1932

Abstract

This autobiographical sketch starts with my arrival as a PhD student at UCLA in 1965. It focuses on the most prominent line of my intellectual development, from work in Priorean tense logic for my dissertation and essays intended to fit within the framework of Montague Grammar to the discourse-oriented framework of Discourse Representation Theory (DRT) and eventually to the unequivocally cognitive approach of Mental State Discourse Representation Theory (MSDRT), which is the core of my present view and work.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-031422-120012
2024-01-16
2024-06-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/linguistics/10/1/annurev-linguistics-031422-120012.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-031422-120012&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Asher N. 1986. Belief in discourse representation theory. J. Philos. Logic 15:127–89
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Asher N. 1987. A typology for attitude verbs and their anaphoric properties. Linguist. Philos. 10:125–98
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Beaver D. 2001. Presupposition and Assertion in Dynamic Semantics Stanford, CA: CSLI/FoLLI
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bratman M. 1987. Intention, Plans and Practical Reasoning Stanford, CA: CSLI
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cocchiarella N. 1965. Tense and modal logic. PhD Thesis UCLA, Los Angeles:
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Geach P. 1962. Reference and Generality Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Guenthner F, Guenthner-Reutter M. 1978. Meaning and Translation: Philosophical and Linguistic Approaches London: Duckworth
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kamp H. 1968. Tense logic and the theory of order PhD Thesis UCLA, Los Angeles:
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kamp H. 1971. Formal properties of “NOW. .” Theoria 37:227–73
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kamp H. 1974. Free choice permission. Proc. Aristot. Soc. 74:157–74
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kamp H. 1975. Two theories about adjectives. Formal Semantics for Natural Language E Keenan 123–55. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kamp H. 1981a. Evénements, représentations discursives et référence temporelle. Langages 64:39–64For the original English manuscript from which the paper in Langages is the French translation, see Semantics and Pragmatics, Volume 10 (2017).
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kamp H 1981b. A theory of truth and semantic representation. Formal Methods in the Study of Language JAG Groenendijk, TMV Janssen, MBJ Stokhof 277–322. Amsterdam: Math. Cent.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kamp H 1990. Prolegomena to a structural account of belief and other attitudes. Propositional Attitudes—The Role of Content in Logic, Language, and Mind CA Anderson, J Owens 27–90. Chicago/Stanford, CA: Univ. Chicago Press/CSLI
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kamp H 2001a. The importance of presupposition. Linguistic Form and Its Computation C Rohrer, A Roßdeutscher, H Kamp 207–54. Stanford, CA: CSLI
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kamp H 2001b. Presupposition computation and presupposition justification: one aspect of the interpretation of multi-sentence discourse. Semantic and Pragmatic Issues in Discourse and Dialogue M Bras, L Vieu 57–84. Amsterdam: Elsevier
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kamp H. 2003. Einstellungszustände und einstellungszuschreibungen in der diskursrepräsentationstheorie. Intentionalität zwischen Subjektivität und Weltbezug U Haas-Spohn 209–89. Paderborn, Ger.: Brill mentis
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kamp H. 2015. Using proper names as intermediaries between labelled entity representations. Erkenntnis 80:263–312
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kamp H 2021. Sharing real and fictional reference. The Language of Fiction E Maier, A Stokke 37–87. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kamp H. 2022. The links of causal chains. Theoria 88:2296–325
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kamp H, Partee B. 1995. Prototype theory and compositionality. Cognition 57:129–91
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kamp H, Reyle U. 1993. From Discourse to Logic Dordrecht, Neth.: Kluwer
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kamp H, Roßdeutscher A. 1994. DRS-construction and lexically driven inferences. Theor. Linguist. 20:165–236
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kamp H, van Genabith J, Reyle U 2011. Discourse Representation Theory. Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol. 15 DM Gabbay, F Guenthner 125–394. Dordrecht, Neth: Springer. , 2nd ed..
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Karttunen L. 1976. Discourse referents. Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 7 J McCawley 363–85. New York: Academic
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Kripke S. 1980. Naming and Necessity Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. PressFirst appeared in Davidson D, Harman G, eds. 1972. Semantics of Natural Language. Dordrecht, Neth.: Reidel.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Lewis D. 1973. Counterfactuals Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Ludwig K. 2016. From Individual to Plural Agency Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Montague R. 1969. On the nature of certain philosophical entities. Monist 53:2159–94
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Montague R 1970a. English as a formal language. Linguaggi nella Societa e nella Tecnica B Visentini et al.189–224. Milan, Italy: Ed. Communita
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Montague R. 1970b. Pragmatics and intensional logic. Synthese 22:68–94
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Montague R. 1970c. Universal grammar. Theoria 36:373–98
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Partee B. 1975. Montague grammar and transformational grammar. Linguist. Inq. 6:203–300
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Prior A. 1967. Past, Present and Future Oxford, UK: Clarendon
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Thomason R 1974. Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  36. van der Sandt RA. 1992. Presupposition projection as anaphora resolution. J. Semant. 9:333–77
    [Google Scholar]
  37. van der Sandt RA, Geurts B. 1991. Presupposition, anaphora, and lexical content. Text Understanding in LILOG O Herzog, C-R Rollinger 259–96. Berlin: Springer
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Vardi M 2008. From church and prior to PSL. 25 Years of Model Checking: History, Achievements, Perspectives O Grumberg, H Veith 150–71. Berlin: Springer
    [Google Scholar]
  39. von Heusinger K, ter Meulen A. 2013. Meaning and the Dynamics of Interpretation: Selected Papers of Hans Kamp Leiden, Neth.: Brill
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-031422-120012
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-031422-120012
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error