1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Vision Science
  4. Volume 7, 2021
  5. Article

Annual Review of Vision Science

Volume 7, 2021

Coming of Age in Science: Just Look?

Abstract

With Professor Patrick Cavanagh, I started the Harvard Vision Sciences Laboratory in 1990. Blessed with the largesse of a wealthy university, we occupied a very large common space. Here, students pursued their own projects in a uniquely cooperative and exciting scientific environment. The times were just right in the emerging and expanding field of vision science. With good thesis projects under their belt, most of the students went on to successful careers. However, my own coming of age in science did not have such a promising start. It only started well into my thirties when I joined the Smith Kettlewell Eye Research Institute in San Francisco. Providentially, it was there that I had the rare and unique opportunity to work closely and essentially only with peers (not students). Through these intense collaborations, I found my way as a scientist. Most of this account describes these formative years.

Keyword(s): autobiography, binocular vision, mid-level vision, perception, phenomenology, psychophysics, surface representation

[Erratum, Closure]

An erratum has been published for this article:
Erratum: Coming of Age in Science: Just Look?
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-vision-100419-120946
2021-09-15
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/vision/7/1/annurev-vision-100419-120946.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-vision-100419-120946&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Ayer AJ. 1936. Language,Truth and Logic London: Victor Gollancz Ltd.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bach-y-Rita P. 1967. Sensory plasticity: applications to a vision substitution system. Acta Neurol. Scand. 43:4417–26
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Balliet R, Nakayama K. 1978. Training of voluntary torsion. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 17:4303–14
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Barlow HB. 1953. Summation and inhibition in the frog's retina. J. Physiol. 119:169–88
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Barlow HB. 1956. Retinal noise and absolute threshold. JOSA 46:8634–39
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Barlow HB. 1961. Possible principles underlying the transformation of sensory messages. Sensory Commun 1:217–34
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Blakemore C, Campbell FW. 1969. On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images. J. Physiol. 203:1237–60.1
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Boeder P. 1957. An analysis of the general type of uniocular rotations. AMA Arch. Ophthalmol. 57:2200–6
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Bravo MJ, Nakayama K. 1992. The role of attention in different visual-search tasks. Percept. Psychophys. 51:5465–72
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Cavanagh P. 1992. Attention-based motion perception. Science 257:50761563–65
     [Google Scholar]
  11. De Valois RL, Albrecht DG, Thorell LG. 1982. Spatial frequency selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex. Vis. Res. 22:5545–59
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Donchin E, Lindsley DB. 1965. Visually evoked response correlates of perceptual masking and enhancement. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 19:4325–35
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Fehmi LG, Adkins JW, Lindsley DB. 1969. Electrophysiological correlates of visual perceptual masking in monkeys. Exp. Brain Res. 7:4299–316
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Feyerabend P. 1993. Against Method London: Verso, 3rd ed..
  15. Frost BJ, Nakayama K. 1983. Single visual neurons code opposing motion independent of direction. Science 220:4598744–45
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Gillam B, Blackburn S, Nakayama K. 1999. Stereopsis based on monocular gaps: metrical encoding of depth and slant without matching contours. Vis. Res. 39:3493–502
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Gillam B, Borsting E. 1988. The role of monocular regions in stereoscopic displays. Perception 17:5603–8
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Hesse JK, Tsao DY. 2016. Consistency of border-ownership cells across artificial stimuli, natural stimuli, and stimuli with ambiguous contours. J. Neurosci. 36:4411338–49
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN. 1960. Receptive fields of optic nerve fibres in the spider monkey. J. Physiol. 154:3572–80
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Johanson D, Edey MA. 1990. Lucy: The Beginnings of Humankind New York: Simon & Schuster
  21. Kaye M. 1978. Stereopsis without binocular correlation. Vis. Res. 18:81013–22
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Koenderink JJ. 2002. The head and the hands: guest editorial. Perception 31:517–20
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Koffka K. 1935. Principles of Gestalt Psychology London: Routledge
  24. Land MF. 1965. Image formation by a concave reflector in the eye of the scallop, Pectenmaximus. J. Physiol. 179:1138–53
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Land MF. 1971. Orientation by jumping spiders in the absence of visual feedback. J. Exp. Biol. 54:1119–39
