1932

Abstract

Understanding the relationship between language change and variation has progressed considerably over the last several decades, but less is known about how speakers at different life stages deal with ongoing change in their speech communities. Longitudinal studies of individuals and groups reveal three trajectory types postadolescence: stability (the most common), adopting (to some degree) a change led by younger people (the next most common trajectory), or swimming against the community current by reverting to an older pattern in later life (the least common trajectory). Declining plasticity over the life course places limits on possible trajectories, which are also subject to social and cultural influences. This article reviews relevant studies from historical linguistics as well as panel studies on African American English and dialect contact, proposing that future progress will be made by interdisciplinary research combining psycholinguistic and sociolinguistic perspectives. Lifespan trajectories in situations of community stability are also discussed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011817-045438
2018-01-14
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/linguistics/4/1/annurev-linguistics-011817-045438.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011817-045438&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Arnaud R. 1979. Regard sur la variation syntaxique: La forme progressive dans la correspondance de George Eliot (1838–1880). Cah. Charles V 1:105–18 [Google Scholar]
  2. Arnaud R. 1982. On the progress of the progressive in the private correspondence of famous British people (1800–1880). Papers from the 2nd Scandinavian Symposium on Syntactic Variation S Jacobson 83–94 Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell [Google Scholar]
  3. Arnaud R. 1998. The development of the progressive in 19th century English: a quantitative survey. Lang. Var. Change 10:123–52 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bailey G. 1993. A perspective on African American English. American Dialect Research D Preston 287–318 Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins [Google Scholar]
  5. Bailey G. 2001. Real and apparent time. The Handbook of Language Variation and Change JK Chambers, P Trudgill, N Schilling-Estes 312–32 Oxford, UK: Blackwell [Google Scholar]
  6. Bailey G, Maynor N. 1987. Decreolization?. Lang. Soc. 16:449–73 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bailey G, Wikle T, Tillery J, Sand L. 1991. The apparent time construct. Lang. Var. Change 3:241–164 [Google Scholar]
  8. Baugh J. 1995. Dimensions of a theory of econolinguistics. Towards a Social Science of Language G Guy, C Feagin, D Schiffrin, J Baugh 1397–419 Philadelphia: Benjamins [Google Scholar]
  9. Becker K. 2010. Regional dialect features on the Lower East Side of New York City: sociophonetics, ethnicity, and identity PhD thesis NYU New York:
  10. Benmamoun E, Montrul S, Polinsky M. 2013. Heritage languages and their speakers: opportunities and challenges for linguistics. Theor. Linguist. 39:129–81 [Google Scholar]
  11. Blondeau H. 2001. Real-time changes in the paradigm of personal pronouns in Montreal French. J. Socioling. 5:453–74 [Google Scholar]
  12. Blondeau H. 2017. Longitudinal studies in sociolinguistics and SLA: bridging two parallel routes. Wagner & Buchstaller 2017 256–78
  13. Blondeau H, Sankoff G, Charity A. 2002. Parcours individuels dans deux changements linguistiques en cours en français montréalais. Rev. Québ. Linguist. 31:13–38 [Google Scholar]
  14. Boberg C. 2004. Real and apparent time in language change: late adoption of changes in Montreal English. Am. Speech 79:250–69 [Google Scholar]
  15. Bowie D. 2005. Language change over the lifespan: a test of the apparent time construct. Univ. Pa. Work. Pap. Linguist. 11:45–58 [Google Scholar]
  16. Buchstaller I. 2013. Quotatives: New Trends and Sociolinguistic Implications Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell
