Creole Tense–Mood–Aspect Systems

Literature Cited

1. Andersen R. 1990. Papiamentu tense–aspect, with special attention to discourse. See Singler 1990 59–96
2. Baptista M. 2002. The Syntax of Cape Verdean Creole: The Sotavento Varieties Amsterdam: Benjamins [Google Scholar]
3. Baptista M. 2013. Cape Verdean Creole of Brava. See Michaelis et al. 2013a 12–19
4. Bickerton D. 1975. Dynamics of a Creole System Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
5. Bickerton D. 1981. Roots of Language Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma [Google Scholar]
6. Bickerton D. 1984. The language bioprogram hypothesis. Behav. Brain Sci. 7:173–88 [Google Scholar]
7. Bollée A. 2013. Reunion Creole. See Michaelis et al. 2013a 241–49
8. Bybee J. 2008. Formal universals as emergent phenomena: the origins of structure preservation. Language Universals and Language Change J Good 108–21 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
9. Bybee J, Perkins R, Pagliuca W. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
10. Cardoso HC. 2013. Diu Indo-Portuguese. See Michaelis et al. 2013a 90–101
11. Christie P. 1991. Modality in Jamaican Creole. Verb Phrase Patterns in Black English and Creoles W Edwards, D Winford 217–33 Detroit, MI: Wayne State Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
12. Cinque G. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
13. Cinque G. 2001. ‘Restructuring’ and the order of aspectual and root modal heads. Current Studies in Italian Syntax: Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi G Cinque, G Salvi 137–55 Amsterdam: Elsevier [Google Scholar]
14. Clements JC. 2009. Accounting for some similarities and differences among the Indo-Portuguese creoles. J. Port. Linguist. 8:23–47 [Google Scholar]
15. Clements JC. 2013. Korlai. See Michaelis et al. 2013a 102–10
16. Clements JC. 2014. Form selection in contact languages: evidence from some Portuguese- and Spanish-lexified contact varieties. Portuguese/Spanish Interfaces: Diachrony, Synchrony, and Contact P Amaral, AM Carvalho 377–401 Amsterdam: Benjamins [Google Scholar]
17. Clements JC, Koontz-Garboden A. 2002. Two Indo-Portuguese creoles in contrast. J. Pidgin Creole Lang. 17:191–236 [Google Scholar]
18. Colot L, Ludwig R. 2013. Guadeloupean Creole and Martinican Creole. See Michaelis et al. 2013a 205–19
19. Comrie B. 1976. Aspect Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
20. Comrie B. 1985. Tense Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
21. Dahl O. 1985. Tense and Aspect Systems Oxford, UK: Blackwell [Google Scholar]
22. Davis MS. 2000. The past imperfect in Palenquero. Stud. Lang. 24:565–81 [Google Scholar]
23. DeGraff M. 2005. Morphology and word order in ‘creolization’ and beyond. Oxford Handbook of Comparative Syntax G Cinque, R Kaynes 293–372 New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
24. Detges U. 2000. Two types of restructuring in French creoles: a cognitive approach to the genesis of tense markers. Degrees of Restructuring in Creole Languages I Neumann-Holzschuh, EW Schneider 135–62 Amsterdam: Benjamins: [Google Scholar]
25. Durrleman S. 2000. The architecture of the clause in Jamaican Creole. Gener. Gramm. Geneva 1:189–240 [Google Scholar]
26. Essegby J, van den Berg M, van de Vate MS. 2013. Possibility and Necessity modals in Gbe and Surinamese creoles. Lingua 129:67–95 [Google Scholar]
27. Faraclas N, Rivera-Castillo Y, Walicek DE. 2007. No exception to the rule: the tense-modality-aspect system of Papiamentu reconsidered. Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives on Contact Languages, ed M Huber, V Velupillai 257–78 Amsterdam: Benjamins [Google Scholar]
28. Fattier D. 2013. Haitian Creole. See Michaelis et al. 2013a 195–204
29. Hagemeijer T. 2013. Santome. See Michaelis et al. 2013a 50–58
30. Holm J. et al. 2000. The creole verb: a comparative study of stativity and time reference. Language Change and Language Contact in Pidgins and Creoles J McWhorter 133–61 Amsterdam: Benjamins [Google Scholar]
