1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
  4. Volume 3, 2016
  5. Article

Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior

Volume 3, 2016

The Social Context of Decisions

Abstract

The past 40 years of psychological research on decision making has identified a number of important cognitive biases. However, the psychological study of decision making tends to focus on individuals making decisions in isolation. This article explores the social context of individual decision making by considering three lenses: individual contributions in social decision processes, individuals as social products, and individuals as sources of social preferences. The social context of decision making both improves decision making by allowing diverse knowledge to be pooled and creates shared perspectives—including shared blind spots. The article offers conjectures on managerial insight about social settings that can inform future research.

Keyword(s): behavioral decision theory, cognitive diversity, group decision making, heuristics and biases, social influence, wisdom of crowds
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062445
2016-03-21
2025-04-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/orgpsych/3/1/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062445.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062445&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Afuah A, Tucci CL. 2012. Crowdsourcing as a solution to distant search. Acad. Manag. Rev. 37:3355–75 [Google Scholar]
  2. Allison GT. 1971. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis Boston: Little Brown. [Google Scholar]
  3. Anicich EM, Swaab RI, Galinsky AD. 2015. Hierarchical cultural values predict success and mortality in high-stakes teams. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112:51338–43 [Google Scholar]
  4. Apfelbaum EP, Phillips KW, Richeson JA. 2014. Rethinking the baseline in diversity research: Should we be explaining the effects of homogeneity?. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 9:3235–44 [Google Scholar]
  5. Armstrong JS. 2001. Combining forecasts. Principles of Forecasting—A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners JS Armstrong 417–39 Boston: Kluwer Acad. Publ. [Google Scholar]
  6. Armstrong JS. 2006. How to make better forecasts and decisions: Avoid face-to-face meetings. Foresight—Int. J. Appl. Forecast. 5:3–8 [Google Scholar]
  7. Asch SE. 1952. Social Psychology Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall [Google Scholar]
  8. Austin JR. 2003. Transactive memory in organizational groups: the effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 88:5866–78 [Google Scholar]
  9. Barton MA, Bunderson JS. 2014. Assessing member expertise in groups: an expertise dependence perspective. Organ. Psychol. Rev. 4:3228–57 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bazerman M, Moore DA. 2012. Judgment in Managerial Decision Making. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 8th ed.. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bell ST. 2007. Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: a meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psychol. 92:3595–615 [Google Scholar]
  12. Berger PL, Luckmann T. 1966. The Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Random House [Google Scholar]
  13. Bond R, Smith PB. 1996. Culture and conformity: a meta-analysis of studies using Asch's (1952b, 1956) line judgment task. Psychol. Bull. 119:1111–37 [Google Scholar]
  14. Bond SD, Carlson KA, Keeney RL. 2008. Generating objectives: Can decision makers articulate what they want?. Manag. Sci. 54:156–70 [Google Scholar]
  15. Brewer MB. 1999. The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate?. J. Soc. Issues 55:429–44 [Google Scholar]
  16. Brewer MB, Chen YR. 2007. Where (who) are collectives in collectivism? Toward conceptual clarification of individualism and collectivism. Psychol. Rev. 114:1133–51 [Google Scholar]
  17. Brooks AW, Gino F, Schweitzer ME. 2015. Smart people ask for (my) advice: Seeking advice boosts perceptions of competence. Manag. Sci. 61:61421–35 [Google Scholar]
  18. Bunderson JS, Reagans RE. 2011. Power, status, and learning in organizations. Organ. Sci. 22:51182–94 [Google Scholar]
  19. Bunderson JS, Sutcliffe KM. 2002. Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: process and performance effects. Acad. Manag. J. 45:5875–93 [Google Scholar]
  20. Burt RS. 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  21. Burt RS. 2004. Structural holes and good ideas. Am. J. Sociol. 110:2349–99 [Google Scholar]
  22. Carton AM, Cummings JN. 2012. A theory of subgroups in work teams. Acad. Manag. Rev. 37:3441–70 [Google Scholar]
  23. Catmull E, Wallace A. 2014. Creativity, Inc: Overcoming the Unseen Forces that Stand in the Way of True Inspiration New York: Random House [Google Scholar]
