1932

Abstract

Evidence of children’s sensitivity to statistical features of their input in language acquisition is often used to argue against learning mechanisms driven by innate knowledge. At the same time, evidence of children acquiring knowledge that is richer than the input supports arguments in favor of such mechanisms. This tension can be resolved by separating the inferential and deductive components of the language learning mechanism. Universal Grammar provides representations that support deductions about sentences that fall outside of experience. In addition, these representations define the evidence that learners use to infer a particular grammar. The input is compared with the expected evidence to drive statistical inference. In support of this model, we review evidence of () children’s sensitivity to the environment, () mismatches between input and intake, () the need for learning mechanisms beyond innate representations, and () the deductive consequences of children’s acquired syntactic representations.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-linguist-030514-125236
2015-01-14
2025-02-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-linguist-030514-125236
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-linguist-030514-125236
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error