We review a number of recent studies that have identified either correlations between different linguistic features (e.g., implicational universals) or correlations between linguistic features and nonlinguistic properties of speakers or their environment (e.g., effects of geography on vocabulary). We compare large-scale quantitative studies with more traditional theoretical and historical linguistic research and identify divergent assumptions and methods that have led linguists to be skeptical of correlational work. We also attempt to demystify statistical techniques and point out the importance of informed critiques of the validity of statistical approaches. Finally, we describe various methods used in recent correlational studies to deal with the fact that, because of contact and historical relatedness, individual languages in a sample rarely represent independent data points, and we show how these methods may allow us to explore linguistic prehistory to a greater time depth than is possible with orthodox comparative reconstruction.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


Literature Cited

  1. Atkinson QD. 2011. Phonemic diversity supports a serial founder effect model of language expansion from Africa. Science 332:346–49 [Google Scholar]
  2. Atkinson QD. 2012a. Response to comment on “Phonemic Diversity Supports a Serial Founder Effect Model of Language Expansion from Africa.”. Science 335:1042 [Google Scholar]
  3. Atkinson QD. 2012b. Response to comments on “Phonemic Diversity Supports a Serial Founder Effect Model of Language Expansion from Africa.”. Science 335:657 [Google Scholar]
  4. Atkinson QD, Meade A, Venditti C, Greenhill SJ, Pagel M. 2008. Languages evolve in punctuational bursts. Science 319:588 [Google Scholar]
  5. Atkinson QD, Nicholls G, Welch D, Gray RD. 2005. From words to dates: water into wine, mathemagic or phylogenetic inference?. Trans. Philol. Soc. 103:193–219 [Google Scholar]
  6. Baayen RH, Davidson DJ, Bates DM. 2008. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. J. Mem. Lang. 59:390–412 [Google Scholar]
  7. Balota DA, Yap MJ, Cortese MJ, Hutchison KA, Kessler B et al. 2007. The English lexicon project. Behav. Res. Methods 39:445–59 [Google Scholar]
  8. Baronchelli A, Gong T, Puglisi A, Loreto V. 2010. Modeling the emergence of universality in color naming patterns. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107:2403–7 [Google Scholar]
  9. Beebee H, Hitchcock C, Menzies P. 2009. The Oxford Handbook of Causation Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  10. Bentz C, Winter B. 2013. Languages with more second language learners tend to lose nominal case. Lang. Dyn. Change 3:1–27 [Google Scholar]
  11. Berlin B, Kay P. 1969. Basic Color Terms: Their Evolution and Universality Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  12. Betti L, Balloux F, Amos W, Hanihara T, Manica A. 2009. Distance from Africa, not climate, explains within-population phenotypic diversity in humans. Proc. Biol. Sci. 276:809–14 [Google Scholar]
  13. Biberauer T, Holmberg A, Roberts I. 2014. A syntactic universal and its consequences. Linguist. Inq. 45:169–225 [Google Scholar]
  14. Boas F. 1931. The Mind of Primitive Man Paris: Ed. Artis. Devereaux
  15. Bornstein MH. 1973. Color vision and color naming: a psychophysiological hypothesis of cultural difference. Psychol. Bull. 80:257–85 [Google Scholar]
  16. Boucher J, Osgood CE. 1969. The Pollyanna hypothesis. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 8:1–8 [Google Scholar]
  17. Bouckaert R, Lemey P, Dunn M, Greenhill SJ, Alekseyenko AV et al. 2012. Mapping the origins and expansion of the Indo-European language family. Science 337:957–60 [Google Scholar]
  18. Bowern C, Epps P, Gray R, Hill J, Hunley K et al. 2011. Does lateral transmission obscure inheritance in hunter-gatherer languages?. PLOS ONE 6:e25195 [Google Scholar]
  19. Brown AM, Lindsey DT. 2004. Color and language: worldwide distribution of Daltonism and distinct words for “blue.”. Vis. Neurosci. 21:409–12 [Google Scholar]
  20. Butler MA, King AA. 2004. Phylogenetic comparative analysis: a modeling approach for adaptive evolution. Am. Nat. 164:683–95 [Google Scholar]
  21. Bybee J. 2011. The vanishing phonemes debate apropos of Atkinson 2011. Linguist. Typol 15:spec. issue147–534 [Google Scholar]
  22. Carp J. 2012. On the plurality of (methodological) worlds: estimating the analytic flexibility of fMRI experiments. Front. Neurosci. 11:149 [Google Scholar]
  23. Carroll M, von Stutterheim C, Nuese R. 2004. The language and thought debate: a psycholinguistic approach. Multidisciplinary Approaches to Language Production Pechmann T, Habel C. 183–218 Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter [Google Scholar]
  24. Chen MK. 2013. The effect of language on economic behavior: evidence from savings rates, health behaviors, and retirement assets. Am. Econ. Rev. 103:690–731 [Google Scholar]
  25. Clancy SJ. 2006. The topology of Slavic case: semantic maps and multidimensional scaling. Glossos 7:1–28 [Google Scholar]
  26. Croft W, Poole KT. 2008. Inferring universals from grammatical variation: multidimensional scaling for typological analysis. Theor. Ling. 34:1–37 [Google Scholar]