  24. Chapman GB, Johnson EJ. 1999. Anchoring, activation, and the construction of values. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 79:2115–53 [Google Scholar]
  25. Cheng CY, Sanchez-Burks J, Lee F. 2008. Connecting the dots within creative performance and identity integration. Psychol. Sci. 19:111178–84 [Google Scholar]
  26. Clemen RT. 1989. Combining forecasts: a review and annotated bibliography. Int. J. Forecasting 5:4559–83 [Google Scholar]
  27. Colquitt JA. 2001. On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. J. Appl. Psychol. 86:3386–400 [Google Scholar]
  28. Cooper D, Patel PC, Thatcher SM. 2013. It depends: environmental context and the effects of faultlines on top management team performance. Organ. Sci. 25:2633–52 [Google Scholar]
  29. Cronin MA, Weingart LR. 2007. Representational gaps, information processing, and conflict in functionally diverse teams. Acad. Manag. Rev. 32:3761–73 [Google Scholar]
  30. Cross R, Cummings JN. 2004. Tie and network correlates of individual performance in knowledge-intensive work. Acad. Manag. J. 47:6928–37 [Google Scholar]
  31. Cummings JN. 2004. Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Manag. Sci. 50:3352–64 [Google Scholar]
  32. Dane E. 2010. Reconsidering the trade-off between expertise and flexibility: a cognitive entrenchment perspective. Acad. Manag. Rev. 35:4579–603 [Google Scholar]
  33. Dreu CK, Weingart LR. De 2003. Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psychol. 88:4741–49 [Google Scholar]
  34. de Wit FR, Greer LL, Jehn KA. 2012. The paradox of intragroup conflict: a meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psychol. 97:2360–90 [Google Scholar]
  35. Dearborn DC, Simon HA. 1958. Selective perception: a note on the departmental identifications of executives. Sociometry 21:140–44 [Google Scholar]
  36. Deutsch M. 1975. Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice?. J. Soc. Issues 31:137–49 [Google Scholar]
  37. Deutsch M, Gerard HB. 1955. A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 51:3629–36 [Google Scholar]
  38. Dittes JE, Kelley HH. 1956. Effects of different conditions of acceptance upon conformity to group norms. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 53:1100–7 [Google Scholar]
  39. Edmondson A. 1999. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Adm. Sci. Q. 44:2350–83 [Google Scholar]
  40. Esser JK. 1998. Alive and well after 25 years: a review of groupthink research. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 73:2116–41 [Google Scholar]
  41. Evans WR, Davis WD. 2005. High-performance work systems and organizational performance: the mediating role of internal social structure. J. Manag. 31:5758–75 [Google Scholar]
  42. Ferraro F, Pfeffer J, Sutton RI. 2005. Economics language and assumptions: how theories can become self-fulfilling. Acad. Manag. Rev. 30:18–24 [Google Scholar]
  43. Gigone D, Hastie R. 1993. The common knowledge effect: information sharing and group judgment. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 65:5959–74 [Google Scholar]
  44. Gilbert DT, Malone PS. 1995. The correspondence bias. Psychol. Bull. 117:121–38 [Google Scholar]
  45. Girotra K, Terwiesch C, Ulrich KT. 2010. Idea generation and the quality of the best idea. Manag. Sci. 56:4591–605 [Google Scholar]
  46. Goncalo JA, Polman E, Maslach C. 2010. Can confidence come too soon? Collective efficacy, conflict and group performance over time. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 113:113–24 [Google Scholar]
  47. Goncalo JA, Staw BM. 2006. Individualism-collectivism and group creativity. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 100:196–109 [Google Scholar]
  48. Greitemeyer T, Schulz-Hardt S. 2003. Preference-consistent evaluation of information in the hidden profile paradigm: beyond group-level explanations for the dominance of shared information in group decisions. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 84:2322 [Google Scholar]
  49. Groysberg B, Lee LE, Nanda A. 2008. Can they take it with them? The portability of star knowledge workers' performance. Manag. Sci. 54:71213–30 [Google Scholar]
  50. Gunia BC, Sivanathan N, Galinsky AD. 2009. Vicarious entrapment: your sunk costs, my escalation of commitment. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 45:61238–44 [Google Scholar]
  51. Haidt J. 2007. The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science 316:5827998–1002 [Google Scholar]
  52. Harrison DA, Klein KJ. 2007. What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Acad. Manag. Rev. 32:41199–228 [Google Scholar]
  53. Heilman ME. 2012. Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Res. Organ. Behav. 32:113–35 [Google Scholar]
