1932

Abstract

The promise and perils of heterogeneity in team member characteristics has been and continues to be one of the central questions in research on management teams. We review the literature on member heterogeneity within management teams, with a focus on summarizing and integrating research on both horizontal member differences (i.e., diversity) and vertical member differences (i.e., inequality)—two streams of research that have been largely separate in past research. We find that the overwhelming majority of research on management team heterogeneity has focused on horizontal differences, though there are few clear and consistent themes in empirical findings within either stream. We also find that horizontal and vertical differences are inter-related, such that the effects of diversity can depend critically on the degree of inequality within a team, and vice versa. Moreover, we find that our ability to clearly account for the effects of vertical and horizontal differences in management teams has been limited by a confusion of definitions and conceptualizations that hamper our ability to compare theoretical arguments and empirical findings across studies. We organize various conceptualizations of heterogeneity into six types based on whether a given conceptualization is concerned with horizontal or vertical differences (diversity or inequality) and whether it is focused on the differentiation, dispersion, or concentration of member differences. The result is a framework with three types of diversity (separation, variety, and skew) and three types of inequality (stratification, steepness, and centralization). Finally, we summarize different approaches to operationalizing each of these types. The conclusions and recommendations of this review can help to bring clarity and focus to research on member heterogeneity within management teams, or groups and teams of any sort.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104500
2018-01-21
2024-06-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/orgpsych/5/1/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104500.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104500&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Allison PD. 1978. Measures of inequality. Am. Sociol. Rev. 43:865–80 [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson C, Brown CE. 2010. The functions and dysfunctions of hierarchy. Res. Organ. Behav. 30:55–89 [Google Scholar]
  3. Ashby WR. 1956. An Introduction to Cybernetics New York: Wiley [Google Scholar]
  4. Barkema HG, Shvyrkov O. 2007. Does top management team diversity promote or hamper foreign expansion?. Strateg. Manag. J. 28:663–80 [Google Scholar]
  5. Barta T, Kleiner M, Neumann T. 2012. Is there a payoff from top-team diversity. ? McKinsey Q 2:13–15 [Google Scholar]
  6. Beckman CM, Burton MD. 2008. Founding the future: path dependence in the evolution of top management teams from founding to IPO. Organ. Sci. 19:3–24 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bednar MK, Westphal JD. 2006. Surveying the corporate elite: theoretical and practical guidance on improving response rates and response quality in top management survey questionnaires. Research Methodology in Strategy and Management 3 DJ Ketchen, DD Bergh 37–55 Bingley, UK: Emerald Gr. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bell ST, Villado AJ, Lukasik MA, Belau L, Briggs AL. 2011. Getting specific about demographic diversity variable and team performance relationships: a meta-analysis. J. Manag. 37:709–43 [Google Scholar]
  9. Berger J, Cohen BP, Zelditch M Jr. 1972. Status characteristics and social interaction. Am. Sociol. Rev. 37:241–55 [Google Scholar]
  10. Berger J, Ridgeway CL, Fişek MH, Norman RZ. 1998. The legitimation and delegitimation of power and prestige orders. Am. Sociol. Rev. 63:379–405 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bermiss YS, Murmann JP. 2015. Who matters more? The impact of functional background and top executive mobility on firm survival. Strateg. Manag. J. 36:1697–716 [Google Scholar]
  12. Blau PM. 1977. Inequality and Heterogeneity New York: Free Press [Google Scholar]
