1932

Abstract

Vagueness is a pervasive feature of natural language, which has been studied from a range of perspectives. This review focuses on recent empirical insights into vagueness that have come out of the field of linguistic semantics, as well as the theoretical developments that these have prompted. Topics covered include the distinction between vagueness and imprecision, or what I refer to as Type 1 and Type 2 vagueness; the complex manifestations of vagueness in the adjectival domain; and recent experimental findings regarding “ordinary” speakers’ use and interpretation of vague language. Also briefly discussed is the broader question of why language is vague.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-linguist-030514-125150
2015-01-14
2024-06-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/linguistics/1/1/annurev-linguist-030514-125150.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-linguist-030514-125150&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Alxatib S. 2010. Denying bivalence and the super-/sub-valuationary divide. Presented at Workshop on Vagueness and Similarity, Paris, May 7–8
  2. Alxatib S, Pagin P, Saurland U. 2013. Acceptable contradictions: pragmatics or semantics?. A reply to Cobreros et al J. Philos. Log. 42:619–34 [Google Scholar]
  3. Alxatib S, Pelletier FJ. 2011. The psychology of vagueness: borderline cases and contradictions. Mind Lang. 26:287–326 [Google Scholar]
  4. Barker C. 2002. The dynamics of vagueness. Linguist. Philos. 25:1–36 [Google Scholar]
  5. Barker C. 2006. Vagueness. Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics Brown K. 294–98 Oxford, UK: Elsevier, 2nd ed.. [Google Scholar]
  6. Barner D, Snedeker J. 2008. Compositionality and statistics in adjective acquisition: 4-year-olds interpret tall and short based on the size distributions of novel noun referents. Child Dev. 79:594–608 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bartsch R, Vennemann T. 1973. Semantic Structures: A Study in the Relation Between Semantics and Syntax Frankfurt: Athenäum [Google Scholar]
  8. Bogal-Allbritten E. 2012. Slightly coerced: processing evidence for adjectival coercion by minimizers. Proceedings of the 48th Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society Beltrama A, Chatzikonstantinou T, Lee JL, Pham M, Rak D. 77–92 Chicago: Chicago Linguist. Soc. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bonini N, Osherson D, Viale R, Williamson T. 1999. On the psychology of vague predicates. Mind Lang. 14:377–93 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bosch P. 1983. “Vagueness” is context-dependence. A solution to the Sorites paradox. Approaching Vagueness Ballmer TT, Pinkal M. 189–210 Amsterdam: North Holland [Google Scholar]
  11. Burnett H. 2014. A delineation solution to the puzzles of absolute adjectives. Linguist. Philos. 37:1–39 [Google Scholar]
  12. Bylinina L. 2012. Functional standards and the absolute/relative distinction. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 16 Guevara AA, Chernilovskaya A, Nouwen R. 1141–57 Cambridge, MA: MIT Work. Pap. Linguist. [Google Scholar]
  13. Bylinina L. 2014. The grammar of standards: judge-dependence, purpose-relativity, and comparison classes in degree constructions. PhD thesis, Utrecht Univ. 199 pp .
  14. Carlson GN. 1977. Reference to kinds in English. PhD thesis, Univ. Mass., Amherst. 487 pp .
  15. Chierchia G. 2010. Mass nouns, vagueness, and semantic variation. Synthese 174:99–149 [Google Scholar]
  16. Cintula P, Fermüller CG, Godo L, Hajek P. 2011. Understanding Vagueness. Logical, Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives London: Coll. Publ. [Google Scholar]
  17. Cobreros P, Égré P, Ripley D, van Rooij R. 2012. Tolerant, classical, strict. J. Philos. Log. 41:347–85 [Google Scholar]
  18. Cresswell MJ. 1977. The semantics of degree. Montague Grammar Partee BH. 261–92 New York: Academic [Google Scholar]
  19. de Jaegher K. 2003. A game-theoretic rationale for vagueness. Linguist. Philos. 26:637–59 [Google Scholar]
  20. Dehaene S. 1997. The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  21. Dehaene S, Mehler J. 1992. Cross-linguistic regularities in the frequency of number words. Cognition 43:1–29 [Google Scholar]
  22. Douven I, Decock L, Dietz R, Égré P. 2013. Vagueness: a conceptual spaces approach. J. Philos. Log. 42:137–60 [Google Scholar]
  23. Edgington D. 1997. Vagueness by degrees. Vagueness: A Reader Keefe R, Smith P. 294–316 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  24. Égré P. 2011. Perceptual ambiguity and the Sorites. See Nouwen et al. 2011, pp. 64–90
  25. Égré P, de Gardelle V, Ripley D. 2013. Vagueness and order effects in color categorization. J. Log. Lang. Inf. 22:391–420 [Google Scholar]
  26. Égré P, Klinedinst N. 2011. Vagueness and Language Use New York: Palgrave Macmillan [Google Scholar]
  27. Endicott TAO. 2001. Vagueness in Law Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  28. Fara D, Graff D. 2000. Shifting sands: an interest-relative theory of vagueness. Philos. Top. 28:45–81 [Google Scholar]
  29. Fine K. 1975. Vagueness, truth and logic. Synthese 54:235–59 [Google Scholar]
  30. Frank MC, Goodman ND. 2012. Predicting pragmatic reasoning in language games. Science 336:998 [Google Scholar]
  31. Fults S. 2006. The structure of comparison: an investigation of gradable adjectives. PhD thesis, Univ. Md., College Park. 285 pp .