  27. Crystal D. 2010. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press, 3rd ed..
  28. Currie TE, Greenhill SJ, Mace R. 2010. Is horizontal transmission really a problem for phylogenetic comparative methods? A simulation study using continuous cultural traits. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 365:3903–12 [Google Scholar]
  29. Currie TE, Meade A, Guillon M, Mace R. 2013. Cultural phylogeography of the Bantu languages of sub-Saharan Africa. Proc. Biol. Sci. 280:20130695 [Google Scholar]
  30. Cysouw M. 2008. Generalizing scales. Scales: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective on Referential Hierarchies Bornkessel I, Malchukov A, Richard M. 379–96 Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter [Google Scholar]
  31. Cysouw M, Comrie B. 2008. How varied typologically are the languages of Africa?. The Cradle of Language Botha R, Knight C. 189–203 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  32. Cysouw M, Dediu D, Moran S. 2012. Comment on “Phonemic Diversity Supports a Serial Founder Effect Model of Language Expansion from Africa.”. Science 335:657 [Google Scholar]
  33. Dahl Ö. 2013. Stuck in the futureless zone. Linguistics Diversity Comment Blog, March 9. http://dlc.hypotheses.org/360
  34. Dale R, Lupyan G. 2012. Understanding the origins of morphological diversity: the linguistic niche hypothesis. Adv. Complex Syst. 15:1150017 [Google Scholar]
  35. Davidoff J, Davies I, Roberson D. 1999. Colour categories in a stone-age tribe. Nature 398:203–4 [Google Scholar]
  36. Dediu D. 2011. A Bayesian phylogenetic approach to estimating the stability of linguistic features and the genetic biasing of tone. Proc. Biol. Sci. 278:474–79 [Google Scholar]
  37. Dediu D, Ladd DR. 2007. Linguistic tone is related to the population frequency of the adaptive haplogroups of two brain size genes, ASPM and Microcephalin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104:10944–49 [Google Scholar]
  38. Dediu D, Levinson SC. 2012. Abstract profiles of structural stability point to universal tendencies, family-specific factors, and ancient connections between languages. PLOS ONE 7:e45198 [Google Scholar]
  39. Donohue M, Nichols J. 2011. Does phoneme inventory size correlate with population size?. Linguist. Typol. 15:161–70 [Google Scholar]
  40. Dowman M. 2007. Explaining color term typology with an evolutionary model. Cogn. Sci. 31:99–132 [Google Scholar]
  41. Dryer MS. 2013a. Relationship between the order of object and verb and the order of adjective and noun. See Dryer & Haspelmath 2013, http://wals.info/chapter/97
  42. Dryer MS. 1989. Large linguistic areas and language sampling. Stud. Lang. 13:257–92 [Google Scholar]
  43. Dryer MS. 2011. The evidence for word order correlations: a response to Dunn, Greenhill, Levinson and Gray’s paper in Nature. Linguist. Typol. 15:335–80 [Google Scholar]
  44. Dryer MS. 2013b. Relationship between the order of object and verb and the order of adposition and noun phrase. See Dryer & Haspelmath 2013, http://wals.info/chapter/95
  45. Dryer MS. 2013c. Relationship between the order of object and verb and the order of relative clause and noun. See Dryer & Haspelmath 2013, http://wals.info/chapter/96
  46. Dryer MS, Haspelmath M. 2013. The World Atlas of Language Structures Online Leipzig, Ger.: Max Planck Inst. Evol. Anthropol http://wals.info
  47. Dunn M, Greenhill SJ, Levinson SC, Gray RD. 2011. Evolved structure of language shows lineage-specific trends in word-order universals. Nature 473:79–82 [Google Scholar]
  48. Dunn M, Levinson SC, Lindström E, Reesink G, Terrill A. 2008. Structural phylogeny in historical linguistics: methodological explorations applied in island Melanesia. Language 84:710–59 [Google Scholar]
  49. Dunn M, Terrill A, Reesink G, Foley RA, Levinson SC. 2005. Structural phylogenetics and the reconstruction of ancient language history. Science 309:2072–75 [Google Scholar]
  50. Easwaran K. 2013. Bayesianism. Oxford Bibliographies Online: Philosophy. http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780195396577/obo-9780195396577-0204.xml
