Western Austronesian Voice

Literature Cited

1. Aldridge E 2004. Ergativity and word order in Austronesian languages PhD thesis Cornell Univ. Ithaca, NY:
2. Aldridge E 2008. Phase-based account of extraction in Indonesian. Lingua 118:1440–69
   [Google Scholar]
3. Aldridge E 2011. Antipassive in Austronesian alignment change. Grammatical Change: Origins, Nature, Outcomes D Jonas, J Whitman, A Garrett 332–46 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
   [Google Scholar]
4. Aldridge E 2017. Φ-feature competition: a unified approach to the Austronesian extraction restriction. Proceedings of the 52nd Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS 52) J Kantarovich, T Truong, O Xherija Chicago: Chicago Linguist. Soc20 pp
   [Google Scholar]
5. Arka IW 2003.a Balinese Morphosyntax: A Lexical–Functional Approach Canberra: Pac. Linguist.
6. Arka IW 2003.b Voice systems in the Austronesian languages of Nusantara: typology, symmetricality and Undergoer orientation. Linguist. Indones. 21:113–39
   [Google Scholar]
7. Arka IW 2005. The core–oblique distinction and core index in some Austronesian languages of Indonesia Paper presented at the Association for Linguistic Typology VI Conference Padang, Indones.:
8. Arka IW 2008. Voice and the syntax of =a/−a verbs in Balinese. See Austin & Musgrave 2008 70–89
9. Arka IW 2009. On the zero (voice) prefix and bare verbs in Austronesian languages of Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. Discovering History Through Language: Papers in Honour of Malcolm Ross B Evans 247–70 Canberra: Pac. Linguist.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Arka IW, Manning CD 2008. Voice and grammatical relations in Indonesian: a new perspective. See Austin & Musgrave 2008 45–69
11. Arka IW, Ross M 2005. The Many Faces of Austronesian Voice Systems: Some New Empirical Studies Canberra: Pac. Linguist.
12. Arka IW, Simpson J 2008. Objective voice and control into subject clauses in Balinese. See Austin & Musgrave 2008 90–127
13. Artawa K 1994. Ergativity and Balinese syntax PhD thesis La Trobe Univ. Melbourne, Aust.:
14. Artawa K, Blake BJ 1997. Patient primacy in Balinese. Stud. Lang. 21:483–508
    [Google Scholar]
15. Asikin-Garmager ES 2017. Sasak voice PhD thesis Univ. Iowa Iowa City, IA:
16. Austin PK, Musgrave S 2008. Voice and Grammatical Relations in Austronesian Languages Stanford, CA: Cent. Study Lang. Inf.
17. Blust R 2013. The Austronesian Languages Canberra: Pac. Linguist. , 2nd ed..
18. Blust R 2015. The case-markers of Proto-Austronesian. Ocean. Linguist. 54:436–91
    [Google Scholar]
19. Cartier A 1979. De-voiced transitive verb sentences in formal Indonesian. Ergativity: Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations F Plank 161–83 New York: Academic
    [Google Scholar]
20. Chafe WL 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. See Li 1976 25–55
21. Chang YL 2011. Triadic encoding in Tsou. Lang. Linguist. 12.4:799–843
    [Google Scholar]
22. Chang YL 2013. Double transitives and double applicatives Paper presented at A Minimalist Workshop on Austronesian Verbal Syntax Taipei, Taiwan:
23. Chen V 2016. “Pivot” ≠ absolutive: evidence from Formosan. Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS 42) E Clem, V Dawson, A Shen, AH Skilton, G Bacon et al.253–72 Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguist. Soc.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Chen V 2017.a A reexamination of the Philippine-type voice system and its implications for Austronesian primary-level subgrouping PhD thesis Univ. Hawai‘i Mānoa Honolulu, HI:
25. Chen V 2017.b Philippine-type voice affixes as A′-agreement morphology: evidence from causatives. Proceedings of the 23rd Meeting of the Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association (AFLA 23) H Nomoto, T Miyauchi, A Shiohara 35–49 Canberra: Asia-Pac. Linguist.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Chen V, Fukuda S 2016. “Absolutive” marks extractions, not Case: against the syntactic ergative analysis for Austronesian-type voice system. Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistics Society (NELS 46) C Hammerly, B Prickett 201–11 Amherst, MA: Grad. Linguist. Stud. Assoc.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Chen V, Fukuda S 2017. Re-labeling “ergative”: evidence from Formosan. Proceedings of the 23rd Meeting of the Austronesian Formal Linguistic Association (AFLA 23) H Nomoto, T Miyauchi, A Shiohara 50–65 Canberra: Asia-Pac. Linguist.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Chung S 1976.a On the subject of two passives in Indonesian. See Li 1976 59–98
