1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Public Health
  4. Volume 44, 2023
  5. Article

Annual Review of Public Health

Volume 44, 2023

Innovations in Public Health Surveillance for Emerging Infections

Abstract

Public health surveillance is defined as the ongoing, systematic collection, analysis, and interpretation of health data and is closely integrated with the timely dissemination of information that the public needs to know and upon which the public should act. Public health surveillance is central to modern public health practice by contributing data and information usually through a national notifiable disease reporting system (NNDRS). Although early identification and prediction of future disease trends may be technically feasible, more work is needed to improve accuracy so that policy makers can use these predictions to guide prevention and control efforts. In this article, we review the advantages and limitations of the current NNDRS in most countries, discuss some lessons learned about prevention and control from the first wave of COVID-19, and describe some technological innovations in public health surveillance, including geographic information systems (GIS), spatial modeling, artificial intelligence, information technology, data science, and the digital twin method. We conclude that the technology-driven innovative public health surveillance systems are expected to further improve the timeliness, completeness, and accuracy of case reporting during outbreaks and also enhance feedback and transparency, whereby all stakeholders should receive actionable information on control and be able to limit disease risk earlier than ever before.

Keyword(s): artificial intelligence, COVID-19, infectious disease, national notifiable disease reporting system, public health surveillance, spatial modeling
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-051920-093141
2023-04-03
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/publhealth/44/1/annurev-publhealth-051920-093141.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-051920-093141&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    Amit AML, Pepito VCF, Gutierrez B, Rawson T. 2021. Data sharing in Southeast Asia during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Front. Public Health 9:662842
     [Google Scholar]
  2. 2.
    Aust. Gov. Dep. Health 2014. National framework for communicable disease control Rep., Aust. Gov. Dep. Health Canberra: https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2020/10/national-framework-for-communicable-disease-control.pdf
  3. 3.
    Bagherian H, Farahbakhsh M, Rabiei R, Moghaddasi H, Asadi F. 2017. National Communicable Disease Surveillance System: a review on information and organizational structures in developed countries. Acta Inform. Med. 25:4271–76
     [Google Scholar]
  4. 4.
    Bedford J, Farrar J, Ihekweazu C, Kang G, Koopmans M, Nkengasong J. 2019. A new twenty-first century science for effective epidemic response. Nature 575:7781130–36
     [Google Scholar]
  5. 5.
    Berger M, Shiau R, Weintraub JM. 2006. Review of syndromic surveillance: implications for waterborne disease detection. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 60:6543–50
     [Google Scholar]
  6. 6.
    Bolton RN, McColl-Kennedy JR, Cheung L, Gallan A, Orsingher C et al. 2018. Customer experience challenges: bringing together digital, physical and social realms. J. Serv. Manag. 29:5776–808
     [Google Scholar]
  7. 7.
    Brailsford S, Eldabi T, Kunc M, Mustafee N, Osorio AF. 2019. Hybrid simulation modelling in operational research: a state-of-the-art review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 278:3721–37
     [Google Scholar]
  8. 8.
    Bruynseels K, Santoni de Sio F, van den Hoven J 2018. Digital twins in health care: ethical implications of an emerging engineering paradigm. Front Genet 9:31
     [Google Scholar]
  9. 9.
    Budd J, Miller BS, Manning EM, Lampos V, Zhuang M et al. 2020. Digital technologies in the public-health response to COVID-19. Nat. Med. 26:1183–92
     [Google Scholar]
  10. 10.
    Cameron EE, Nuzzo JB, Bell JA. 2019. Global health security index: building collective action and accountability Rep., Nucl. Threat Initiat./Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch. Public Health Washington, DC/Baltimore, MD: https://www.ghsindex.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/2019-Global-Health-Security-Index.pdf
  11. 11.
    CDC (Cent. Dis. Control Prev.) 2016. Health in all policies. Office of the Associate Director for Policy and Strategy https://www.cdc.gov/policy/hiap/index.html
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 12.
