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: a meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. J. Vocat. Behav. 61:20–52
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Mischel L, Gould E, Bivens J 2015. Wage stagnation in nine charts. Economic Policy Institute Jan. 6. https://www.epi.org/publication/charting-wage-stagnation/
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Mitchell JI, Gagné M, Beaudry A, Dyer L 2012. The role of perceived organizational support, distributive justice and motivation in reactions to new information technology. Comput. Human. Behav. 28:729–38
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Morris JA, Feldman DC. 1996. The dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of emotional labor. Acad. Manag. Rev. 21:986–1010
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Neves P, Eisenberger R. 2014. Perceived organizational support and risk taking. J. Manag. Psychol. 29:187–205
     [Google Scholar]
  73. O'Neill OA, Vandenberg RJ, DeJoy DM, Wilson M 2009. Exploring relationships among anger, perceived organizational support, and workplace outcomes. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 14:318–33
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) 2018. Part-Time Employment Rate (Indicator) Paris: OECD
  75. Panaccio A, Vandenberghe C. 2009. Perceived organizational support, organizational commitment and psychological well-being: a longitudinal study. J. Vocat. Behav. 75:224–36
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Rhoades L, Eisenberger R. 2002. Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature. J. Appl. Psychol. 87:698–714
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Rhoades L, Eisenberger R, Armeli S 2001. Affective commitment to the organization: the contribution of perceived organizational support. J. Appl. Psychol. 86:825–36
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Robbins SP, Judge T. 2018. Essentials of Organizational Behavior Harlow, UK: Pearson Educ.
  79. Rockstuhl T, Ang S, Shore L, Mesdashinia S 2015. POS and culture: a meta-analysis of correlates across 43 countries Paper presented at the 75th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Vancouver
  80. Saks AM. 2006. Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. J. Manag. Psychol. 21:600–19
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Shanock LR, Eisenberger R. 2006. When supervisors feel supported: relationships with subordinates' perceived supervisor support, perceived organizational support, and performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 91:689–95
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Shore LM, Shore TH. 1995. Perceived organizational support and organizational justice. Organizational Politics, Justice, and Support: Managing the Social Climate of the Workplace RS Cropanzano, KM Kacmar 149–64 Westport, CT: Quorum
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Shore LM, Wayne SJ. 1993. Commitment and employee behavior: comparison of affective commitment and continuance commitment with perceived organizational support. J. Appl. Psychol. 78:774–80
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Shoss MK, Eisenberger R, Restubog SD, Zagenczyk TJ 2013. Blaming the organization for abusive supervision: the roles of perceived organizational support and supervisor's organizational embodiment. J. Appl. Psychol. 98:158–68
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Singelis TM, Triandis HC, Bhawuk DPS, Gelfand MJ 1995. Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: a theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross Cult. Res. 29:240–75
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Sluss DM, Klimchak M, Holmes JJ 2008. Perceived organizational support as a mediator between relational exchange and organizational identification. J. Vocat. Behav. 73:457–64
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Smith TW, Davern M, Freese J, Hout M 2018. General Social Surveys, 1972–2016 Chicago: NORC, Univ. Chicago http://gss.norc.org/get-the-data/spss
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Sonnentag S, Frese M. 2003. Stress in organizations. Handbook of Psychology, Vol. 12: Industrial and Organizational Psychology WC Borman, DR Ilgen, RJ Klimoski 453–91 Hoboken, NJ: Wiley
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Sonnentag S, Fritz C. 2015. Recovery from job stress: the stressor‐detachment model as an integrative framework. J. Organ. Behav. 36:72–103
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Stamper C, Johlke M. 2003. The impact of perceived organizational support on the relationship between boundary spanner role stress and work outcomes. J. Manag. 29:569–88
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Stinglhamber F, Marique G, Caesens G, Hanin D, De Zanet F 2015. The influence of transformational leadership on followers’ affective commitment: the role of perceived organizational support and supervisor's organizational embodiment. Career Dev. Int. 20:583–603
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Susskind AM, Kacmar KM, Borchgrevink CP 2003. Customer service providers' attitudes relating to customer service and customer satisfaction in the customer-server exchange. J. Appl. Psychol. 88:179–87
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Tangirala S, Green SG, Ramanujam R 2007. In the shadow of the boss's boss: effects of supervisors' upward exchange relationships on employees. J. Appl. Psychol. 92:309–20
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Tepper BJ, Taylor EC. 2003. Relationships among supervisors' and subordinates' procedural justice perceptions and organizational citizenship behaviors. Acad. Manag. J. 46:97–105
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Triandis HC. 1995. Individualism and Collectivism Boulder, CO: Westview Press
  96. Venkatesh V, Brown SA, Maruping LM, Bala H 2008. Predicting different conceptualizations of system use: the competing roles of behavioral intention, facilitating conditions, and behavioral expectation. MIS Q 32:483–502
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Wallace JC, Edwards BD, Arnold T, Frazier ML, Finch DM 2009. Work stressors, role-based performance, and the moderating influence of organizational support. J. Appl. Psychol. 94:254–62
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Wallace JC, Popp E, Mondore S 2006. Safety climate as a mediator between foundation climates and occupational accidents: a group-level investigation. J. Appl. Psychol. 91:681–88
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Wang H, Tsui AS, Xin KR 2011. CEO leadership behaviors, organizational performance, and employees' attitudes. Leadersh. Q. 22:92–105
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Wayne SJ, Shore LM, Liden RC 1997. Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: a social exchange perspective. Acad. Manag. J. 40:82–111
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Weathington BL, Tetrick LE 2000. Compensation or right: an analysis of employee “fringe” benefit perception. Employ. Responsib. Rights J. 12:141–62
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Weiner B. 1985. An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychol. Rev. 92:548–73
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Whitener EM. 2001. Do “high commitment” human resource practices affect employee commitment? A cross-level analysis using hierarchical linear modeling. J. Manag. 27:515–35
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Yu C, Frenkel SJ. 2013. Explaining task performance and creativity from perceived organizational support theory: Which mechanisms are more important?. J. Organ. Behav. 34:1165–81
     [Google Scholar]
  105. Zhang L, Bu Q, Wee S 2016. Effect of perceived organizational support on employee creativity: moderating role of job stressors. Int. J. Stress Manag. 23:400–17
     [Google Scholar]
  106. Zheng D, Wu H, Eisenberger R, Shore LM, Tetrick LE, Buffardi LC 2016. Newcomer leader–member exchange: the contribution of anticipated organizational support. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 89:834–55
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012119-044917
Loading
Perceived Organizational Support: Why Caring About Employees Counts
Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 7, 101 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012119-044917
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012119-044917
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012119-044917
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error