  13. Boone C, Hendriks W. 2009. Top management team diversity and firm performance: moderators of functional-background and locus-of-control diversity. Manag. Sci. 55:165–80 [Google Scholar]
  14. Boone C, Van Olffen W, Van Witteloostuijn A, De Brabander B. 2004. The genesis of top management team diversity: selective turnover among top management teams in Dutch newspaper publishing. Acad. Manag. J. 47:633–56 [Google Scholar]
  15. Brewer MB, Brown RJ. 1998. Intergroup relations. Handbook of Social Psychology DT Gilbert, ST Fiske 554–94 Boston: McGraw-Hill [Google Scholar]
  16. Bunderson JS. 2003a. Recognizing and utilizing expertise in work groups: a status characteristics perspective. Adm. Sci. Q. 48:557–91 [Google Scholar]
  17. Bunderson JS. 2003b. Team member functional background and involvement in management teams: direct effects and the moderating role of power centralization. Acad. Manag. J. 46:458–74 [Google Scholar]
  18. Bunderson JS, Sutcliffe KM. 2002. Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: process and performance effects. Acad. Manag. J. 45:875–93 [Google Scholar]
  19. Bunderson JS, Van der Vegt GS, Cantimur Y, Rink F. 2016. Different views of hierarchy and why they matter: hierarchy as inequality or as cascading influence. Acad. Manag. J. 59:1265–89 [Google Scholar]
  20. Burgelman RA. 1983. A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm. Adm. Sci. Q. 28:223–44 [Google Scholar]
  21. Byrne D. 1971. The Attraction Paradigm New York: Academic [Google Scholar]
  22. Cannella AA, Park JH, Lee HU. 2008. Top management team functional background diversity and firm performance: examining the roles of team member colocation and environmental uncertainty. Acad. Manag. J. 51:768–84 [Google Scholar]
  23. Carpenter MA. 2002. The implications of strategy and social context for the relationship between top management team heterogeneity and firm performance. Strateg. Manag. J. 23:275–84 [Google Scholar]
  24. Carpenter MA, Fredrickson JW. 2001. Top management teams, global strategic posture, and the moderating role of uncertainty. Acad. Manag. J. 44:533–45 [Google Scholar]
  25. Carpenter MA, Geletkanycz MA, Sanders WG. 2004. Upper echelons research revisited: antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. J. Manag. 30:749–78 [Google Scholar]
  26. Carpenter MA, Sanders WG. 2004. The effects of top management team pay and firm internationalization on MNC performance. J. Manag. 30:509–28 [Google Scholar]
  27. Cooper D, Patel PC, Thatcher SMB. 2014. It depends: environmental context and the effects of faultlines on top management team performance. Organ. Sci. 25:633–52 [Google Scholar]
  28. Eesley CE, Hsu DH, Roberts EB. 2014. The contingent effects of top management teams on venture performance: aligning founding team composition with innovation strategy and commercialization environment. Strateg. Manag. J. 35:1798–817 [Google Scholar]
  29. Eisenhardt KM, Bourgeois LJ III. 1988. Politics of strategic decision making in high-velocity environments: toward a midrange theory. Acad. Manag. J. 31:737–70 [Google Scholar]
  30. Emerson RM. 1962. Power-dependence relations. Am. Sociol. Rev. 27:31–41 [Google Scholar]
  31. Eriksson T. 1999. Executive compensation and tournament theory: empirical tests on Danish data. J. Labor Econ. 17:262–80 [Google Scholar]
  32. Finkelstein S. 1992. Power in top management teams: dimensions, measurement, and validations. Acad. Manag. J. 35:505–38 [Google Scholar]
  33. Finkelstein S, Hambrick DC. 1996. Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and their Effects on Organizations Minneapolis: West [Google Scholar]
  34. Freda F, Lauder WP, McCarthy D, Pinault F-H. 2017. Straight talk about gender diversity in the boardroom and beyond. McKinsey Quarterly June. https://www.mckinsey.com/global-themes/leadership/straight-talk-about-gender-diversity-in-the-boardroom-and-beyond [Google Scholar]
  35. Fredrickson JW. 1984. The comprehensiveness of strategic decision processes: extension, observations, future directions. Acad. Manag. J. 27:445–66 [Google Scholar]