    CDC (Cent. Dis. Control Prev.) 2020. What is NBS?. National Electronic Disease Surveillance System Base System https://www.cdc.gov/nbs/overview/index.html
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 13.
    Chandrasekar K, Mahesan S, Bath PA. 2013. Notifiable disease surveillance in Sri Lanka and the United Kingdom: a comparative study. Sri Lanka J. Bio-Med. Inform. 4:114–22
     [Google Scholar]
  14. 14.
    Coombes MG. 2000. Defining locality boundaries with synthetic data. Environ. Plan. A Econ. Space 32:81499–518
     [Google Scholar]
  15. 15.
    CRS (Congr. Res. Serv.) 2020. Tracking COVID-19: U.S. public health surveillance and data R46588, CRS Washington, DC: https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/R46588.pdf
  16. 16.
    DHL Trend Res 2019. Digital twins in logistics: a DHL perspective on the impact of digital twins on the logistics industry Rep., DHL Trend Res https://www.dhl.com/content/dam/dhl/global/core/documents/pdf/glo-core-digital-twins-in-logistics.pdf
  17. 17.
    Durski KN, Naidoo D, Singaravelu S, Shah AA, Djingarey MH et al. 2020. Systems thinking for health emergencies: use of process mapping during outbreak response. BMJ Global Health 5:e003901
     [Google Scholar]
  18. 18.
    Elliot AJ, Harcourt SE, Hughes HE, Loveridge P, Morbey RA et al. 2020. The COVID-19 pandemic: a new challenge for syndromic surveillance. Epidemiol. Infect. 148:e122
     [Google Scholar]
  19. 19.
    GE (Gen. Electr.) 2016. GE digital twin: analytic engine for the digital power plant Rep., GE Power Digit. Solut. Boston: https://www.ge.com/digital/sites/default/files/download_assets/Digital-Twin-for-the-digital-power-plant-.pdf
  20. 20.
    Gebreyes WA, Dupouy-Camet J, Newport MJ, Oliveira CJB, Schlesinger LS et al. 2014. The Global One Health paradigm: challenges and opportunities for tackling infectious diseases at the human, animal, and environment interface in low-resource settings. PLOS Negl. Trop. Dis. 8:11e3257
     [Google Scholar]
  21. 21.
    George J, Häsler B, Mremi I, Sindato C, Mboera L et al. 2020. A systematic review on integration mechanisms in human and animal health surveillance systems with a view to addressing global health security threats. One Health Outlook 2:11
     [Google Scholar]
  22. 22.
    Grieves M 2019. Virtually intelligent product systems: digital and physical twins. Complex Systems Engineering: Theory and Practice S Flumerfelt, KG Schwartz, D Mavris, S Briceno 175–200. Reston, VA: Am. Inst. Aeronaut. Astronaut.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. 23.
    Groseclose SL, Buckeridge DL. 2017. Public health surveillance systems: recent advances in their use and evaluation. Annu. Rev. Public Health 38:57–79
     [Google Scholar]
  24. 24.
    Haffajee RL, Mello MM. 2020. Thinking globally, acting locally—the U.S. response to Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 382:22e75
     [Google Scholar]
  25. 25.
    Hassan I, Obaid F, Ahmed R, Abdelrahman L, Adam S et al. 2020. A systems thinking approach for responding to the COVID-19 pandemic. East Mediterr. Health J. 26:8872–76
     [Google Scholar]
  26. 26.
    Holmgren AJ, Apathy NC, Adler-Milstein J. 2020. Barriers to hospital electronic public health reporting and implications for the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 27:81306–9
     [Google Scholar]
  27. 27.
    Jayasinghe S. 2015. Social determinants of health inequalities: towards a theoretical perspective using systems science. Int. J. Equity Health 14:171
     [Google Scholar]
  28. 28.
    Jia P. 2020. Understanding the epidemic course in order to improve epidemic forecasting. Geohealth 4:10e2020GH000303
     [Google Scholar]
  29. 29.