  17. Buchstaller I. 2015. Exploring linguistic malleability across the life span: age-specific patterns in quotative use. Lang. Soc. 44:457–96 [Google Scholar]
  18. Cameron R. 2005. Aging and gendering. Lang. Soc. 34:23–61 [Google Scholar]
  19. Cameron R. 2011. Aging, age, and sociolinguistics. The Handbook of Hispanic Sociolinguistics M Díaz-Campos 207–29 Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell [Google Scholar]
  20. Carvalho AM. 2004. I speak like the guys on TV: palatalization and the urbanization of Uruguayan Portuguese. Lang. Var. Change 16:127–51 [Google Scholar]
  21. Castañeda R-M. 2016. The sociolinguistic evolution of a sound change. J. Port. Linguist. 15:1–20 [Google Scholar]
  22. Cedergren HJ. 1988. The spread of language change: verifying inferences of linguistic diffusion. Language Spread and Language Policy: Issues, Implications and Case Studies PH Lowenberg 45–60 Washington, DC: Georgetown Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  23. Chambers JK. 1992. Dialect acquisition. Language68.673–706
  24. Chambers JK. 2003. Sociolinguistic Theory: Linguistic Variation and Its Social Significance Oxford, UK/Malden, MA: Blackwell
  25. Cieri C, Yaeger Dror M. 2017. Alternative sources of panel study data: opportunities, caveats and suggestions. Wagner & Buchstaller 2017 53–72
  26. Cukor-Avila P. 2002. She say, she go, she be like: verbs of quotation over time in African American Vernacular English. Am. Speech 77:3–31 [Google Scholar]
  27. Cukor-Avila P. 2012. Some structural consequences of diffusion. Lang. Soc. 41:615–40 [Google Scholar]
  28. Cukor-Avila P, Bailey G. 1996. The spread of urban AAVE: a case study. Sociolinguistic Variation: Data, Theory, and Analysis. Selected Papers from NWAV-23 at Stanford J Arnold, R Blake, B Davidson, S Schwenter, J Solomon 469–85 Stanford, CA: Cent. Study Lang. Inf. [Google Scholar]
  29. Cukor-Avila P, Bailey G. 2011. The interaction of transmission and diffusion in the spread of linguistic forms. Univ. Pa. Work. Pap. Linguist. 17.2:41–49 [Google Scholar]
  30. Cukor-Avila P, Bailey G. 2017. The effect of small Ns and gaps in contact on panel survey data. Wagner & Buchstaller 2017 181–212
  31. De Decker P. 2006. A real-time investigation of social and phonetic changes in post-adolescence. Univ. Pa. Work. Pap. Linguist. 12:65–76 [Google Scholar]
  32. Dodsworth R. 2017. Migration and dialect contact. Annu. Rev. Linguist. 3:331–46 [Google Scholar]
  33. Eckert P. 1997. Age as a sociolinguistic variable. Handbook of Sociolinguistics F Coulmas 151–67 Oxford, UK: Blackwell [Google Scholar]
  34. Eckert P. 2011. Language and power in the pre-adolescent marketplace. Am. Speech 86:85–99 [Google Scholar]
  35. Fruehwald J. 2017. Generations, lifespans, and the zeitgeist. Lang. Var. Change 29:1–27 [Google Scholar]
  36. Giles H. 2015. Communication accommodation theory. International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy KB Jensen, RT Craig, J Pooley, E Rothenbuhler 1260–66 Oxford, UK: Wiley [Google Scholar]
  37. Gregersen F, Maegaard M, Pharao N. 2009. The long and short of (ae)-variation in Danish: a panel study of short (ae)-variants in Danish in real time. Acta Linguist. Hafniensia 41:64–82 [Google Scholar]
  38. Grossman M. 2018. Linguistic aspects of primary progressive aphasia. Annu. Rev. Linguist. 4: In press [Google Scholar]
  39. Hamid M. 2017. “Fresh Air” interview: From refugees to politics, Mohsin Hamid writes the change he wants to see. Philadelphia, WHYY radio broadcast March 8. http://www.npr.org/2017/03/08/519217991/from-refugees-to-politics-mohsin-hamid-writes-the-change-he-wants-to-see [Google Scholar]
  40. Harrington J. 2006. An acoustic analysis of ‘happy-tensing’ in the Queen's Christmas broadcasts. J. Phon. 34:439–57 [Google Scholar]
  41. Hazen K, Hamilton S. 2008. A dialect turned inside out: migration and the Appalachian diaspora. J. Engl. Linguist. 36:105–28 [Google Scholar]
