Computational Phylogenetics

Literature Cited

1. Andersen H. 2006. Synchrony, diachrony, and evolution. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 279 Competing Models of Linguistic Change. Evolution and Beyond ON Thomsen 59–90 Amsterdam: Benjamins [Google Scholar]
2. Atkinson QD, Gray RD. 2005. Curious parallels and curious connections—phylogenetic thinking in biology and historical linguistics. Syst. Biol. 54:513–26 [Google Scholar]
3. Atkinson QD, Gray RD. 2006. How old is the Indo-European language family? Illumination or more moths to the flame. Phylogenetic Methods and the Prehistory of Languages P Forster, C Renfrew 91–109 Cambridge, UK: McDonald Inst. Archaeol. Res. [Google Scholar]
4. Atkinson QD, Nicholls G, Welch D, Gray RD. 2005. From words to dates: water into wine, mathemagic or phylogenetic inference?. Trans. Philol. Soc. 103:193–219 [Google Scholar]
5. Baum D. 2008. Reading a phylogenetic tree: the meaning of monophyletic groups. Nat. Educ. 1:190 [Google Scholar]
6. Biberauer T, Holmberg A, Roberts I, Sheehan M. 2014. Complexity in comparative syntax: the view from modern parametric theory. Measuring Grammatical Complexity LB Preston, FJ Newmeyer 103–27 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
7. Black P. 1997. Lexicostatistics and Australian languages: problems and prospects. Boundary Rider: Essays in Honour of Geoffrey O'Grady T Tryon, M Walsh 51–69 Canberra: Res. Sch. Pac. Asian Stud. [Google Scholar]
8. Blench R. 2015. ‘New mathematical methods’ in linguistics constitute the greatest intellectual fraud in the discipline since Chomsky Presented at Max Planck Inst. Psycholinguist., Nijmegen, Neth. [Google Scholar]
9. Blevins J. 2004. Evolutionary Phonology: The Emergence of Sound Patterns Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
10. Botero CA, Gardner B, Kirby KR, Bulbulia J, Gavin MC, Gray RD. 2014. The ecology of religious beliefs. PNAS 111:16784–89 [Google Scholar]
11. Bouchard-Côté A, Hall D, Griffiths TL, Klein D. 2013. Automated reconstruction of ancient languages using probabilistic models of sound change. PNAS 110:4224–29 [Google Scholar]
12. Bouckaert R, Lemey P, Dunn M, Greenhill SJ, Alekseyenko AV. et al. 2012. Mapping the origins and expansion of the Indo-European language family. Science 337:957–60 [Google Scholar]
13. Bowern C. 2012. The riddle of Tasmanian languages. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 279:4590–95 [Google Scholar]
14. Bowern C. 2017. The Indo-European controversy and Bayesian phylogenetic methods. Diachronica 34:421–36 [Google Scholar]
15. Bowern C, Atkinson Q. 2012. Computational phylogenetics and the internal structure of Pama-Nyungan. Language 88:817–45 [Google Scholar]
16. Bowern C, Epps P, Gray R, Hill J, Hunley K. et al. 2011. Does lateral transmission obscure inheritance in hunter-gatherer languages?. PLOS ONE 6:e25195 [Google Scholar]
17. Bryant D, Filimon F, Gray R. 2005. Untangling our past: languages, trees, splits and networks. The Evolution of Cultural Diversity: Phylogenetic Approaches R Mace, C Holden, S Shennan 69–85 London: UCL Press [Google Scholar]
18. Campbell L, Poser WJ. 2008. Language Classification: History and Method Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
19. Croft W. 2008. Evolutionary linguistics. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 37:219–54 [Google Scholar]
20. Crowley T, Bowern C. 2010. An Introduction to Historical Linguistics Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
21. Darwin C. 1859. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life London: John Murray [Google Scholar]