  32. Fults S. 2011. Vagueness and scales. See Égré & Klinedinst 2011, pp. 25–50 [Google Scholar]
  33. Gärdenfors P. 2004. Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  34. Hahn U, Chater N. 1998. Similarity and rules: distinct? exhaustive? empirically distinguishable?. Cognition 65:197–230 [Google Scholar]
  35. Hampton JA. 2007. Typicality, graded membership, and vagueness. Cogn. Sci. 31:355–84 [Google Scholar]
  36. Heim I. 2000. Degree operators and scope. Proceedings of the 10th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference Jackson B, Matthews T. 40–64 Ithaca, NY: CLC Publ. [Google Scholar]
  37. Hobbs JR. 1985. Granularity. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics Joshi AK. 432–35 San Francisco: Kaufmann [Google Scholar]
  38. Hyde D. 1997. From heaps and gaps to heaps of gluts. Mind 106:641–60 [Google Scholar]
  39. Hyde D. 2014. Sorites paradox. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Zalta EN. Spring 2014 ed. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/sorites-paradox/ [Google Scholar]
  40. Jansen CJM, Pollmann MMW. 2001. On round numbers: pragmatic aspects of numerical expressions. J. Quant. Linguist. 8:187–201 [Google Scholar]
  41. Kagan O, Alexeyenko S. 2011. Degree modification in Russian morphology: the case of the suffix -ovat. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 15 Reich I, Horch E, Pauly D. 321–55 Saarbrücken, Ger.: Saarland Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  42. Kamp H. 1975. Two theories about adjectives. Formal Semantics of Natural Language Keenan EL. 123–55 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  43. Kamp H. 1981. The paradox of the heap. Aspects of Philosophical Logic: Some Logical Forays into Central Notions of Linguistics and Philosophy Mönnich U. 225–77 Dordrecht, Neth.: Riedel [Google Scholar]
  44. Kamp H, Partee B. 1995. Prototype theory and compositionality. Cognition 57:129–91 [Google Scholar]
  45. Keefe R. 2000. Theories of Vagueness Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  46. Keefe R, Smith P. 1997. Introduction: theories of vagueness. Vagueness: A Reader Keefe R, Smith P. 1–57 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  47. Kennedy C. 2007. Vagueness and grammar: the semantics of relative and absolute gradable adjectives. Linguist. Philos. 30:1–45 [Google Scholar]
  48. Kennedy C. 2011. Vagueness and comparison. See Égré & Klinedinst 2011, pp. 73–97 [Google Scholar]
  49. Kennedy C. 2012. Ambiguity and vagueness: an overview. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning. Maienborn C, von Heusinger K, Portner P. 507–52 Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter [Google Scholar]
  50. Kennedy C, McNally L. 2005. Scale structure, degree modification and the semantics of gradable predicates. Language 81:345–81 [Google Scholar]
  51. Klein E. 1980. A semantics for positive and comparative adjectives. Linguist. Philos. 4:1–45 [Google Scholar]
  52. Krifka M. 2002. Be brief and vague! And how bidirectional optimality theory allows for verbosity and precision. Sounds and Systems. Studies in Structure and Change: A Festschrift for Theo Vennemann Restle D, Zaefferer D. 439–58 Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter [Google Scholar]
  53. Krifka M. 2007. Approximate interpretations of number words: a case of strategic communication. Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation Bouma G, Krämer I, Zwarts J. 111–26 K. Ned. Akad. Wet. [Google Scholar]
  54. Kyburg A, Morreau M. 2000. Fitting words: vague language in context. Linguist. Philos. 23:577–97 [Google Scholar]
  55. Lakoff G. 1973. Hedges: a study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. J. Philos. Log. 2:458–508 [Google Scholar]
  56. Lasersohn P. 1999. Pragmatic halos. Language 75:522–51 [Google Scholar]
  57. Lasersohn P. 2005. Context dependence, disagreement, and predicates of personal taste. Linguist. Philos. 28:643–86 [Google Scholar]
  58. Lassiter D, Goodman ND. 2013. Context, scale structure, and statistics in the interpretation of positive-form adjectives. Proceedings of the 23rd Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference Snider T. 587–610 Ithaca, NY: CLC Publ. [Google Scholar]
  59. Lauer S. 2012. On the pragmatics of pragmatic slack. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 16, Vol. 2 Guevara AA, Chernilovskaya A, Nouwen R. 389–401 Cambridge, MA: MIT Work. Pap. Linguist. [Google Scholar]