    Jia P. 2021. A changed research landscape of youth's obesogenic behaviours and environments in the post-COVID-19 era. Obes. Rev. 22:Suppl. 1e13162
     [Google Scholar]
  30. 30.
    Jia P, Dai S, Wu T, Yang S 2021. New approaches to anticipate the risk of reverse zoonosis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 36:7580–90
     [Google Scholar]
  31. 31.
    Jia P, Stein A, James P, Brownson RC, Wu T et al. 2019. Earth observation: investigating noncommunicable diseases from space. Annu. Rev. Public Health 40:85–104
     [Google Scholar]
  32. 32.
    Jia P, Wang T, van Vliet AJH, Skidmore AK, van Aalst M. 2020. Worsening of tree-related public health issues under climate change. Nat. Plants 6:248
     [Google Scholar]
  33. 33.
    Jia P, Yang S 2020. China needs a national intelligent syndromic surveillance system (NISSS). Nat. Med. 26:990
     [Google Scholar]
  34. 34.
    Jia P, Yang S 2020. Early warning of epidemics: towards a national intelligent syndromic surveillance system (NISSS) in China. BMJ Glob. Health 5:10e002925
     [Google Scholar]
  35. 35.
    Jia P, Zhang L, Yu W, Yu B, Liu M et al. 2021. Impact of COVID-19 lockdown on activity patterns and weight status among youths in China: the COVID-19 Impact on Lifestyle Change Survey (COINLICS). Int. J. Obes. 45:695–99
     [Google Scholar]
  36. 36.
    Jones KE, Patel NG, Levy MA, Storeygard A, Balk D et al. 2008. Global trends in emerging infectious diseases. Nature 451:7181990–93
     [Google Scholar]
  37. 37.
    Jones T, Hedberg C. 2018. Coordination of multiple states and federal agencies. CDC Field Epidemiology Manual https://www.cdc.gov/eis/field-epi-manual/chapters/Coordinating-Agencies.html
    [Google Scholar]
  38. 38.
    Katapally TR. 2019. The SMART framework: integration of citizen science, community-based participatory research, and systems science for population health science in the digital age. JMIR mHealth uHealth 7:8e14056
     [Google Scholar]
  39. 39.
    Kostkova P. 2018. Disease surveillance data sharing for public health: the next ethical frontiers. Life Sci. Soc. Policy 14:116
     [Google Scholar]
  40. 40.
    Kraemer MUG, Yang C-H, Gutierrez B, Wu C-H, Klein B et al. 2020. The effect of human mobility and control measures on the COVID-19 epidemic in China. Science 368:6490493–97
     [Google Scholar]
  41. 41.
    Lancet 2020. COVID-19: remaking the social contract. Lancet 395:102341401
     [Google Scholar]
  42. 42.
    Lawpoolsri S, Kaewkungwal J, Khamsiriwatchara A, Sovann L, Sreng B et al. 2018. Data quality and timeliness of outbreak reporting system among countries in greater Mekong subregion: challenges for international data sharing. PLOS Negl. Trop. Dis. 12:e0006425
     [Google Scholar]
  43. 43.
    Lee D, Robertson C, Marques D 2022. Quantifying the small-area spatio-temporal dynamics of the Covid-19 pandemic in Scotland during a period with limited testing capacity. Spat Stat 49:100508
     [Google Scholar]
  44. 44.
    Leischow SJ, Best A, Trochim WM, Clark PI, Gallagher RS et al. 2008. Systems thinking to improve the public's health. Am. J. Prev. Med. 35:S2S196–203
     [Google Scholar]
  45. 45.
    Leitmeyer KC, Espinosa L, Broberg EK, Struelens MJ, ECDC Natl. Focal Points Lab 2020. Automated digital reporting of clinical laboratory information to national public health surveillance systems, results of a EU/EEA survey; 2018. Euro. Surveill. 25:391900591
     [Google Scholar]
  46. 46.
