1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Linguistics
  4. Volume 6, 2020
  5. Article

Annual Review of Linguistics

Volume 6, 2020

Fantastic Linguistics

Abstract

Many nonlinguists believe that their ability to speak at least one language provides special insight into the essence of languages and their histories. One result of this belief is a plethora of theories about language from a surprising variety of perspectives: where particular languages (or all languages) originated, which languages are related by a shared history, how undeciphered writings or pseudowritings are to be read, how language figures in paranormal claims as “evidence” for reincarnation and channeled entities, and much, much more. This review surveys some of the major areas in which fringe and crackpot claims about language thrive. Only a few topics and examples can be covered in the limited space of a single article, but these should be enough, we hope, to suggest the range of wonderfully wacky pseudolinguistic notions out there.

Keyword(s): channeling, glossolalia, Ogam, paranormal language, pseudoscience, ultradiffusionist, xenoglossy
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011619-030459
2020-01-14
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/linguistics/6/1/annurev-linguistics-011619-030459.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011619-030459&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Aytürk İ 2004. Turkish linguists against the West: the origins of linguistic nationalism in Atatürk's Turkey. Middle East. Stud. 40:61–25
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bjørnflaten JI 1982. Marr og språkvitenskapen i Sovjetunionen: bidrag til den sovjetiske språkvitenskaps historie Oslo, Norway: Novus
  3. Brash RR. 1879. The Ogam Inscribed Monuments of the Gaedhil London: G. Bell
  4. Cole JR. 1979. Inscription mania, hyperdiffusionism and the public: fallout from a 1977 meeting in Vermont. Man Northeast 17:27–53
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Cole JR. 1988. Cult archaeology and unscientific method and theory. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 3 MB Schiffer 1–33 New York: Academic
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Conscious CT 2005. ConsciousCT: East of the River holistic community http://www.consciousct.org/spirituality/celebration_bev.htm
  7. Damick AS. 2016. Early Pentecostal speaking in tongues was about foreign languages. Orthodoxy and Heterodoxy Apr. 12. https://blogs.ancientfaith.com/orthodoxyandheterodoxy/2016/04/12/early-pentecostal-speaking-tongues-foreign-languages
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Daynal Inst 2010. Ken Carey. Nordan Symposia http://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=Ken_Carey
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Deal DA. 1993. The Nexus Spoken Language; The Link Between the Mayan and the Semitic in Pre-Columbian Times Columbus, GA: ISAC Press
  10. Dürr M. 1987. Morphologie, Syntax und Textstrukturen des Maya-Quiche des Popol Vuh Bonn, Ger: Holos Verl.
  11. Dürr M. 2015. Einführung in das kolonialzeitliche K'iche' (Quiché) Berlin: Freie Univ. Lateinamerika Inst.
  12. Elert C-C. 1978. Andreas Kempe (1622–89) and the languages spoken in Paradise. Historiogr. Linguist. 5:3221–26
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Fell B. 1976. America B.C.: Ancient Settlers in the New World New York: Quadrangle
  14. Fell B. 1980. Saga America New York: Times Books
  15. Fell B. 1982. Bronze Age America Boston: Little Brown Co.
  16. Fell B. 1983. Christian messages in Old Irish script deciphered from rock carvings in West Virginia. Wonderful West Virginia March 12–19
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Gallagher IJ. 1983. Light dawns on West Virginia history. Wonderful West Virginia March 7–11
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Gardner M. 1957. Fads and Fallacies in the Name of Science New York: Dover Publ.
  19. Goddard I, Fitzhugh WW. 1979. A statement concerning America B.C. . Man Northeast 17:166–72
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Goodman FD. 1972. Speaking in Tongues: A Cross-Cultural Study of Glossolalia Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  21. Jespersen O. 1964 (1922). Language: Its Nature, Development, and Origin New York: Norton
  22. Laing H. 2013. Examining Edenics, the theory that English (and every other language) came from Hebrew. Tablet Oct. 31. https://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-arts-and-culture/books/150768/examining-edenics
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Lee TE. 1977. If at first you don't succeed…. Anthropol. J. Can. 15:311–14
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Lewis GL. 1997. Turkish language reform: the episode of the Sun-Language Theory. Turk. Lang. 1:25–40