  36. Fredrickson JW, Davis-Blake A, Sanders WG. 2010. Sharing the wealth: social comparisons and pay dispersion in the CEO's top team. Strateg. Manag. J. 31:1031–53 [Google Scholar]
  37. Freeman LC. 1979. Centrality in social networks: conceptual clarification. Soc. Netw. 1:215–39 [Google Scholar]
  38. Frick B, Prinz J, Winkelmann K. 2003. Pay inequalities and team performance: empirical evidence from the North American major leagues. Int. J. Manpow. 24:472–88 [Google Scholar]
  39. Gini C. 1936. On the measure of concentration with special reference to income and statistics. Colorado Coll. Publ. 208:73–79 [Google Scholar]
  40. Gordon SS, Stewart WH, Sweo R, Luker WA. 2000. Convergence versus strategic reorientation: the antecedents of fast-paced organizational change. J. Manag. 26:911–45 [Google Scholar]
  41. Groeneveld RA, Meeden G. 1984. Measuring skewness and kurtosis. J. Royal Stat. Soc. D 33:391–99 [Google Scholar]
  42. Gruenfeld DH, Tiedens LZ. 2010. Organizational preferences and their consequences. Handbook of Social Psychology 2 ST Fiske, DT Gilbert, G Lindzey 1252–87 New Jersey: Wiley & Sons, 5th ed.. [Google Scholar]
  43. Halevy N, Chou EY, Galinsky AD, Murnighan JK. 2011. When hierarchy wins: evidence from the National Basketball Association. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 3:398–406 [Google Scholar]
  44. Hambrick DC. 1994. Top management groups: a conceptual integration and reconsideration of the “team” label. Res. Organ. Behav. 16:171–214 [Google Scholar]
  45. Hambrick DC. 2007. Upper echelons theory: an update. Acad. Manag. Rev. 32:334–43 [Google Scholar]
  46. Hambrick DC, Cho T, Chen M. 1996. The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms' competitive moves. Adm. Sci. Q. 41:659–84 [Google Scholar]
  47. Hambrick DC, D'Aveni RA. 1992. Top team deterioration as part of the downward spiral of large corporate bankruptcies. Manag. Sci. 38:1445–66 [Google Scholar]
  48. Hambrick DC, Humphrey SE, Gupta A. 2015. Structural interdependence within top management teams: a key moderator of upper echelons predictions. Strateg. Manag. J. 36:449–61 [Google Scholar]
  49. Hambrick DC, Mason PA. 1984. Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad. Manag. Rev. 9:193–206 [Google Scholar]
  50. Harrison DA, Klein KJ. 2007. What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Acad. Manag. Rev. 32:1199–228 [Google Scholar]
  51. He J, Huang Z. 2011. Board informal hierarchy and firm financial performance: exploring a tacit structure guiding boardroom interactions. Acad. Manag. J. 54:1119–39 [Google Scholar]
  52. Herfindahl OC. 1950. Concentration in the U.S. steel industry. (Unpublished) Doctoral Dissertation, Columbia Univ.: [Google Scholar]
  53. Higgins MC, Gulati R. 2003. Getting off to a good start: the effects of upper echelon affiliations on underwriter prestige. Organ. Sci. 14:244–63 [Google Scholar]
  54. Higgins MC, Gulati R. 2006. Stacking the deck: the effects of top management backgrounds on investor decisions. Strateg. Manag. J. 27:1–25 [Google Scholar]
  55. Hirschman AO. 1964. The paternity of an index. Am. Econ. Rev. 54:761–62 [Google Scholar]
  56. Homberg F, Bui HTM. 2013. Top management team diversity: a systematic review. Group Organ. Manag. 38:455–79 [Google Scholar]
  57. Horwitz SK, Horwitz IB. 2007. The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: a meta-analytic review of team demography. J. Manag. 33:987–1015 [Google Scholar]
  58. Hutzschenreuter T, Horstkotte J. 2013. Performance effects of top management team demographic faultlines in the process of product diversification. Strateg. Manag. J. 34:704–26 [Google Scholar]
  59. Ibarra H. 1992. Structural alignments, individual strategies, and managerial action: elements toward a network theory of getting things done. Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action N Nohria, RG Eccles 165–88 Boston: HBS Press [Google Scholar]
  60. Jackson SE, Joshi A. 2011. Work team diversity. APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 1 S Zedeck 651–86 Washington, DC: APA [Google Scholar]
  61. Joshi A, Roh H. 2009. The role of context in work team diversity research: a meta-analytic review. Acad. Manag. J. 52:599–627 [Google Scholar]