29. Chung S 1976.b An object-creating rule in Bahasa Indonesia. Linguist. Inq. 7:41–87
    [Google Scholar]
30. Chung S 1994. Wh-agreement and “referentiality” in Chamorro. Linguist. Inq. 25:1–44
    [Google Scholar]
31. Chung S 1998. The Design of Agreement: Evidence from Chamorro Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
32. Cole P, Son M-J 2004. The argument structure of verbs with the suffix -kan in Indonesian. Ocean. Linguist. 43:339–64
    [Google Scholar]
33. Cole P, Hermon G 2005. The typology of Malay reflexives. Lingua 115:627–44
    [Google Scholar]
34. Cole P, Hermon G, Yanti R 2008. Voice in Malay/Indonesian. Lingua 118:1500–53
    [Google Scholar]
35. Cumming S, Wouk F 1987. Is there ‘discourse ergativity’ in Austronesian languages. Lingua 71:271–96
    [Google Scholar]
36. Davies WD 2010. A Grammar of Madurese Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
37. De Guzman VP 1988. Ergative analysis for Philippine languages: an analysis. See McGinn 1988 323–45
38. Dixon RMW 1994. Ergativity Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
39. Erlewine MY, Levin T, van Urk C 2017. Ergativity and Austronesian-type voice systems. Oxford Handbook of Ergativity J Coon, D Massam, L deMena Travis 373–96 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
40. Ferrell R 1979. Construction markers and subgrouping of Formosan languages. South-East Asian Linguistic Studies 3 ND Liem 199–212 Canberra: Pac. Linguist.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Foley WA 2008. The place of Philippine languages in a typology of voice systems. See Austin & Musgrave 2008 22–44
42. Foley WA, van Valin RD 1984. Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
43. Gerdts D 1980. Antipassives and causatives in Halkomelem. Proceedings of the 6th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS 6) BR Caron, MAB Hoffman, M Silva, J Van Ooste, DK Alford et al.300–14 Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguist. Soc.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Gerdts D 1988. Antipassives and causatives in Ilokano: evidence for an ergative analysis. See McGinn 1988 295–321
45. Guilfoyle E, Hung H, Travis L 1992. SPEC of IP and SPEC of VP: two subjects in Austronesian languages. Nat. Lang. Linguist. Theory 10:375–414
    [Google Scholar]
46. Heaton R 2017. A typology of antipassives, with special reference to Mayan PhD thesis Univ. Hawai‘i Mānoa Honolulu, HI:
47. Heine B, Kuteva T 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
48. Hemmings C 2015. Kelabit voice: Philippine-type, Indonesian-type or something a bit different. Trans. Philol. Soc. 113:383–405
    [Google Scholar]
49. Hemmings C 2016. The Kelabit language: Austronesian voice and syntactic typology PhD thesis. Sch. Orient. Afr. Stud., Univ. London London, UK:
50. Himmelmann NP 2002.a Voice in two northern Sulawesi languages. See Wouk & Ross 2002 123–42
51. Himmelmann NP 2002.b Voice in western Austronesian: an update. See Wouk & Ross 2002 7–16
52. Himmelmann NP 2005. The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar: typological characteristics. The Austronesian Languages of Asia and Madagascar KA Adelaar, NP Himmelmann 110–81 New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
53. Himmelmann NP, Riesberg S 2013. Symmetrical voice and applicative alternations: evidence from Totoli. Ocean. Linguist. 52:396–422
    [Google Scholar]
54. Huang SF 2005. Split O in Formosan languages—a localist interpretation. Lang. Linguist. 6:783–806
    [Google Scholar]
55. Hopper PJ 1983. Ergative, passive, and active in Malay narrative. Discourse Perspectives on Syntax F Klein-Andreu 67–88 New York: Academic
    [Google Scholar]
56. Hopper PJ 1988. How ergative is Malay?. See McGinn 1988 441–54
57. Keenan E 1976. Remarkable subjects in Malagasy. See Li 1976 247–301
58. Kiss K 1995. Introduction. Discourse-Configurational Languages K Kiss 3–28 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