31. Intumbo I, Inverno L, Holm J. 2013. Guinea-Bissau Kriyol. See Michaelis et al. 2013a 31–39
32. Klinger TA, Neumann-Holzschuh I. 2013. Louisiana Creole. See Michaelis et al. 2013a 229–40
33. Kouwenberg S, Lefebvre C. 2007. A new analysis of the Papiamentu clause structure. Probus 19:37–73 [Google Scholar]
34. Krajinović A. 2016. Aspect and modality in Malabar Indo-Portuguese Presented at Annu. Meet. Soc. Linguist. Eur., 49th, Aug. 31–Sep. 3, Naples. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309491045_Aspect_and_modality_in_Malabar_Indo-Portuguese_Status_of_the_habitual_aspect [Google Scholar]
35. Kratzer A. 1991. Modality. Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research A von Stechow, D Wunderlich 639–50 Berlin: de Gruyter [Google Scholar]
36. Kratzer A. 2002. The notional category of modality. Formal Semantics: The Essential Readings P Portner, BH Partee 289–323 Oxford, UK: Blackwell [Google Scholar]
37. Lang J. 2013. Cape Verdean Creole of Santiago. See Michaelis et al. 2013a 3–11
38. Lefebvre C. 1996. The tense, mood and aspect system of Haitian Creole and the problem of transmission of grammar in creole genesis. J. Pidgin Creole Lang. 11:231–313 [Google Scholar]
39. Luffin X. 2013. Kinubi. See Michaelis et al. 2013b 50–53
40. Lyons J. 1977. Semantics Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
41. Magloire-Holly H. 1982. Les modaux: auxiliaires ou verbes?. Syntaxe de l'haïtien C Lefebvre, H Magloire-Holly, N Piou 92–120 Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma [Google Scholar]
42. Manfredi S, Petrollino P. 2013. Juba Arabic. See Michaelis et al. 2013b 50–53
43. Maurer P. 1993. The subjunctive in Papiamentu. Atlantic Meets Pacific: A Global View of Pidginization and Creolization F Byrne, J Holm 243–50 Amsterdam: Benjamins [Google Scholar]
44. Maurer P. 1997. Tense-aspect-mood in Principense. The Structure and Status of Pidgins and Creoles AK Spears, D Winford 415–35 Amsterdam: Benjamins. [Google Scholar]
45. Maurer P. 2013a. Papiamentu. See Michaelis et al. 2013a 163–81
46. Maurer P. 2013b. Principense. See Michaelis et al. 2013a 72–80
47. Maurer P. 2013c. Angolar. See Michaelis et al. 2013a 59–71
48. Michaelis S, Maurer P, Haspelmath M, Huber M. 2013a. The Survey of Pidgin and Creole Languages II Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
49. Michaelis S, Maurer P, Haspelmath M, Huber M. 2013b. The Survey of Pidgin and Creole Languages III Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
50. Migge B. 2006. Tracing the origin of modality in the creoles of Suriname. Structure and Variation in Language Contact A Deumert, S Durrleman-Tame 29–59 Amsterdam: Benjamins [Google Scholar]
51. Migge B, Goury L. 2008. Between contact and internal development: towards a multi-layered explanation for the development of the TMA system in the creoles of Suriname. Roots of Creole Structure S Michaelis 303–31 Amsterdam: Benjamins [Google Scholar]
52. Migge B, Winford D. 2009. The origin and development of possibility in the creoles of Suriname. Gradual Creolization R Selbach, H Cardoso, M van den Berg 129–53 Amsterdam: Benjamins [Google Scholar]
53. Palmer FR. 1986. Mood and Modality Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
54. Patzelt C. 2010. Testing the validity of the universalist hypothesis in creole genesis: evidence from the TMA systems of Spanish-based creoles. Int. J. Arts Sci. 3:1–19 [Google Scholar]
55. Pfander S. 2013. Guyanais. See Michaelis et al. 2013a 220–28
56. Post M. 1995. Aspect marking in Fa d'Ambu: the elements xa and sa and their respective aspectual values. From Contact to Creole and Beyond P Baker 189–205 London: Univ. Westminster Press [Google Scholar]
57. Roberts SJ. 1998. The role of diffusion in the genesis of Hawaiian Creole. Language 74:1–39 [Google Scholar]
58. Robertson I. 1990. The tense–mood–aspect system of Berbice Dutch. See Singler 1990 169–84