  54. Hofstede G. 1980. Motivation, leadership, and organization: Do American theories apply abroad?. Organ. Dyn. 9:142–63 [Google Scholar]
  55. Hogarth RM. 1978. A note on aggregating opinions. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 21:140–46 [Google Scholar]
  56. Hogg MA, Terry DJ. 2000. Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Acad. Manag. Rev. 25:1121–40 [Google Scholar]
  57. Holmes RM, Bromiley P, Devers CE, Holcomb TR, McGuire JB. 2011. Management theory applications of prospect theory: accomplishments, challenges, and opportunities. J. Manag. 37:41069–107 [Google Scholar]
  58. James S. 2004. The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many are Smarter than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economies, Societies, and Nations New York: Doubleday [Google Scholar]
  59. Janis IL. 1972. Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign-Policy Decisions and Fiascoes Boston: Houghton Mifflin [Google Scholar]
  60. Jehn KA. 1995. A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Adm. Sci. Q. 40:256–82 [Google Scholar]
  61. Jehn KA, Mannix EA. 2001. The dynamic nature of conflict: a longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Acad. Manag. J. 44:2238–51 [Google Scholar]
  62. Johnson EJ, Goldstein DG. 2003. Do defaults save lives?. Science 302:1338–39 [Google Scholar]
  63. Kahneman D. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow New York: Macmillan [Google Scholar]
  64. Kahneman D, Tversky A. 1979. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47:263–91 [Google Scholar]
  65. Kane AA. 2010. Unlocking knowledge transfer potential: knowledge demonstrability and superordinate social identity. Organ. Sci. 21:3643–60 [Google Scholar]
  66. Kirkman BL, Shapiro DL. 2001. The impact of cultural values on job satisfaction and organizational commitment in self-managing work teams: the mediating role of employee resistance. Acad. Manag. J. 44:3557–69 [Google Scholar]
  67. Kogut B, Zander U. 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. 3:3383–97 [Google Scholar]
  68. Kornish LJ, Ulrich KT. 2011. Opportunity spaces in innovation: empirical analysis of large samples of ideas. Manag. Sci. 57:1107–28 [Google Scholar]
  69. Kőszegi B, Rabin M. 2006. A model of reference-dependent preferences. Q. J. Econ. 121:1133–65 [Google Scholar]
  70. Larrick RP. 1993. Motivational factors in decision theories: the role of self-protection. Psychol. Bull. 113:3440–50 [Google Scholar]
  71. Larrick RP. 2009. Broaden the decision frame to make effective decisions. Handbook of Principles of Organizational Behavior EA Locke 461–80 Chichester, UK: Wiley, 2nd ed.. [Google Scholar]
  72. Larrick RP, Feiler DC. 2016. Expertise in decision making. Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making GB Keren, G Wu 696–724 Malden, MA: Blackwell [Google Scholar]
  73. Larrick RP, Soll JB. 2006. Intuitions about combining opinions: misappreciation of the averaging principle. Manag. Sci. 52:111–27 [Google Scholar]
  74. Lau DC, Murnighan JK. 1998. Demographic diversity and faultlines: the compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23:2325–40 [Google Scholar]
  75. Le Mens G, Denrell J. 2011. Rational learning and information sampling: on the “naivety” assumption in sampling explanations of judgment biases. Psychol. Rev. 118:2379–92 [Google Scholar]
  76. Lerner JS, Keltner D. 2001. Fear, anger, and risk. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 81:1146–59 [Google Scholar]
  77. Levin DZ, Cross R. 2004. The strength of weak ties you can trust: the mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Manag. Sci. 50:111477–90 [Google Scholar]
  78. Lewis K. 2003. Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: scale development and validation. J. Appl. Psychol. 88:4587–604 [Google Scholar]
  79. Lind EA, Tyler TR. 1988. The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice Berlin: Springer [Google Scholar]
  80. Locke CC, Anderson C. 2015. The downside of looking like a leader: power, nonverbal confidence, and participative decision-making. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 58:42–47 [Google Scholar]
  81. Madrian BC, Shea DF. 2001. The power of suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) participation and savings behavior. Q. J. Econ. 116:41149–87 [Google Scholar]
  82. Mannes AE. 2009a. Are we wise about the wisdom of crowds? The use of group judgments in belief revision. Manag. Sci. 55:81267–79 [Google Scholar]
  83. Mannes AE. 2009b. An integrative solution to the conflict over conflict. PhD Thesis, Duke Univ. [Google Scholar]
  84. Mannes AE, Soll JB, Larrick RP. 2014. The wisdom of select crowds.. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 107:276–99 [Google Scholar]