  51. Edgington E, Onghena P. 2007. Randomization Tests London: Chapman & Hall/CRC, 4th ed..
  52. Ember C, Ember M. 2007. Climate, econiche, and sexuality: influences on sonority in language. Am. Anthropol. 109:180–85 [Google Scholar]
  53. Ember M. 1978. Size of color lexicon: interaction of cultural and biological factors. Am. Anthropol. 80:364–67 [Google Scholar]
  54. Everett C. 2013. Evidence for direct geographic influences on linguistic sounds: the case of ejectives. PLOS ONE 8:e65275 [Google Scholar]
  55. Felsenstein J. 2004. Inferring Phylogenies Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Assoc.
  56. Fought JG, Munroe RL, Fought CR, Good EM. 2004. Sonority and climate in a world sample of languages: findings and prospects. Cross-Cult. Res. 38:27–51 [Google Scholar]
  57. Gay V, Santacreu-Vasut E, Shoham A. 2013. The grammatical origins of gender roles. Work. pap., Berkeley Econ. Hist. Lab. Pap. Ser.
  58. Gelman A, Shalizi CR. 2013. Philosophy and the practice of Bayesian statistics. Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 66:8–38 [Google Scholar]
  59. Gray RD, Atkinson QD. 2003. Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of Indo-European origin. Nature 426:435–39 [Google Scholar]
  60. Gray RD, Bryant D, Greenhill SJ. 2010. On the shape and fabric of human history. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 365:3923–33 [Google Scholar]
  61. Gray RD, Drummond AJ, Greenhill SJ. 2009. Language phylogenies reveal expansion pulses and pauses in Pacific settlement. Science 323:479–83 [Google Scholar]
  62. Greenberg JH. 1966. Universals of Language Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  63. Greenberg JH. 1987. Language in the Americas Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  64. Greenberg JH. 1993. Observations concerning Ringe’s “Calculating the Factor of Chance in Language Comparison.”. Proc. Am. Philos. Soc. 137:79–90 [Google Scholar]
  65. Greenhill SJ, Atkinson QD, Meade A, Gray RD. 2010. The shape and tempo of language evolution. Proc. Biol. Sci. 277:2443–50 [Google Scholar]
  66. Grossman E. 2013. The costs of ignoring language change. Diversity Linguistics Comment Blog, March 10. http://dlc.hypotheses.org/371
  67. Hammarström H. 2009. Sampling and genealogical coverage in the WALS. Linguist. Typol. 13:105–19 [Google Scholar]
  68. Hardy JL, Frederick CM, Kay P, Werner JS. 2005. Color naming, lens aging, and grue: what the optics of the aging eye can teach us about color language. Psychol. Sci. 16:321–27 [Google Scholar]
  69. Hawkins JA. 1979. Implicational universals as predictors of word order change. Language 55:618–48 [Google Scholar]
  70. Hawkins JA. 1982. Cross-category harmony, X-bar and the predictions of markedness. J. Linguist. 18:1–35 [Google Scholar]
  71. Hay J, Bauer L. 2007. Phoneme inventory size and population size. Language 83:388–400 [Google Scholar]
  72. Hernan MA, Robins JM. 2014. Causal Inference. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC. http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/miguel-hernan/causal-inference-book/
  73. Hudson PT, Bergman MW. 1985. Lexical knowledge in word recognition: word length and word frequency in naming and lexical decision tasks. J. Mem. Lang. 24:46–58 [Google Scholar]
  74. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F, Nielsen R, Bollback JP. 2001. Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology. Science 294:2310–14 [Google Scholar]
  75. Hunley K, Bowern C, Healy M. 2012. Rejection of a serial founder effects model of genetic and linguistic coevolution. Proc. Biol. Sci. 279:2281–88 [Google Scholar]
  76. Jaeger TF, Graff P, Croft W, Pontillo D. 2011. Mixed effect models for genetic and areal dependencies in linguistic typology. Linguist. Typol. 15:281–319 [Google Scholar]
  77. Jaeger TF. 2008. Categorical data analysis: away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. J. Mem. Lang. 59:434–46 [Google Scholar]
  78. Janssen DP, Bickel B, Zúñiga F. 2006. Randomization tests in language typology. Linguist. Typol. 10:419–40 [Google Scholar]