  60. Lewis D. 1970. General semantics. Synthese 22:18–67 [Google Scholar]
  61. Lipman BL. 2009. Why is language vague? Work. pap., Dep. Econ., Boston Univ.
  62. Luce RD. 1956. Semiorders and a theory of utility discrimination. Econometrica 24:178–91 [Google Scholar]
  63. Ludlow P. 1989. Implicit comparison classes. Linguist. Philos. 12:519–33 [Google Scholar]
  64. McConnell-Ginet S. 1973. Comparative constructions in English: a syntactic and semantic analysis. PhD thesis, Univ. Rochester. 518 pp .
  65. McNabb Y. 2012. The syntax and semantics of degree modification. PhD thesis, Univ. Chicago. 209 pp .
  66. McNally L. 2011. The relative role of property type and scale structure in explaining the behavior of gradable adjectives. See Nouwen et al. 2011, pp. 151–68
  67. Morzycki M. 2011. Metalinguistic comparison in an alternative semantics for imprecision. Nat. Lang. Semant. 19:39–86 [Google Scholar]
  68. Nouwen R, van Rooij R, Sauerland U, Schmitz HC. 2011. Vagueness in Communication: Revised Selected Papers Berlin: Springer [Google Scholar]
  69. Parikh R. 1994. Vagueness and utility: the semantics of common nouns. Linguist. Philos. 17:521–35 [Google Scholar]
  70. Pinkal M. 1995. Logic and Lexicon: The Semantics of the Indefinite Dordrecht, Neth.: Kluwer [Google Scholar]
  71. Poscher R. 2012. Ambiguity and vagueness in legal interpretation. Oxford Handbook of Language and Law Tiersma P, Solan L. 128–44 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  72. Priest G. 1979. The logic of paradox. J. Philos. Log. 8:219–41 [Google Scholar]
  73. Raffman D. 1996. Vagueness and context-relativity. Philos. Stud. 81:175–92 [Google Scholar]
  74. Raffman D. 2014. Unruly Words: A Study of Vague Language Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  75. Ripley D. 2011. Contradictions at the borders. See Nouwen et al. 2011, pp. 169–88 [Google Scholar]
  76. Rosch EH. 1973. Natural categories. Cogn. Psychol. 4:328–50 [Google Scholar]
  77. Rosch EH. 1975. Cognitive representations of semantic categories. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 104:192–233 [Google Scholar]
  78. Rotstein C, Winter Y. 2004. Total adjectives vs. partial adjectives: scale structure and higher-order modifiers. Nat. Lang. Semant. 12:259–88 [Google Scholar]
  79. Sadock JM. 1977. Truth and approximations. Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society Whistler K Jr, Van Valin RD, Chiarello C, Jaeger JJ, Petruck M et al.430–39 Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguist. Soc. [Google Scholar]
  80. Sapir E. 1944. Grading: a study in semantics. Philos. Sci. 11:93–116 [Google Scholar]
  81. Sassoon GW. 2007. Vagueness, gradability and typicality: a comprehensive semantic analysis. PhD thesis, Tel Aviv Univ. 381 pp .