  85. March JG. 1978. Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice. Bell J. Econ. 9:2567–608 [Google Scholar]
  86. March JG. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2:171–87 [Google Scholar]
  87. March JG, Simon HA. 1958. Organizations Oxford: Wiley [Google Scholar]
  88. McCauley C. 1998. Group dynamics in Janis's theory of groupthink: backward and forward. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 73:2142–62 [Google Scholar]
  89. Mellers B, Ungar L, Baron J, Ramos J, Gurcay B. et al. 2014. Psychological strategies for winning a geopolitical forecasting tournament. Psychol. Sci. 25:51106–15 [Google Scholar]
  90. Mellers BA, McGraw AP. 2001. Anticipated emotions as guides to choice. Curr. Direct. Psychol. Sci. 10:6210–14 [Google Scholar]
  91. Miller CC. 2008. Decisional comprehensiveness and firm performance: towards a more complete understanding. J. Behav. Decis. Making 21:5598–620 [Google Scholar]
  92. Minson JA, Mueller JS, Larrick RP. 2015. The contingent wisdom of dyads: When discussion undermines versus enhances the accuracy of collaborative judgments SSRN Work. Pap. 2590720. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2590720 [Google Scholar]
  93. Moore DA, Healy PJ. 2008. The trouble with overconfidence. Psychol. Rev. 115:2502–17 [Google Scholar]
  94. Morrison EW. 2014. Employee voice and silence. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 1:1173–97 [Google Scholar]
  95. Mussweiler T, Strack F. 1999. Hypothesis-consistent testing and semantic priming in the anchoring paradigm: a selective accessibility model. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 35:2136–64 [Google Scholar]
  96. Nembhard IM, Edmondson AC. 2006. Making it safe: the effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. J. Organ. Behav. 27:7941–66 [Google Scholar]
  97. Nijstad BA, Stroebe W. 2006. How the group affects the mind: a cognitive model of idea generation in groups. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 10:3186–213 [Google Scholar]
  98. Paulus PB, Yang HC. 2000. Idea generation in groups: a basis for creativity in organizations. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 82:176–87 [Google Scholar]
  99. Peterson RS, Nemeth CJ. 1996. Focus versus flexibility majority and minority influence can both improve performance. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 22:114–23 [Google Scholar]
  100. Plous S. 1995. A comparison of strategies for reducing interval overconfidence in group judgments. J. Appl. Psychol. 80:4443–54 [Google Scholar]
  101. Postmes T, Spears R, Cihangir S. 2001. Quality of decision making and group norms. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 80:6918–30 [Google Scholar]
  102. Pronin E, Gilovich T, Ross L. 2004. Objectivity in the eye of the beholder: divergent perceptions of bias in self versus others. Psychol. Rev. 111:3781–99 [Google Scholar]
  103. Ren H, Gray B, Harrison DA. 2014. Triggering faultline effects in teams: the importance of bridging friendship ties and breaching animosity ties. Organ. Sci. 26:2390–404 [Google Scholar]
  104. Ren Y, Argote L. 2011. Transactive memory systems 1985–2010: an integrative framework of key dimensions, antecedents, and consequences. Acad. Manag. Ann. 5:1189–229 [Google Scholar]
  105. Rink F, Ellemers N. 2015. The pernicious effects of unstable work group membership: how work group changes undermine unique task contributions and newcomer acceptance. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 18:16–23 [Google Scholar]
  106. Ross L, Nisbett RE. 2011. The Person and the Situation: Perspectives of Social Psychology London: Pinter & Martin Publ. [Google Scholar]
  107. Salganik MJ, Dodds PS, Watts DJ. 2006. Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science 311:5762854–56 [Google Scholar]
  108. Sanner B, Bunderson JS. 2015. When feeling safe isn't enough: contextualizing models of safety and learning in teams. Organ. Psychol. Rev. 5:224–43 [Google Scholar]
  109. Schultze T, Mojzisch A, Schulz-Hardt S. 2012. Why groups perform better than individuals at quantitative judgment tasks: group-to-individual transfer as an alternative to differential weighting. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 118:124–36 [Google Scholar]
  110. See KE, Morrison EW, Rothman NB, Soll JB. 2011. The detrimental effects of power on confidence, advice taking, and accuracy. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 116:2272–85 [Google Scholar]
  111. Shimizu K, Hitt MA. 2004. Strategic flexibility: organizational preparedness to reverse ineffective strategic decisions. Acad. Manag. Exec. 18:444–59 [Google Scholar]
  112. Simon HA. 1955. A behavioral model of rational choice. Q. J. Econ. 69:99–118 [Google Scholar]
  113. Simons T, Pelled LH, Smith KA. 1999. Making use of difference: diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Acad. Manag. J. 42:6662–73 [Google Scholar]
