Stance and Stancetaking

Literature Cited

1. Agha A. 2003. The social life of a cultural value. Lang. Commun. 23:231–73
   [Google Scholar]
2. Aikhenvald AY. 2004. Evidentiality Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
3. Babel AM. 2009. Dizque, evidentiality, and stance in Valley Spanish. Lang. Soc. 38:4487–511
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bakhtin M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays Austin: Univ. Tex. Press
5. Bergqvist H 2018. Evidentiality as stance. Evidence for Evidentiality A Foolen, H de Hoop, G Mulder 19–43 Amsterdam: John Benjamins
   [Google Scholar]
6. Biber D, Finegan E. 1988. Adverbial stance types in English. Discourse Process. 11:11–34
   [Google Scholar]
7. Brown P, Levinson SC, Levinson SC. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage 4 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
8. Bucholtz M. 1999. You da man: narrating the racial other in the production of white masculinity. J. Sociolinguist. 3:4443–60
   [Google Scholar]
9. Butler J. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity New York: Routledge
10. Clift R. 2006. Indexing stance: reported speech as an interactional evidential. J. Sociolinguist. 10:5569–95
    [Google Scholar]
11. Donaldson M. 1993. What is hegemonic masculinity? Structures of oppression, forces for change. Theory Soc. 22:5643–57
    [Google Scholar]
12. Du Bois JW. 2007. The stance triangle. See Englebretson 2007. 139–82
13. Du Bois JW, Kärkkäinen E 2012. Taking a stance on emotion: affect, sequence, and intersubjectivity in dialogic interaction. Text Talk 32:4433–51
    [Google Scholar]
14. Englebretson R 2007. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 164 Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction Philadelphia: John Benjamins
15. Fischer JL. 1958. Social influences on the choice of a linguistic variant. WORD 14:147–56
    [Google Scholar]
16. Freeman V. 2014. Hyperarticulation as a signal of stance. J. Phonet. 45:1–11
    [Google Scholar]
17. Gadanidis T, Hildebrand-Edgar N, Kiss A, Konnelly L, Pabst K et al. 2018. Stance, style, and semantics: operationalizing insights from semantics-pragmatics to account for linguistic variation Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation (NWAV) 47 New York: Oct. 21
18. Goffman E 1981. Footing. Forms of Talk E Goffman 124–59 Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
    [Google Scholar]
19. Hanks WF. 2005. Explorations in the deictic field. Curr. Anthropol. 46:2191–220
    [Google Scholar]
20. Holmes-Elliott S, Levon E 2017. The substance of style: gender, social class and interactional stance in /s/-fronting in southeast England. Linguistics 55:51045–72
    [Google Scholar]
21. Jaffe A 2009. Introduction: the sociolinguistics of stance. Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives A Jaffe 3–28 Oxford, UK/New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
22. Jakobson R. 1990 (1957). Shifters and verbal categories. On Language LR Waugh, M Monville-Burston 386–92 Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
23. Johnstone B. 2009. Pittsburghese shirts: commodification and the enregisterment of an urban dialect. Am. Speech 84:2157–75
    [Google Scholar]
24. Johnstone B 2017. Characterological figures and expressive style in the enregisterment of linguistic variety. Language and a Sense of Place: Studies in Language and Region C Montgomery, E Moore 283–300 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
25. Kaltenböck G, López-Couso MJ, Méndez-Naya B. 2020. The dynamics of stance constructions. Lang. Sci. 82:101330
    [Google Scholar]
26. Kärkkäinen E. 2003. Epistemic Stance in English Conversation Amsterdam: John Benjamins
27. Keizer E. 2020. Modelling stance adverbs in grammatical theory: tackling heterogeneity with Functional Discourse Grammar. Lang. Sci. 82:101273
    [Google Scholar]
28. Kiesling SF. 1998. Men's identities and sociolinguistic variation: the case of fraternity men. J. Sociolinguist. 2:169–99
    [Google Scholar]
29. Kiesling SF. 2004. Dude. Am. Speech 79:3281–305
    [Google Scholar]
30. Kiesling SF 2006. Hegemonic identity-making in narrative. Discourse and Identity A De Fina, D Schiffrin, M Bamberg 261–87 New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
31. Kiesling SF 2009. Style as stance: stance as the explanation for patterns of sociolinguistic variation. Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives A Jaffe 171–94 Oxford, UK/New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