  62. Keck SL. 1997. Top management team structure: differential effects by environmental context. Organ. Sci. 8:143–56 [Google Scholar]
  63. Keck SL, Tushman ML. 1993. Environmental and organizational context and executive team structure. Acad. Manag. J. 36:1314–44 [Google Scholar]
  64. Kilduff M, Angelmar R, Mehra A. 2000. Top management-team diversity and firm performance: examining the role of cognitions. Organ. Sci. 11:21–34 [Google Scholar]
  65. Knight D, Pearce CL, Smith KG, Olian JD, Sims HP. et al. 1999. Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus. Strateg. Manag. J. 20:445–65 [Google Scholar]
  66. Kor YY. 2003. Experience-based top management team competence and sustained growth. Organ. Sci. 14:707–19 [Google Scholar]
  67. Kor YY. 2006. Direct and interaction effects of top management team and board compositions on R&D investment strategy. Strateg. Manag. J. 27:1081–99 [Google Scholar]
  68. Krishnan HA, Miller A, Judge WQ. 1997. Diversification and top management team complementarity: Is performance improved by merging similar or dissimilar teams. ? Strateg. Manag. J. 18:361–74 [Google Scholar]
  69. Lau DC, Murnighan JK. 1998. Demographic diversity and faultlines: the compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23:325–40 [Google Scholar]
  70. Lazear E, Rosen S. 1981. Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. J. Polit. Econ. 89:841–64 [Google Scholar]
  71. Leonard JS. 1990. Executive pay and firm performance. Ind. Labor Relat. Rev. 43:13–29 [Google Scholar]
  72. Magee JC, Galinsky AD. 2008. Social hierarchy: the self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Acad. Manag. Ann. 2:351–98 [Google Scholar]
  73. Mannix E, Neale MA. 2005. What differences make a difference? The promise and reality of diverse teams in organizations. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 6:31–55 [Google Scholar]
  74. Marcel JJ. 2009. Why top management team characteristics matter when employing a chief operating officer: a strategic contingency perspective. Strateg. Manag. J. 30:647–58 [Google Scholar]
  75. McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM. 2001. Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annu. Rev. Soc. 27:415–44 [Google Scholar]
  76. Mihalache OR, Jansen JJJP, Van den Bosch FAJ, Volberda HW. 2012. Offshoring and firm innovation: the moderating role of top management team attributes. Strateg. Manag. J. 33:1480–98 [Google Scholar]
  77. Miller CC, Burke LM, Glick WH. 1998. Cognitive diversity among upper-echelon executives: implications for strategic decision processes. Strateg. Manag. J. 19:39–58 [Google Scholar]
  78. Murray AI. 1989. Top management group heterogeneity and firm performance. Strateg. Manag. J. 10:125–41 [Google Scholar]
  79. Nadolska A, Barkema HG. 2014. Good learners: how top management teams affect the success and frequency of acquisitions. Strateg. Manag. J. 35:1483–507 [Google Scholar]
  80. Ndofor HA, Sirmon DG, He XM. 2015. Utilizing the firm's resources: how TMT heterogeneity and resulting faultlines affect TMT tasks. Strateg. Manag. J. 36:1656–74 [Google Scholar]
  81. Nielsen BB, Nielsen S. 2013. Top management team nationality diversity and firm performance: a multilevel study. Strateg. Manag. J. 34:373–82 [Google Scholar]
  82. Nielsen S. 2009. Why do top management teams look the way they do? A multilevel exploration of the antecedents of TMT heterogeneity. Strateg. Organ. 7:277–305 [Google Scholar]
  83. Nielsen S. 2010. Top management team diversity: a review of theories and methodologies. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 12:301–16 [Google Scholar]
  84. Patel PC, Cooper D. 2014. Structural power equality between family and non-family TMT members and the performance of family firms. Acad. Manag. J. 57:1624–49 [Google Scholar]
  85. Pfeffer J. 1983. Organizational demography. Res. Organ. Behav. 5:299–357 [Google Scholar]
  86. Pitcher P, Smith AD. 2001. Top management team heterogeneity: personality, power, and proxies. Organ. Sci. 12:1–18 [Google Scholar]