59. Kroeger P 1993. Phrase Structure and Grammatical Relations in Tagalog Stanford, CA: Cent. Study Lang. Inf.
60. Kroeger P 2014. Passive agents in Malay: the binding properties and discourse functions of agentive =nya. Current Trends in Malay Linguistics S-F Chung, H Nomoto 5–29 Tokyo: Tokyo Univ. Foreign Stud.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Kuo CC 2015. Argument alternation and argument structure in symmetrical voice languages: a case study of transfer verbs in Amis, Puyuma, and Seediq PhD thesis Univ. Hawai‘i Mānoa Honolulu, HI:
62. Li CN 1976. Subject and Topic New York: Academic
63. Li CN, Thompson SA 1976. Subject and topic: a new typology of language. See Li 1976 457–61
64. Liao HC 2004. Transitivity and ergativity in Formosan and Philippine languages PhD thesis Univ. Hawai‘i Mānoa Honolulu, HI:
65. Legate JA 2012. Subjects in Acehnese and the nature of the passive. Language 88:495–525
    [Google Scholar]
66. Legate JA 2014. Voice and v: Lessons from Acehnese Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
67. Manning C 1996. Ergativity: Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations Stanford, CA: Cent. Study Lang. Inf.
68. McDonnell B 2016. Symmetrical voice constructions in Besemah: a usage-based approach PhD thesis Univ. Calif. Santa Barbara:
69. McGinn R 1988. Studies in Austronesian Linguistics Athens: Ohio Univ. Cent. Int. Stud.
70. Mithun M 1994. The implications of ergativity for a Philippine voice system. Voice: Form and Function B Fox, P Hopper 247–77 Amsterdam: Benjamins
    [Google Scholar]
71. Mithun M 2008. Does passivization require a subject category?. Case and Grammatical Relations: Studies in Honor of Bernard Comrie GG Corbett, M Noonan 211–40 Amsterdam: Benjamins
    [Google Scholar]
72. Miyagawa S 2010. Why Agree? Why Move? Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
73. Miyagawa S 2017. Agreement Beyond Phi Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
74. Musgrave S 2001. Non-subject arguments in Indonesian PhD thesis Univ. Melbourne Melbourne, Aust.:
75. Paul I, Travis L 2006. Ergativity in Austronesian languages: what it can do, what it can't do, but not why. Ergativity: Emerging Issues A Johns, D Massam, J Ndayiragije 315–36 Berlin: Springer
    [Google Scholar]
76. Payne T 1982. Role and reference related subject properties and ergativity in Yup'ik Eskimo and Tagalog. Stud. Lang. 6:75–106
    [Google Scholar]
77. Pearson M 2001. The clause structure of Malagasy: a minimalist approach PhD thesis Univ. Calif. Los. Angel.:
78. Pearson M 2005. The Malagasy subject/topic as an A′-element. Nat. Lang. Linguist. Theory 23:381–457
    [Google Scholar]
79. Polinsky M 2016. Deconstructing Ergativity: Two Types of Ergative Languages and Their Features Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
80. Polinsky P 2017. Antipassive. The Oxford Handbook of Ergativity J Coon, D Massam, L deMena Travis 308–31 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
81. Rackowski A 2002. The structure of Tagalog: specificity, voice, and the distribution of arguments PhD thesis MIT Cambridge, MA:
82. Rackowski A, Richards N 2005. Phase edge and extraction: a Tagalog case study. Linguist. Inq. 36:565–99
    [Google Scholar]
83. Rafferty E 1982. Discourse Structures of the Chinese Indonesian of Malang Jakarta: Badan Penyelenggara Seri Nusa
84. Richards N 2000. Another look at Tagalog subjects. Formal Issues in Austronesian Linguistics I Paul, V Phillips, L Travis 105–16 Dordrecht, Neth.: Kluwer
    [Google Scholar]
85. Riesberg S 2014. Symmetrical Voice and Linking in Western Austronesian Languages Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
86. Ross M 2002. The history of western Austronesian voice and voice-marking. See Wouk & Ross 2002 17–62
87. Ross M 2006. Reconstructing the case-marking and personal pronoun systems of Proto-Austronesian. Streams Converging into an Ocean: Festschrift in Honor of Professor Paul Jen-kuei Li on His 70th Birthday H Chang, L Huang, D Ho 521–63 Taipei: Inst. Linguist., Acad. Sin.
    [Google Scholar]
88. Ross M 2009. Proto Austronesian verbal morphology: a reappraisal. Austronesian Historical Linguistics and Culture History: A Festschrift for Robert Blust KA Adelaar, A Pawley 295–326 Canberra: Pac. Linguist.
    [Google Scholar]
89. Schachter P 1976. The subject in Philippine languages: topic, actor, actor-topic, or none of the above?. See Li 1976 491–518
90. Schachter P, Otanes FT 1972. Tagalog Reference Grammar Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
91. Shibatani M 1985. Passives and related constructions: a prototype analysis. Language 61:821–48
    [Google Scholar]
92. Shibatani M 1988. Passive and Voice Amsterdam: Benjamins
93. Sneddon JN 1996. Indonesian: A Comprehensive Grammar London: Routledge
94. Teng FC 2008. A Grammar of Puyuma, an Austronesian Language of Taiwan Canberra: Aust. Natl. Univ.
95. Verhaar JW 1983. Ergativity, accusativity, and hierarchy. Sophia Linguist. Work. Pap. Linguist. 11:1–23
    [Google Scholar]
96. Verhaar JW 1988. Syntactic ergativity in Indonesian. See McGinn 1988 347–84
97. van Urk C 2015. A uniform syntax for phrasal movement: a case study of Dinka Bor PhD thesis MIT Cambridge, MA:
98. Wechsler S, Arka IW 1998. Syntactic ergativity in Balinese: an argument structure based theory. Nat. Lang. Linguist. Theory 16:387–442
    [Google Scholar]
99. Wolff JU 1973. Verbal inflection in Proto-Austronesian. Parangal Kay Cecilio Lopez: Essays in Honor of Cecilio Lopez on His Seventy-Fifth Birthday A Gonzalez 71–91 Quezon City: Linguist. Soc. Philipp.
    [Google Scholar]
100. Wolff JU 1996. The development of the passive verb with pronominal prefix in Western Austronesian languages. Reconstruction, Classification, Description: Festschrift in Honor of Isidore Dyen B Nothofer 15–40 Hamburg, Ger.: Abera
     [Google Scholar]
101. Wouk F, Ross M 2002. The History and Typology of Western Austronesian Voice Systems Canberra: Pac. Linguist.
102. Wu CM 2013. The syntax of linking constructions in Mayrinax Atayal and Sinvaudjan Paiwan PhD thesis Natl. Tsing Hua Univ Hsinchu, Taiwan:
103. Zobel E 2002. The position of Chamorro and Palauan in the Austronesian family tree: evidence from verb morphosyntax. See Wouk & Ross 2002 405–34