    Leung K, Wu JT, Leung GM. 2021. Real-time tracking and prediction of COVID-19 infection using digital proxies of population mobility and mixing. Nat. Commun. 12:1501
     [Google Scholar]
  47. 47.
    Liang F. 2020. COVID-19 and health code: how digital platforms tackle the pandemic in China. Soc. Media Soc. 6:3 https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120947657
    [Google Scholar]
  48. 48.
    Limkittikul K, Brett J, L'Azou M. 2014. Epidemiological trends of dengue disease in Thailand (2000–2011): a systematic literature review. PLOS Negl. Trop. Dis. 8:11e3241
     [Google Scholar]
  49. 49.
    Liverani M, Teng S, Le MS, Coker R. 2018. Sharing public health data and information across borders: lessons from Southeast Asia. Glob. Health 14:194
     [Google Scholar]
  50. 50.
    Luke DA, Stamatakis KA. 2012. Systems science methods in public health: dynamics, networks, and agents. Annu. Rev. Public Health 33:357–76
     [Google Scholar]
  51. 51.
    Luo M, Wang Q, Yang S, Jia P 2022. Changes in patterns of take-away food ordering among youths before and after COVID-19 lockdown in China: the COVID-19 Impact on Lifestyle Change Survey (COINLICS). Eur. J. Nutr. 61:1121–31
     [Google Scholar]
  52. 52.
    Mabry PL, Marcus SE, Clark PI, Leischow SJ, Méndez D. 2010. Systems science: a revolution in public health policy research. Am. J. Public Health 100:71161–63
     [Google Scholar]
  53. 53.
    Maxmen A. 2020. Why the United States is having a coronavirus data crisis. Nature 585:13–14
     [Google Scholar]
  54. 54.
    McCloskey B, Heymann DL. 2020. SARS to novel coronavirus—old lessons and new lessons. Epidemiol. Infect. 148:e22
     [Google Scholar]
  55. 55.
    McNab D, McKay J, Shorrock S, Luty S, Bowie P. 2020. Development and application of ‘systems thinking’ principles for quality improvement. BMJ Open. Qual. 9:e000714
     [Google Scholar]
  56. 56.
    McNabb SJN, Chungong S, Ryan M, Wuhib T, Nsubuga P et al. 2002. Conceptual framework of public health surveillance and action and its application in health sector reform. BMC Public Health 2:2
     [Google Scholar]
  57. 57.
    Meyers L, Ginocchio CC, Faucett AN, Nolte FS, Gesteland PH et al. 2018. Automated real-time collection of pathogen-specific diagnostic data: syndromic infectious disease epidemiology. JMIR Public Health Surveill 4:3e59
     [Google Scholar]
  58. 58.
    Osaka K, Takahashi H, Ohyama T. 2002. Testing a symptom-based surveillance system at high-profile gatherings as a preparatory measure for bioterrorism. Epidemiol. Infect. 129:3429–34
     [Google Scholar]
  59. 59.
    Park S, Cho E. 2014. National Infectious Diseases Surveillance data of South Korea. Epidemiol. Health 36:e2014030
     [Google Scholar]
  60. 60.
    Persistent Syst 2022. Digital twins in healthcare: enabling mass personalization of care delivery White Pap., Persistent Syst. New York: https://www.persistent.com/insights/whitepapers/digital-twins-in-healthcare/
  61. 61.
    Peters DH. 2014. The application of systems thinking in health: Why use systems thinking?. Health Res. Policy Sys. 12:51
     [Google Scholar]
  62. 62.
    Plack MM, Goldman EF, Scott AR, Brundage SB. 2019. Systems Thinking in the Healthcare Professions: A Guide for Educators and Clinicians Washington, DC: George Wash. Univ https://hsrc.himmelfarb.gwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=educational_resources_teaching
  63. 63.
    Rahmandad H, Sterman JD. 2008. Heterogeneity and network structure in the dynamics of diffusion: comparing agent-based and differential equation models. Manag. Sci. 54:5998–1014
     [Google Scholar]
  64. 64.
    Reskin B. 2012. The race discrimination system. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 38:17–35
     [Google Scholar]
  65. 65.