  79. Juola P. 1998. Measuring linguistic complexity: the morphological tier. J. Quant. Linguist. 5:206–13 [Google Scholar]
  80. Kiparsky P. 2014. New Perspectives in Historical Linguistics: The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics London/New York: Routledge
  81. Knooihuizen R, Dediu D. 2012. Historical demography and historical sociolinguistics: the role of migrant integration in the development of Dunkirk French in the 17th century. Lang. Dyn. Change 2:1–33 [Google Scholar]
  82. Köhler R. 1986. Zur linguistischen Synergetik Bochum, Ger.: Strukt. Dyn. Lexik
  83. Köhler R. 1999. Der Zusammenhang zwischen Lexemlänge und Polysemie im Maori. Pange lingua. Zborník na počest’ Viktora Krupu Ondrejovič S, Genzor J. 27–33 Bratislava: Veda [Google Scholar]
  84. Kriegeskorte N, Simmons WK, Bellgowan PSF, Baker CI. 2009. Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: the dangers of double dipping. Nat. Neurosci. 12:535–40 [Google Scholar]
  85. Kuperman V, Stadthagen-Gonzalez H, Brysbaert M. 2013. Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words. Behav. Res. Methods 44:978–90 [Google Scholar]
  86. Laeng B, Brennen T, Elden K, Gaare Paulsen H, Banerjee A, Lipton R. 2007. Latitude-of-birth and season-of-birth effects on human color vision in the Arctic. Vis. Res. 47:1595–607 [Google Scholar]
  87. Levinson SC, Meira S. 2003. ‘Natural concepts’ in the spatial topological domain—adpositional meanings in crosslinguistic perspective. An exercise in semantic typology. Language 79:485–516 [Google Scholar]
  88. Levinson SC, Greenhill SJ, Gray RD, Dunn M. 2011. Universal typological dependencies should be detectable in the history of language families. Linguist. Typol. 15:509–34 [Google Scholar]
  89. Levinson SC. 2000. Yélî Dnye and the theory of basic color terms. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 10:3–55 [Google Scholar]
  90. Levinson SC. 2012. Foreword. Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf Carroll JB, Levinson SC, Lee P. vii–xxiii Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2nd ed.. [Google Scholar]
  91. Lewis MW, Pereltsvaig A. 2013. Ejectives, high altitudes, and grandiose linguistic hypotheses. GeoCurrents Blog, June 14. http://languagesoftheworld.info/geolinguistics/ejectives-high-altitudes-grandiose-linguistic-hypotheses.html
  92. Liberman M. 2013. High-altitude ejectives. Language Log Blog, June 14. http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=4685
  93. Lin H, Luo MR, MacDonald LW, Tarrant AW. 2001. A cross-cultural colour-naming study. Part I: Using an unconstrained method. Color Res. Appl. 26:40–60 [Google Scholar]
  94. Little H. 2012. The role of foreigner-directed speech in language evolution. Proceedings of the 2012 European Human Behaviour and Evolution Association Annual Meeting7 Durham, UK: Univ. Durham http://community.dur.ac.uk/jeremy.kendal/EHBEA2012/Talks%20&%20Posters_files/PosterBookV2.pdf
  95. Loreto V, Mukherjee A, Tria F. 2012. On the origin of the hierarchy of color names. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109:6819–24 [Google Scholar]
  96. Lupyan G, Dale R. 2010. Language structure is partly determined by social structure. PLOS ONE 5:e8559 [Google Scholar]
  97. Mace R, Pagel M. 1994. The comparative method in anthropology. Curr. Anthropol. 35:549–64 [Google Scholar]
  98. Majid A, Boster JS, Bowerman M. 2008. The cross-linguistic categorization of everyday events: a study of cutting and breaking. Cognition 109:235–50 [Google Scholar]
  99. Malt BC, Ameel E, Imai M, Gennari SP, Saji N, Majid A. 2013. Human locomotion in languages: constraints on moving and meaning. J. Mem. Lang. 74:107–23 [Google Scholar]
  100. Malt BC, Gennari SP, Imai M, Ameel E, Saji N, Majid A. 2014. Where are the concepts? What words can and can’t reveal. In Concepts: New Directions Margolis E, Laurence S. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press In press [Google Scholar]
  101. Mantel N. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res. 27:209–20 [Google Scholar]
  102. Martowicz A. 2011. The origin and functioning of circumstantial clause linkers: a cross-linguistic study. PhD thesis, Univ. Edinburgh. 419 pp.
