1932

Abstract

Distributivity in natural language occurs in sentences such as , when a predicate that is combined with a plurality-denoting expression is understood as holding of each of the members of that plurality. Language provides ways to express distributivity overtly, with words such as English , but also covertly, when no one word can be regarded as contributing it. Both overt and covert distributivity occur in a wide variety of constructions. This article reviews and synthesizes influential approaches to distributivity in formal semantics and includes pointers to some more recent approaches. Theories of distributivity can be distinguished on the basis of how they answer a number of interrelated questions: To what extent can distributivity be attributed to what we know about the world, as opposed to the meanings of words or silent operators? What is the relationship between distributivity and plurality? Does distributivity always reach down to the singular individuals in a plurality? If not, under what circumstances is distributivity over subgroups possible, and what is its relation to distributivity over individuals?

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011718-012528
2019-01-14
2024-06-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/linguistics/5/1/annurev-linguistics-011718-012528.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011718-012528&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Bach E 1986. The algebra of events. Linguist. Philos. 15:5–16
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Balusu R, Jayaseelan KA 2013. Distributive quantification by reduplication in Dravidian. Strategies of Quantification S Harlow60–86 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Barker C 1992. Group terms in English: representing groups as atoms. J. Semant. 9:69–93
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bartsch R 1973. The semantics and syntax of number and numbers. Syntax Semant. 2:51–93
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Beck S 2012. Pluractional comparisons. Linguist. Philos. 35:57–110
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Beck S, Sauerland U 2000. Cumulation is needed: a reply to Winter 2000. Nat. Lang. Semant. 8:349–71
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bennett MR 1974. Some extensions of a Montague fragment of English PhD thesis, Univ. Calif., Los Angel.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Brasoveanu A 2011. Sentence-internal different as quantifier-internal anaphora. Linguist. Philos. 34:93–168
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Brisson C 2003. Plurals, all, and the nonuniformity of collective predication. Linguist. Philos. 26:129–84
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bumford D, Barker C 2013. Association with distributivity and the problem of multiple antecedents for singular different. Linguist. Philos. 36:355–69
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Cabredo Hofherr P, Laca B, ed 2012. Verbal Plurality and Distributivity Berlin: de Gruyter
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Champollion L 2015. Stratified reference: the common core of distributivity, aspect, and measurement. Theor. Linguist. 41:109–49
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Champollion L 2016.a Covert distributivity in algebraic event semantics. Semant. Pragmat. 9:15
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Champollion L 2016.b Overt distributivity in algebraic event semantics. Semant. Pragmat. 9:16
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Champollion L 2017. Parts of a Whole: Distributivity as a Bridge Between Aspect and Measurement Oxford Stud. Theor. Linguist. vol. 66. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Champollion L Distributivity, collectivity and cumulativity. Wiley's Companion to Semantics D Gutzmann, L Matthewson, C Meier, H Rullmann, TE Zimmermann Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Forthcoming
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Champollion L, Krifka M 2016. Mereology. Cambridge Handbook of Formal Semantics M Aloni, P Dekker369–88 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Chierchia G 1998. Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of ‘semantic parameter. Events and Grammar S Rothstein53–104 Stud. Linguist. Philos. vol. 70. Dordrecht, Neth.: Kluwer
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Chierchia G 2010. Mass nouns, vagueness and semantic variation. Synthese 174:99–149
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Choe JW 1987. Anti-quantifiers and a theory of distributivity PhD thesis, Univ. Mass., Amherst
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Davidson D 1967. The logical form of action sentences. The Logic of Decision and Action N Rescher81–95 Pittsburgh, PA: Univ. Pittsburgh Press
    [Google Scholar]
  22. de Koster A, Dotlačil J, Spenader J 2017. Children's understanding of distributivity and adjectives of comparison. Proceedings of the 41st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD 41) M LaMendola, J Scott373–86 Somerville, MA: Cascadilla
    [Google Scholar]
  23. de Vries H 2015. Shifting sets, hidden atoms: the semantics of distributivity, plurality and animacy PhD thesis, Utrecht Univ., Utrecht, Neth.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. de Vries H 2017. Two kinds of distributivity. Nat. Lang. Semant. 25:173–97
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Dotlačil J 2010. Anaphora and distributivity: a study of same, different, reciprocals and othersPhD thesis, Utrecht Univ., Utrecht, Neth.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Dotlačil J 2012. Binominal each as an anaphoric determiner: compositional analysis. Sinn und Bedeutung 16 A Aguilar Guevara, A Chernilovskaya, R Nouwen211–24 Cambridge, MA: MIT Work. Pap. Linguist.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Dotlačil J 2013. Reciprocals distribute over information states. J. Semant. 30:423–77
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Eckardt R 1998. Adverbs, Events, and Other Things Linguist. Arb. vol. 379. Tübingen, Ger.: Niemeyer
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Filip H, Carlson GN 2001. Distributivity strengthens reciprocity, collectivity weakens it. Linguist. Philos. 24:417–66
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Frazier L, Pacht JM, Rayner K 1999. Taking on semantic commitments. II. Collective versus distributive readings. Cognition 70:87–104