59. Schuchardt H. 1890. Kreolische Studien IX: über das Malaioportugiesische von Batavia und Tugu. Sitzungsberichte der Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Wien, philosophisch-historische Klasse 1221–256 Vienna: Rohrer [Google Scholar]
60. Schwegler A. 1992. Future and conditional in Palenquero. J. Pidgin Creole Lang. 7:223–59 [Google Scholar]
61. Schwegler A. 1998. Palenquero. América negra: Panorámica actual de los estudios linguísticos sobre variedades criollas y afrohispanas M Perl, A Schwegler 220–91 Frankfurt/Vervuert/Madrid: Iberoamericana [Google Scholar]
62. Schwegler A. 2013. Palenquero. See Michaelis et al. 2013a 182–92
63. Siegel J. 2007. Recent evidence against the Language Bioprogram Hypothesis: the pivotal case of Hawai'i Creole. Stud. Lang. 31:51–88 [Google Scholar]
64. Silva IS. 1990. Tense and aspect in Capeverdean Crioulo. See Singler 1990 143–68
65. Singler JV. 1988. Topics in Liberian English modality. Current Issues in African Linguistics, ed. P Newman, R Bothe 5253–66 Dordrecht, Neth: Foris [Google Scholar]
66. Singler JV. 1990. Pidgin and Creole Tense–Mood–Aspect Systems Amsterdam: Benjamins [Google Scholar]
67. Smith C. 1997. The Parameter of Aspect Dordrecht, Neth.: Kluwer [Google Scholar]
68. Smith HL. 2013. Habitual aspect marking in Palenquero: variation in present temporal reference. Selected Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics AM Carvalho, S Beaudrie 97–108 Somerville, MA: Cascadilla [Google Scholar]
69. Spears AK. 1990. Tense, mood and aspect in the Haitian Creole preverbal marker system. See Singler 1990 119–42
70. Steinkrüger P. 2008. The puzzling case of Chabacano: creolization, substrate, mixing and secondary contact. Stud. Philipp. Lang. Cult. 19:142–57 [Google Scholar]
71. Stolz T. 1987. The development of the AUX-category in pidgins and creoles: the case of the resultative-perfect and its relation to anteriority. Historical Development of Auxiliaries M Harris, P Ramat 291–315 Berlin: de Gruyter [Google Scholar]
72. Swolkien D. 2013. Cape Verdean creole of São Vicente. See Michaelis et al. 2013a 20–30
73. Tonhauser J. 2007. Temporal interpretation Work. pap., Dep. Linguist., Ohio State Univ Columbus: [Google Scholar]
74. Tosco M. 1995. A pidgin verbal system: the case of Juba Arabic. Anthropol. Linguist. 37:423–54 [Google Scholar]
75. van de Vate MS. 2010. Possibility modality in Saamáka. Proceedings of SULA 5: Semantics of Under-Represented Languages in the Americas S Lima243–58 Amherst, MA: Grad. Linguist. Stud. Assoc. [Google Scholar]
76. van de Vate MS. 2011. Tense, aspect and modality in a radical creole: the case of Saamáka PhD thesis, Univ. Tromsø, Norway [Google Scholar]
77. van de Vate MS. 2013. An account of the stative versus dynamic split in Saamáka. Lingua 129:124–49 [Google Scholar]
78. van den Berg MC. 2001. “Mingo, joù no man”, Oud-Sranan in verhoren en verslagen van rechtszaken. Oso 20:241–53 [Google Scholar]
79. van den Berg MC, Aboh E. 2013. Done already? A comparison of completive markers in the Gbe languages and Sranan Tongo. Lingua 129:150–72 [Google Scholar]
80. Winford D. 1993. Predication in Caribbean English Creoles Amsterdam: Benjamins [Google Scholar]
81. Winford D. 2000a. Tense and aspect in Sranan and the creole prototype. Language Change and Language Contact in Pidgins and Creoles J McWhorter 383–442 Amsterdam: Benjamins [Google Scholar]
82. Winford D. 2000b. Irrealis in Sranan: mood and modality in a radical creole. J. Pidgin Creole Lang. 15:63–125 [Google Scholar]
83. Winford D. 2012. Creole languages. The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect, ed. R. Binnick 428–57 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
84. Winford D. 2013. Substrate influence and universals in the emergence of contact Englishes: re-evaluating the evidence. English as a Contact Language D Schreier, M Hundt 222–41 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
85. Winford D, Migge B. 2007. Substrate influence on the emergence of the TMA systems of the Surinamese creoles. J. Pidgin Creole Lang. 22:73–99 [Google Scholar]