    Schmidt M, Schmidt SAJ, Sandegaard JL, Ehrenstein V, Pedersen L, Sørensen HT. 2015. The Danish National Patient Registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potential. Clin. Epidemiol. 7:449–90
     [Google Scholar]
  66. 66.
    Shahroz M, Ahmad F, Younis MS, Ahmad N, Kamel Boulos MNK et al. 2021. COVID-19 digital contact tracing applications and techniques: a review post initial deployments. Transp. Eng. 5:100072
     [Google Scholar]
  67. 67.
    Shi Y, Jiang H-L, Yang M-X, Dong L-J, Chen Y et al. 2021. The precision of epidemiological investigation of COVID-19 transmission in Shanghai, China. Infect. Dis. Poverty 10:58
     [Google Scholar]
  68. 68.
    Shortt NK, Moore A, Coombes M, Wymer C. 2005. Defining regions for locality health care planning: a multidimensional approach. Soc. Sci. Med. 60:122715–27
     [Google Scholar]
  69. 69.
    Siemens. The value of digital twin technology: transforming care delivery in a single department or an entire healthcare enterprise White Pap., Siemens Erlangen, Ger: https://www.siemens-healthineers.com/en-us/services/value-partnerships/asset-center/white-papers-articles/value-of-digital-twin-technology
  70. 70.
    Singh HJL, Couch D, Yap K. 2020. Mobile health apps that help with COVID-19 management: scoping review. JMIR Nurs 3:1e20596
     [Google Scholar]
  71. 71.
    Smith CD, Mennis J. 2020. Incorporating geographic information science and technology in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Prev. Chronic Dis. 17:E58
     [Google Scholar]
  72. 72.
    Smith GE, Elliot AJ, Lake I, Edeghere O, Morbey R et al. 2019. Syndromic surveillance: two decades experience of sustainable systems—its people not just data!. Epidemiol. Infect 147:e101
     [Google Scholar]
  73. 73.
    Smith T, Rotondo J, Desai S, Deehan H. 2014. Pertussis surveillance in Canada: trends to 2012. Can. Commun. Dis. Rep. 40:321–30
     [Google Scholar]
  74. 74.
    Statens Serum Inst 2016. Surveillance in Denmark. Statens Serum Institut https://en.ssi.dk/surveillance-and-preparedness/surveillance-in-denmark
    [Google Scholar]
  75. 75.
    Thacker SB, Berkelman RL. 1988. Public health surveillance in the United States. Epidemiol. Rev. 10:164–90
     [Google Scholar]
  76. 76.
    Thomson B. 2020. The COVID-19 pandemic: a global natural experiment. Circulation 142:14–16
     [Google Scholar]
  77. 77.
    Thygesen LC, Daasnes C, Thaulow I, Brønnum-Hansen H. 2011. Introduction to Danish (nationwide) registers on health and social issues: structure, access, legislation, and archiving. Scand. J. Public Health 39:Suppl. 712–16
     [Google Scholar]
  78. 78.
    Tosti ME, Longhi S, de Waure C, Mele A, Frano E et al. 2015. Assessment of timeliness, representativeness and quality of data reported to Italy's national integrated surveillance system for acute viral hepatitis (SEIEVA). Public Health 129:5561–68
     [Google Scholar]
  79. 79.
    van Panhuis WG, Paul P, Emerson C, Grefenstette J, Wilder R et al. 2014. A systematic review of barriers to data sharing in public health. BMC Public Health 14:1144
     [Google Scholar]
  80. 80.
    Vlieg WL, Fanoy EB, van Asten L, Liu X, Yang J et al. 2017. Comparing national infectious disease surveillance systems: China and the Netherlands. BMC Public Health 17:1415
     [Google Scholar]
  81. 81.
    Wakefield J, Okonek T, Pedersen J. 2020. Small area estimation for disease prevalence mapping. Int. Stat. Rev. 88:2398–418
     [Google Scholar]
  82. 82.