  103. McMahon A, Heggarty P, McMahon R, Maguire W. 2007. The sound patterns of Englishes: representing phonetic similarity. Engl. Lang. Linguist. 11:113–42 [Google Scholar]
  104. McMahon A, McMahon R. 2005. Language Classification by Numbers Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  105. McWhorter J. 2007. Language Interrupted: Signs of Non-Native Acquisition in Standard Language Grammars New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  106. Moran S, McCloy D, Wright R. 2012. Revisiting population size vs phoneme inventory size. Language 88:877–93 [Google Scholar]
  107. Nelson-Sathi S, List J-M, Geisler H, Fangerau H, Gray RD et al. 2010. Networks uncover hidden lexical borrowing in Indo-European language evolution. Proc. Biol. Sci. 278:1794–803 [Google Scholar]
  108. Nerbonne J. 2009. Data-driven dialectology. Lang. Linguist. Compass 3:175–98 [Google Scholar]
  109. Nettle D. 1999. Linguistic Diversity Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  110. Nettle D. 2012. Social scale and structural complexity in human languages. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 367:1829–36 [Google Scholar]
  111. Nichols J. 1992. Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  112. Pagel M, Atkinson QD, Meade A. 2007. Frequency of word-use predicts rates of lexical evolution throughout Indo-European history. Nature 449:717–21 [Google Scholar]
  113. Pearl J. 2000. Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
  114. Piantadosi S, Tily H, Gibson E. 2011a. Word lengths are optimized for efficient communication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108:3526–29 [Google Scholar]
  115. Piantadosi S, Tily H, Gibson E. 2011b. Reply to Reilly and Kean: clarifications on word length and information content. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108:e109 [Google Scholar]
  116. Piantadosi S. 2014. Zipf’s word-frequency law in natural language: a critical review and future directions. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 21:1112–30 [Google Scholar]
  117. Pierrehumbert J. 2002. Word-specific phonetics. Laboratory Phonology 7 Gussenhoven C, Warner N. 101–39 Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter [Google Scholar]
  118. Pullum GK. 2012. Keith Chen, Whorfian economist. Language Log Blog, Feb. 9. http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=3756
  119. Ramachandran S, Deshpande O, Roseman CC, Rosenberg NA, Feldman MW, Cavalli-Sforza LL. 2005. Support from the relationship of genetic and geographic distance in human populations for a serial founder effect originating in Africa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:15942–47 [Google Scholar]
  120. Reilly J, Kean J. 2007. Formal distinctiveness of high- and low-imageability nouns: analyses and theoretical implications. Cogn. Sci. 31:157–68 [Google Scholar]
  121. Roberts SG, Winters J. 2012. Social structure and language structure: the new nomothetic approach. Psychol. Lang. Commun. 16:89–112 [Google Scholar]
  122. Roberts SG, Winters J. 2013. Linguistic diversity and traffic accidents: lessons from statistical studies of cultural traits. PLOS ONE 8:e70902 [Google Scholar]
  123. Rosch E. 1974. Linguistic relativity. Human Communication: Theoretical Perspective Silverstein E. 95–121 Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum [Google Scholar]
  124. Saunders BA, van Brakel J. 1997. Colour: an exosomatic organ?. Behav. Brain Sci. 20:212–20 [Google Scholar]
  125. Sereno SC, O’Donnell PJ, Sereno ME. 2009. Size matters: Bigger is faster. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 62:1115–22 [Google Scholar]
