- Home
- A-Z Publications
- Annual Review of Biochemistry
- Previous Issues
- Volume 68, 1999
Annual Review of Biochemistry - Volume 68, 1999
Volume 68, 1999
- Review Articles
-
-
-
In Vitro Selection of Functional Nucleic Acids
Vol. 68 (1999), pp. 611–647More Less▪ AbstractIn vitro selection allows rare functional RNA or DNA molecules to be isolated from pools of over 1015 different sequences. This approach has been used to identify RNA and DNA ligands for numerous small molecules, and recent three-dimensional structure solutions have revealed the basis for ligand recognition in several cases. By selecting high-affinity and -specificity nucleic acid ligands for proteins, promising new therapeutic and diagnostic reagents have been identified. Selection experiments have also been carried out to identify ribozymes that catalyze a variety of chemical transformations, including RNA cleavage, ligation, and synthesis, as well as alkylation and acyl-transfer reactions and N-glycosidic and peptide bond formation. The existence of such RNA enzymes supports the notion that ribozymes could have directed a primitive metabolism before the evolution of protein synthesis. New in vitro protein selection techniques should allow for a direct comparison of the frequency of ligand binding and catalytic structures in pools of random sequence polynucleotides versus polypeptides.
-
-
-
-
MCM Proteins in DNA Replication
Vol. 68 (1999), pp. 649–686More Less▪ AbstractThe MCM proteins are essential replication initiation factors originally identified as proteins required for minichromosome maintenance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The best known among them are a family of six structurally related proteins, MCM2–7, which are evolutionally conserved in all eukaryotes. The MCM2–7 proteins form a hexameric complex. This complex is a key component of the prereplication complex that assembles at replication origins during early G1 phase. New evidence suggests that the MCM2–7 proteins may be involved not only in the initiation but also in the elongation of DNA replication. Orchestration of the functional interactions between the MCM2–7 proteins and other components of the prereplication complex by cell cycle–dependent protein kinases results in initiation of DNA synthesis once every cell cycle.
-
-
-
Structural Mechanism of Muscle Contraction
M. A. Geeves, and K. C. HolmesVol. 68 (1999), pp. 687–728More Less▪ AbstractX-ray crystallography shows the myosin cross-bridge to exist in two conformations, the beginning and end of the “power stroke.” A long lever-arm undergoes a 60° to 70° rotation between the two states. This rotation is coupled with changes in the active site (OPEN to CLOSED) and phosphate release. Actin binding mediates the transition from CLOSED to OPEN. Kinetics shows that the binding of myosin to actin is a two-step process which affects ATP and ADP affinity. The structural basis of these effects is not explained by the presently known conformers of myosin. Therefore, other states of the myosin cross-bridge must exist. Moreover, cryoelectronmicroscopy has revealed other angles of the cross-bridge lever arm induced by ADP binding. These structural states are presently being characterized by site-directed mutagenesis coupled with kinetic analysis.
-
-
-
Functions of Cell Surface Heparan Sulfate Proteoglycans
Vol. 68 (1999), pp. 729–777More Less▪ AbstractThe heparan sulfate on the surface of all adherent cells modulates the actions of a large number of extracellular ligands. Members of both cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycan families, the transmembrane syndecans and the glycosylphosphoinositide-linked glypicans, bind these ligands and enhance formation of their receptor-signaling complexes. These heparan sulfate proteoglycans also immobilize and regulate the turnover of ligands that act at the cell surface. The extracellular domains of these proteoglycans can be shed from the cell surface, generating soluble heparan sulfate proteoglycans that can inhibit interactions at the cell surface. Recent analyses of genetic defects in Drosophila melanogaster, mice, and humans confirm most of these activities in vivo and identify additional processes that involve cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans. This chapter focuses on the mechanisms underlying these activities and on the cellular functions that they regulate.
-
-
-
De Novo Design and Structural Characterization of Proteins and Metalloproteins
Vol. 68 (1999), pp. 779–819More Less▪ AbstractDe novo protein design has recently emerged as an attractive approach for studying the structure and function of proteins. This approach critically tests our understanding of the principles of protein folding; only in de novo design must one truly confront the issue of how to specify a protein's fold and function. If we truly understand proteins, it should be possible to design receptors, enzymes, and ion channels from scratch. Further, as this understanding evolves and is further refined, it should be possible to design proteins and biomimetic polymers with properties unprecedented in nature.