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Gillon BS 1987. The readings of plural noun phrases in English. Linguist. Philos. 10:199–219
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Gillon BS 1990. Plural noun phrases and their readings: a reply to Lasersohn. Linguist. Philos. 13:477–85
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Glass L 2018.a Deriving the distributivity potential of adjectives via measurement theory. Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America P Farrell Washington, DC: Linguist. Soc. Am. 14 pp.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Glass L 2018.b Distributivity, lexical semantics, and world knowledge PhD thesis, Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Groenendijk J, Janssen T, Stokhof M, ed 1984. Truth, Interpretation and Information: Selected Papers from the 3rd Amsterdam Colloquium Dordrecht, Neth.: Foris
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Hausser R 1974. Quantification in an extended Montague grammar PhD thesis, Univ. Tex., Austin
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Heim I 1994. Plurals Lecture notes, MIT, Cambridge, MA. http://www.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/∼astechow/Lehre/SS08/Heim_Plurals%20%2794.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Heim I, Kratzer A 1998. Semantics in Generative Grammar Oxford, UK: Blackwell
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Henderson RM 2014. Dependent indefinites and their post-suppositions. Semant. Pragmat. 7:1–58
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Heycock C, Zamparelli R 2005. Friends and colleagues: plurality, coordination, and the structure of DP. Nat. Lang. Semant. 13:201–70
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Hoeksema J 1983. Plurality and conjunction. Studies in Modeltheoretic Semantics AGB ter Meulen63–83 Dordrecht, Neth.: Foris
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Keenan EL, Faltz LM 1985. Boolean Semantics for Natural Language Dordrecht, Neth.: Kluwer
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Kratzer A 2008. On the plurality of verbs. Event Structures in Linguistic Form and Interpretation J Dölling, T Heyde-Zybatow, M Schäfer269–300 Berlin: de Gruyter
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Krifka M 1989. Nominalreferenz und Zeitkonstitution: Zur Semantik von Massentermen, Pluraltermen und Aspektklassen Munich, Ger.: Wilhelm Fink
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Krifka M 1998. The origins of telicity. Events and Grammar S Rothstein197–235 Stud. Linguist. Philos. vol. 70. Dordrecht, Neth.: Kluwer
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Križ M 2015. Aspects of homogeneity in the semantics of natural language PhD thesis, Univ. Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Križ M 2016. Homogeneity, non-maximality, and all. J. Semant. 33:493–539
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Kuhn J 2015. Cross-categorial singular and plural reference in sign language PhD thesis, NYU, New York
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Landman F 1989.a Groups. I. Linguist. Philos. 12:559–605
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Landman F 1989.b Groups. II. Linguist. Philos. 12:723–44
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Landman F 1996. Plurality. Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory S Lappin425–57 Oxford, UK: Blackwell
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Landman F 2000. Events and Plurality: The Jerusalem Lectures Dordrecht, Neth.: Kluwer
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Lasersohn P 1989. On the readings of plural noun phrases. Linguist. Inq. 20:130–34
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Lasersohn P 1990. Group action and spatio-temporal proximity. Linguist. Philos. 13:179–206
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Lasersohn P 1995. Plurality, Conjunction and Events Dordrecht, Neth.: Kluwer
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Lasersohn P 1998. Generalized distributivity operators. Linguist. Philos. 21:83–93
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Lasersohn P 1999. Pragmatic halos. Language 75:522–51
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Lasersohn P 2011. Mass nouns and plurals. Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning C Maienborn, K von Heusinger, P Portner1131–53 Berlin: de Gruyter
    [Google Scholar]
  59. LaTerza C 2014.a Distributivity and plural anaphora PhD thesis, Univ. Md., College Park
    [Google Scholar]
  60. LaTerza C 2014.b Local plural anaphora as sub-event distributivity. Proceedings of the 32nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 32) U Steindl, T Borer, H Fang, AG Pardo, P Guekguezian141–48 Somerville, MA: Cascadilla
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Leśniewski S 1916. Podstawy Ogólnej Teorii Mnogości [Foundations of a General Theory of Manifolds] Moscow: Prace Polskiego Koła Nauk. Moskw.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Link G 1983. The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: a lattice-theoretical approach. Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language R Bäuerle, C Schwarze, A von Stechow303–23 Berlin: de Gruyter
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Link G 1984. Hydras. On the logic of relative clause constructions with multiple heads. Varieties of Formal Semantics F Landman, F Veltman245–57 Dordrecht, Neth.: Foris
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Link G 1987. Generalized quantifiers and plurals. Generalized Quantifiers P Gärdenfors151–80 Berlin: Springer
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Link G 1991. Plural. Semantik: Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung [Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research] A von Stechow, D Wunderlich418–40 Berlin: de Gruyter
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Link G 1998. Algebraic Semantics in Language and Philosophy Stanford, CA: Cent. Study Lang. Inf.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Lønning JT 1997. Plurals and collectivity. Handbook of Logic and Language J van Benthem, AGB ter Meulen 31009–53 Amsterdam: Elsevier
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Malamud SA 2012. The meaning of plural definites: a decision-theoretic approach. Semant. Pragmat. 5:1–58