  126. Sicoli MA, Holton G. 2014. Linguistic phylogenies support back-migration from Beringia to Asia. PLOS ONE 9:e91722 [Google Scholar]
  127. Silver M, Montana G, Nichols TE. 2011. False positives in neuroimaging genetics using voxel-based morphometry data. Neuroimage 54:992–1000 [Google Scholar]
  128. Sinnemäki K. 2009. Complexity and size of speech community. Language Complexity as an Evolving Variable Sampson PT, Gil D. 126–41 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  129. Spruit MR. 2006. Measuring syntactic variation in Dutch dialects. Lit. Linguist. Comput. 21:493–506 [Google Scholar]
  130. Steels L, McIntyre A. 1999. Spatially distributed naming games. Adv. Complex Syst. 1:301–24 [Google Scholar]
  131. Sullivan J, McMahon A. 2010. Phonetic comparison, varieties, and networks: Swadesh’s influence lives on here too. Diachronica 27:325–40 [Google Scholar]
  132. Swadesh M. 1955. Towards greater accuracy in lexicostatistic dating. Int. J. Am. Linguist. 21:121–37 [Google Scholar]
  133. Szmrecsanyi B. 2014. Forests, trees, corpora, and dialect grammars. Aggregating Dialectology, Typology, and Register Analysis: Linguistic Variation in Text and Speech Szmrecsanyi B, Wälchli B. 89–212 Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter [Google Scholar]
  134. Talbott W. 2013. Bayesian epistemology. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Zalta EN. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/epistemology-bayesian/ [Google Scholar]
  135. Thomason SG. 2000. Linguistic areas and language history. Stud. Slav. Gen. Linguist. 28:311–27 [Google Scholar]
  136. Thomason SG. 2013. Ultraconserved words? Really?? Language Log Blog, May 8. http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=4612
  137. Torreira H, Roberts S. 2014. Functional trade-off between lexical tone and intonation: typological evidence from polar-question marking. Presented at Int. Symp. Tonal Asp. Lang. (TAL 2014), 4th, Nijmegen, Neth.
  138. Trudgill P. 2002. Sociolinguistic Variation and Change Washington, DC: Georgetown Univ. Press
  139. Verkerk A. 2014. The correlation between motion event encoding and path verb lexicon size in the Indo-European language family. Folia Linguist. Hist. 35:307–58 [Google Scholar]
  140. Vul E, Harris C, Winkielman P, Pashler H. 2009. Puzzlingly high correlations in fMRI studies of emotion, personality, and social cognition. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 4:274–90 [Google Scholar]
  141. Walker I, Hulme C. 1999. Concrete words are easier to recall than abstract words: evidence for a semantic contribution to short-term serial recall. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 25:1256–71 [Google Scholar]
  142. Wang C-C, Ding Q-L, Tao H, Li H. 2012. Comment on “Phonemic Diversity Supports a Serial Founder Effect Model of Language Expansion from Africa.”. Science 335:657 [Google Scholar]
  143. Wichmann S, Holman EW. 2009. Population size and rates of language change. Hum. Biol. 81:259–74 [Google Scholar]
  144. Wichmann S, Rama T, Holman EW. 2011. Phonological diversity, word length and population sizes across languages: the ASJP evidence. Linguist. Typol. 15:177–97 [Google Scholar]
  145. Yang C. 2013. Ontogeny and phylogeny of language. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110:6324–27 [Google Scholar]
  146. Yao B, Vasiljevic M, Weick M, Sereno ME, O’Donnell PJ et al. 2013. Semantic size of abstract concepts: It gets emotional when you can’t see it. PLOS ONE 8:e75000 [Google Scholar]
  147. Zipf G. 1936. The Psychobiology of Language London: Routledge
  148. Zipf G. 1949. Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort New York:: Addison-Wesley

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error