  42. Johnson DE. 2009. Stability and Change Across a Dialect Boundary: The Low Vowels of Southeastern New England Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  43. Johnson JS, Newport EL. 1989. Critical period efforts in second-language learning: the influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cogn. Psychol. 21:60–99 [Google Scholar]
  44. Kataoka K, Asahi Y. 2015. Synchronic and diachronic variation in the use of spatial frames of reference: an analysis of Japanese route instructions. J. Socioling. 19:133–60 [Google Scholar]
  45. Kerswill P. 1996. Children, adolescents, and language change. Lang. Var. Change 8:177–202 [Google Scholar]
  46. Kerswill P, Williams A. 2000. Creating a new town koine: children and language change in Milton Keynes. Lang. Soc. 29:65–116 [Google Scholar]
  47. Kroll JF, Dussias PE, Bice K, Perrotti L. 2015. Bilingualism, mind, and brain. Annu. Rev. Linguist. 1:377–94 [Google Scholar]
  48. Kunnas N, Salo H, Sillanpää MJ. 2017. How do idiolects of old minority language speakers change? A case study of White Sea Karelian. Nord. J. Linguist. 40: In press [Google Scholar]
  49. Kurki T. 2004. Applying the apparent-time method and the real-time method on Finnish. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Language Variation in Europe (ICLaVE) B Gunnarsson 2241–52 Uppsala, Swed.: Dep. Scand. Lang., Uppsala Univ. [Google Scholar]
  50. Kwon S. 2014. Vowel change across Noam Chomsky's lifespan. Univ. Pa. Work. Pap. Linguist. 14:90–100 [Google Scholar]
  51. Labov W. 1972a. Sociolinguistic Patterns Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
  52. Labov W. 1972b. Language in the Inner City Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
  53. Labov W. 1975. On the use of the present to explain the past. Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of Linguists L Heilmann 825–51 Bologna, Italy: Il Mulino [Google Scholar]
  54. Labov W. 2001. Principles of Linguistic Change 2 Social Factors Oxford, UK: Blackwell
  55. Labov W. 2007. Transmission and diffusion. Language 83:344–87 [Google Scholar]
  56. MacKenzie L. 2017. Frequency effects over the lifespan: a case study of Attenborough's r's.. Linguist. Vanguard 4 In press [Google Scholar]
  57. Meisel J. 2001. The simultaneous acquisition of two first languages: early differentiation and subsequent development of grammars. Trends in Bilingual Acquisition J Cenoz, F Genesee 11–41 Amsterdam: Benjamins [Google Scholar]
  58. Nardy A, Chevrot J-P, Barbu S. 2014. Sociolinguistic convergence and social interactions within a group of preschoolers: a longitudinal study. Lang. Var. Change 26:273–301 [Google Scholar]
  59. Naro AJ, Scherre M. 2002. The individual and the community in real-time linguistic change: social dimensions Presented at 31st Conf. New Ways Anal. Var. (NWAV 31) Stanford Univ. Stanford, CA:
  60. Naro AJ, Scherre M. 2003. Estabilidade e mudança lingüística em tempo real: a concordância de número. Mudança lingüística em tempo real M De Paiva, ME Duarte 47–62 Rio de Janeiro: Capa [Google Scholar]
  61. Nevalainen T. 2015a. Age-related variation and language change in Early Modern English. Language Development: The Lifespan Perspective A Gerstenberg, A Voeste 129–46 Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins [Google Scholar]
  62. Nevalainen T. 2015b. Social networks and language change in Tudor and Stuart London—only connect?. Engl. Lang. Linguist. 19:269–92 [Google Scholar]
  63. Nevalainen T, Raumolin-Brunberg H. 2003. Historical Sociolinguistics: Language Change in Tudor and Stuart England London: Longman
  64. Nevalainen T, Raumolin-Brunberg H, Mannila H. 2011. The diffusion of language change in real time: progressive and conservative individuals and the time-depth of change. Lang. Var. Change 23:1–43 [Google Scholar]
  65. Newport EL. 1990. Maturational constraints on language learning. Cogn. Sci. 14:11–28 [Google Scholar]
  66. Nurmi A. 1996. Periphrastic do and be+ing: interconnected developments?. Sociolinguistics and Language History: Studies Based on the Corpus of Early English Correspondence T Nevalainen, H Raumolin-Brunberg 151–65 Amsterdam: Rodopi [Google Scholar]