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Loomis JM. 1974. Tactile letter recognition under different modes of stimulus presentation. Percept. Psychophys. 16:2401–8
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Maljkovic V, Nakayama K. 1994. Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features. Mem. Cogn. 22:6657–72
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Michotte A, Burke L. 1951. Une nouvelle énigme de la psychologie de la perception: le “donnée amodal” dans l'experience sensorielle. Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of Psychology179–80 Berlin: Springer
  29. Mitzdorf U, Singer W. 1979. Excitatory synaptic ensemble properties in the visual cortex of the macaque monkey: a current source density analysis of electrically evoked potentials. J. Comp. Neurol. 187:171–83
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Nakayama K. 1971. Local adaptation in cat LGN cells: evidence for a surround antagonism. Vis. Res. 11:6501–9
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Nakayama K. 1974. Photographic determination of the rotational state of the eye using matrices. Optom. Vis. Sci. 51:10736–42
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Nakayama K. 1978. A new method of determining the primary position of the eye using Listing's law. Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 55:331–36
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Nakayama K. 1994. James J. Gibson—an appreciation. Psychol. Rev. 101:329–35
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Nakayama K, Balliet R. 1977. Listing's law, eye position sense, and perception of the vertical. Vis. Res. 17:3453–57
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Nakayama K, He ZJ, Shimojo S 1995. Visual surface representation: a critical link between lower-level and higher-level vision. Visual Cognition: An Invitation to Cognitive Science SM Kosslyn, DN Osherson 1–70 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Nakayama K, Loomis JM. 1974. Optical velocity patterns, velocity-sensitive neurons, and space perception: a hypothesis. Perception 3:163–80
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Nakayama K, Shimojo S. 1990. Da Vinci stereopsis: depth and subjective occluding contours from unpaired image points. Vis. Res. 30:111811–25
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Nakayama K, Shimojo S. 1992. Experiencing and perceiving visual surfaces. Science 257:50751357–63
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Nakayama K, Shimojo S, Silverman GH. 1989. Stereoscopic depth: its relation to image segmentation, grouping and the recognition of occluded objects. Perception 18:55–68
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Nakayama K, Tyler CW. 1981. Psychophysical isolation of movement sensitivity by removal of familiar position cues. Vis. Res. 21:4427–33
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Newsome WT, Britten KH, Movshon JA. 1989. Neuronal correlates of a perceptual decision. Nature 341:623752–54
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Reichardt W 1961. Autocorrelation, a principle for evaluation of sensory information by the central nervous system. Principles of Sensory Communications WA Rosenblith 303–17 New York: Wiley
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Robinson DA. 1970. Oculomotor unit behavior in the monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 33:3393–403
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Rosenbaum RA. 1963. Introduction to Projective Geometry and Modern Algebra Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley
  45. Schiller PH. 1968. Single unit analysis of backward visual masking and metacontrast in the cat lateral geniculate nucleus. Vis. Res. 8:7855–66
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Shimojo S, Nakajima Y. 1981. Adaptation to the reversal of binocular depth cues: effects of wearing left-right reversing spectacles on stereoscopic depth perception. Perception 10:4391–402
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Tyler CW. 1971. Stereoscopic depth movement: two eyes less sensitive than one. Science 174:4012958–61
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Tyler CW. 1973. Stereoscopic vision: cortical limitations and a disparity scaling effect. Science 181:4096276–78
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Tyler CW. 1974. Depth perception in disparity gratings. Nature 251:5471140–42
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Tyler CW, Clarke MB 1990. Autostereogram. Stereoscopic Displays and Applications JO Merritt, SS Fisher 182–197 Bellingham, WA: SPIE
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Westheimer G. 1957. Kinematics of the eye. JOSA 47:10967–74
     [Google Scholar]
  52. White BW, Saunders FA, Scadden L, Bach-y-Rita P, Collins CC. 1970. Seeing with the skin. Percept. Psychophys. 7:123–27
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhou H, Friedman HS, von der, Heydt R. 2000. Coding of border ownership in monkey visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 20:176594–611
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-vision-100419-120946
Loading
Coming of Age in Science: Just Look?
Annual Review of Vision Science 7, 1 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-vision-100419-120946
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-vision-100419-120946
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-vision-100419-120946
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error