  114. Simons TL, Peterson RS. 2000. Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: the pivotal role of intragroup trust. J. Appl. Psychol. 85:1102–11 [Google Scholar]
  115. Soll JB, Klayman J. 2004. Overconfidence in interval estimates. J. Exp. Psychol.: Learn., Mem., Cognit. 30:2299–314 [Google Scholar]
  116. Soll JB, Larrick RP. 2009. Strategies for revising judgment: how (and how well) people use others' opinions. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cognit. 35:780–805 [Google Scholar]
  117. Stasser G, Stewart D. 1992. Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: solving a problem versus making a judgment. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 63:3426–34 [Google Scholar]
  118. Stasser G, Titus W. 1985. Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: biased information sampling during discussion. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 48:61467–78 [Google Scholar]
  119. Stasser G, Titus W. 2003. Hidden profiles: a brief history. Psychol. Inq. 14:3–4304–13 [Google Scholar]
  120. Stasser G, Vaughan SI, Stewart DD. 2000. Pooling unshared information: the benefits of knowing how access to information is distributed among group members. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 82:1102–16 [Google Scholar]
  121. Summers JK, Humphrey SE, Ferris GR. 2012. Team member change, flux in coordination, and performance: effects of strategic core roles, information transfer, and cognitive ability. Acad. Manag. J. 55:2314–38 [Google Scholar]
  122. Sunstein CR, Hastie R. 2015. Wiser: Getting Beyond Groupthink to Make Groups Smarter Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  123. Swift SA, Moore DA, Sharek ZS, Gino F. 2013. Inflated applicants: attribution errors in performance evaluation by professionals. PLoS ONE 8:7e69258 [Google Scholar]
  124. Tadmor CT, Galinsky AD, Maddux WW. 2012. Getting the most out of living abroad: biculturalism and integrative complexity as key drivers of creative and professional success. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 103:3520–42 [Google Scholar]
  125. Taras V, Kirkman BL, Steel P. 2010. Examining the impact of culture's consequences: a three-decade, multilevel, meta-analytic review of Hofstede's cultural value dimensions. J. Appl. Psychol. 95:3405–39 [Google Scholar]
  126. Thaler R, Sunstein C. 2008. Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New York: Penguin [Google Scholar]
  127. Thatcher SM, Patel PC. 2012. Group faultlines: a review, integration, and guide to future research. J. Manag. 38:4969–1009 [Google Scholar]
  128. Tost LP, Gino F, Larrick RP. 2012. Power, competitiveness, and advice taking: why the powerful don't listen. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 117:153–65 [Google Scholar]
  129. Tost LP, Gino F, Larrick RP. 2013. When power makes others speechless: the negative impact of leader power on team performance. Acad. Manag. J. 56:51465–86 [Google Scholar]
  130. Tversky A, Kahneman D. 1973. Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognit. Psychol. 5:2207–32 [Google Scholar]
  131. Tversky A, Kahneman D. 1991. Loss aversion in riskless choice: a reference-dependent model. Q. J. Econ. 106:1039–61 [Google Scholar]
  132. Williams KY, O'Reilly CA. 1998. Demography and diversity in organizations: a review of 40 years of research. Res. Organ. Behav. 20:77–140 [Google Scholar]
  133. Woolley AW, Chabris CF, Pentland A, Hashmi N, Malone TW. 2010. Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science 330:6004686–88 [Google Scholar]
  134. Yaniv I, Choshen-Hillel S, Milyavsky M. 2009. Spurious consensus and opinion revision: Why might people be more confident in their less accurate judgments?. J. Exp. Psychol.: Learn. Mem. Cognit. 35:2558–63 [Google Scholar]
  135. Yaniv I, Milyavsky M. 2007. Using advice from multiple sources to revise and improve judgments. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 103:1104–20 [Google Scholar]
  136. Zeelenberg M. 1999. Anticipated regret, expected feedback and behavioral decision making. J. Behav. Decis. Making 12:293–106 [Google Scholar]
  137. Zhang D, Lowry PB, Zhou L, Fu X. 2007. The impact of individualism—collectivism, social presence, and group diversity on group decision making under majority influence. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 23:453–80 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062445
Loading
The Social Context of Decisions
Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 3, 441 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062445
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062445
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062445
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error