-
-
-
CREB: A Stimulus-Induced Transcription Factor Activated by A Diverse Array of Extracellular Signals
Vol. 68 (1999), pp. 821–861More Less▪ AbstractExtracellular stimuli elicit changes in gene expression in target cells by activating intracellular protein kinase cascades that phosphorylate transcription factors within the nucleus. One of the best characterized stimulus-induced transcription factors, cyclic AMP response element (CRE) -binding protein (CREB), activates transcription of target genes in response to a diverse array of stimuli, including peptide hormones, growth factors, and neuronal activity, that activate a variety of protein kinases including protein kinase A (PKA), pp90 ribosomal S6 kinase (pp90RSK), and Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinases (CaMKs). These kinases all phosphorylate CREB at a particular residue, serine 133 (Ser133), and phosphorylation of Ser133 is required for CREB-mediated transcription. Despite this common feature, the mechanism by which CREB activates transcription varies depending on the stimulus. In some cases, signaling pathways target additional sites on CREB or proteins associated with CREB, permitting CREB to regulate distinct programs of gene expression under different conditions of stimulation. This review will discuss the molecular mechanisms by which Ser133--phosphorylated CREB activates transcription, intracellular signaling pathways that lead to phosphorylation of CREB at Ser133, and features of each signaling pathway that impart specificity at the level of CREB activation.
-
-
-
Membrane Fusion and Exocytosis
Vol. 68 (1999), pp. 863–911More Less▪ AbstractMembrane fusion involves the merger of two phospholipid bilayers in an aqueous environment. In artificial lipid bilayers, fusion proceeds by means of defined transition states, including hourglass-shaped intermediates in which the proximal leaflets of the fusing membranes are merged whereas the distal leaflets are separate (fusion stalk), followed by the reversible opening of small aqueous fusion pores. Fusion of biological membranes requires the action of specific fusion proteins. Best understood are the viral fusion proteins that are responsible for merging the viral with the host cell membrane during infection. These proteins undergo spontaneous and dramatic conformational changes upon activation. In the case of the paradigmatic fusion proteins of the influenza virus and of the human immunodeficiency virus, an amphiphilic fusion peptide is inserted into the target membrane. The protein then reorients itself, thus forcing the fusing membranes together and inducing lipid mixing. Fusion of intracellular membranes in eukaryotic cells involves several protein families including SNAREs, Rab proteins, and Sec1/Munc-18 related proteins (SM-proteins). SNAREs form a novel superfamily of small and mostly membrane-anchored proteins that share a common motif of about 60 amino acids (SNARE motif). SNAREs reversibly assemble into tightly packed helical bundles, the core complexes. Assembly is thought to pull the fusing membranes closely together, thus inducing fusion. SM-proteins comprise a family of soluble proteins that bind to certain types of SNAREs and prevent the formation of core complexes. Rab proteins are GTPases that undergo highly regulated GTP-GDP cycles. In their GTP form, they interact with specific proteins, the effector proteins. Recent evidence suggests that Rab proteins function in the initial membrane contact connecting the fusing membranes but are not involved in the fusion reaction itself.
-
-
-
eIF4 Initiation Factors: Effectors of mRNA Recruitment to Ribosomes and Regulators of Translation
Vol. 68 (1999), pp. 913–963More Less▪ AbstractEukaryotic translation initiation factor 4F (eIF4F) is a protein complex that mediates recruitment of ribosomes to mRNA. This event is the rate-limiting step for translation under most circumstances and a primary target for translational control. Functions of the constituent proteins of eIF4F include recognition of the mRNA 5′ cap structure (eIF4E), delivery of an RNA helicase to the 5′ region (eIF4A), bridging of the mRNA and the ribosome (eIF4G), and circularization of the mRNA via interaction with poly(A)-binding protein (eIF4G). eIF4 activity is regulated by transcription, phosphorylation, inhibitory proteins, and proteolytic cleavage. Extracellular stimuli evoke changes in phosphorylation that influence eIF4F activity, especially through the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) and Ras signaling pathways. Viral infection and cellular stresses also affect eIF4F function. The recent determination of the structure of eIF4E at atomic resolution has provided insight about how translation is initiated and regulated. Evidence suggests that eIF4F is also implicated in malignancy and apoptosis.
-
-
-
AKT/PKB and Other D3 Phosphoinositide-Regulated Kinases: Kinase Activation by Phosphoinositide-Dependent Phosphorylation
Vol. 68 (1999), pp. 965–1014More Less▪ AbstractThe protein kinase Akt/PKB is activated via a multistep process by a variety of signals. In the early steps of this process, PI-3 kinase-generated D3-phosphorylated phosphoinositides bind the Akt PH domain and induce the translocation of the kinase to the plasma membrane where it co-localizes with phosphoinositide-dependent kinase-1. By binding to the PH domains of both Akt and phosphoinositide-dependent kinase-1, D3-phosphorylated phosphoinositides appear to also induce conformational changes that permit phosphoinositide-dependent kinase-1 to phosphorylate the activation loop of Akt. The paradigm of Akt activation via phosphoinositide-dependent phosphorylation provided a framework for research into the mechanism of activation of other members of the AGC kinase group (p70S6K, PKC, and PKA) and members of the Tec tyrosine kinase family (TecI, TecII, Btk/Atk, Itk/Tsk/Emt, Txk/Rlk, and Bm/Etk). The result was the discovery that these kinases and Akt are activated by overlapping pathways. In this review, we present our current understanding of the regulation and function of the Akt kinase and we discuss the common and unique features of the activation processes of Akt and the AGC and Tec kinase families. In addition, we present an overview of the biosynthesis of phosphoinositides that contribute to the regulation of these kinases.