  67. Nurmi A, Nevala M, Palander-Collin M. 2009. The Language of Daily Life in England Amsterdam: Benjamins
  68. Nycz J. 2013. Changing words or changing rules? Second dialect acquisition and phonological representation. J. Pragmat. 52:49–62 [Google Scholar]
  69. Nycz J. 2015. Second dialect acquisition: a sociophonetic perspective. Lang. Linguist. Compass 9:469–82 [Google Scholar]
  70. Palander M. 2005. Lapsuudesta keski-ikiiiin. Seuruututkimus itiisavolaisen yksilomurteen kehityksestii [From Childhood to Middle Age: A Longitudinal Study of the Development of an East-Savo Idiolect] Helsinki: Finn. Lit. Soc. (In Finnish) [Google Scholar]
  71. Palander M. 2006/2007. Changes in an idiolect from childhood to middle age. Linguist. Atl. 26/27:81–85 [Google Scholar]
  72. Paunonen H. 1996. Language change in apparent time and in real time: possessive constructions in Helsinki colloquial Finnish. Samspel och variation: Språkliga studier tillägnade Bengt Nordberg på 60-årsdagen375–86 Uppsala, Swed.: Inst. Nord. Språk, Uppsala Univ. [Google Scholar]
  73. Payne A. 1976. The acquisition of the phonological system of a second dialect PhD thesis Univ. Pa. Philadelphia:
  74. Polinsky M. 2016. Structure versus use in heritage language. Linguist. Vanguard 2:1–14 [Google Scholar]
  75. Poplack S, Dion N. 2009. Prescription versus praxis: the evolution of future temporal reference in French. Language 85:557–87 [Google Scholar]
  76. Raumolin-Brunberg H. 2005. Language change in adulthood: historical letters as evidence. Eur. J. Engl. Stud. 9:37–51 [Google Scholar]
  77. Raumolin-Brunberg H. 2009. Lifespan changes in the language of three early modern gentlemen. The Language of Daily Life in England (1450–1800) A Nurmi, M Nevala, M Palander-Collin 165–96 Amsterdam: Benjamins [Google Scholar]
  78. Raumolin-Brunberg H, Nevalainen T. 2007. From mine to my and thine to thy: the loss of the nasal in the first and second person possessives. Tracing English Through Time: Explorations in Language Variation U Smit, J Hüttner, G Kaltenböck, U Lutzky 303–14 Vienna: Braumüller [Google Scholar]
  79. Reubold U, Harrington J. 2017. The influence of age on estimating sound change acoustically from longitudinal data. In Wagner & Buchstaller 2017 129–52
  80. Rhodes R. 2012. Assessing the strength of non-contemporaneous forensic speech evidence PhD thesis Univ. York Heslington, UK:
  81. Rickford J. 2014. Stylistic variation in panel studies of language change in real time Presented at Methods Dialectol. Conf. Groningen, Neth.:
  82. Rickford J, McNair-Knox F. 1994. Addressee- and topic-influenced style shift: a quantitative sociolinguistic study. Perspectives on Register: Situating Register Variation Within Sociolinguistics D Biber, E Finegan 235–76 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  83. Rickford J, Price M. 2013. Girlz II women: age-grading, language change and stylistic variation. J. Socioling. 17:143–79 [Google Scholar]
  84. Sankoff G. 2004. Adolescents, young adults and the critical period: two case studies from ‘Seven Up’. Sociolinguistic Variation: Critical Reflections C Fought 121–39 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  85. Sankoff G. 2005. Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies in sociolinguistics. An International Handbook of the Science of Language and Society A Ulrich, N Dittmar, KJ Mattheier, P Trudgill 21003–13 Berlin: de Gruyter [Google Scholar]
  86. Sankoff G. 2006. Age: apparent time and real time. Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics K Brown 110–16 Boston: Elsevier [Google Scholar]
  87. Sankoff G. 2013. Longitudinal studies. The Oxford Handbook of Sociolinguistics R Bayley, R Cameron, C Lucas 261–81 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  88. Sankoff G. 2017a. Language change across the lifespan: three trajectory types Work. pap. Dep. Linguist., Univ. Pa. Philadelphia:
  89. Sankoff G. 2017b. Plenary address: Transmission revisited. Proceedings of the Georgetown University Round Table D. Lightfoot Washington, DC: Georgetown Univ. Press In press [Google Scholar]
  90. Sankoff G, Blondeau H. 2007. Language change across the lifespan: /r/ in Montreal French. Language 83:560–88 [Google Scholar]
  91. Sankoff G, Wagner S, Jensen L. 2012. The long tail of language change: Québécois French futures in real time. Univ. Pa. Work. Pap. Linguist. 18:106–16 [Google Scholar]
  92. Schmid M. 2014. The debate on maturational constraints in bilingual development: a perspective from first-language attrition. Lang. Acquis. 21:386–410 [Google Scholar]
  93. Shapp A, LaFave N, Singler JV. 2014. Ginsburg v. Ginsburg: a longitudinal study of regional features in a Supreme Court Justice's speech. Univ. Pa. Work. Pap. Linguist. 20:149–58 [Google Scholar]
  94. Siegel J. 2010. Second Dialect Acquisition Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  95. Smith J. 2015. Parenting style: from preschool to preadolescence in the acquisition of variation Presented at 44th Conf. New Ways Anal. Var. (NWAV 44) Toronto, Can.:
  96. Smith J, Durham M, Fortune L. 2007. “Mam, my trousers is fa'in doon!” Community, caregiver and child in the acquisition of variation in a Scottish dialect. Lang. Var. Change 19:63–99 [Google Scholar]
  97. Sorace A. 2000. Gradients in auxiliary selection with intransitive verbs. Language 76:859–90 [Google Scholar]
  98. Starks D, Bayard D. 2002. Individual variation in the acquisition of postvocalic /r/: day care and sibling order as potential variables. Am. Speech 77:184–94 [Google Scholar]
  99. Tagliamonte SA. 2012. Variationist Sociolinguistics: Change, Observation, Interpretation Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell
  100. Tagliamonte SA, D'Arcy A. 2009. Peaks beyond phonology: adolescence, incrementation, and language change. Language 85:58–108 [Google Scholar]
  101. Tagliamonte SA, Molfenter S. 2007. How'd you get that accent? Acquiring a second dialect of the same language. Lang. Soc. 36:649–75 [Google Scholar]
  102. Trudgill P. 1974. The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  103. Trudgill P. 1986. Dialects in Contact Oxford, UK/New York: Blackwell
  104. Van Hofwegen J. 2015. The development of African American English through childhood and adolescence. Oxford Handbook of African American Language S Lanehart 454–74 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  105. Van Hofwegen J, Wolfram W. 2010. Coming of age in African American English: a longitudinal study. J. Socioling. 14:427–55 [Google Scholar]
  106. Van Hofwegen J, Wolfram W. 2017. On the utility of composite indices in longitudinal language study: the case of African American language. In Wagner & Buchstaller 2017 73–98
  107. Wagner SE. 2008. Language change and stabilization in the transition from adolescence to adulthood PhD thesis Univ. Pa. Philadelphia:
  108. Wagner SE. 2012. Age grading in sociolinguistic theory. Lang. Linguist. Compass 6:371–82 [Google Scholar]
  109. Wagner SE, Sankoff G. 2011. Age grading in the Montréal inflected future. Lang. Var. Change 23:275–313 [Google Scholar]
  110. Wagner SE, Tagliamonte S. 2017. What makes a panel study work? Researcher and participant in real time. In Wagner & Buchstaller 2017 213–32
  111. Wagner SE, Buchstaller I. 2017. Panel Studies of Variation and Change New York: Routledge In press
  112. Weinreich U. 1968. Languages in Contact: Findings and Problems The Hague: Mouton
  113. Werker JF, Tees RC. 2005. Speech perception as a window for understanding plasticity and commitment in language systems of the brain. Dev. Psychobiol. 46:233–51 [Google Scholar]
  114. Zilles AMS. 2005. The development of a new pronoun: the linguistic and social embedding of a gente in Brazilian Portuguese. Lang. Var. Change 17:19–53 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011817-045438
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error