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Moltmann F 1992. Reciprocals and same/different: towards a semantic analysis. Linguist. Philos. 15:411–62
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Moltmann F 1997. Parts and Wholes in Semantics Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Moltmann F 1998. Part structures, integrity, and the mass–count distinction. Synthese 116:75–111
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Moltmann F 2004. The semantics of together. Nat. Lang. Semant. 12:289–318
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Moltmann F 2005. Part structures in situations: the semantics of individual and whole. Linguist. Philos. 28:599–641
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Moltmann F 2016. Plural reference and reference to a plurality. Unity and Plurality M Carrara, A Arapinis, F Moltmann93–120 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Nouwen R 2016. Plurality. Cambridge Handbook of Formal Semantics M Aloni, P Dekker267–84 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Nunberg GD 1979. The non-uniqueness of semantic solutions: polysemy. Linguist. Philos. 3:143–84
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Oliver A, Smiley T 2016. Plural Logic Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Parsons T 1990. Events in the Semantics of English Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Partee BH, Rooth M 1983. Generalized conjunction and type ambiguity. Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language R Bäuerle, C Schwarze, A von Stechow361–83 Berlin: de Gruyter
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Pianesi F 2002. Book review: Friederike Moltmann, Parts and Wholes in Semantics. Linguist. Philos. 25:97–120
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Quine WV 1937. New foundations for mathematical logic. Am. Math. Mon. 44:70–80
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Roberts C 1987. Modal subordination, anaphora, and distributivity PhD thesis, Univ. Mass., Amherst
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Roberts C 1991. Distributivity & reciprocal distributivity. Proceedings of the 1st Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference (SALT 1) SK Moore, AZ Wyner209–29 Ithaca, NY: Cornell Linguist. Club
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Rothstein S 2010. Counting and the mass/count distinction. J. Semant. 27:343–97
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Scha R 1981. Distributive, collective and cumulative quantification. Formal Methods in the Study of Language J Groenendijk, T Janssen, M Stokhof483–512 Amsterdam: Math. Cent. Tracts
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Schein B 1993. Plurals and Events Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Schein B 2008. Plurals. Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language E Lepore, BC Smith716–67 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Schwarzschild R 1991. On the meaning of definite plural noun phrases PhD thesis, Univ. Mass., Amherst
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Schwarzschild R 1994. Plurals, presuppositions and the sources of distributivity. Nat. Lang. Semant. 2:201–48
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Schwarzschild R 1996. Pluralities Stud. Linguist. Philos. vol. 61. Dordrecht, Neth.: Kluwer
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Schwarzschild R 2011. Stubborn distributivity, multiparticipant nouns and the count/mass distinction. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS 39) S Lima, K Mullin, B Smith661–78 Amherst, MA: Grad. Linguist. Stud. Assoc.
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Scontras G, Goodman ND 2017. Resolving uncertainty in plural predication. Cognition 168:294–311
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Spector B 2007. Aspects of the pragmatics of plural morphology: on higher-order implicatures. Presupposition and Implicature in Compositional Semantics U Sauerland, P Stateva243–81 London: Palgrave
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Sternefeld W 1998. Reciprocity and cumulative predication. Nat. Lang. Semant. 6:303–37
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Syrett K, Musolino J 2013. Collectivity, distributivity, and the interpretation of plural numerical expressions in child and adult language. Lang. Acquis. 20:259–91
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Szabolcsi A 2010. Quantification Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Vaillette N 2001. Flexible summativity: a type-logical approach to plural semantics. OSU Work. Pap. Linguist. 56:135–57
    [Google Scholar]
  98. van den Berg MH 1996. Some aspects of the internal structure of discourse PhD thesis, Univ. Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Neth.
    [Google Scholar]
  99. van Rooij R 2003. Questioning to resolve decision problems. Linguist. Philos. 26:727–63
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Varzi AC 2016. Mereology. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy EN Zalta Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Winter ed.
    [Google Scholar]
  101. Winter Y 2000. Distributivity and dependency. Nat. Lang. Semant. 8:27–69
    [Google Scholar]
  102. Winter Y 2001. Flexibility Principles in Boolean Semantics: The Interpretation of Coordination, Plurality, and Scope in Natural Language Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
    [Google Scholar]
  103. Winter Y 2017. Critical typicality: truth judgements and compositionality with plurals and other gradable concepts. Compositionality and Concepts in Linguistics and Psychology JA Hampton, Y Winter163–90 Berlin: Springer
    [Google Scholar]
  104. Winter Y, Scha R 2015. Plurals. Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory S Lappin, C Fox77–113 Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. 2nd ed.
    [Google Scholar]
  105. Zimmermann M 2002. Boys buying two sausages each: on the syntax and semantics of distance-distributivity PhD thesis, Univ. Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Neth.
    [Google Scholar]
  106. Zucchi S, White M 2001. Twigs, sequences and the temporal constitution of predicates. Linguist. Philos. 24:223–70
    [Google Scholar]
  107. Zweig E 2009. Number-neutral bare plurals and the multiplicity implicature. Linguist. Philos. 32:353–407
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011718-012528
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error