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Liberman M. 2007. The envelope, please. Language Log Jan. 3. http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/myl/languagelog/archives/003998.html
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Maddieson I. 2013. Tone. The World Atlas of Language Structures Online M Dryer, M Haspelmath Leipzig, Ger: Max Planck Inst. Evol. Anthropol http://wals.info/chapter/13
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Mallery G. 1972 (1893). Picture-Writing of the American Indians 1–2 New York: Dover Publ. Repr.
  28. Matson RG, Magne MPR. 2007. Athapaskan Migrations: The Archaeology of Eagle Lake, British Columbia Tucson: Univ. Ariz. Press
  29. McKay B, Bar-Natan D, Bar-Hillel M, Kalai G 1999. Solving the Bible code puzzle. Stat. Sci. 14:150–73
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Melton JG 2001. Encyclopedia of Occultism and Parapsychology 1–2 Detroit, MI: Gale Group . , 5th ed.. https://archive.org/details/EncyclopediaOfOccultismAndParapsychologyVol2.pdf
  31. Newbrook M, Curtain J, Libert A 2013. Strange Linguistics: A Skeptical Linguist Looks at Non-Mainstream Ideas About Language Munich, Ger: Lincom
  32. Özbayoǧlu E. 1993. Kizilderililerin Orta Asya - Türk baǧlantısı [The relationship of the Indians to Central Asian Turks]. Cumhur. Kitap 179:July3
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Samarin WJ. 1972. Tongues of Men and Angels: The Religious Language of Pentecostalism New York: Macmillan
  34. Samarin WJ. 1974. Review of Felicitas D. Goodman. Speaking in Tongues: A Cross-Cultural Study of Glossolalia. Language 50:207–12
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Shermer M. 2011. What is pseudoscience? Distinguishing between science and pseudoscience is problematic. Scientific American Sept. 1. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/what-is-pseudoscience
    [Google Scholar]
  36. St. Germain 1994. Twin Souls and Soul Mates: The I AM Presence of St. Germain channeled A Ramanda, C Heartsong Gainesville, FL: Triad Publ. Co.
  37. Stalin JV. 1950. Marksism i voprosi jazykoznanija [Marxism and problems of linguistics]. Marxists Internet Archive https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1950/jun/20.htm
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Stevenson I. 1974. Xenoglossy: A Review and Report of a Case Charlottesville: Univ. Press Va.
  39. Stevenson I. 1976. A preliminary report of a new case of responsive xenoglossy. J. Am. Soc. Psych. Res. 70:65–77
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Stevenson I. 1980. A preliminary report on an unusual case of the reincarnation type with xenoglossy. J. Am. Soc. Psych. Res. 74:331–48
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Stevenson I. 1984. Unlearned Language: New Studies in Xenoglossy Charlottesville: Univ. Press Va.
  42. Stewart EG. 1991. The Dene and Na-Dene Indian Migrations 1233 A.D.: Escape from Genghis Khan to America Columbus, GA: ISAC Press
  43. Stollznow K. 2014. Language Myths, Mysteries and Magic Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan
  44. TDK (Türk Dil Kurultayı) 1937. Üçünçü Türk Dil Kurultayı 1936: tezler, müzakere, zabıtları [Third Turkish Language Assembly 1936: theses, discussion, and proceedings] Ankara, Turk: Devl. Basmevi
  45. Tedlock D transl .-ed. 1985. Popol Vuh: The Definitive Edition of the Mayan Book of the Dawn of Life and the Glories of Gods and Kings, with Commentary Based on the Ancient Knowledge of the Modern Quiché Maya New York: Simon Schuster
  46. Thomason SG. 1984. Do you remember your previous life's language in your present incarnation. Am. Speech 59:340–50
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Thomason SG. 1987. Past tongues remembered. Skept. Inq. 11:367–75
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Thomason SG. 1988. Reply to ‘Response to “Past tongues remembered?. ”' Skept. Inq. 12:323–24
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Thomason SG. 1989. “Entities” in the linguistic minefield. Skept. Inq. 13:391–96
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Thomason SG. 1996. Xenoglossy. The Encyclopedia of the Paranormal G Stein 835–44 Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Turks teach new theories 1936. New York Times Feb. 9 7
  52. Williams S. 1991. Fantastic Archaeology: The Wild Side of North American Prehistory Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
  53. Winter JR. 2019. WinterChild http://www.winterchild.com/jw_mywork.php
  54. Witztum D, Rips E, Rosenberg Y 1994. Equidistant letter sequences in the Book of Genesis. Stat. Sci. 9:3429–38
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011619-030459
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error