    Wang S, Ding S, Xiong L. 2020. A new system for surveillance and digital contact tracing for COVID-19: spatiotemporal reporting over network and GPS. JMIR mHealth uHealth 8:6e19457
     [Google Scholar]
  83. 83.
    WHO (World Health Organ.) 2020. Public health surveillance for COVID-19 Interim Guid. 2020.8, WHO Geneva: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/337897/WHO-2019-nCoV-SurveillanceGuidance-2020.8-eng.pdf
  84. 84.
    Wilder-Smith A, Freedman DO. 2020. Isolation, quarantine, social distancing and community containment: pivotal role for old-style public health measures in the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) outbreak. J. Travel. Med. 27:2taaa020
     [Google Scholar]
  85. 85.
    Wójcik OP, Brownstein JS, Chunara R, Johansson MA. 2014. Public health for the people: participatory infectious disease surveillance in the digital age. Emerg. Themes Epidemiol. 11:17
     [Google Scholar]
  86. 86.
    Wood A, Denholm R, Hollings S, Cooper J, Ip S et al. 2021. Linked electronic health records for research on a nationwide cohort of more than 54 million people in England: data resource. BMJ 373:n826
     [Google Scholar]
  87. 87.
    Wu JT, Leung K, Leung GM. 2020. Nowcasting and forecasting the potential domestic and international spread of the 2019-nCoV outbreak originating in Wuhan, China: a modelling study. Lancet 395:10225689–97
     [Google Scholar]
  88. 88.
    Wu Z, McGoogan JM. 2020. Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: summary of a report of 72 314 cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA 323:131239–42
     [Google Scholar]
  89. 89.
    Yang S, Pan X, Zeng P, Jia P. 2021. Spatial technologies to strengthen traditional testing for SARS-CoV-2. Trends Microbiol 29:121055–57
     [Google Scholar]
  90. 90.
    Yang S, Yu C, Jia P. 2021. Spatiobehavioral characteristics—defining the epidemiology of new contagious diseases at the earliest moment possible. Trends Parasitol 37:3179–81
     [Google Scholar]
  91. 91.
    Yoo H-S, Park O, Park H-K, Lee E-G, Jeong E-K et al. 2009. Timeliness of national notifiable diseases surveillance system in Korea: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 9:193
     [Google Scholar]
  92. 92.
    Yu B, Luo M, Liu M, Zhou J, Yang S, Jia P 2021. Social capital changes after COVID-19 lockdown among youths in China: COVID-19 Impact on Lifestyle Change Survey (COINLICS). Front. Public Health 9:697068
     [Google Scholar]
  93. 93.
    Yu B, Zhang D, Yu W, Luo M, Yang S, Jia P 2021. Impacts of lockdown on dietary patterns among youths in China: the COVID-19 Impact on Lifestyle Change Survey. Public Health Nutr 24:113221–32
     [Google Scholar]
  94. 94.
    Zhang L, Zhang L, Lai L, Du Z, Huang Y et al. 2022. Risk assessment of imported COVID-19 in China: a modelling study in Sichuan Province. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.14700. In press
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  95. 95.
    Zhang X, Holt JB, Yun S, Lu H, Greenlund KJ, Croft JB. 2015. Validation of multilevel regression and poststratification methodology for small area estimation of health indicators from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Am. J. Epidemiol. 182:2127–37
     [Google Scholar]
  96. 96.
    Zhang Y, Peng N, Yang S, Jia P 2022. Associations between nighttime light and COVID-19 incidence and mortality in the United States. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf 112:102855
     [Google Scholar]
  97. 97.
    Zhou Y, Jiang H, Wang Q, Yang M, Chen Y, Jiang Q. 2021. Use of contact tracing, isolation, and mass testing to control transmission of covid-19 in China. BMJ 375:n2330
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-051920-093141
Loading
Innovations in Public Health Surveillance for Emerging Infections
Annual Review of Public Health 44, 55 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-051920-093141
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-051920-093141
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-051920-093141
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error