32. Kiesling SF. 2017. Youtube yinzers: stancetaking and the performance of ‘Pittsburghese.’ In Identity and Dialect Performance: A Study of Communities and Dialects R Bassiouney 245–64 London: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
33. Kiesling SF. 2018. Masculine stances and the linguistics of affect: on masculine ease. NORMA: Int. J. Masc. Stud. 13:3–4191–212
    [Google Scholar]
34. Kiesling SF 2019. The “gay voice” and “brospeak”: toward a systematic model of stance. The Oxford Handbook of Language and Sexuality K Hall, R Barrett Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190212926.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780190212926-e-11
    [Google Scholar]
35. Kiesling SF. 2020. Investment in a model of stancetaking: I mean and just sayin'. Lang. Sci. 82:101333
    [Google Scholar]
36. Kiesling SF 2022. Operationalizing theoretical constructs in digital discourse analysis: the example of stancetaking. Research Methods for Digital Discourse Analysis C Vasquez London: Bloomsbury. In press
    [Google Scholar]
37. Kiesling SF, Pavalanathan U, Fitzpatrick J, Han X, Eisenstein J 2018. Interactional stancetaking in online forums. Comput. Linguist. 44:4683–718
    [Google Scholar]
38. Kockelman P. 2004. Stance and subjectivity. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 14:2127–50
    [Google Scholar]
39. Labov W. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City Washington, DC: Cent. Appl. Linguist.
40. Lawson R. 2013. The construction of `tough' masculinity: negotiation, alignment and rejection. Gend. Lang. 7:3369–95
    [Google Scholar]
41. Lempert M. 2008. The poetics of stance: text-metricality, epistemicity, interaction. Lang. Soc. 37:4569–92
    [Google Scholar]
42. Liu B. 2012. Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies Williston, VT: Morgan & Claypool
43. Mendoza-Denton N. 2011. The semiotic hitchhiker's guide to creaky voice: circulation and gendered hardcore in a Chicana/o gang persona. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 21:2261–80
    [Google Scholar]
44. Ochs E 1992. Indexing gender. Rethinking Context A Duranti, C Goodwin 335–58 Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
45. Ochs E 1996. Linguistic resources for socializing humanity. Rethinking Linguistic Relativity J Gumperz, S Levinson 407–37 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
46. Palmer FR. 2001. Mood and Modality Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
47. Pratt T. 2020. Embodying “tech”: articulatory setting, phonetic variation, and social meaning. J. Sociolinguist. 24:3328–49
    [Google Scholar]
48. Putnam H. 1974. Meaning and reference. J. Philos. 70:19699–711
    [Google Scholar]
49. Schiffrin D. 1984. Jewish argument as sociability. Lang. Soc. 13:3311–35
    [Google Scholar]
50. Silver L, Devlin K, Huang C. 2021. Most Americans support tough stance toward China on human rights, economic issues. Pew Research Center Mar. 4. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2021/03/04/most-americans-support-tough-stance-toward-china-on-human-rights-economic-issues/
    [Google Scholar]
51. Silverstein M. 2003. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Lang. Commun. 23:3–4193–229
    [Google Scholar]
52. Snell J. 2018. Solidarity, stance, and class identities. Lang. Soc. 47:5665–91
    [Google Scholar]
53. Stivers T. 2008. Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: when nodding is a token of affiliation. Res. Lang. Soc. Interact. 41:131–57
    [Google Scholar]
54. Tannen D. 2004. Talking the dog: framing pets as interactional resources in family discourse. Res. Lang. Soc. Interact. 37:4399–420
    [Google Scholar]
55. Tannen D. 2007. Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
56. Trudgill P. 1972. Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the Urban British English of Norwich. Lang. Soc. 1:2179–95
    [Google Scholar]
57. Wetherell M, Edley N. 1999. Negotiating hegemonic masculinity: imaginary positions and psycho-discursive practices. Fem. Psychol. 9:3335–56
    [Google Scholar]
58. Winters MS. 2020. US bishops need to recalibrate their stance toward the culture. National Catholic Reporter Nov. 13. https://www.ncronline.org/news/accountability/distinctly-catholic/us-bishops-need-recalibrate-their-stance-toward-culture
    [Google Scholar]
59. Wortham S, Reyes A. 2020. Discourse Analysis Beyond the Speech Event New York: Routledge