Stance and Stancetaking

Literature Cited

1. Agha A. 2003.. The social life of a cultural value. . Lang. Commun. 23::231–73
   [Google Scholar]
2. Aikhenvald AY. 2004.. Evidentiality. Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press
   [Google Scholar]
3. Babel AM. 2009.. Dizque, evidentiality, and stance in Valley Spanish. . Lang. Soc. 38:(4):487–511
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bakhtin M. 1981.. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Austin:: Univ. Tex. Press
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bergqvist H. 2018.. Evidentiality as stance. . In Evidence for Evidentiality, ed. A Foolen, H de Hoop, G Mulder , pp. 19–43. Amsterdam:: John Benjamins
   [Google Scholar]
6. Biber D, Finegan E. 1988.. Adverbial stance types in English. . Discourse Process. 11:(1):1–34
   [Google Scholar]
7. Brown P, Levinson SC, Levinson SC. 1987.. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage, Vol. 4. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bucholtz M. 1999.. You da man: narrating the racial other in the production of white masculinity. . J. Sociolinguist. 3:(4):443–60
   [Google Scholar]
9. Butler J. 1990.. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York:: Routledge
   [Google Scholar]
10. Clift R. 2006.. Indexing stance: reported speech as an interactional evidential. . J. Sociolinguist. 10:(5):569–95
    [Google Scholar]
11. Donaldson M. 1993.. What is hegemonic masculinity? Structures of oppression, forces for change. . Theory Soc. 22:(5):643–57
    [Google Scholar]
12. Du Bois JW. 2007.. The stance triangle. See Englebretson 2007. , pp. 139–82
13. Du Bois JW, Kärkkäinen E. 2012.. Taking a stance on emotion: affect, sequence, and intersubjectivity in dialogic interaction. . Text Talk 32:(4):433–51
    [Google Scholar]
14. Englebretson R, ed. 2007.. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, Vol. 164: Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction. Philadelphia:: John Benjamins
    [Google Scholar]
15. Fischer JL. 1958.. Social influences on the choice of a linguistic variant. . WORD 14:(1):47–56
    [Google Scholar]
16. Freeman V. 2014.. Hyperarticulation as a signal of stance. . J. Phonet. 45::1–11
    [Google Scholar]
17. Gadanidis T, Hildebrand-Edgar N, Kiss A, Konnelly L, Pabst K, et al. 2018.. Stance, style, and semantics: operationalizing insights from semantics-pragmatics to account for linguistic variation. Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation (NWAV) 47, New York:, Oct. 21
    [Google Scholar]
18. Goffman E. 1981.. Footing. . In Forms of Talk, ed. E Goffman , pp. 124–59. Philadelphia:: Univ. Pa. Press
    [Google Scholar]
19. Hanks WF. 2005.. Explorations in the deictic field. . Curr. Anthropol. 46:(2):191–220
    [Google Scholar]
20. Holmes-Elliott S, Levon E. 2017.. The substance of style: gender, social class and interactional stance in /s/-fronting in southeast England. . Linguistics 55:(5):1045–72
    [Google Scholar]
21. Jaffe A. 2009.. Introduction: the sociolinguistics of stance. . In Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, ed. A Jaffe , pp. 3–28. Oxford, UK/New York:: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
22. Jakobson R. 1990 (1957).. Shifters and verbal categories. . In On Language, ed. LR Waugh, M Monville-Burston , pp. 386–92. Cambridge, MA:: Harvard Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
23. Johnstone B. 2009.. Pittsburghese shirts: commodification and the enregisterment of an urban dialect. . Am. Speech 84:(2):157–75
    [Google Scholar]
24. Johnstone B. 2017.. Characterological figures and expressive style in the enregisterment of linguistic variety. . In Language and a Sense of Place: Studies in Language and Region, ed. C Montgomery, E Moore , pp. 283–300. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
25. Kaltenböck G, López-Couso MJ, Méndez-Naya B. 2020.. The dynamics of stance constructions. . Lang. Sci. 82::101330
    [Google Scholar]
26. Kärkkäinen E. 2003.. Epistemic Stance in English Conversation. Amsterdam:: John Benjamins
    [Google Scholar]
27. Keizer E. 2020.. Modelling stance adverbs in grammatical theory: tackling heterogeneity with Functional Discourse Grammar. . Lang. Sci. 82::101273
    [Google Scholar]
28. Kiesling SF. 1998.. Men's identities and sociolinguistic variation: the case of fraternity men. . J. Sociolinguist. 2:(1):69–99
    [Google Scholar]
29. Kiesling SF. 2004.. Dude. . Am. Speech 79:(3):281–305
    [Google Scholar]
30. Kiesling SF. 2006.. Hegemonic identity-making in narrative. . In Discourse and Identity, ed. A De Fina, D Schiffrin, M Bamberg , pp. 261–87. New York:: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
31. Kiesling SF. 2009.. Style as stance: stance as the explanation for patterns of sociolinguistic variation. . In Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, ed. A Jaffe , pp. 171–94. Oxford, UK/New York:: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