-
-
-
The 26S Proteasome: A Molecular Machine Designed for Controlled Proteolysis
D. Voges, P. Zwickl, and W. BaumeisterVol. 68 (1999), pp. 1015–1068More Less▪ AbstractIn eukaryotic cells, most proteins in the cytosol and nucleus are degraded via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. The 26S proteasome is a 2.5-MDa molecular machine built from ∼31 different subunits, which catalyzes protein degradation. It contains a barrel-shaped proteolytic core complex (the 20S proteasome), capped at one or both ends by 19S regulatory complexes, which recognize ubiquitinated proteins. The regulatory complexes are also implicated in unfolding and translocation of ubiquitinated targets into the interior of the 20S complex, where they are degraded to oligopeptides. Structure, assembly and enzymatic mechanism of the 20S complex have been elucidated, but the functional organization of the 19S complex is less well understood. Most subunits of the 19S complex have been identified, however, specific functions have been assigned to only a few. A low-resolution structure of the 26S proteasome has been obtained by electron microscopy, but the precise arrangement of subunits in the 19S complex is unclear.
-
Previous Volumes
-
Volume 93 (2024)
-
Volume 92 (2023)
-
Volume 91 (2022)
-
Volume 90 (2021)
-
Volume 89 (2020)
-
Volume 88 (2019)
-
Volume 87 (2018)
-
Volume 86 (2017)
-
Volume 85 (2016)
-
Volume 84 (2015)
-
Volume 83 (2014)
-
Volume 82 (2013)
-
Volume 81 (2012)
-
Volume 80 (2011)
-
Volume 79 (2010)
-
Volume 78 (2009)
-
Volume 77 (2008)
-
Volume 76 (2007)
-
Volume 75 (2006)
-
Volume 74 (2005)
-
Volume 73 (2004)
-
Volume 72 (2003)
-
Volume 71 (2002)
-
Volume 70 (2001)
-
Volume 69 (2000)
-
Volume 68 (1999)
-
Volume 67 (1998)
-
Volume 66 (1997)
-
Volume 65 (1996)
-
Volume 64 (1995)
-
Volume 63 (1994)
-
Volume 62 (1993)
-
Volume 61 (1992)
-
Volume 60 (1991)
-
Volume 59 (1990)
-
Volume 58 (1989)
-
Volume 57 (1988)
-
Volume 56 (1987)
-
Volume 55 (1986)
-
Volume 54 (1985)
-
Volume 53 (1984)
-
Volume 52 (1983)
-
Volume 51 (1982)
-
Volume 50 (1981)
-
Volume 49 (1980)
-
Volume 48 (1979)
-
Volume 47 (1978)
-
Volume 46 (1977)
-
Volume 45 (1976)
-
Volume 44 (1975)
-
Volume 43 (1974)
-
Volume 42 (1973)
-
Volume 41 (1972)
-
Volume 40 (1971)
-
Volume 39 (1970)
-
Volume 38 (1969)
-
Volume 37 (1968)
-
Volume 36 (1967)
-
Volume 35 (1966)
-
Volume 34 (1965)
-
Volume 33 (1964)
-
Volume 32 (1963)
-
Volume 31 (1962)
-
Volume 30 (1961)
-
Volume 29 (1960)
-
Volume 28 (1959)
-
Volume 27 (1958)
-
Volume 26 (1957)
-
Volume 25 (1956)
-
Volume 24 (1955)
-
Volume 23 (1954)
-
Volume 22 (1953)
-
Volume 21 (1952)
-
Volume 20 (1951)
-
Volume 19 (1950)
-
Volume 18 (1949)
-
Volume 17 (1948)
-
Volume 16 (1947)
-
Volume 15 (1946)
-
Volume 14 (1945)
-
Volume 13 (1944)
-
Volume 12 (1943)
-
Volume 11 (1942)
-
Volume 10 (1941)
-
Volume 9 (1940)
-
Volume 8 (1939)
-
Volume 7 (1938)
-
Volume 6 (1937)
-
Volume 5 (1936)
-
Volume 4 (1935)
-
Volume 3 (1934)
-
Volume 2 (1933)
-
Volume 1 (1932)
-
Volume 0 (1932)