  82. Sassoon GW. 2012. A slightly modified economy principle: stable properties have nonstable standards. Proceedings of the 27th Meeting of the Israel Association of Theoretical Linguistics Cohen E. 163–82 Cambridge, MA: MIT Work. Pap. Linguist. [Google Scholar]
  83. Sassoon GW. 2013. A typology of multidimensional adjectives. J. Semant. 30:335–80 [Google Scholar]
  84. Sassoon GW, Zevakhina N. 2012. Granularity shifting: experimental evidence from degree modifiers. Proceedings of the 22nd Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference Chereches A. 226–46 Ithaca, NY: CLC Publ. [Google Scholar]
  85. Sauerland U. 2011. Vagueness in language: the case against fuzzy logic revisited. See Cintula et al. 2011, pp. 185–98 [Google Scholar]
  86. Sauerland U, Stateva P. 2007. Scalar vs. epistemic vagueness: evidence from approximators. Proceedings of the 17th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference Friedman T, Gibson M. 228–45 Ithaca, NY: CLC Publ. [Google Scholar]
  87. Taatgen N, van Rijn H. Schmidt LA, Goodman ND, Barner D, Tenenbaum JB. 2009. How tall is tall? Compositionality, statistics, and gradable adjectives. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society3151–56 Amsterdam: Vrije Univ. [Google Scholar]
  88. Seising R. 2006. From vagueness in medical thought to the foundations of fuzzy reasoning in medical diagnosis. Artif. Intell. Med. 38:237–56 [Google Scholar]
  89. Serchuk P, Hargreaves I, Zach R. 2011. Vagueness, logic and use: four experimental studies on vagueness. Mind Lang. 26:540–73 [Google Scholar]
  90. Solt S. 2011. Notes on the comparison class. See Nouwen et al. 2011, pp. 189–206 [Google Scholar]
  91. Solt S. 2012. Comparison to arbitrary standards. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 16 Guevara AA, Chernilovskaya A, Nouwen R. 557–70 Cambridge, MA: MIT Work. Pap. Linguist. [Google Scholar]
  92. Solt S. On measurement and quantification: the case of most and more than half. Language Forthcoming [Google Scholar]
  93. Solt S, Gotzner N. 2010. Expensive, not expensive or cheap? An experimental investigation of vague predicates. Presented at Szklarska Poręba Workshop, 11th, Szrenica, Pol. [Google Scholar]
  94. Solt S, Gotzner N. 2012. Experimenting with degree. Proceedings of the 22nd Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference Chereches A. 166–87 Ithaca, NY: CLC Publ. [Google Scholar]
  95. Sorensen R. 2013. Vagueness. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Zalta EN. Winter 2013 ed. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2013/entries/vagueness/ [Google Scholar]
  96. Stephenson T. 2007. Judge dependence, epistemic modals, and predicates of personal taste. Linguist. Philos. 30:487–525 [Google Scholar]
  97. Syrett K, Kennedy C, Lidz J. 2010. Meaning and context in children’s understanding of gradable adjectives. J. Semant. 27:1–35 [Google Scholar]
  98. Toledo A, Sassoon GW. 2011. Absolute vs. relative adjectives: variance within vs. between individuals. Proceedings of the 21st Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference Ashton N, Chereches A, Lutz D. 135–54 Ithaca, NY: CLC Publ. [Google Scholar]
  99. Tribushinina E. 2011. Once again on norms and comparison classes. Linguistics 49:525–53 [Google Scholar]
  100. Tversky A. 1977. Features of similarity. Psychol. Rev. 84:327–52 [Google Scholar]
  101. Tversky A, Kahneman D. 1983. Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychol. Rev. 90:293–315 [Google Scholar]
  102. Tye M. 1994. Sorites paradoxes and the semantics of vagueness. Philosophical Perspectives, Vol. 8: Logic and Language Tomberlin JE. 189–206 Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview [Google Scholar]
  103. van Deemter K. 2009. Utility and language generation: the case of vagueness. J. Philos. Log. 38:607–32 [Google Scholar]
  104. van Deemter K. 2010. Not Exactly: In Praise of Vagueness Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  105. Van der Henst JB, Carles L, Sperber D. 2002. Truthfulness and relevance in telling the time. Mind Lang. 81:457–66 [Google Scholar]
  106. van Rooij R. 2011a. Implicit versus explicit comparatives. See Égré & Klinedinst 2011, pp. 51–72 [Google Scholar]
  107. van Rooij R. 2011b. Vagueness and linguistics. Vagueness: A Guide Ronzitti G. 123–70 Dordrecht, Neth.: Springer [Google Scholar]
  108. Varzi AC. 2001. Vagueness in geography. Philos. Geogr. 4:49–65 [Google Scholar]
  109. von Stechow A. 1984. Comparing semantic theories of comparison. J. Semant. 3:1–77 [Google Scholar]
  110. von Stechow A. 2009. The temporal degree adjectives früh(er)/spät(er) ‘early(er)’/‘late(r)’ and the semantics of the positive. In Quantification, Definiteness, and Nominalization Giannakidou A, Rathert M. 214–33 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  111. Williamson T. 1994. Vagueness London: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  112. Wittgenstein L. 1953. Philosophical Investigations Oxford, UK: Blackwell [Google Scholar]
  113. Wright C. 1975. On the coherence of vague predicates. Synthese 30:325–65 [Google Scholar]
  114. Zadeh L. 1975. The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. I. Inf. Sci. 8:199–249 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-linguist-030514-125150
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error