22. Dediu D. 2011. A Bayesian phylogenetic approach to estimating the stability of linguistic features and the genetic biasing of tone. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 278:474–79 [Google Scholar]
23. Dediu D, Cysouw M. 2013. Some structural aspects of language are more stable than others: a comparison of seven methods. PLOS ONE 8:e55009 [Google Scholar]
24. Donohue M, Denham T. 2011. Languages and genes attest different histories in Island Southeast Asia. Ocean. Linguist. 50:536–42 [Google Scholar]
25. Dunn M. 2015. Language phylogenies. The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics C Bowern, B Evans 190–211 Oxford, UK: Routledge [Google Scholar]
26. Dunn M, Greenhill SJ, Levinson SC, Gray RD. 2011. Evolved structure of language shows lineage-specific trends in word-order universals. Nature 473:79–82 [Google Scholar]
27. Dunn M, Levinson SC, Lindström E, Reesink G, Terrill A. 2008. Structural phylogeny in historical linguistics: methodological explorations applied in Island Melanesia. Language 84:710–59 [Google Scholar]
28. Dunn M, Terrill A, Reesink G, Foley RA, Levinson SC. 2005. Structural phylogenetics and the reconstruction of ancient language history. Science 309:2072–75 [Google Scholar]
29. Dyen I, Kruskal JB, Black P. 1992. An Indoeuropean classification: a lexicostatistical experiment. Trans. Am. Philos. Soc. 82:iii–132 [Google Scholar]
30. Gray RD, Drummond AJ, Greenhill SJ. 2009. Language phylogenies reveal expansion pulses and pauses in Pacific settlement. Science 323:479–83 [Google Scholar]
31. Gray RD, Greenhill SJ, Atkinson Q. 2013. Phylogenetic models of language change: three new questions. Cultural Evolution: Society, Technology, Language, and Religion PJ Richerson, MH Christiansen 285–300 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
32. Gray RD, Greenhill SJ, Ross RM. 2007. The pleasures and perils of Darwinizing culture (with phylogenies). Biol. Theory 2:360–75 [Google Scholar]
33. Gray RD, Jordan FM. 2000. Language trees support the express-train sequence of Austronesian expansion. Nature 405:1052–55 [Google Scholar]
34. Greenhill SJ, Atkinson QD, Meade A, Gray RD. 2010. The shape and tempo of language evolution. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 277:2443–50 [Google Scholar]
35. Greenhill SJ, Currie TE, Gray RD. 2009. Does horizontal transmission invalidate cultural phylogenies?. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 276:2299–306 [Google Scholar]
36. Greenhill SJ, Gray RD. 2009. Austronesian language phylogenies: myths and misconceptions about Bayesian computational methods. Austronesian Historical Linguistics and Culture History: A Festschrift for Robert Blust A Adelaar, A Pawley 375–97 Canberra: Pac. Linguist. [Google Scholar]
37. Greenhill SJ, Gray RD. 2012. Basic vocabulary and Bayesian phylolinguistics: issues of understanding and representation. Diachronica 29:523–37 [Google Scholar]
38. Guy JBM. 2007. Lexicostatistics as chess: observations on Paul Black's ‘Lexicostatistics with Massive Borrowing’. Aust. J. Linguist. 27:73–75 [Google Scholar]
39. Hale M. 1998. Diachronic syntax. Syntax 1:1–18 [Google Scholar]
40. Haspelmath M, Tadmor U. 2009. Loanwords in the World's Languages: A Comparative Handbook Berlin: de Gruyter [Google Scholar]
41. Holden CJ. 2002. Bantu language trees reflect the spread of farming across sub-Saharan Africa: a maximum-parsimony analysis. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 269:793–99 [Google Scholar]
42. Hruschka DJ, Branford S, Smith E, Wilkins J, Meade A. et al. 2014. Detecting regular sound changes in linguistics as events of concerted evolution. Curr. Biol. 25:1–9 [Google Scholar]