  87. Qian C, Cao Q, Takeuchi R. 2013. Top management team functional diversity and organizational innovation in China: the moderating effects of environment. Strateg. Manag. J. 34:110–20 [Google Scholar]
  88. Ridge JW, Aime F, White MA. 2015. When much more of a difference makes a difference: social comparison and tournaments in the CEO's top team. Strateg. Manag. J. 36:618–36 [Google Scholar]
  89. Rock D, Grant H. 2016. Why diverse teams are smarter. Harvard Business Review Nov. 4. https://hbr.org/2016/11/why-diverse-teams-are-smarter [Google Scholar]
  90. Sambharya RB. 1996. Foreign experience of top management teams and international diversification strategies of US multinational corporations. Strateg. Manag. J. 17:739–46 [Google Scholar]
  91. Shannon CE. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27:379–423, 623–56 [Google Scholar]
  92. Sherbin L, Rashid R. 2017. Diversity doesn't stick without inclusion. Harvard Business Review Febr. 1. https://hbr.org/2017/02/diversity-doesnt-stick-without-inclusion?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A%20harvardbusiness%20%28HBR.org%29 [Google Scholar]
  93. Siegel PA, Hambrick DC. 2005. Pay disparities within top management groups: evidence of harmful effects on performance of high-technology firms. Organ. Sci. 16:259–74 [Google Scholar]
  94. Simons T, Pelled LH, Smith KA. 1999. Making use of difference: diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Acad. Manag. J. 42:662–73 [Google Scholar]
  95. Simpson B, Willer R, Ridgeway CL. 2012. Status hierarchies and the organization of collective action. Sociol. Theory 30:149–66 [Google Scholar]
  96. Simsek Z, Veiga JF, Lubatkin MH, Dino RN. 2005. Modeling the multilevel determinants of top management team behavioral integration. Acad. Manag. J. 48:69–84 [Google Scholar]
  97. Smith KG, Smith KA, Olian JD, Sims HP, O'Bannon P, Scully JA. 1994. Top management team demography and process—the role of social integration and communication. Adm. Sci. Q. 39:412–38 [Google Scholar]
  98. Suls J, Wills TA. 1991. Social Comparison: Contemporary Theory and Research Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum [Google Scholar]
  99. Sutcliffe KM. 1994. What executives notice: accurate perceptions in top management teams. Acad. Manag. J. 37:1360–78 [Google Scholar]
  100. Tajfel H. 1981. Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  101. Teachman JD. 1980. Analysis of population diversity. Sociol. Methods Res. 8:341–62 [Google Scholar]
  102. Thompson JD. 1967. Organizations in Action New York: McGraw-Hill [Google Scholar]
  103. Tihanyi L, Ellstrand AE, Daily CM, Dalton DR. 2000. Composition of the top management team and firm international diversification. J. Manag. 26:1157–77 [Google Scholar]
  104. van Knippenberg D Schippers MC. 2007. Work group diversity. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 58:515–41 [Google Scholar]
  105. Wagner WG, Pfeffer J, O'Reilly CA. 1984. Organizational demography and turnover in top management groups. Adm. Sci. Q. 29:74–92 [Google Scholar]
  106. Webber SS, Donahue LM. 2001. Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: a meta-analysis. J. Manag. 27:141–62 [Google Scholar]
  107. West CT, Schwenk CR. 1996. Top management team strategic consensus, demographic homogeneity and firm performance: a report of resounding nonfindings. Strateg. Manag. J. 17:571–76 [Google Scholar]
  108. West MA, Anderson NR. 1996. Innovation in top management teams. J. Appl. Psychol. 81:680–93 [Google Scholar]
  109. Wiersema MF, Bantel KA. 1992. Top management team turnover as an adaptation mechanism: the role of the environment. Strateg. Manag. J. 14:485–504 [Google Scholar]
  110. Wiersema MF, Bird A. 1993. Organizational demography in Japanese firms: group heterogeneity, individual dissimilarity, and top management turnover. Acad. Manag. J. 36:996–1025 [Google Scholar]
  111. Williams K, O'Reilly C. 1998. Demography and diversity in organizations: a review of 40 years of research. Res. Organ. Behav. 20:77–140 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104500
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104500
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error