32. Kiesling SF. 2017.. Youtube yinzers: stancetaking and the performance of ‘Pittsburghese.’ In Identity and Dialect Performance: A Study of Communities and Dialects, ed. R Bassiouney , pp. 245–64. London:: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
33. Kiesling SF. 2018.. Masculine stances and the linguistics of affect: on masculine ease. . NORMA: Int. J. Masc. Stud. 13:(3–4):191–212
    [Google Scholar]
34. Kiesling SF. 2019.. The “gay voice” and “brospeak”: toward a systematic model of stance. . In The Oxford Handbook of Language and Sexuality, ed. K Hall, R Barrett . Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press. https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190212926.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780190212926-e-11
    [Google Scholar]
35. Kiesling SF. 2020.. Investment in a model of stancetaking: I mean and just sayin'. . Lang. Sci. 82::101333
    [Google Scholar]
36. Kiesling SF. 2022.. Operationalizing theoretical constructs in digital discourse analysis: the example of stancetaking. . In Research Methods for Digital Discourse Analysis, ed. C Vasquez . London:: Bloomsbury. In press
    [Google Scholar]
37. Kiesling SF, Pavalanathan U, Fitzpatrick J, Han X, Eisenstein J. 2018.. Interactional stancetaking in online forums. . Comput. Linguist. 44:(4):683–718
    [Google Scholar]
38. Kockelman P. 2004.. Stance and subjectivity. . J. Linguist. Anthropol. 14:(2):127–50
    [Google Scholar]
39. Labov W. 1966.. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC:: Cent. Appl. Linguist.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Lawson R. 2013.. The construction of `tough' masculinity: negotiation, alignment and rejection. . Gend. Lang. 7:(3):369–95
    [Google Scholar]
41. Lempert M. 2008.. The poetics of stance: text-metricality, epistemicity, interaction. . Lang. Soc. 37:(4):569–92
    [Google Scholar]
42. Liu B. 2012.. Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies . Williston, VT:: Morgan & Claypool
    [Google Scholar]
43. Mendoza-Denton N. 2011.. The semiotic hitchhiker's guide to creaky voice: circulation and gendered hardcore in a Chicana/o gang persona. . J. Linguist. Anthropol. 21:(2):261–80
    [Google Scholar]
44. Ochs E. 1992.. Indexing gender. . In Rethinking Context, ed. A Duranti, C Goodwin , pp. 335–58. Cambridge, UK/New York:: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
45. Ochs E. 1996.. Linguistic resources for socializing humanity. . In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, ed. J Gumperz, S Levinson , pp. 407–37. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
46. Palmer FR. 2001.. Mood and Modality. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
47. Pratt T. 2020.. Embodying “tech”: articulatory setting, phonetic variation, and social meaning. . J. Sociolinguist. 24:(3):328–49
    [Google Scholar]
48. Putnam H. 1974.. Meaning and reference. . J. Philos. 70:(19):699–711
    [Google Scholar]
49. Schiffrin D. 1984.. Jewish argument as sociability. . Lang. Soc. 13:(3):311–35
    [Google Scholar]
50. Silver L, Devlin K, Huang C. 2021.. Most Americans support tough stance toward China on human rights, economic issues. . Pew Research Center, Mar. 4. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2021/03/04/most-americans-support-tough-stance-toward-china-on-human-rights-economic-issues/
    [Google Scholar]
51. Silverstein M. 2003.. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. . Lang. Commun. 23:(3–4):193–229
    [Google Scholar]
52. Snell J. 2018.. Solidarity, stance, and class identities. . Lang. Soc. 47:(5):665–91
    [Google Scholar]
53. Stivers T. 2008.. Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: when nodding is a token of affiliation. . Res. Lang. Soc. Interact. 41:(1):31–57
    [Google Scholar]
54. Tannen D. 2004.. Talking the dog: framing pets as interactional resources in family discourse. . Res. Lang. Soc. Interact. 37:(4):399–420
    [Google Scholar]
55. Tannen D. 2007.. Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
56. Trudgill P. 1972.. Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the Urban British English of Norwich. . Lang. Soc. 1:(2):179–95
    [Google Scholar]
57. Wetherell M, Edley N. 1999.. Negotiating hegemonic masculinity: imaginary positions and psycho-discursive practices. . Fem. Psychol. 9:(3):335–56
    [Google Scholar]
58. Winters MS. 2020.. US bishops need to recalibrate their stance toward the culture. . National Catholic Reporter, Nov. 13. https://www.ncronline.org/news/accountability/distinctly-catholic/us-bishops-need-recalibrate-their-stance-toward-culture
    [Google Scholar]
59. Wortham S, Reyes A. 2020.. Discourse Analysis Beyond the Speech Event. New York:: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]