43. Jordan FM. 2013. Comparative phylogenetic methods and the study of pattern and process in kinship. Kinship Systems: Change and Reconstructions P McConvell, I Keen, R Hendery 43–58 Salt Lake City: Univ. Utah Press [Google Scholar]
44. Jordan FM, Huber BR. 2013. Evolutionary approaches to cross-cultural anthropology. Cross-Cult. Res. 47:91–101 [Google Scholar]
45. Kirby S. 1998. Fitness and the selective adaptation of language. Approaches to the Evolution of Language: Social and Cognitive Bases J Hurford, M Studdert-Kennedy, C Knight 359–83 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
46. Kushnik G, Gray RD, Jordan FM. 2014. The sequential evolution of land tenure norms. Evol. Hum. Behav. 35:309–18 [Google Scholar]
47. Ladd DR, Roberts SG, Dediu D. 2015. Correlational studies in typological and historical linguistics. Annu. Rev. Linguist. 1:221–41 [Google Scholar]
48. Laland KN, Sterelny K. 2006. Perspective: seven reasons (not) to neglect niche construction. Evolution 60:1751–62 [Google Scholar]
49. Levinson SC, Gray RD. 2012. Tools from evolutionary biology shed new light on the diversification of languages. Trends Cogn. Sci. 16:167–73 [Google Scholar]
50. Lewontin R. 1970. The units of selection. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1:1–18 [Google Scholar]
51. Lightfoot D. 2002. Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
52. List JM. 2011. Multiple sequence alignment in historical linguistics: a sound class based approach. Proc. ConSOLE 19:241–60 [Google Scholar]
53. List JM, Greenhill SJ, Gray RD, Hautes E. 2017. The potential of automatic word comparison for historical linguistics. PLOS ONE 12:e0170046 [Google Scholar]
54. Longobardi G, Guardiano C. 2009. Evidence for syntax as a signal of historical relatedness. Lingua 119:1679–706 [Google Scholar]
55. Matisoff JA. 1990. On megalocomparison. Language 66:106–20 [Google Scholar]
56. Mesoudi A. 2011. Cultural Evolution: How Darwinian Theory Can Explain Human Culture and Synthesize the Social Sciences Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
57. Nunn CL. 2011. The Comparative Approach in Evolutionary Anthropology and Biology Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
58. Pagel M, Atkinson QD, Calude AS, Meade A. 2013. Ultraconserved words point to deep language ancestry across Eurasia. PNAS 110:8471–76 [Google Scholar]
59. Pagel M, Meade A. 2004. A phylogenetic mixture model for detecting pattern-heterogeneity in gene sequence or character-state data. Syst. Biol. 53:571–81 [Google Scholar]
60. Pereltsvaig A, Lewis MW. 2015. The Indo-European Controversy Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
61. Rama T, Wahle J, Sofroniev P, Jäger G. 2017. Fast and unsupervised methods for multilingual cognate clustering. arXiv:1702.04938 [cs.CL]
62. Richerson PJ, Boyd R, Bettinger RL. 2001. Was agriculture impossible during the Pleistocene but mandatory during the Holocene? A climate change hypothesis. Am. Antiq. 66:387–411 [Google Scholar]
63. Steiner L, Stadler PF, Cysouw M. 2011. A pipeline for computational historical linguistics. Lang. Dyn. Change 1:89–127 [Google Scholar]
64. Sterelny K. 2006. The evolution and evolvability of culture. Mind Lang 21:137–65 [Google Scholar]
65. Thomason SG, Kaufman T. 1988. Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press [Google Scholar]
66. Towner MC, Grote MN, Venti J, Borgerhoff Mulder M. 2012. Cultural macroevolution on neighbor graphs. Hum. Nat. 23:283–305 [Google Scholar]
67. Wedel AB. 2006. Exemplar models, evolution and language change. Linguist. Rev. 23:247–74 [Google Scholar]
68. Wichmann S, Rama T, Holman EW. 2011. Phonological diversity, word length, and population sizes across languages: the ASJP evidence. Linguist. Typol. 15:177–98 [Google Scholar]